<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux-stable.git/kernel/bpf, branch linux-5.17.y</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Fix probe read error in ___bpf_prog_run()</title>
<updated>2022-06-14T16:41:22+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Menglong Dong</name>
<email>imagedong@tencent.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-05-24T02:12:27+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=5f53d4b7bcc1a0ee67f42538214d96a49acd5b57'/>
<id>5f53d4b7bcc1a0ee67f42538214d96a49acd5b57</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit caff1fa4118cec4dfd4336521ebd22a6408a1e3e ]

I think there is something wrong with BPF_PROBE_MEM in ___bpf_prog_run()
in big-endian machine. Let's make a test and see what will happen if we
want to load a 'u16' with BPF_PROBE_MEM.

Let's make the src value '0x0001', the value of dest register will become
0x0001000000000000, as the value will be loaded to the first 2 byte of
DST with following code:

  bpf_probe_read_kernel(&amp;DST, SIZE, (const void *)(long) (SRC + insn-&gt;off));

Obviously, the value in DST is not correct. In fact, we can compare
BPF_PROBE_MEM with LDX_MEM_H:

  DST = *(SIZE *)(unsigned long) (SRC + insn-&gt;off);

If the memory load is done by LDX_MEM_H, the value in DST will be 0x1 now.

And I think this error results in the test case 'test_bpf_sk_storage_map'
failing:

  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:bpf_iter_bpf_sk_storage_map__open_and_load 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:socket 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:map_update 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:socket 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:map_update 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:socket 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:map_update 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:attach_iter 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:create_iter 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:read 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:FAIL:ipv6_sk_count got 0 expected 3
  $10/26 bpf_iter/bpf_sk_storage_map:FAIL

The code of the test case is simply, it will load sk-&gt;sk_family to the
register with BPF_PROBE_MEM and check if it is AF_INET6. With this patch,
now the test case 'bpf_iter' can pass:

  $10  bpf_iter:OK

Fixes: 2a02759ef5f8 ("bpf: Add support for BTF pointers to interpreter")
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong &lt;imagedong@tencent.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Reviewed-by: Jiang Biao &lt;benbjiang@tencent.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Hao Peng &lt;flyingpeng@tencent.com&gt;
Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich &lt;iii@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220524021228.533216-1-imagedong@tencent.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit caff1fa4118cec4dfd4336521ebd22a6408a1e3e ]

I think there is something wrong with BPF_PROBE_MEM in ___bpf_prog_run()
in big-endian machine. Let's make a test and see what will happen if we
want to load a 'u16' with BPF_PROBE_MEM.

Let's make the src value '0x0001', the value of dest register will become
0x0001000000000000, as the value will be loaded to the first 2 byte of
DST with following code:

  bpf_probe_read_kernel(&amp;DST, SIZE, (const void *)(long) (SRC + insn-&gt;off));

Obviously, the value in DST is not correct. In fact, we can compare
BPF_PROBE_MEM with LDX_MEM_H:

  DST = *(SIZE *)(unsigned long) (SRC + insn-&gt;off);

If the memory load is done by LDX_MEM_H, the value in DST will be 0x1 now.

And I think this error results in the test case 'test_bpf_sk_storage_map'
failing:

  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:bpf_iter_bpf_sk_storage_map__open_and_load 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:socket 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:map_update 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:socket 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:map_update 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:socket 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:map_update 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:attach_iter 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:create_iter 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:read 0 nsec
  test_bpf_sk_storage_map:FAIL:ipv6_sk_count got 0 expected 3
  $10/26 bpf_iter/bpf_sk_storage_map:FAIL

The code of the test case is simply, it will load sk-&gt;sk_family to the
register with BPF_PROBE_MEM and check if it is AF_INET6. With this patch,
now the test case 'bpf_iter' can pass:

  $10  bpf_iter:OK

Fixes: 2a02759ef5f8 ("bpf: Add support for BTF pointers to interpreter")
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong &lt;imagedong@tencent.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Reviewed-by: Jiang Biao &lt;benbjiang@tencent.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Hao Peng &lt;flyingpeng@tencent.com&gt;
Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich &lt;iii@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220524021228.533216-1-imagedong@tencent.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Check PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY in check_helper_mem_access</title>
<updated>2022-06-06T06:47:57+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi</name>
<email>memxor@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-03-19T08:08:24+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=bfe25df63048edd4ceaf78a2fc755d5e2befc978'/>
<id>bfe25df63048edd4ceaf78a2fc755d5e2befc978</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 97e6d7dab1ca4648821c790a2b7913d6d5d549db upstream.

The commit being fixed was aiming to disallow users from incorrectly
obtaining writable pointer to memory that is only meant to be read. This
is enforced now using a MEM_RDONLY flag.

For instance, in case of global percpu variables, when the BTF type is
not struct (e.g. bpf_prog_active), the verifier marks register type as
PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY from bpf_this_cpu_ptr or bpf_per_cpu_ptr
helpers. However, when passing such pointer to kfunc, global funcs, or
BPF helpers, in check_helper_mem_access, there is no expectation
MEM_RDONLY flag will be set, hence it is checked as pointer to writable
memory. Later, verifier sets up argument type of global func as
PTR_TO_MEM | PTR_MAYBE_NULL, so user can use a global func to get around
the limitations imposed by this flag.

This check will also cover global non-percpu variables that may be
introduced in kernel BTF in future.

Also, we update the log message for PTR_TO_BUF case to be similar to
PTR_TO_MEM case, so that the reason for error is clear to user.

Fixes: 34d3a78c681e ("bpf: Make per_cpu_ptr return rdonly PTR_TO_MEM.")
Reviewed-by: Hao Luo &lt;haoluo@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi &lt;memxor@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220319080827.73251-3-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 97e6d7dab1ca4648821c790a2b7913d6d5d549db upstream.

The commit being fixed was aiming to disallow users from incorrectly
obtaining writable pointer to memory that is only meant to be read. This
is enforced now using a MEM_RDONLY flag.

For instance, in case of global percpu variables, when the BTF type is
not struct (e.g. bpf_prog_active), the verifier marks register type as
PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY from bpf_this_cpu_ptr or bpf_per_cpu_ptr
helpers. However, when passing such pointer to kfunc, global funcs, or
BPF helpers, in check_helper_mem_access, there is no expectation
MEM_RDONLY flag will be set, hence it is checked as pointer to writable
memory. Later, verifier sets up argument type of global func as
PTR_TO_MEM | PTR_MAYBE_NULL, so user can use a global func to get around
the limitations imposed by this flag.

This check will also cover global non-percpu variables that may be
introduced in kernel BTF in future.

Also, we update the log message for PTR_TO_BUF case to be similar to
PTR_TO_MEM case, so that the reason for error is clear to user.

Fixes: 34d3a78c681e ("bpf: Make per_cpu_ptr return rdonly PTR_TO_MEM.")
Reviewed-by: Hao Luo &lt;haoluo@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi &lt;memxor@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220319080827.73251-3-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Reject writes for PTR_TO_MAP_KEY in check_helper_mem_access</title>
<updated>2022-06-06T06:47:57+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi</name>
<email>memxor@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-03-19T08:08:25+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=70674d11d14eeecad90be4b409a22b902112ba32'/>
<id>70674d11d14eeecad90be4b409a22b902112ba32</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 7b3552d3f9f6897851fc453b5131a967167e43c2 upstream.

It is not permitted to write to PTR_TO_MAP_KEY, but the current code in
check_helper_mem_access would allow for it, reject this case as well, as
helpers taking ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM also take PTR_TO_MAP_KEY.

Fixes: 69c087ba6225 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi &lt;memxor@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220319080827.73251-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 7b3552d3f9f6897851fc453b5131a967167e43c2 upstream.

