linux-stable.git/kernel/bpf/syscall.c, branch v6.13.2 Linux kernel stable tree Merge tag 'trace-v6.13' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace 2024-11-22T21:27:01+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2024-11-22T21:27:01+00:00 06afb0f36106ecb839c5e2509905e68c1e2677de Pull tracing updates from Steven Rostedt: - Addition of faultable tracepoints There's a tracepoint attached to both a system call entry and exit. This location is known to allow page faults. The tracepoints are called under an rcu_read_lock() which does not allow faults that can sleep. This limits the ability of tracepoint handlers to page fault in user space system call parameters. Now these tracepoints have been made "faultable", allowing the callbacks to fault in user space parameters and record them. Note, only the infrastructure has been implemented. The consumers (perf, ftrace, BPF) now need to have their code modified to allow faults. - Fix up of BPF code for the tracepoint faultable logic - Update tracepoints to use the new static branch API - Remove trace_*_rcuidle() variants and the SRCU protection they used - Remove unused TRACE_EVENT_FL_FILTERED logic - Replace strncpy() with strscpy() and memcpy() - Use replace per_cpu_ptr(smp_processor_id()) with this_cpu_ptr() - Fix perf events to not duplicate samples when tracing is enabled - Replace atomic64_add_return(1, counter) with atomic64_inc_return(counter) - Make stack trace buffer 4K instead of PAGE_SIZE - Remove TRACE_FLAG_IRQS_NOSUPPORT flag as it was never used - Get the true return address for function tracer when function graph tracer is also running. When function_graph trace is running along with function tracer, the parent function of the function tracer sometimes is "return_to_handler", which is the function graph trampoline to record the exit of the function. Use existing logic that calls into the fgraph infrastructure to find the real return address. - Remove (un)regfunc pointers out of tracepoint structure - Added last minute bug fix for setting pending modules in stack function filter. echo "write*:mod:ext3" > /sys/kernel/tracing/stack_trace_filter Would cause a kernel NULL dereference. - Minor clean ups * tag 'trace-v6.13' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace: (31 commits) ftrace: Fix regression with module command in stack_trace_filter tracing: Fix function name for trampoline ftrace: Get the true parent ip for function tracer tracing: Remove redundant check on field->field in histograms bpf: ensure RCU Tasks Trace GP for sleepable raw tracepoint BPF links bpf: decouple BPF link/attach hook and BPF program sleepable semantics bpf: put bpf_link's program when link is safe to be deallocated tracing: Replace strncpy() with strscpy() when copying comm tracing: Add might_fault() check in __DECLARE_TRACE_SYSCALL tracing: Fix syscall tracepoint use-after-free tracing: Introduce tracepoint_is_faultable() tracing: Introduce tracepoint extended structure tracing: Remove TRACE_FLAG_IRQS_NOSUPPORT tracing: Replace multiple deprecated strncpy with memcpy tracing: Make percpu stack trace buffer invariant to PAGE_SIZE tracing: Use atomic64_inc_return() in trace_clock_counter() trace/trace_event_perf: remove duplicate samples on the first tracepoint event tracing/bpf: Add might_fault check to syscall probes tracing/perf: Add might_fault check to syscall probes tracing/ftrace: Add might_fault check to syscall probes ... 
Pull tracing updates from Steven Rostedt:

 - Addition of faultable tracepoints

   There's a tracepoint attached to both a system call entry and exit.
   This location is known to allow page faults. The tracepoints are
   called under an rcu_read_lock() which does not allow faults that can
   sleep. This limits the ability of tracepoint handlers to page fault
   in user space system call parameters. Now these tracepoints have been
   made "faultable", allowing the callbacks to fault in user space
   parameters and record them.

   Note, only the infrastructure has been implemented. The consumers
   (perf, ftrace, BPF) now need to have their code modified to allow
   faults.

