linux-stable.git/kernel/bpf, branch v5.10.87 Linux kernel stable tree bpf: Fix integer overflow in argument calculation for bpf_map_area_alloc 2021-12-17T09:14:41+00:00 Bui Quang Minh minhquangbui99@gmail.com 2021-06-13T14:34:39+00:00 613725436e69fc3ccdf39f827bb274f999288dba commit 7dd5d437c258bbf4cc15b35229e5208b87b8b4e0 upstream. In 32-bit architecture, the result of sizeof() is a 32-bit integer so the expression becomes the multiplication between 2 32-bit integer which can potentially leads to integer overflow. As a result, bpf_map_area_alloc() allocates less memory than needed. Fix this by casting 1 operand to u64. Fixes: 0d2c4f964050 ("bpf: Eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps") Fixes: 99c51064fb06 ("devmap: Use bpf_map_area_alloc() for allocating hash buckets") Fixes: 546ac1ffb70d ("bpf: add devmap, a map for storing net device references") Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210613143440.71975-1-minhquangbui99@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 7dd5d437c258bbf4cc15b35229e5208b87b8b4e0 upstream.

In 32-bit architecture, the result of sizeof() is a 32-bit integer so
the expression becomes the multiplication between 2 32-bit integer which
can potentially leads to integer overflow. As a result,
bpf_map_area_alloc() allocates less memory than needed.

Fix this by casting 1 operand to u64.

Fixes: 0d2c4f964050 ("bpf: Eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps")
Fixes: 99c51064fb06 ("devmap: Use bpf_map_area_alloc() for allocating hash buckets")
Fixes: 546ac1ffb70d ("bpf: add devmap, a map for storing net device references")
Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210613143440.71975-1-minhquangbui99@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Fix the off-by-two error in range markings 2021-12-14T10:32:36+00:00 Maxim Mikityanskiy maximmi@nvidia.com 2021-11-30T18:16:07+00:00 349e83c0cf674e3d5820f475aed4fa565519fcbe commit 2fa7d94afc1afbb4d702760c058dc2d7ed30f226 upstream. The first commit cited below attempts to fix the off-by-one error that appeared in some comparisons with an open range. Due to this error, arithmetically equivalent pieces of code could get different verdicts from the verifier, for example (pseudocode): // 1. Passes the verifier: if (data + 8 > data_end) return early read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7] // 2. Rejected by the verifier (should still pass): if (data + 7 >= data_end) return early read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7] The attempted fix, however, shifts the range by one in a wrong direction, so the bug not only remains, but also such piece of code starts failing in the verifier: // 3. Rejected by the verifier, but the check is stricter than in #1. if (data + 8 >= data_end) return early read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7] The change performed by that fix converted an off-by-one bug into off-by-two. The second commit cited below added the BPF selftests written to ensure than code chunks like #3 are rejected, however, they should be accepted. This commit fixes the off-by-two error by adjusting new_range in the right direction and fixes the tests by changing the range into the one that should actually fail. Fixes: fb2a311a31d3 ("bpf: fix off by one for range markings with L{T, E} patterns") Fixes: b37242c773b2 ("bpf: add test cases to bpf selftests to cover all access tests") Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211130181607.593149-1-maximmi@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 2fa7d94afc1afbb4d702760c058dc2d7ed30f226 upstream.

The first commit cited below attempts to fix the off-by-one error that
appeared in some comparisons with an open range. Due to this error,
arithmetically equivalent pieces of code could get different verdicts
from the verifier, for example (pseudocode):

  // 1. Passes the verifier:
  if (data + 8 > data_end)
      return early
  read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7]

  // 2. Rejected by the verifier (should still pass):
  if (data + 7 >= data_end)
      return early
  read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7]

The attempted fix, however, shifts the range by one in a wrong
direction, so the bug not only remains, but also such piece of code
starts failing in the verifier:

  // 3. Rejected by the verifier, but the check is stricter than in #1.
  if (data + 8 >= data_end)
      return early
  read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7]

The change performed by that fix converted an off-by-one bug into
off-by-two. The second commit cited below added the BPF selftests
written to ensure than code chunks like #3 are rejected, however,
they should be accepted.

This commit fixes the off-by-two error by adjusting new_range in the
right direction and fixes the tests by changing the range into the
one that should actually fail.