It is not permitted to write to PTR_TO_MAP_KEY, but the current code in
check_helper_mem_access would allow for it, reject this case as well, as
helpers taking ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM also take PTR_TO_MAP_KEY.

Fixes: 69c087ba6225 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi &lt;memxor@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220319080827.73251-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Fix excessive memory allocation in stack_map_alloc()</title>
<updated>2022-06-06T06:47:56+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yuntao Wang</name>
<email>ytcoode@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-04-07T13:04:23+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=b9037efc1f3483cfa459e59f803989a6cee4a8da'/>
<id>b9037efc1f3483cfa459e59f803989a6cee4a8da</id>
<content type='text'>
commit b45043192b3e481304062938a6561da2ceea46a6 upstream.

The 'n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket))' part of the
allocated memory for 'smap' is never used after the memlock accounting was
removed, thus get rid of it.

[ Note, Daniel:

Commit b936ca643ade ("bpf: rework memlock-based memory accounting for maps")
moved `cost += n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket))`
up and therefore before the bpf_map_area_alloc() allocation, sigh. In a later
step commit c85d69135a91 ("bpf: move memory size checks to bpf_map_charge_init()"),
and the overflow checks of `cost &gt;= U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE` moved into
bpf_map_charge_init(). And then 370868107bf6 ("bpf: Eliminate rlimit-based
memory accounting for stackmap maps") finally removed the bpf_map_charge_init().
Anyway, the original code did the allocation same way as /after/ this fix. ]

Fixes: b936ca643ade ("bpf: rework memlock-based memory accounting for maps")
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang &lt;ytcoode@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220407130423.798386-1-ytcoode@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit b45043192b3e481304062938a6561da2ceea46a6 upstream.

The 'n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket))' part of the
allocated memory for 'smap' is never used after the memlock accounting was
removed, thus get rid of it.

[ Note, Daniel:

Commit b936ca643ade ("bpf: rework memlock-based memory accounting for maps")
moved `cost += n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket))`
up and therefore before the bpf_map_area_alloc() allocation, sigh. In a later
step commit c85d69135a91 ("bpf: move memory size checks to bpf_map_charge_init()"),
and the overflow checks of `cost &gt;= U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE` moved into
bpf_map_charge_init(). And then 370868107bf6 ("bpf: Eliminate rlimit-based
memory accounting for stackmap maps") finally removed the bpf_map_charge_init().
Anyway, the original code did the allocation same way as /after/ this fix. ]

Fixes: b936ca643ade ("bpf: rework memlock-based memory accounting for maps")
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang &lt;ytcoode@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220407130423.798386-1-ytcoode@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Fix usage of trace RCU in local storage.</title>
<updated>2022-06-06T06:47:56+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>KP Singh</name>
<email>kpsingh@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-04-18T15:51:58+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=cf4b46ea392d75cc06800be7397d58d54453c6f3'/>
<id>cf4b46ea392d75cc06800be7397d58d54453c6f3</id>
<content type='text'>
commit dcf456c9a095a6e71f53d6f6f004133ee851ee70 upstream.

bpf_{sk,task,inode}_storage_free() do not need to use
call_rcu_tasks_trace as no BPF program should be accessing the owner
as it's being destroyed. The only other reader at this point is
bpf_local_storage_map_free() which uses normal RCU.

The only path that needs trace RCU are:

* bpf_local_storage_{delete,update} helpers
* map_{delete,update}_elem() syscalls

Fixes: 0fe4b381a59e ("bpf: Allow bpf_local_storage to be used by sleepable programs")
Signed-off-by: KP Singh &lt;kpsingh@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau &lt;kafai@fb.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220418155158.2865678-1-kpsingh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit dcf456c9a095a6e71f53d6f6f004133ee851ee70 upstream.

bpf_{sk,task,inode}_storage_free() do not need to use
call_rcu_tasks_trace as no BPF program should be accessing the owner
as it's being destroyed. The only other reader at this point is
bpf_local_storage_map_free() which uses normal RCU.