 - Fix up of BPF code for the tracepoint faultable logic

 - Update tracepoints to use the new static branch API

 - Remove trace_*_rcuidle() variants and the SRCU protection they used

 - Remove unused TRACE_EVENT_FL_FILTERED logic

 - Replace strncpy() with strscpy() and memcpy()

 - Use replace per_cpu_ptr(smp_processor_id()) with this_cpu_ptr()

 - Fix perf events to not duplicate samples when tracing is enabled

 - Replace atomic64_add_return(1, counter) with
   atomic64_inc_return(counter)

 - Make stack trace buffer 4K instead of PAGE_SIZE

 - Remove TRACE_FLAG_IRQS_NOSUPPORT flag as it was never used

 - Get the true return address for function tracer when function graph
   tracer is also running.

   When function_graph trace is running along with function tracer, the
   parent function of the function tracer sometimes is
   "return_to_handler", which is the function graph trampoline to record
   the exit of the function. Use existing logic that calls into the
   fgraph infrastructure to find the real return address.

 - Remove (un)regfunc pointers out of tracepoint structure

 - Added last minute bug fix for setting pending modules in stack
   function filter.

     echo "write*:mod:ext3" > /sys/kernel/tracing/stack_trace_filter

   Would cause a kernel NULL dereference.

 - Minor clean ups

* tag 'trace-v6.13' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace: (31 commits)
  ftrace: Fix regression with module command in stack_trace_filter
  tracing: Fix function name for trampoline
  ftrace: Get the true parent ip for function tracer
  tracing: Remove redundant check on field->field in histograms
  bpf: ensure RCU Tasks Trace GP for sleepable raw tracepoint BPF links
  bpf: decouple BPF link/attach hook and BPF program sleepable semantics
  bpf: put bpf_link's program when link is safe to be deallocated
  tracing: Replace strncpy() with strscpy() when copying comm
  tracing: Add might_fault() check in __DECLARE_TRACE_SYSCALL
  tracing: Fix syscall tracepoint use-after-free
  tracing: Introduce tracepoint_is_faultable()
  tracing: Introduce tracepoint extended structure
  tracing: Remove TRACE_FLAG_IRQS_NOSUPPORT
  tracing: Replace multiple deprecated strncpy with memcpy
  tracing: Make percpu stack trace buffer invariant to PAGE_SIZE
  tracing: Use atomic64_inc_return() in trace_clock_counter()
  trace/trace_event_perf: remove duplicate samples on the first tracepoint event
  tracing/bpf: Add might_fault check to syscall probes
  tracing/perf: Add might_fault check to syscall probes
  tracing/ftrace: Add might_fault check to syscall probes
  ...
bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach 2024-11-11T16:18:03+00:00 Jiri Olsa jolsa@kernel.org 2024-11-08T13:45:34+00:00 d920179b3d4842a0e27cae54fdddbe5ef3977e73 Adding support to attach BPF program for entry and return probe of the same function. This is common use case which at the moment requires to create two uprobe multi links. Adding new BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION attach type that instructs kernel to attach single link program to both entry and exit probe. It's possible to control execution of the BPF program on return probe simply by returning zero or non zero from the entry BPF program execution to execute or not the BPF program on return probe respectively. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241108134544.480660-4-jolsa@kernel.org 
Adding support to attach BPF program for entry and return probe
of the same function. This is common use case which at the moment
requires to create two uprobe multi links.

Adding new BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION attach type that instructs
kernel to attach single link program to both entry and exit probe.

