While the check_max_stack_depth function explores call chains emanating
from the main prog, which is typically enough to cover all possible call
chains, it doesn't explore those rooted at async callbacks unless the
async callback will have been directly called, since unlike non-async
callbacks it skips their instruction exploration as they don't
contribute to stack depth.
It could be the case that the async callback leads to a callchain which
exceeds the stack depth, but this is never reachable while only
exploring the entry point from main subprog. Hence, repeat the check for
the main subprog *and* all async callbacks marked by the symbolic
execution pass of the verifier, as execution of the program may begin at
any of them.
Consider functions with following stack depths:
main: 256
async: 256
foo: 256
main:
rX = async
bpf_timer_set_callback(...)
async:
foo()
Here, async is not descended as it does not contribute to stack depth of
main (since it is referenced using bpf_pseudo_func and not
bpf_pseudo_call). However, when async is invoked asynchronously, it will
end up breaching the MAX_BPF_STACK limit by calling foo.
Hence, in addition to main, we also need to explore call chains
beginning at all async callback subprogs in a program.
Fixes: 7ddc80a476c2 ("bpf: Teach stack depth check about async callbacks.")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230717161530.1238-3-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The assignment to idx in check_max_stack_depth happens once we see a
bpf_pseudo_call or bpf_pseudo_func. This is not an issue as the rest of
the code performs a few checks and then pushes the frame to the frame
stack, except the case of async callbacks. If the async callback case
causes the loop iteration to be skipped, the idx assignment will be
incorrect on the next iteration of the loop. The value stored in the
frame stack (as the subprogno of the current subprog) will be incorrect.
This leads to incorrect checks and incorrect tail_call_reachable
marking. Save the target subprog in a new variable and only assign to
idx once we are done with the is_async_cb check which may skip pushing
of frame to the frame stack and subsequent stack depth checks and tail
call markings.
Fixes: 7ddc80a476c2 ("bpf: Teach stack depth check about async callbacks.")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230717161530.1238-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The check_max_stack_depth pass happens after the verifier's symbolic
execution, and attempts to walk the call graph of the BPF program,
ensuring that the stack usage stays within bounds for all possible call
chains. There are two cases to consider: bpf_pseudo_func and
bpf_pseudo_call. In the former case, the callback pointer is loaded into
a register, and is assumed that it is passed to some helper later which
calls it (however there is no way to be sure), but the check remains
conservative and accounts the stack usage anyway. For this particular
case, asynchronous callbacks are skipped as they execute asynchronously
when their corresponding event fires.
The case of bpf_pseudo_call is simpler and we know that the call is
definitely made, hence the stack depth of the subprog is accounted for.
However, the current check still skips an asynchronous callback even if
a bpf_pseudo_call was made for it. This is erroneous, as it will miss
accounting for the stack usage of the asynchronous callback, which can
be used to breach the maximum stack depth limit.
Fix this by only skipping asynchronous callbacks when the instruction is
not a pseudo call to the subprog.
Fixes: 7ddc80a476c2 ("bpf: Teach stack depth check about async callbacks.")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230705144730.235802-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2023-06-23
We've added 49 non-merge commits during the last 24 day(s) which contain
a total of 70 files changed, 1935 insertions(+), 442 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Extend bpf_fib_lookup helper to allow passing the route table ID,
from Louis DeLosSantos.
2) Fix regsafe() in verifier to call check_ids() for scalar registers,
from Eduard Zingerman.
3) Extend the set of cpumask kfuncs with bpf_cpumask_first_and()
and a rework of bpf_cpumask_any*() kfuncs. Additionally,
add selftests, from David Vernet.
4) Fix socket lookup BPF helpers for tc/XDP to respect VRF bindings,
from Gilad Sever.
5) Change bpf_link_put() to use workqueue unconditionally to fix it
under PREEMPT_RT, from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior.
6) Follow-ups to address issues in the bpf_refcount shared ownership
implementation, from Dave Marchevsky.
7) A few general refactorings to BPF map and program creation permissions
checks which were part of the BPF token series, from Andrii Nakryiko.
8) Various fixes for benchmark framework and add a new benchmark
for BPF memory allocator to BPF selftests, from Hou Tao.
9) Documentation improvements around iterators and trusted pointers,
from Anton Protopopov.
10) Small cleanup in verifier to improve allocated object check,
from Daniel T. Lee.
11) Improve performance of bpf_xdp_pointer() by avoiding access
to shared_info when XDP packet does not have frags,
from Jesper Dangaard Brouer.
12) Silence a harmless syzbot-reported warning in btf_type_id_size(),
from Yonghong Song.
13) Remove duplicate bpfilter_umh_cleanup in favor of umd_cleanup_helper,
from Jarkko Sakkinen.