The only path that needs trace RCU are:

* bpf_local_storage_{delete,update} helpers
* map_{delete,update}_elem() syscalls

Fixes: 0fe4b381a59e ("bpf: Allow bpf_local_storage to be used by sleepable programs")
Signed-off-by: KP Singh &lt;kpsingh@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau &lt;kafai@fb.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220418155158.2865678-1-kpsingh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Fix combination of jit blinding and pointers to bpf subprogs.</title>
<updated>2022-06-06T06:47:56+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Alexei Starovoitov</name>
<email>ast@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-05-13T01:10:24+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=a029b02b47dd5bb87a21550d9d9a80cb4dd3f714'/>
<id>a029b02b47dd5bb87a21550d9d9a80cb4dd3f714</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 4b6313cf99b0d51b49aeaea98ec76ca8161ecb80 upstream.

The combination of jit blinding and pointers to bpf subprogs causes:
[   36.989548] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000100000001
[   36.990342] #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode
[   36.990968] #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page
[   36.994859] RIP: 0010:0x100000001
[   36.995209] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0xffffffd7.
[   37.004091] Call Trace:
[   37.004351]  &lt;TASK&gt;
[   37.004576]  ? bpf_loop+0x4d/0x70
[   37.004932]  ? bpf_prog_3899083f75e4c5de_F+0xe3/0x13b

The jit blinding logic didn't recognize that ld_imm64 with an address
of bpf subprogram is a special instruction and proceeded to randomize it.
By itself it wouldn't have been an issue, but jit_subprogs() logic
relies on two step process to JIT all subprogs and then JIT them
again when addresses of all subprogs are known.
Blinding process in the first JIT phase caused second JIT to miss
adjustment of special ld_imm64.

Fix this issue by ignoring special ld_imm64 instructions that don't have
user controlled constants and shouldn't be blinded.

Fixes: 69c087ba6225 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko &lt;andrii@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko &lt;andrii@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau &lt;kafai@fb.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220513011025.13344-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 4b6313cf99b0d51b49aeaea98ec76ca8161ecb80 upstream.

The combination of jit blinding and pointers to bpf subprogs causes:
[   36.989548] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000100000001
[   36.990342] #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode
[   36.990968] #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page
[   36.994859] RIP: 0010:0x100000001
[   36.995209] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0xffffffd7.
[   37.004091] Call Trace:
[   37.004351]  &lt;TASK&gt;
[   37.004576]  ? bpf_loop+0x4d/0x70
[   37.004932]  ? bpf_prog_3899083f75e4c5de_F+0xe3/0x13b

The jit blinding logic didn't recognize that ld_imm64 with an address
of bpf subprogram is a special instruction and proceeded to randomize it.
By itself it wouldn't have been an issue, but jit_subprogs() logic
relies on two step process to JIT all subprogs and then JIT them
again when addresses of all subprogs are known.
Blinding process in the first JIT phase caused second JIT to miss
adjustment of special ld_imm64.

Fix this issue by ignoring special ld_imm64 instructions that don't have
user controlled constants and shouldn't be blinded.

Fixes: 69c087ba6225 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko &lt;andrii@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko &lt;andrii@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau &lt;kafai@fb.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220513011025.13344-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Fix potential array overflow in bpf_trampoline_get_progs()</title>
<updated>2022-06-06T06:47:56+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yuntao Wang</name>
<email>ytcoode@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-04-30T13:08:03+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=32c4559c61652f24c9fdd5440342196fe37453bc'/>
<id>32c4559c61652f24c9fdd5440342196fe37453bc</id>
<content type='text'>
commit a2aa95b71c9bbec793b5c5fa50f0a80d882b3e8d upstream.

The cnt value in the 'cnt &gt;= BPF_MAX_TRAMP_PROGS' check does not
include BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN bpf programs, so the number of
the attached BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN bpf programs in a trampoline
can exceed BPF_MAX_TRAMP_PROGS.

