linux-stable.git/kernel/bpf, branch v5.19.4 Linux kernel stable tree bpf: Acquire map uref in .init_seq_private for hash map iterator 2022-08-25T09:45:14+00:00 Hou Tao houtao1@huawei.com 2022-08-10T08:05:31+00:00 b6bd5ea6a3d418d9406869e63cf56652ea94dc94 commit ef1e93d2eeb58a1f08c37b22a2314b94bc045f15 upstream. bpf_iter_attach_map() acquires a map uref, and the uref may be released before or in the middle of iterating map elements. For example, the uref could be released in bpf_iter_detach_map() as part of bpf_link_release(), or could be released in bpf_map_put_with_uref() as part of bpf_map_release(). So acquiring an extra map uref in bpf_iter_init_hash_map() and releasing it in bpf_iter_fini_hash_map(). Fixes: d6c4503cc296 ("bpf: Implement bpf iterator for hash maps") Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220810080538.1845898-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit ef1e93d2eeb58a1f08c37b22a2314b94bc045f15 upstream.

bpf_iter_attach_map() acquires a map uref, and the uref may be released
before or in the middle of iterating map elements. For example, the uref
could be released in bpf_iter_detach_map() as part of
bpf_link_release(), or could be released in bpf_map_put_with_uref() as
part of bpf_map_release().

So acquiring an extra map uref in bpf_iter_init_hash_map() and
releasing it in bpf_iter_fini_hash_map().

Fixes: d6c4503cc296 ("bpf: Implement bpf iterator for hash maps")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220810080538.1845898-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Acquire map uref in .init_seq_private for array map iterator 2022-08-25T09:45:14+00:00 Hou Tao houtao1@huawei.com 2022-08-10T08:05:30+00:00 a80118919088a79aa18a88b422ab73a6ae6ca40e commit f76fa6b338055054f80c72b29c97fb95c1becadc upstream. bpf_iter_attach_map() acquires a map uref, and the uref may be released before or in the middle of iterating map elements. For example, the uref could be released in bpf_iter_detach_map() as part of bpf_link_release(), or could be released in bpf_map_put_with_uref() as part of bpf_map_release(). Alternative fix is acquiring an extra bpf_link reference just like a pinned map iterator does, but it introduces unnecessary dependency on bpf_link instead of bpf_map. So choose another fix: acquiring an extra map uref in .init_seq_private for array map iterator. Fixes: d3cc2ab546ad ("bpf: Implement bpf iterator for array maps") Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220810080538.1845898-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit f76fa6b338055054f80c72b29c97fb95c1becadc upstream.

bpf_iter_attach_map() acquires a map uref, and the uref may be released
before or in the middle of iterating map elements. For example, the uref
could be released in bpf_iter_detach_map() as part of
bpf_link_release(), or could be released in bpf_map_put_with_uref() as
part of bpf_map_release().

Alternative fix is acquiring an extra bpf_link reference just like
a pinned map iterator does, but it introduces unnecessary dependency
on bpf_link instead of bpf_map.

So choose another fix: acquiring an extra map uref in .init_seq_private
for array map iterator.

Fixes: d3cc2ab546ad ("bpf: Implement bpf iterator for array maps")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220810080538.1845898-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Don't reinit map value in prealloc_lru_pop 2022-08-25T09:45:13+00:00 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi memxor@gmail.com 2022-08-09T21:30:32+00:00 62ec78d96dcb520c21cf1d7df379fc196c9884bf commit 275c30bcee66a27d1aa97a215d607ad6d49804cb upstream. The LRU map that is preallocated may have its elements reused while another program holds a pointer to it from bpf_map_lookup_elem. Hence, only check_and_free_fields is appropriate when the element is being deleted, as it ensures proper synchronization against concurrent access of the map value. After that, we cannot call check_and_init_map_value again as it may rewrite bpf_spin_lock, bpf_timer, and kptr fields while they can be concurrently accessed from a BPF program. This is safe to do as when the map entry is deleted, concurrent access is protected against by check_and_free_fields, i.e. an existing timer would be freed, and any existing kptr will be released by it. The program can create further timers and kptrs after check_and_free_fields, but they will eventually be released once the preallocated items are freed on map destruction, even if the item is never reused again. Hence, the deleted item sitting in the free list can still have resources attached to it, and they would never leak. With spin_lock, we never touch the field at all on delete or update, as we may end up modifying the state of the lock. Since the verifier ensures that a bpf_spin_lock call is always paired with bpf_spin_unlock call, the program will eventually release the lock so that on reuse the new user of the value can take the lock. Essentially, for the preallocated case, we must assume that the map value may always be in use by the program, even when it is sitting in the freelist, and handle things accordingly, i.e. use proper synchronization inside check_and_free_fields, and never reinitialize the special fields when it is reused on update. Fixes: 68134668c17f ("bpf: Add map side support for bpf timers.") Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220809213033.24147-3-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 275c30bcee66a27d1aa97a215d607ad6d49804cb upstream.