14) Fix BPF selftests build for resolve_btfids under custom HOSTCFLAGS,
from Viktor Malik.
* tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (49 commits)
bpf, docs: Document existing macros instead of deprecated
bpf, docs: BPF Iterator Document
selftests/bpf: Fix compilation failure for prog vrf_socket_lookup
selftests/bpf: Add vrf_socket_lookup tests
bpf: Fix bpf socket lookup from tc/xdp to respect socket VRF bindings
bpf: Call __bpf_sk_lookup()/__bpf_skc_lookup() directly via TC hookpoint
bpf: Factor out socket lookup functions for the TC hookpoint.
selftests/bpf: Set the default value of consumer_cnt as 0
selftests/bpf: Ensure that next_cpu() returns a valid CPU number
selftests/bpf: Output the correct error code for pthread APIs
selftests/bpf: Use producer_cnt to allocate local counter array
xsk: Remove unused inline function xsk_buff_discard()
bpf: Keep BPF_PROG_LOAD permission checks clear of validations
bpf: Centralize permissions checks for all BPF map types
bpf: Inline map creation logic in map_create() function
bpf: Move unprivileged checks into map_create() and bpf_prog_load()
bpf: Remove in_atomic() from bpf_link_put().
selftests/bpf: Verify that check_ids() is used for scalars in regsafe()
bpf: Verify scalar ids mapping in regsafe() using check_ids()
selftests/bpf: Check if mark_chain_precision() follows scalar ids
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230623211256.8409-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cross-merge networking fixes after downstream PR.
Conflicts:
tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh
d7a2fc1437f7 ("selftests: net: fcnal-test: check if FIPS mode is enabled")
dd017c72dde6 ("selftests: fcnal: Test SO_DONTROUTE on TCP sockets.")
https://lore.kernel.org/all/5007b52c-dd16-dbf6-8d64-b9701bfa498b@tessares.net/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230619105427.4a0df9b3@canb.auug.org.au/
No adjacent changes.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Make sure that the following unsafe example is rejected by verifier:
1: r9 = ... some pointer with range X ...
2: r6 = ... unbound scalar ID=a ...
3: r7 = ... unbound scalar ID=b ...
4: if (r6 > r7) goto +1
5: r6 = r7
6: if (r6 > X) goto ...
--- checkpoint ---
7: r9 += r7
8: *(u64 *)r9 = Y
This example is unsafe because not all execution paths verify r7 range.
Because of the jump at (4) the verifier would arrive at (6) in two states:
I. r6{.id=b}, r7{.id=b} via path 1-6;
II. r6{.id=a}, r7{.id=b} via path 1-4, 6.
Currently regsafe() does not call check_ids() for scalar registers,
thus from POV of regsafe() states (I) and (II) are identical. If the
path 1-6 is taken by verifier first, and checkpoint is created at (6)
the path [1-4, 6] would be considered safe.
Changes in this commit:
- check_ids() is modified to disallow mapping multiple old_id to the
same cur_id.
- check_scalar_ids() is added, unlike check_ids() it treats ID zero as
a unique scalar ID.
- check_scalar_ids() needs to generate temporary unique IDs, field
'tmp_id_gen' is added to bpf_verifier_env::idmap_scratch to
facilitate this.
- regsafe() is updated to:
- use check_scalar_ids() for precise scalar registers.
- compare scalar registers using memcmp only for explore_alu_limits
branch. This simplifies control flow for scalar case, and has no
measurable performance impact.
- check_alu_op() is updated to avoid generating bpf_reg_state::id for
constant scalar values when processing BPF_MOV. ID is needed to
propagate range information for identical values, but there is
nothing to propagate for constants.
Fixes: 75748837b7e5 ("bpf: Propagate scalar ranges through register assignments.")
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230613153824.3324830-4-eddyz87@gmail.com
Change mark_chain_precision() to track precision in situations
like below:
r2 = unknown value
...
--- state #0 ---
...
r1 = r2 // r1 and r2 now share the same ID
...
--- state #1 {r1.id = A, r2.id = A} ---
...
if (r2 > 10) goto exit; // find_equal_scalars() assigns range to r1
...
--- state #2 {r1.id = A, r2.id = A} ---
r3 = r10
r3 += r1 // need to mark both r1 and r2
At the beginning of the processing of each state, ensure that if a
register with a scalar ID is marked as precise, all registers sharing
this ID are also marked as precise.
This property would be used by a follow-up change in regsafe().