When this happens, the assignment '*progs++ = aux-&gt;prog' in
bpf_trampoline_get_progs() will cause progs array overflow as the
progs field in the bpf_tramp_progs struct can only hold at most
BPF_MAX_TRAMP_PROGS bpf programs.

Fixes: 88fd9e5352fe ("bpf: Refactor trampoline update code")
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang &lt;ytcoode@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220430130803.210624-1-ytcoode@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit a2aa95b71c9bbec793b5c5fa50f0a80d882b3e8d upstream.

The cnt value in the 'cnt &gt;= BPF_MAX_TRAMP_PROGS' check does not
include BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN bpf programs, so the number of
the attached BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN bpf programs in a trampoline
can exceed BPF_MAX_TRAMP_PROGS.

When this happens, the assignment '*progs++ = aux-&gt;prog' in
bpf_trampoline_get_progs() will cause progs array overflow as the
progs field in the bpf_tramp_progs struct can only hold at most
BPF_MAX_TRAMP_PROGS bpf programs.

Fixes: 88fd9e5352fe ("bpf: Refactor trampoline update code")
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang &lt;ytcoode@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220430130803.210624-1-ytcoode@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Adjust BPF stack helper functions to accommodate skip &gt; 0</title>
<updated>2022-04-08T11:59:00+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Namhyung Kim</name>
<email>namhyung@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-03-14T18:20:41+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=6c4f243b58f5362e983386488b2d563764c567af'/>
<id>6c4f243b58f5362e983386488b2d563764c567af</id>
<content type='text'>
commit ee2a098851bfbe8bcdd964c0121f4246f00ff41e upstream.

Let's say that the caller has storage for num_elem stack frames.  Then,
the BPF stack helper functions walk the stack for only num_elem frames.
This means that if skip &gt; 0, one keeps only 'num_elem - skip' frames.

This is because it sets init_nr in the perf_callchain_entry to the end
of the buffer to save num_elem entries only.  I believe it was because
the perf callchain code unwound the stack frames until it reached the
global max size (sysctl_perf_event_max_stack).

However it now has perf_callchain_entry_ctx.max_stack to limit the
iteration locally.  This simplifies the code to handle init_nr in the
BPF callstack entries and removes the confusion with the perf_event's
__PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY which sets init_nr to 0.

Also change the comment on bpf_get_stack() in the header file to be
more explicit what the return value means.

Fixes: c195651e565a ("bpf: add bpf_get_stack helper")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim &lt;namhyung@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yhs@fb.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/30a7b5d5-6726-1cc2-eaee-8da2828a9a9c@oracle.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220314182042.71025-1-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

Based-on-patch-by: Eugene Loh &lt;eugene.loh@oracle.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit ee2a098851bfbe8bcdd964c0121f4246f00ff41e upstream.

Let's say that the caller has storage for num_elem stack frames.  Then,
the BPF stack helper functions walk the stack for only num_elem frames.
This means that if skip &gt; 0, one keeps only 'num_elem - skip' frames.

This is because it sets init_nr in the perf_callchain_entry to the end
of the buffer to save num_elem entries only.  I believe it was because
the perf callchain code unwound the stack frames until it reached the
global max size (sysctl_perf_event_max_stack).

However it now has perf_callchain_entry_ctx.max_stack to limit the
iteration locally.  This simplifies the code to handle init_nr in the
BPF callstack entries and removes the confusion with the perf_event's
__PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY which sets init_nr to 0.

Also change the comment on bpf_get_stack() in the header file to be
more explicit what the return value means.