The LRU map that is preallocated may have its elements reused while
another program holds a pointer to it from bpf_map_lookup_elem. Hence,
only check_and_free_fields is appropriate when the element is being
deleted, as it ensures proper synchronization against concurrent access
of the map value. After that, we cannot call check_and_init_map_value
again as it may rewrite bpf_spin_lock, bpf_timer, and kptr fields while
they can be concurrently accessed from a BPF program.

This is safe to do as when the map entry is deleted, concurrent access
is protected against by check_and_free_fields, i.e. an existing timer
would be freed, and any existing kptr will be released by it. The
program can create further timers and kptrs after check_and_free_fields,
but they will eventually be released once the preallocated items are
freed on map destruction, even if the item is never reused again. Hence,
the deleted item sitting in the free list can still have resources
attached to it, and they would never leak.

With spin_lock, we never touch the field at all on delete or update, as
we may end up modifying the state of the lock. Since the verifier
ensures that a bpf_spin_lock call is always paired with bpf_spin_unlock
call, the program will eventually release the lock so that on reuse the
new user of the value can take the lock.

Essentially, for the preallocated case, we must assume that the map
value may always be in use by the program, even when it is sitting in
the freelist, and handle things accordingly, i.e. use proper
synchronization inside check_and_free_fields, and never reinitialize the
special fields when it is reused on update.

Fixes: 68134668c17f ("bpf: Add map side support for bpf timers.")
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220809213033.24147-3-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Disallow bpf programs call prog_run command. 2022-08-25T09:45:13+00:00 Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org 2022-08-09T03:58:09+00:00 b429d0b9a7a0f3dddb1f782b72629e6353f292fd commit 86f44fcec22ce2979507742bc53db8400e454f46 upstream. The verifier cannot perform sufficient validation of bpf_attr->test.ctx_in pointer, therefore bpf programs should not be allowed to call BPF_PROG_RUN command from within the program. To fix this issue split bpf_sys_bpf() bpf helper into normal kern_sys_bpf() kernel function that can only be used by the kernel light skeleton directly. Reported-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com> Fixes: b1d18a7574d0 ("bpf: Extend sys_bpf commands for bpf_syscall programs.") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 86f44fcec22ce2979507742bc53db8400e454f46 upstream.

The verifier cannot perform sufficient validation of bpf_attr->test.ctx_in
pointer, therefore bpf programs should not be allowed to call BPF_PROG_RUN
command from within the program.
To fix this issue split bpf_sys_bpf() bpf helper into normal kern_sys_bpf()
kernel function that can only be used by the kernel light skeleton directly.

Reported-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Fixes: b1d18a7574d0 ("bpf: Extend sys_bpf commands for bpf_syscall programs.")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: fix potential 32-bit overflow when accessing ARRAY map element 2022-08-17T13:14:51+00:00 Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org 2022-07-15T05:31:43+00:00 3c7256b880b3a5aa1895fd169a34aa4224a11862 [ Upstream commit 87ac0d600943994444e24382a87aa19acc4cd3d4 ] If BPF array map is bigger than 4GB, element pointer calculation can overflow because both index and elem_size are u32. Fix this everywhere by forcing 64-bit multiplication. Extract this formula into separate small helper and use it consistently in various places. Speculative-preventing formula utilizing index_mask trick is left as is, but explicit u64 casts are added in both places. Fixes: c85d69135a91 ("bpf: move memory size checks to bpf_map_charge_init()") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220715053146.1291891-2-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 87ac0d600943994444e24382a87aa19acc4cd3d4 ]

If BPF array map is bigger than 4GB, element pointer calculation can
overflow because both index and elem_size are u32. Fix this everywhere
by forcing 64-bit multiplication. Extract this formula into separate
small helper and use it consistently in various places.

Speculative-preventing formula utilizing index_mask trick is left as is,
but explicit u64 casts are added in both places.