Fixes: fb2a311a31d3 ("bpf: fix off by one for range markings with L{T, E} patterns")
Fixes: b37242c773b2 ("bpf: add test cases to bpf selftests to cover all access tests")
Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211130181607.593149-1-maximmi@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Fix toctou on read-only map's constant scalar tracking 2021-12-01T08:18:58+00:00 Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net 2021-11-09T18:48:08+00:00 33fe044f6a9e8977686a6a09f0bf33e5cc75257e commit 353050be4c19e102178ccc05988101887c25ae53 upstream. Commit a23740ec43ba ("bpf: Track contents of read-only maps as scalars") is checking whether maps are read-only both from BPF program side and user space side, and then, given their content is constant, reading out their data via map->ops->map_direct_value_addr() which is then subsequently used as known scalar value for the register, that is, it is marked as __mark_reg_known() with the read value at verification time. Before a23740ec43ba, the register content was marked as an unknown scalar so the verifier could not make any assumptions about the map content. The current implementation however is prone to a TOCTOU race, meaning, the value read as known scalar for the register is not guaranteed to be exactly the same at a later point when the program is executed, and as such, the prior made assumptions of the verifier with regards to the program will be invalid which can cause issues such as OOB access, etc. While the BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG map flag is always fixed and required to be specified at map creation time, the map->frozen property is initially set to false for the map given the map value needs to be populated, e.g. for global data sections. Once complete, the loader "freezes" the map from user space such that no subsequent updates/deletes are possible anymore. For the rest of the lifetime of the map, this freeze one-time trigger cannot be undone anymore after a successful BPF_MAP_FREEZE cmd return. Meaning, any new BPF_* cmd calls which would update/delete map entries will be rejected with -EPERM since map_get_sys_perms() removes the FMODE_CAN_WRITE permission. This also means that pending update/delete map entries must still complete before this guarantee is given. This corner case is not an issue for loaders since they create and prepare such program private map in successive steps. However, a malicious user is able to trigger this TOCTOU race in two different ways: i) via userfaultfd, and ii) via batched updates. For i) userfaultfd is used to expand the competition interval, so that map_update_elem() can modify the contents of the map after map_freeze() and bpf_prog_load() were executed. This works, because userfaultfd halts the parallel thread which triggered a map_update_elem() at the time where we copy key/value from the user buffer and this already passed the FMODE_CAN_WRITE capability test given at that time the map was not "frozen". Then, the main thread performs the map_freeze() and bpf_prog_load(), and once that had completed successfully, the other thread is woken up to complete the pending map_update_elem() which then changes the map content. For ii) the idea of the batched update is similar, meaning, when there are a large number of updates to be processed, it can increase the competition interval between the two. It is therefore possible in practice to modify the contents of the map after executing map_freeze() and bpf_prog_load(). One way to fix both i) and ii) at the same time is to expand the use of the map's map->writecnt. The latter was introduced in fc9702273e2e ("bpf: Add mmap() support for BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY") and further refined in 1f6cb19be2e2 ("bpf: Prevent re-mmap()'ing BPF map as writable for initially r/o mapping") with the rationale to make a writable mmap()'ing of a map mutually exclusive with read-only freezing. The counter indicates writable mmap() mappings and then prevents/fails the freeze operation. Its semantics can be expanded beyond just mmap() by generally indicating ongoing write phases. This would essentially span any parallel regular and batched flavor of update/delete operation and then also have map_freeze() fail with -EBUSY. For the check_mem_access() in the verifier we expand upon the bpf_map_is_rdonly() check ensuring that all last pending writes have completed via bpf_map_write_active() test. Once the map->frozen is set and bpf_map_write_active() indicates a map->writecnt of 0 only then we are really guaranteed to use the map's data as known constants. For map->frozen being set and pending writes in process of still being completed we fall back to marking that register as unknown scalar so we don't end up making assumptions about it. With this, both TOCTOU reproducers from i) and ii) are fixed. Note that the map->writecnt has been converted into a atomic64 in the fix in order to avoid a double freeze_mutex mutex_{un,}lock() pair when updating map->writecnt in the various map update/delete BPF_* cmd flavors. Spanning the freeze_mutex over entire map update/delete operations in syscall side would not be possible due to then causing everything to be serialized. Similarly, something like synchronize_rcu() after setting map->frozen to wait for update/deletes to complete is not possible either since it would also have to span the user copy which can sleep. On the libbpf side, this won't break d66562fba1ce ("libbpf: Add BPF object skeleton support") as the anonymous mmap()-ed "map initialization image" is remapped as a BPF map-backed mmap()-ed memory where for .rodata it's non-writable. Fixes: a23740ec43ba ("bpf: Track contents of read-only maps as scalars") Reported-by: w1tcher.bupt@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> [fix conflict to call bpf_map_write_active_dec() in err_put block. fix conflict to insert new functions after find_and_alloc_map().] Reference: CVE-2021-4001 Signed-off-by: Masami Ichikawa(CIP) <masami.ichikawa@cybertrust.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 353050be4c19e102178ccc05988101887c25ae53 upstream.