Fixes: c195651e565a ("bpf: add bpf_get_stack helper")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim &lt;namhyung@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yhs@fb.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/30a7b5d5-6726-1cc2-eaee-8da2828a9a9c@oracle.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220314182042.71025-1-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

Based-on-patch-by: Eugene Loh &lt;eugene.loh@oracle.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Fix a btf decl_tag bug when tagging a function</title>
<updated>2022-04-08T11:58:03+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yonghong Song</name>
<email>yhs@fb.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-02-03T19:17:27+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=796d5666f6422ddadc938fb888044fcc16f2dbe3'/>
<id>796d5666f6422ddadc938fb888044fcc16f2dbe3</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit d7e7b42f4f956f2c68ad8cda87d750093dbba737 ]

syzbot reported a btf decl_tag bug with stack trace below:

  general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
  KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]
  CPU: 0 PID: 3592 Comm: syz-executor914 Not tainted 5.16.0-syzkaller-11424-gb7892f7d5cb2 #0
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
  RIP: 0010:btf_type_vlen include/linux/btf.h:231 [inline]
  RIP: 0010:btf_decl_tag_resolve+0x83e/0xaa0 kernel/bpf/btf.c:3910
  ...
  Call Trace:
   &lt;TASK&gt;
   btf_resolve+0x251/0x1020 kernel/bpf/btf.c:4198
   btf_check_all_types kernel/bpf/btf.c:4239 [inline]
   btf_parse_type_sec kernel/bpf/btf.c:4280 [inline]
   btf_parse kernel/bpf/btf.c:4513 [inline]
   btf_new_fd+0x19fe/0x2370 kernel/bpf/btf.c:6047
   bpf_btf_load kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4039 [inline]
   __sys_bpf+0x1cbb/0x5970 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4679
   __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4738 [inline]
   __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4736 [inline]
   __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xb0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4736
   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
   do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

The kasan error is triggered with an illegal BTF like below:
   type 0: void
   type 1: int
   type 2: decl_tag to func type 3
   type 3: func to func_proto type 8
The total number of types is 4 and the type 3 is illegal
since its func_proto type is out of range.

Currently, the target type of decl_tag can be struct/union, var or func.
Both struct/union and var implemented their own 'resolve' callback functions
and hence handled properly in kernel.
But func type doesn't have 'resolve' callback function. When
btf_decl_tag_resolve() tries to check func type, it tries to get
vlen of its func_proto type, which triggered the above kasan error.

To fix the issue, btf_decl_tag_resolve() needs to do btf_func_check()
before trying to accessing func_proto type.
In the current implementation, func type is checked with
btf_func_check() in the main checking function btf_check_all_types().
To fix the above kasan issue, let us implement 'resolve' callback
func type properly. The 'resolve' callback will be also called
in btf_check_all_types() for func types.

Fixes: b5ea834dde6b ("bpf: Support for new btf kind BTF_KIND_TAG")
Reported-by: syzbot+53619be9444215e785ed@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yhs@fb.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau &lt;kafai@fb.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220203191727.741862-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit d7e7b42f4f956f2c68ad8cda87d750093dbba737 ]

syzbot reported a btf decl_tag bug with stack trace below:

  general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
  KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]
  CPU: 0 PID: 3592 Comm: syz-executor914 Not tainted 5.16.0-syzkaller-11424-gb7892f7d5cb2 #0
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
  RIP: 0010:btf_type_vlen include/linux/btf.h:231 [inline]
  RIP: 0010:btf_decl_tag_resolve+0x83e/0xaa0 kernel/bpf/btf.c:3910
  ...
  Call Trace:
   &lt;TASK&gt;
   btf_resolve+0x251/0x1020 kernel/bpf/btf.c:4198
   btf_check_all_types kernel/bpf/btf.c:4239 [inline]
   btf_parse_type_sec kernel/bpf/btf.c:4280 [inline]
   btf_parse kernel/bpf/btf.c:4513 [inline]
   btf_new_fd+0x19fe/0x2370 kernel/bpf/btf.c:6047
   bpf_btf_load kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4039 [inline]
   __sys_bpf+0x1cbb/0x5970 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4679
   __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4738 [inline]
   __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4736 [inline]
   __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xb0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4736
   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
   do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

The kasan error is triggered with an illegal BTF like below:
   type 0: void
   type 1: int
   type 2: decl_tag to func type 3
   type 3: func to func_proto type 8
The total number of types is 4 and the type 3 is illegal
since its func_proto type is out of range.