Fixes: c85d69135a91 ("bpf: move memory size checks to bpf_map_charge_init()")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220715053146.1291891-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Fix subprog names in stack traces. 2022-08-17T13:14:49+00:00 Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org 2022-07-14T21:16:37+00:00 1f319b976560c2c91eee098fdc0008d720ac3698 [ Upstream commit 9c7c48d6a1e2eb5192ad5294c1c4dbd42a88e88b ] The commit 7337224fc150 ("bpf: Improve the info.func_info and info.func_info_rec_size behavior") accidently made bpf_prog_ksym_set_name() conservative for bpf subprograms. Fixed it so instead of "bpf_prog_tag_F" the stack traces print "bpf_prog_tag_full_subprog_name". Fixes: 7337224fc150 ("bpf: Improve the info.func_info and info.func_info_rec_size behavior") Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220714211637.17150-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 9c7c48d6a1e2eb5192ad5294c1c4dbd42a88e88b ]

The commit 7337224fc150 ("bpf: Improve the info.func_info and info.func_info_rec_size behavior")
accidently made bpf_prog_ksym_set_name() conservative for bpf subprograms.
Fixed it so instead of "bpf_prog_tag_F" the stack traces print "bpf_prog_tag_full_subprog_name".

Fixes: 7337224fc150 ("bpf: Improve the info.func_info and info.func_info_rec_size behavior")
Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220714211637.17150-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf, x86: fix freeing of not-finalized bpf_prog_pack 2022-08-17T13:14:48+00:00 Song Liu song@kernel.org 2022-07-06T00:26:12+00:00 60e66074812dde9cde3d99cdd3caa9e40f1a4516 [ Upstream commit 1d5f82d9dd477d5c66e0214a68c3e4f308eadd6d ] syzbot reported a few issues with bpf_prog_pack [1], [2]. This only happens with multiple subprogs. In jit_subprogs(), we first call bpf_int_jit_compile() on each sub program. And then, we call it on each sub program again. jit_data is not freed in the first call of bpf_int_jit_compile(). Similarly we don't call bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() in the first call of bpf_int_jit_compile(). If bpf_int_jit_compile() failed for one sub program, we will call bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() for this sub program. However, we don't have a chance to call it for other sub programs. Then we will hit "goto out_free" in jit_subprogs(), and call bpf_jit_free on some subprograms that haven't got bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() yet. At this point, bpf_jit_binary_pack_free() is called and the whole 2MB page is freed erroneously. Fix this with a custom bpf_jit_free() for x86_64, which calls bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() if necessary. Also, with custom bpf_jit_free(), bpf_prog_aux->use_bpf_prog_pack is not needed any more, remove it. Fixes: 1022a5498f6f ("bpf, x86_64: Use bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc") [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2f649ec6d2eea1495a8f [2] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=87f65c75f4a72db05445 Reported-by: syzbot+2f649ec6d2eea1495a8f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+87f65c75f4a72db05445@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220706002612.4013790-1-song@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 1d5f82d9dd477d5c66e0214a68c3e4f308eadd6d ]

syzbot reported a few issues with bpf_prog_pack [1], [2]. This only happens
with multiple subprogs. In jit_subprogs(), we first call bpf_int_jit_compile()
on each sub program. And then, we call it on each sub program again. jit_data
is not freed in the first call of bpf_int_jit_compile(). Similarly we don't
call bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() in the first call of bpf_int_jit_compile().

If bpf_int_jit_compile() failed for one sub program, we will call
bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() for this sub program. However, we don't have a
chance to call it for other sub programs. Then we will hit "goto out_free" in
jit_subprogs(), and call bpf_jit_free on some subprograms that haven't got
bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() yet.

At this point, bpf_jit_binary_pack_free() is called and the whole 2MB page is
freed erroneously.

Fix this with a custom bpf_jit_free() for x86_64, which calls
bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() if necessary. Also, with custom
bpf_jit_free(), bpf_prog_aux->use_bpf_prog_pack is not needed any more,
remove it.

Fixes: 1022a5498f6f ("bpf, x86_64: Use bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc")
[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2f649ec6d2eea1495a8f
[2] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=87f65c75f4a72db05445
Reported-by: syzbot+2f649ec6d2eea1495a8f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+87f65c75f4a72db05445@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220706002612.4013790-1-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf, x64: Add predicate for bpf2bpf with tailcalls support in JIT 2022-08-17T13:14:48+00:00 Tony Ambardar tony.ambardar@gmail.com 2022-06-17T10:57:34+00:00 7018bd9fac6237e706d175d0a5926de9226c664a [ Upstream commit 95acd8817e66d031d2e6ee7def3f1e1874819317 ] The BPF core/verifier is hard-coded to permit mixing bpf2bpf and tail calls for only x86-64. Change the logic to instead rely on a new weak function 'bool bpf_jit_supports_subprog_tailcalls(void)', which a capable JIT backend can override. Update the x86-64 eBPF JIT to reflect this. Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <Tony.Ambardar@gmail.com> [jakub: drop MIPS bits and tweak patch subject] Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220617105735.733938-2-jakub@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 95acd8817e66d031d2e6ee7def3f1e1874819317 ]

The BPF core/verifier is hard-coded to permit mixing bpf2bpf and tail
calls for only x86-64. Change the logic to instead rely on a new weak
function 'bool bpf_jit_supports_subprog_tailcalls(void)', which a capable
JIT backend can override.