It's possible to control execution of the BPF program on return
probe simply by returning zero or non zero from the entry BPF
program execution to execute or not the BPF program on return
probe respectively.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241108134544.480660-4-jolsa@kernel.org
bpf: ensure RCU Tasks Trace GP for sleepable raw tracepoint BPF links 2024-11-01T18:39:07+00:00 Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org 2024-11-01T18:17:54+00:00 24507ce81eaf0c34d91f3d1acaa73ee2f796190a Now that kernel supports sleepable tracepoints, the fact that bpf_probe_unregister() is asynchronous, i.e., that it doesn't wait for any in-flight tracepoints to conclude before returning, we now need to delay BPF raw tp link's deallocation and bpf_prog_put() of its underlying BPF program (regardless of program's own sleepable semantics) until after full RCU Tasks Trace GP. With that GP over, we'll have a guarantee that no tracepoint can reach BPF link and thus its BPF program. We use newly added tracepoint_is_faultable() check to know when this RCU Tasks Trace GP is necessary and utilize BPF link's own sleepable flag passed through bpf_link_init_sleepable() initializer. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20241101181754.782341-3-andrii@kernel.org Tested-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com> Reported-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com> Fixes: a363d27cdbc2 ("tracing: Allow system call tracepoints to handle page faults") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> 
Now that kernel supports sleepable tracepoints, the fact that
bpf_probe_unregister() is asynchronous, i.e., that it doesn't wait for
any in-flight tracepoints to conclude before returning, we now need to
delay BPF raw tp link's deallocation and bpf_prog_put() of its
underlying BPF program (regardless of program's own sleepable semantics)
until after full RCU Tasks Trace GP. With that GP over, we'll have
a guarantee that no tracepoint can reach BPF link and thus its BPF program.

We use newly added tracepoint_is_faultable() check to know when this RCU
Tasks Trace GP is necessary and utilize BPF link's own sleepable flag
passed through bpf_link_init_sleepable() initializer.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20241101181754.782341-3-andrii@kernel.org
Tested-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
Reported-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
Fixes: a363d27cdbc2 ("tracing: Allow system call tracepoints to handle page faults")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
bpf: decouple BPF link/attach hook and BPF program sleepable semantics 2024-11-01T18:39:07+00:00 Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org 2024-11-01T18:17:53+00:00 61c6fefa92bb4ed7a34163b94f6ffac628237a29 BPF link's lifecycle protection scheme depends on both BPF hook and BPF program. If *either* of those require RCU Tasks Trace GP, then we need to go through a chain of GPs before putting BPF program refcount and deallocating BPF link memory. This patch adds bpf_link-specific sleepable flag, which can be set to true even if underlying BPF program is not sleepable itself. If either link->sleepable or link->prog->sleepable is true, we'll go through a chain of RCU Tasks Trace GP and RCU GP before putting BPF program and freeing memory. This will be used to protect BPF link for sleepable (faultable) raw tracepoints in the next patch. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20241101181754.782341-2-andrii@kernel.org Tested-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> 
BPF link's lifecycle protection scheme depends on both BPF hook and BPF
program. If *either* of those require RCU Tasks Trace GP, then we need
to go through a chain of GPs before putting BPF program refcount and
deallocating BPF link memory.

This patch adds bpf_link-specific sleepable flag, which can be set to
true even if underlying BPF program is not sleepable itself. If either
link->sleepable or link->prog->sleepable is true, we'll go through
a chain of RCU Tasks Trace GP and RCU GP before putting BPF program and
freeing memory.