Currently, the target type of decl_tag can be struct/union, var or func.
Both struct/union and var implemented their own 'resolve' callback functions
and hence handled properly in kernel.
But func type doesn't have 'resolve' callback function. When
btf_decl_tag_resolve() tries to check func type, it tries to get
vlen of its func_proto type, which triggered the above kasan error.

To fix the issue, btf_decl_tag_resolve() needs to do btf_func_check()
before trying to accessing func_proto type.
In the current implementation, func type is checked with
btf_func_check() in the main checking function btf_check_all_types().
To fix the above kasan issue, let us implement 'resolve' callback
func type properly. The 'resolve' callback will be also called
in btf_check_all_types() for func types.

Fixes: b5ea834dde6b ("bpf: Support for new btf kind BTF_KIND_TAG")
Reported-by: syzbot+53619be9444215e785ed@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yhs@fb.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau &lt;kafai@fb.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220203191727.741862-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Fix UAF due to race between btf_try_get_module and load_module</title>
<updated>2022-04-08T11:57:56+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi</name>
<email>memxor@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-01-14T16:39:44+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=0481baa2318cb1ab13277715da6cdbb657807b3f'/>
<id>0481baa2318cb1ab13277715da6cdbb657807b3f</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 18688de203b47e5d8d9d0953385bf30b5949324f ]

While working on code to populate kfunc BTF ID sets for module BTF from
its initcall, I noticed that by the time the initcall is invoked, the
module BTF can already be seen by userspace (and the BPF verifier). The
existing btf_try_get_module calls try_module_get which only fails if
mod-&gt;state == MODULE_STATE_GOING, i.e. it can increment module reference
when module initcall is happening in parallel.

Currently, BTF parsing happens from MODULE_STATE_COMING notifier
callback. At this point, the module initcalls have not been invoked.
The notifier callback parses and prepares the module BTF, allocates an
ID, which publishes it to userspace, and then adds it to the btf_modules
list allowing the kernel to invoke btf_try_get_module for the BTF.

However, at this point, the module has not been fully initialized (i.e.
its initcalls have not finished). The code in module.c can still fail
and free the module, without caring for other users. However, nothing
stops btf_try_get_module from succeeding between the state transition
from MODULE_STATE_COMING to MODULE_STATE_LIVE.

This leads to a use-after-free issue when BPF program loads
successfully in the state transition, load_module's do_init_module call
fails and frees the module, and BPF program fd on close calls module_put
for the freed module. Future patch has test case to verify we don't
regress in this area in future.

There are multiple points after prepare_coming_module (in load_module)
where failure can occur and module loading can return error. We
illustrate and test for the race using the last point where it can
practically occur (in module __init function).

An illustration of the race:

CPU 0                           CPU 1
			  load_module
			    notifier_call(MODULE_STATE_COMING)
			      btf_parse_module
			      btf_alloc_id	// Published to userspace
			      list_add(&amp;btf_mod-&gt;list, btf_modules)
			    mod-&gt;init(...)
...				^
bpf_check		        |
check_pseudo_btf_id             |
  btf_try_get_module            |
    returns true                |  ...
...                             |  module __init in progress
return prog_fd                  |  ...
...                             V
			    if (ret &lt; 0)
			      free_module(mod)
			    ...
close(prog_fd)
 ...
 bpf_prog_free_deferred
  module_put(used_btf.mod) // use-after-free

We fix this issue by setting a flag BTF_MODULE_F_LIVE, from the notifier
callback when MODULE_STATE_LIVE state is reached for the module, so that
we return NULL from btf_try_get_module for modules that are not fully
formed. Since try_module_get already checks that module is not in
MODULE_STATE_GOING state, and that is the only transition a live module
can make before being removed from btf_modules list, this is enough to
close the race and prevent the bug.