Update the x86-64 eBPF JIT to reflect this.

Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <Tony.Ambardar@gmail.com>
[jakub: drop MIPS bits and tweak patch subject]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220617105735.733938-2-jakub@cloudflare.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Fix KASAN use-after-free Read in compute_effective_progs 2022-08-17T13:13:52+00:00 Tadeusz Struk tadeusz.struk@linaro.org 2022-05-17T18:04:20+00:00 be001f9da71eaa3b61e186fb88bde3279728bdca commit 4c46091ee985ae84c60c5e95055d779fcd291d87 upstream. Syzbot found a Use After Free bug in compute_effective_progs(). The reproducer creates a number of BPF links, and causes a fault injected alloc to fail, while calling bpf_link_detach on them. Link detach triggers the link to be freed by bpf_link_free(), which calls __cgroup_bpf_detach() and update_effective_progs(). If the memory allocation in this function fails, the function restores the pointer to the bpf_cgroup_link on the cgroup list, but the memory gets freed just after it returns. After this, every subsequent call to update_effective_progs() causes this already deallocated pointer to be dereferenced in prog_list_length(), and triggers KASAN UAF error. To fix this issue don't preserve the pointer to the prog or link in the list, but remove it and replace it with a dummy prog without shrinking the table. The subsequent call to __cgroup_bpf_detach() or __cgroup_bpf_detach() will correct it. Fixes: af6eea57437a ("bpf: Implement bpf_link-based cgroup BPF program attachment") Reported-by: <syzbot+f264bffdfbd5614f3bb2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=8ebf179a95c2a2670f7cf1ba62429ec044369db4 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220517180420.87954-1-tadeusz.struk@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 4c46091ee985ae84c60c5e95055d779fcd291d87 upstream.

Syzbot found a Use After Free bug in compute_effective_progs().
The reproducer creates a number of BPF links, and causes a fault
injected alloc to fail, while calling bpf_link_detach on them.
Link detach triggers the link to be freed by bpf_link_free(),
which calls __cgroup_bpf_detach() and update_effective_progs().
If the memory allocation in this function fails, the function restores
the pointer to the bpf_cgroup_link on the cgroup list, but the memory
gets freed just after it returns. After this, every subsequent call to
update_effective_progs() causes this already deallocated pointer to be
dereferenced in prog_list_length(), and triggers KASAN UAF error.

To fix this issue don't preserve the pointer to the prog or link in the
list, but remove it and replace it with a dummy prog without shrinking
the table. The subsequent call to __cgroup_bpf_detach() or
__cgroup_bpf_detach() will correct it.

Fixes: af6eea57437a ("bpf: Implement bpf_link-based cgroup BPF program attachment")
Reported-by: <syzbot+f264bffdfbd5614f3bb2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=8ebf179a95c2a2670f7cf1ba62429ec044369db4
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220517180420.87954-1-tadeusz.struk@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Add flags arg to bpf_dynptr_read and bpf_dynptr_write APIs 2022-07-08T08:55:53+00:00 Joanne Koong joannelkoong@gmail.com 2022-07-06T23:25:47+00:00 f8d3da4ef8faf027261e06b7864583930dd7c7b9 Commit 13bbbfbea759 ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_read and bpf_dynptr_write") added the bpf_dynptr_write() and bpf_dynptr_read() APIs. However, it will be needed for some dynptr types to pass in flags as well (e.g. when writing to a skb, the user may like to invalidate the hash or recompute the checksum). This patch adds a "u64 flags" arg to the bpf_dynptr_read() and bpf_dynptr_write() APIs before their UAPI signature freezes where we then cannot change them anymore with a 5.19.x released kernel. Fixes: 13bbbfbea759 ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_read and bpf_dynptr_write") Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220706232547.4016651-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com 
Commit 13bbbfbea759 ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_read and bpf_dynptr_write")
added the bpf_dynptr_write() and bpf_dynptr_read() APIs.

However, it will be needed for some dynptr types to pass in flags as
well (e.g. when writing to a skb, the user may like to invalidate the
hash or recompute the checksum).

This patch adds a "u64 flags" arg to the bpf_dynptr_read() and
bpf_dynptr_write() APIs before their UAPI signature freezes where
we then cannot change them anymore with a 5.19.x released kernel.

Fixes: 13bbbfbea759 ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_read and bpf_dynptr_write")
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220706232547.4016651-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com