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230613153824.3324830-2-eddyz87@gmail.com
When subprograms are in use, the main program is not jit'd after the
subprograms because jit_subprogs sets a value for prog->bpf_func upon
success. Subsequent calls to the JIT are bypassed when this value is
non-NULL. This leads to a situation where the main program and its
func[0] counterpart are both in the bpf kallsyms tree, but only func[0]
has an extable. Extables are only created during JIT. Now there are
two nearly identical program ksym entries in the tree, but only one has
an extable. Depending upon how the entries are placed, there's a chance
that a fault will call search_extable on the aux with the NULL entry.
Since jit_subprogs already copies state from func[0] to the main
program, include the extable pointer in this state duplication.
Additionally, ensure that the copy of the main program in func[0] is not
added to the bpf_prog_kallsyms table. Instead, let the main program get
added later in bpf_prog_load(). This ensures there is only a single
copy of the main program in the kallsyms table, and that its tag matches
the tag observed by tooling like bpftool.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 1c2a088a6626 ("bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs")
Signed-off-by: Krister Johansen <kjlx@templeofstupid.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/6de9b2f4b4724ef56efbb0339daaa66c8b68b1e7.1686616663.git.kjlx@templeofstupid.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The following scenario describes a bug in the verifier where it
incorrectly concludes about equivalent scalar IDs which could lead to
verifier bypass in privileged mode:
1. Prepare a 32-bit rogue number.
2. Put the rogue number into the upper half of a 64-bit register, and
roll a random (unknown to the verifier) bit in the lower half. The
rest of the bits should be zero (although variations are possible).
3. Assign an ID to the register by MOVing it to another arbitrary
register.
4. Perform a 32-bit spill of the register, then perform a 32-bit fill to
another register. Due to a bug in the verifier, the ID will be
preserved, although the new register will contain only the lower 32
bits, i.e. all zeros except one random bit.
At this point there are two registers with different values but the same
ID, which means the integrity of the verifier state has been corrupted.
5. Compare the new 32-bit register with 0. In the branch where it's
equal to 0, the verifier will believe that the original 64-bit
register is also 0, because it has the same ID, but its actual value
still contains the rogue number in the upper half.
Some optimizations of the verifier prevent the actual bypass, so
extra care is needed: the comparison must be between two registers,
and both branches must be reachable (this is why one random bit is
needed). Both branches are still suitable for the bypass.
6. Right shift the original register by 32 bits to pop the rogue number.
7. Use the rogue number as an offset with any pointer. The verifier will
believe that the offset is 0, while in reality it's the given number.
The fix is similar to the 32-bit BPF_MOV handling in check_alu_op for
SCALAR_VALUE. If the spill is narrowing the actual register value, don't
keep the ID, make sure it's reset to 0.
Fixes: 354e8f1970f8 ("bpf: Support <8-byte scalar spill and refill")
Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxim@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> # Checked veristat delta
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230607123951.558971-2-maxtram95@gmail.com
In reg_type_not_null(), we currently assume that a pointer may be NULL
if it has the PTR_MAYBE_NULL modifier, or if it doesn't belong to one of
several base type of pointers that are never NULL-able. For example,
PTR_TO_CTX, PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, etc.
It turns out that in some cases, PTR_TO_BTF_ID can never be NULL as
well, though we currently don't specify it. For example, if you had the
following program:
SEC("tc")
long example_refcnt_fail(void *ctx)
{
struct bpf_cpumask *mask1, *mask2;
mask1 = bpf_cpumask_create();
mask2 = bpf_cpumask_create();
if (!mask1 || !mask2)
goto error_release;
bpf_cpumask_test_cpu(0, (const struct cpumask *)mask1);
bpf_cpumask_test_cpu(0, (const struct cpumask *)mask2);
error_release:
if (mask1)
bpf_cpumask_release(mask1);
if (mask2)
bpf_cpumask_release(mask2);
return ret;
}
The verifier will incorrectly fail to load the program, thinking
(unintuitively) that we have a possibly-unreleased reference if the mask
is NULL, because we (correctly) don't issue a bpf_cpumask_release() on
the NULL path.
The reason the verifier gets confused is due to the fact that we don't
explicitly tell the verifier that trusted PTR_TO_BTF_ID pointers can
never be NULL. Basically, if we successfully get past the if check
(meaning both pointers go from ptr_or_null_bpf_cpumask to
ptr_bpf_cpumask), the verifier will correctly assume that the references
need to be dropped on any possible branch that leads to program exit.
However, it will _incorrectly_ think that the ptr == NULL branch is
possible, and will erroneously detect it as a branch on which we failed
to drop the reference.
The solution is of course to teach the verifier that trusted
PTR_TO_BTF_ID pointers can never be NULL, so that it doesn't incorrectly
think it's possible for the reference to be present on the ptr == NULL
branch.
A follow-on patch will add a selftest that verifies this behavior.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230602150112.1494194-1-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>