A later selftest patch crafts the race condition artifically to verify
that it has been fixed, and that verifier fails to load program (with
ENXIO).

Lastly, a couple of comments:

 1. Even if this race didn't exist, it seems more appropriate to only
    access resources (ksyms and kfuncs) of a fully formed module which
    has been initialized completely.

 2. This patch was born out of need for synchronization against module
    initcall for the next patch, so it is needed for correctness even
    without the aforementioned race condition. The BTF resources
    initialized by module initcall are set up once and then only looked
    up, so just waiting until the initcall has finished ensures correct
    behavior.

Fixes: 541c3bad8dc5 ("bpf: Support BPF ksym variables in kernel modules")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi &lt;memxor@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220114163953.1455836-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 18688de203b47e5d8d9d0953385bf30b5949324f ]

While working on code to populate kfunc BTF ID sets for module BTF from
its initcall, I noticed that by the time the initcall is invoked, the
module BTF can already be seen by userspace (and the BPF verifier). The
existing btf_try_get_module calls try_module_get which only fails if
mod-&gt;state == MODULE_STATE_GOING, i.e. it can increment module reference
when module initcall is happening in parallel.

Currently, BTF parsing happens from MODULE_STATE_COMING notifier
callback. At this point, the module initcalls have not been invoked.
The notifier callback parses and prepares the module BTF, allocates an
ID, which publishes it to userspace, and then adds it to the btf_modules
list allowing the kernel to invoke btf_try_get_module for the BTF.

However, at this point, the module has not been fully initialized (i.e.
its initcalls have not finished). The code in module.c can still fail
and free the module, without caring for other users. However, nothing
stops btf_try_get_module from succeeding between the state transition
from MODULE_STATE_COMING to MODULE_STATE_LIVE.

This leads to a use-after-free issue when BPF program loads
successfully in the state transition, load_module's do_init_module call
fails and frees the module, and BPF program fd on close calls module_put
for the freed module. Future patch has test case to verify we don't
regress in this area in future.

There are multiple points after prepare_coming_module (in load_module)
where failure can occur and module loading can return error. We
illustrate and test for the race using the last point where it can
practically occur (in module __init function).

An illustration of the race:

CPU 0                           CPU 1
			  load_module
			    notifier_call(MODULE_STATE_COMING)
			      btf_parse_module
			      btf_alloc_id	// Published to userspace
			      list_add(&amp;btf_mod-&gt;list, btf_modules)
			    mod-&gt;init(...)
...				^
bpf_check		        |
check_pseudo_btf_id             |
  btf_try_get_module            |
    returns true                |  ...
...                             |  module __init in progress
return prog_fd                  |  ...
...                             V
			    if (ret &lt; 0)
			      free_module(mod)
			    ...
close(prog_fd)
 ...
 bpf_prog_free_deferred
  module_put(used_btf.mod) // use-after-free

We fix this issue by setting a flag BTF_MODULE_F_LIVE, from the notifier
callback when MODULE_STATE_LIVE state is reached for the module, so that
we return NULL from btf_try_get_module for modules that are not fully
formed. Since try_module_get already checks that module is not in
MODULE_STATE_GOING state, and that is the only transition a live module
can make before being removed from btf_modules list, this is enough to
close the race and prevent the bug.

A later selftest patch crafts the race condition artifically to verify
that it has been fixed, and that verifier fails to load program (with
ENXIO).

Lastly, a couple of comments:

 1. Even if this race didn't exist, it seems more appropriate to only
    access resources (ksyms and kfuncs) of a fully formed module which
    has been initialized completely.

 2. This patch was born out of need for synchronization against module
    initcall for the next patch, so it is needed for correctness even
    without the aforementioned race condition. The BTF resources
    initialized by module initcall are set up once and then only looked
    up, so just waiting until the initcall has finished ensures correct
    behavior.

Fixes: 541c3bad8dc5 ("bpf: Support BPF ksym variables in kernel modules")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi &lt;memxor@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220114163953.1455836-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