This will be used to protect BPF link for sleepable (faultable) raw
tracepoints in the next patch.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20241101181754.782341-2-andrii@kernel.org
Tested-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
bpf: put bpf_link's program when link is safe to be deallocated 2024-11-01T18:39:06+00:00 Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org 2024-11-01T18:17:52+00:00 f44ec8733a8469143fde1984b5e6931b2e2f6f3f In general, BPF link's underlying BPF program should be considered to be reachable through attach hook -> link -> prog chain, and, pessimistically, we have to assume that as long as link's memory is not safe to free, attach hook's code might hold a pointer to BPF program and use it. As such, it's not (generally) correct to put link's program early before waiting for RCU GPs to go through. More eager bpf_prog_put() that we currently do is mostly correct due to BPF program's release code doing similar RCU GP waiting, but as will be shown in the following patches, BPF program can be non-sleepable (and, thus, reliant on only "classic" RCU GP), while BPF link's attach hook can have sleepable semantics and needs to be protected by RCU Tasks Trace, and for such cases BPF link has to go through RCU Tasks Trace + "classic" RCU GPs before being deallocated. And so, if we put BPF program early, we might free BPF program before we free BPF link, leading to use-after-free situation. So, this patch defers bpf_prog_put() until we are ready to perform bpf_link's deallocation. At worst, this delays BPF program freeing by one extra RCU GP, but that seems completely acceptable. Alternatively, we'd need more elaborate ways to determine BPF hook, BPF link, and BPF program lifetimes, and how they relate to each other, which seems like an unnecessary complication. Note, for most BPF links we still will perform eager bpf_prog_put() and link dealloc, so for those BPF links there are no observable changes whatsoever. Only BPF links that use deferred dealloc might notice slightly delayed freeing of BPF programs. Also, to reduce code and logic duplication, extract program put + link dealloc logic into bpf_link_dealloc() helper. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20241101181754.782341-1-andrii@kernel.org Tested-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> 
In general, BPF link's underlying BPF program should be considered to be
reachable through attach hook -> link -> prog chain, and, pessimistically,
we have to assume that as long as link's memory is not safe to free,
attach hook's code might hold a pointer to BPF program and use it.

As such, it's not (generally) correct to put link's program early before
waiting for RCU GPs to go through. More eager bpf_prog_put() that we
currently do is mostly correct due to BPF program's release code doing
similar RCU GP waiting, but as will be shown in the following patches,
BPF program can be non-sleepable (and, thus, reliant on only "classic"
RCU GP), while BPF link's attach hook can have sleepable semantics and
needs to be protected by RCU Tasks Trace, and for such cases BPF link
has to go through RCU Tasks Trace + "classic" RCU GPs before being
deallocated. And so, if we put BPF program early, we might free BPF
program before we free BPF link, leading to use-after-free situation.

So, this patch defers bpf_prog_put() until we are ready to perform
bpf_link's deallocation. At worst, this delays BPF program freeing by
one extra RCU GP, but that seems completely acceptable. Alternatively,
we'd need more elaborate ways to determine BPF hook, BPF link, and BPF
program lifetimes, and how they relate to each other, which seems like
an unnecessary complication.

Note, for most BPF links we still will perform eager bpf_prog_put() and
link dealloc, so for those BPF links there are no observable changes
whatsoever. Only BPF links that use deferred dealloc might notice
slightly delayed freeing of BPF programs.

Also, to reduce code and logic duplication, extract program put + link
dealloc logic into bpf_link_dealloc() helper.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20241101181754.782341-1-andrii@kernel.org
Tested-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf 2024-10-25T01:47:28+00:00 Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org 2024-10-25T01:45:59+00:00 bfa7b5c98be4bdcf8aaa4e5ca0b91359ea28c05c Cross-merge bpf fixes after downstream PR. No conflicts. Adjacent changes in: include/linux/bpf.h include/uapi/linux/bpf.h kernel/bpf/btf.c kernel/bpf/helpers.c kernel/bpf/syscall.c kernel/bpf/verifier.c kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c mm/slab_common.c tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241024215724.60017-1-daniel@iogearbox.net/ Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
Cross-merge bpf fixes after downstream PR.

No conflicts.

Adjacent changes in:

include/linux/bpf.h
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
kernel/bpf/btf.c
kernel/bpf/helpers.c
kernel/bpf/syscall.c
kernel/bpf/verifier.c
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
mm/slab_common.c
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241024215724.60017-1-daniel@iogearbox.net/
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bpf: Add uptr support in the map_value of the task local storage. 2024-10-24T17:25:59+00:00 Martin KaFai Lau martin.lau@kernel.org 2024-10-23T23:47:53+00:00 ba512b00e5efbf7e19cfb7fa9f66ce82669b7077 This patch adds uptr support in the map_value of the task local storage. struct map_value { struct user_data __uptr *uptr; }; struct { __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_TASK_STORAGE); __uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC); __type(key, int); __type(value, struct value_type); } datamap SEC(".maps"); A new bpf_obj_pin_uptrs() is added to pin the user page and also stores the kernel address back to the uptr for the bpf prog to use later. It currently does not support the uptr pointing to a user struct across two pages. It also excludes PageHighMem support to keep it simple. As of now, the 32bit bpf jit is missing other more crucial bpf features. For example, many important bpf features depend on bpf kfunc now but so far only one arch (x86-32) supports it which was added by me as an example when kfunc was first introduced to bpf. The uptr can only be stored to the task local storage by the syscall update_elem. Meaning the uptr will not be considered if it is provided by the bpf prog through bpf_task_storage_get(BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE). This is enforced by only calling bpf_local_storage_update(swap_uptrs==true) in bpf_pid_task_storage_update_elem. Everywhere else will have swap_uptrs==false. This will pump down to bpf_selem_alloc(swap_uptrs==true). It is the only case that bpf_selem_alloc() will take the uptr value when updating the newly allocated selem. bpf_obj_swap_uptrs() is added to swap the uptr between the SDATA(selem)->data and the user provided map_value in "void *value". bpf_obj_swap_uptrs() makes the SDATA(selem)->data takes the ownership of the uptr and the user space provided map_value will have NULL in the uptr. The bpf_obj_unpin_uptrs() is called after map->ops->map_update_elem() returning error. If the map->ops->map_update_elem has reached a state that the local storage has taken the uptr ownership, the bpf_obj_unpin_uptrs() will be a no op because the uptr is NULL. A "__"bpf_obj_unpin_uptrs is added to make this error path unpin easier such that it does not have to check the map->record is NULL or not. BPF_F_LOCK is not supported when the map_value has uptr. This can be revisited later if there is a use case. A similar swap_uptrs idea can be considered. The final bit is to do unpin_user_page in the bpf_obj_free_fields(). The earlier patch has ensured that the bpf_obj_free_fields() has gone through the rcu gp when needed. Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241023234759.860539-7-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
This patch adds uptr support in the map_value of the task local storage.

struct map_value {
	struct user_data __uptr *uptr;
};

struct {
	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_TASK_STORAGE);
	__uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
	__type(key, int);
	__type(value, struct value_type);
} datamap SEC(".maps");

A new bpf_obj_pin_uptrs() is added to pin the user page and
also stores the kernel address back to the uptr for the
bpf prog to use later. It currently does not support
the uptr pointing to a user struct across two pages.
It also excludes PageHighMem support to keep it simple.
As of now, the 32bit bpf jit is missing other more crucial bpf
features. For example, many important bpf features depend on
bpf kfunc now but so far only one arch (x86-32) supports it
which was added by me as an example when kfunc was first
introduced to bpf.

The uptr can only be stored to the task local storage by the
syscall update_elem. Meaning the uptr will not be considered
if it is provided by the bpf prog through
bpf_task_storage_get(BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE).
This is enforced by only calling
bpf_local_storage_update(swap_uptrs==true) in
bpf_pid_task_storage_update_elem. Everywhere else will
have swap_uptrs==false.

This will pump down to bpf_selem_alloc(swap_uptrs==true). It is
the only case that bpf_selem_alloc() will take the uptr value when
updating the newly allocated selem. bpf_obj_swap_uptrs() is added
to swap the uptr between the SDATA(selem)->data and the user provided
map_value in "void *value". bpf_obj_swap_uptrs() makes the
SDATA(selem)->data takes the ownership of the uptr and the user space
provided map_value will have NULL in the uptr.

The bpf_obj_unpin_uptrs() is called after map->ops->map_update_elem()
returning error. If the map->ops->map_update_elem has reached
a state that the local storage has taken the uptr ownership,
the bpf_obj_unpin_uptrs() will be a no op because the uptr
is NULL. A "__"bpf_obj_unpin_uptrs is added to make this
error path unpin easier such that it does not have to check
the map->record is NULL or not.