Commit a23740ec43ba ("bpf: Track contents of read-only maps as scalars") is
checking whether maps are read-only both from BPF program side and user space
side, and then, given their content is constant, reading out their data via
map->ops->map_direct_value_addr() which is then subsequently used as known
scalar value for the register, that is, it is marked as __mark_reg_known()
with the read value at verification time. Before a23740ec43ba, the register
content was marked as an unknown scalar so the verifier could not make any
assumptions about the map content.

The current implementation however is prone to a TOCTOU race, meaning, the
value read as known scalar for the register is not guaranteed to be exactly
the same at a later point when the program is executed, and as such, the
prior made assumptions of the verifier with regards to the program will be
invalid which can cause issues such as OOB access, etc.

While the BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG map flag is always fixed and required to be
specified at map creation time, the map->frozen property is initially set to
false for the map given the map value needs to be populated, e.g. for global
data sections. Once complete, the loader "freezes" the map from user space
such that no subsequent updates/deletes are possible anymore. For the rest
of the lifetime of the map, this freeze one-time trigger cannot be undone
anymore after a successful BPF_MAP_FREEZE cmd return. Meaning, any new BPF_*
cmd calls which would update/delete map entries will be rejected with -EPERM
since map_get_sys_perms() removes the FMODE_CAN_WRITE permission. This also
means that pending update/delete map entries must still complete before this
guarantee is given. This corner case is not an issue for loaders since they
create and prepare such program private map in successive steps.

However, a malicious user is able to trigger this TOCTOU race in two different
ways: i) via userfaultfd, and ii) via batched updates. For i) userfaultfd is
used to expand the competition interval, so that map_update_elem() can modify
the contents of the map after map_freeze() and bpf_prog_load() were executed.
This works, because userfaultfd halts the parallel thread which triggered a
map_update_elem() at the time where we copy key/value from the user buffer and
this already passed the FMODE_CAN_WRITE capability test given at that time the
map was not "frozen". Then, the main thread performs the map_freeze() and
bpf_prog_load(), and once that had completed successfully, the other thread
is woken up to complete the pending map_update_elem() which then changes the
map content. For ii) the idea of the batched update is similar, meaning, when
there are a large number of updates to be processed, it can increase the
competition interval between the two. It is therefore possible in practice to
modify the contents of the map after executing map_freeze() and bpf_prog_load().

One way to fix both i) and ii) at the same time is to expand the use of the
map's map->writecnt. The latter was introduced in fc9702273e2e ("bpf: Add mmap()
support for BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY") and further refined in 1f6cb19be2e2 ("bpf:
Prevent re-mmap()'ing BPF map as writable for initially r/o mapping") with
the rationale to make a writable mmap()'ing of a map mutually exclusive with
read-only freezing. The counter indicates writable mmap() mappings and then
prevents/fails the freeze operation. Its semantics can be expanded beyond
just mmap() by generally indicating ongoing write phases. This would essentially
span any parallel regular and batched flavor of update/delete operation and
then also have map_freeze() fail with -EBUSY. For the check_mem_access() in
the verifier we expand upon the bpf_map_is_rdonly() check ensuring that all
last pending writes have completed via bpf_map_write_active() test. Once the
map->frozen is set and bpf_map_write_active() indicates a map->writecnt of 0
only then we are really guaranteed to use the map's data as known constants.
For map->frozen being set and pending writes in process of still being completed
we fall back to marking that register as unknown scalar so we don't end up
making assumptions about it. With this, both TOCTOU reproducers from i) and
ii) are fixed.

Note that the map->writecnt has been converted into a atomic64 in the fix in
order to avoid a double freeze_mutex mutex_{un,}lock() pair when updating
map->writecnt in the various map update/delete BPF_* cmd flavors. Spanning
the freeze_mutex over entire map update/delete operations in syscall side
would not be possible due to then causing everything to be serialized.
Similarly, something like synchronize_rcu() after setting map->frozen to wait
for update/deletes to complete is not possible either since it would also
have to span the user copy which can sleep. On the libbpf side, this won't
break d66562fba1ce ("libbpf: Add BPF object skeleton support") as the
anonymous mmap()-ed "map initialization image" is remapped as a BPF map-backed
mmap()-ed memory where for .rodata it's non-writable.

Fixes: a23740ec43ba ("bpf: Track contents of read-only maps as scalars")
Reported-by: w1tcher.bupt@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
[fix conflict to call bpf_map_write_active_dec() in err_put block.
fix conflict to insert new functions after find_and_alloc_map().]
Reference: CVE-2021-4001
Signed-off-by: Masami Ichikawa(CIP) <masami.ichikawa@cybertrust.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Fix propagation of signed bounds from 64-bit min/max into 32-bit. 2021-11-18T13:04:13+00:00 Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org 2021-11-01T22:21:52+00:00 4a50bc00847635e092f8f447439d8263afaa65ed [ Upstream commit 388e2c0b978339dee9b0a81a2e546f8979e021e2 ] Similar to unsigned bounds propagation fix signed bounds. The 'Fixes' tag is a hint. There is no security bug here. The verifier was too conservative. Fixes: 3f50f132d840 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101222153.78759-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 388e2c0b978339dee9b0a81a2e546f8979e021e2 ]

Similar to unsigned bounds propagation fix signed bounds.
The 'Fixes' tag is a hint. There is no security bug here.
The verifier was too conservative.

Fixes: 3f50f132d840 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101222153.78759-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Fix propagation of bounds from 64-bit min/max into 32-bit and var_off. 2021-11-18T13:04:13+00:00 Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org 2021-11-01T22:21:51+00:00 84dde8c8c9335213f091977eb1e935f3f38da71c [ Upstream commit b9979db8340154526d9ab38a1883d6f6ba9b6d47 ] Before this fix: 166: (b5) if r2 <= 0x1 goto pc+22 from 166 to 189: R2=invP(id=1,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) After this fix: 166: (b5) if r2 <= 0x1 goto pc+22 from 166 to 189: R2=invP(id=1,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x1)) While processing BPF_JLE the reg_set_min_max() would set true_reg->umax_value = 1 and call __reg_combine_64_into_32(true_reg). Without the fix it would not pass the condition: if (__reg64_bound_u32(reg->umin_value) && __reg64_bound_u32(reg->umax_value)) since umin_value == 0 at this point. Before commit 10bf4e83167c the umin was incorrectly ingored. The commit 10bf4e83167c fixed the correctness issue, but pessimized propagation of 64-bit min max into 32-bit min max and corresponding var_off. Fixes: 10bf4e83167c ("bpf: Fix propagation of 32 bit unsigned bounds from 64 bit bounds") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101222153.78759-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit b9979db8340154526d9ab38a1883d6f6ba9b6d47 ]

Before this fix:
166: (b5) if r2 <= 0x1 goto pc+22
from 166 to 189: R2=invP(id=1,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))

After this fix:
166: (b5) if r2 <= 0x1 goto pc+22
from 166 to 189: R2=invP(id=1,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x1))

While processing BPF_JLE the reg_set_min_max() would set true_reg->umax_value = 1
and call __reg_combine_64_into_32(true_reg).

Without the fix it would not pass the condition:
if (__reg64_bound_u32(reg->umin_value) && __reg64_bound_u32(reg->umax_value))

since umin_value == 0 at this point.
Before commit 10bf4e83167c the umin was incorrectly ingored.
The commit 10bf4e83167c fixed the correctness issue, but pessimized
propagation of 64-bit min max into 32-bit min max and corresponding var_off.

Fixes: 10bf4e83167c ("bpf: Fix propagation of 32 bit unsigned bounds from 64 bit bounds")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101222153.78759-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Prevent increasing bpf_jit_limit above max 2021-11-18T13:03:42+00:00 Lorenz Bauer lmb@cloudflare.com 2021-10-14T14:25:53+00:00 b92ac0a9ca8f27076c2096cae0896b94aaa4a6ac [ Upstream commit fadb7ff1a6c2c565af56b4aacdd086b067eed440 ] Restrict bpf_jit_limit to the maximum supported by the arch's JIT. Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211014142554.53120-4-lmb@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit fadb7ff1a6c2c565af56b4aacdd086b067eed440 ]

Restrict bpf_jit_limit to the maximum supported by the arch's JIT.

Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211014142554.53120-4-lmb@cloudflare.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Fix error usage of map_fd and fdget() in generic_map_update_batch() 2021-11-02T18:48:21+00:00 Xu Kuohai xukuohai@huawei.com 2021-10-19T03:29:34+00:00 ee4908f909b3761ded2e32c79a6ea5ed20e1fdc6 commit fda7a38714f40b635f5502ec4855602c6b33dad2 upstream. 1. The ufd in generic_map_update_batch() should be read from batch.map_fd; 2. A call to fdget() should be followed by a symmetric call to fdput(). Fixes: aa2e93b8e58e ("bpf: Add generic support for update and delete batch ops") Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211019032934.1210517-1-xukuohai@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit fda7a38714f40b635f5502ec4855602c6b33dad2 upstream.

1. The ufd in generic_map_update_batch() should be read from batch.map_fd;
2. A call to fdget() should be followed by a symmetric call to fdput().

Fixes: aa2e93b8e58e ("bpf: Add generic support for update and delete batch ops")
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211019032934.1210517-1-xukuohai@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Fix potential race in tail call compatibility check 2021-11-02T18:48:21+00:00 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen toke@redhat.com 2021-10-26T11:00:19+00:00 dd2260ec643d309d8c58ceac3aa77f80db765488 commit 54713c85f536048e685258f880bf298a74c3620d upstream. Lorenzo noticed that the code testing for program type compatibility of tail call maps is potentially racy in that two threads could encounter a map with an unset type simultaneously and both return true even though they are inserting incompatible programs. The race window is quite small, but artificially enlarging it by adding a usleep_range() inside the check in bpf_prog_array_compatible() makes it trivial to trigger from userspace with a program that does, essentially: map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY, 4, 4, 2, 0); pid = fork(); if (pid) { key = 0; value = xdp_fd; } else { key = 1; value = tc_fd; } err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key, &value, 0); While the race window is small, it has potentially serious ramifications in that triggering it would allow a BPF program to tail call to a program of a different type. So let's get rid of it by protecting the update with a spinlock. The commit in the Fixes tag is the last commit that touches the code in question. v2: - Use a spinlock instead of an atomic variable and cmpxchg() (Alexei) v3: - Put lock and the members it protects into an embedded 'owner' struct (Daniel) Fixes: 3324b584b6f6 ("ebpf: misc core cleanup") Reported-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026110019.363464-1-toke@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 54713c85f536048e685258f880bf298a74c3620d upstream.

Lorenzo noticed that the code testing for program type compatibility of
tail call maps is potentially racy in that two threads could encounter a
map with an unset type simultaneously and both return true even though they
are inserting incompatible programs.

The race window is quite small, but artificially enlarging it by adding a
usleep_range() inside the check in bpf_prog_array_compatible() makes it
trivial to trigger from userspace with a program that does, essentially:

        map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY, 4, 4, 2, 0);
        pid = fork();
        if (pid) {
                key = 0;
                value = xdp_fd;
        } else {
                key = 1;
                value = tc_fd;
        }
        err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key, &value, 0);

While the race window is small, it has potentially serious ramifications in
that triggering it would allow a BPF program to tail call to a program of a
different type. So let's get rid of it by protecting the update with a
spinlock. The commit in the Fixes tag is the last commit that touches the
code in question.

v2:
- Use a spinlock instead of an atomic variable and cmpxchg() (Alexei)
v3:
- Put lock and the members it protects into an embedded 'owner' struct (Daniel)

Fixes: 3324b584b6f6 ("ebpf: misc core cleanup")
Reported-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026110019.363464-1-toke@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Fix integer overflow in prealloc_elems_and_freelist() 2021-10-13T08:04:26+00:00 Tatsuhiko Yasumatsu th.yasumatsu@gmail.com 2021-09-30T13:55:45+00:00 064faa8e8a9b50f5010c5aa5740e06d477677a89 [ Upstream commit 30e29a9a2bc6a4888335a6ede968b75cd329657a ] In prealloc_elems_and_freelist(), the multiplication to calculate the size passed to bpf_map_area_alloc() could lead to an integer overflow. As a result, out-of-bounds write could occur in pcpu_freelist_populate() as reported by KASAN: [...] [ 16.968613] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in pcpu_freelist_populate+0xd9/0x100 [ 16.969408] Write of size 8 at addr ffff888104fc6ea0 by task crash/78 [ 16.970038] [ 16.970195] CPU: 0 PID: 78 Comm: crash Not tainted 5.15.0-rc2+ #1 [ 16.970878] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 [ 16.972026] Call Trace: [ 16.972306] dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44 [ 16.972687] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x21/0x140 [ 16.973297] ? pcpu_freelist_populate+0xd9/0x100 [ 16.973777] ? pcpu_freelist_populate+0xd9/0x100 [ 16.974257] kasan_report.cold+0x7f/0x11b [ 16.974681] ? pcpu_freelist_populate+0xd9/0x100 [ 16.975190] pcpu_freelist_populate+0xd9/0x100 [ 16.975669] stack_map_alloc+0x209/0x2a0 [ 16.976106] __sys_bpf+0xd83/0x2ce0 [...] The possibility of this overflow was originally discussed in [0], but was overlooked. Fix the integer overflow by changing elem_size to u64 from u32. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/728b238e-a481-eb50-98e9-b0f430ab01e7@gmail.com/ Fixes: 557c0c6e7df8 ("bpf: convert stackmap to pre-allocation") Signed-off-by: Tatsuhiko Yasumatsu <th.yasumatsu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210930135545.173698-1-th.yasumatsu@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 30e29a9a2bc6a4888335a6ede968b75cd329657a ]

In prealloc_elems_and_freelist(), the multiplication to calculate the
size passed to bpf_map_area_alloc() could lead to an integer overflow.
As a result, out-of-bounds write could occur in pcpu_freelist_populate()
as reported by KASAN:

[...]
[   16.968613] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in pcpu_freelist_populate+0xd9/0x100
[   16.969408] Write of size 8 at addr ffff888104fc6ea0 by task crash/78
[   16.970038]
[   16.970195] CPU: 0 PID: 78 Comm: crash Not tainted 5.15.0-rc2+ #1
[   16.970878] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
[   16.972026] Call Trace:
[   16.972306]  dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44
[   16.972687]  print_address_description.constprop.0+0x21/0x140
[   16.973297]  ? pcpu_freelist_populate+0xd9/0x100
[   16.973777]  ? pcpu_freelist_populate+0xd9/0x100
[   16.974257]  kasan_report.cold+0x7f/0x11b
[   16.974681]  ? pcpu_freelist_populate+0xd9/0x100
[   16.975190]  pcpu_freelist_populate+0xd9/0x100
[   16.975669]  stack_map_alloc+0x209/0x2a0
[   16.976106]  __sys_bpf+0xd83/0x2ce0
[...]

The possibility of this overflow was originally discussed in [0], but
was overlooked.

Fix the integer overflow by changing elem_size to u64 from u32.

  [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/728b238e-a481-eb50-98e9-b0f430ab01e7@gmail.com/

Fixes: 557c0c6e7df8 ("bpf: convert stackmap to pre-allocation")
Signed-off-by: Tatsuhiko Yasumatsu <th.yasumatsu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210930135545.173698-1-th.yasumatsu@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Exempt CAP_BPF from checks against bpf_jit_limit 2021-10-06T13:55:55+00:00 Lorenz Bauer lmb@cloudflare.com 2021-09-22T11:11:52+00:00 59efda5073abb4fff2ce8c90ca9c2d25882e84a4 [ Upstream commit 8a98ae12fbefdb583a7696de719a1d57e5e940a2 ] When introducing CAP_BPF, bpf_jit_charge_modmem() was not changed to treat programs with CAP_BPF as privileged for the purpose of JIT memory allocation. This means that a program without CAP_BPF can block a program with CAP_BPF from loading a program. Fix this by checking bpf_capable() in bpf_jit_charge_modmem(). Fixes: 2c78ee898d8f ("bpf: Implement CAP_BPF") Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210922111153.19843-1-lmb@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 8a98ae12fbefdb583a7696de719a1d57e5e940a2 ]

When introducing CAP_BPF, bpf_jit_charge_modmem() was not changed to treat
programs with CAP_BPF as privileged for the purpose of JIT memory allocation.
This means that a program without CAP_BPF can block a program with CAP_BPF
from loading a program.

Fix this by checking bpf_capable() in bpf_jit_charge_modmem().

Fixes: 2c78ee898d8f ("bpf: Implement CAP_BPF")
Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210922111153.19843-1-lmb@cloudflare.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>