BPF_F_LOCK is not supported when the map_value has uptr.
This can be revisited later if there is a use case. A similar
swap_uptrs idea can be considered.

The final bit is to do unpin_user_page in the bpf_obj_free_fields().
The earlier patch has ensured that the bpf_obj_free_fields() has
gone through the rcu gp when needed.

Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241023234759.860539-7-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bpf: Support __uptr type tag in BTF 2024-10-24T17:25:58+00:00 Kui-Feng Lee thinker.li@gmail.com 2024-10-23T23:47:48+00:00 1cb80d9e93f861018fabe81a69ea0ded20f5a2d0 This patch introduces the "__uptr" type tag to BTF. It is to define a pointer pointing to the user space memory. This patch adds BTF logic to pass the "__uptr" type tag. btf_find_kptr() is reused for the "__uptr" tag. The "__uptr" will only be supported in the map_value of the task storage map. However, btf_parse_struct_meta() also uses btf_find_kptr() but it is not interested in "__uptr". This patch adds a "field_mask" argument to btf_find_kptr() which will return BTF_FIELD_IGNORE if the caller is not interested in a “__uptr” field. btf_parse_kptr() is also reused to parse the uptr. The btf_check_and_fixup_fields() is changed to do extra checks on the uptr to ensure that its struct size is not larger than PAGE_SIZE. It is not clear how a uptr pointing to a CO-RE supported kernel struct will be used, so it is also not allowed now. Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241023234759.860539-2-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
This patch introduces the "__uptr" type tag to BTF. It is to define
a pointer pointing to the user space memory. This patch adds BTF
logic to pass the "__uptr" type tag.

btf_find_kptr() is reused for the "__uptr" tag. The "__uptr" will only
be supported in the map_value of the task storage map. However,
btf_parse_struct_meta() also uses btf_find_kptr() but it is not
interested in "__uptr". This patch adds a "field_mask" argument
to btf_find_kptr() which will return BTF_FIELD_IGNORE if the
caller is not interested in a “__uptr” field.

btf_parse_kptr() is also reused to parse the uptr.
The btf_check_and_fixup_fields() is changed to do extra
checks on the uptr to ensure that its struct size is not larger
than PAGE_SIZE. It is not clear how a uptr pointing to a CO-RE
supported kernel struct will be used, so it is also not allowed now.

Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241023234759.860539-2-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bpf: Check validity of link->type in bpf_link_show_fdinfo() 2024-10-24T17:17:12+00:00 Hou Tao houtao1@huawei.com 2024-10-24T01:35:58+00:00 8421d4c8762bd022cb491f2f0f7019ef51b4f0a7 If a newly-added link type doesn't invoke BPF_LINK_TYPE(), accessing bpf_link_type_strs[link->type] may result in an out-of-bounds access. To spot such missed invocations early in the future, checking the validity of link->type in bpf_link_show_fdinfo() and emitting a warning when such invocations are missed. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241024013558.1135167-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com 
If a newly-added link type doesn't invoke BPF_LINK_TYPE(), accessing
bpf_link_type_strs[link->type] may result in an out-of-bounds access.

To spot such missed invocations early in the future, checking the
validity of link->type in bpf_link_show_fdinfo() and emitting a warning
when such invocations are missed.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241024013558.1135167-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
bpf: Add MEM_WRITE attribute 2024-10-22T22:42:56+00:00 Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net 2024-10-21T15:28:05+00:00 6fad274f06f038c29660aa53fbad14241c9fd976 Add a MEM_WRITE attribute for BPF helper functions which can be used in bpf_func_proto to annotate an argument type in order to let the verifier know that the helper writes into the memory passed as an argument. In the past MEM_UNINIT has been (ab)used for this function, but the latter merely tells the verifier that the passed memory can be uninitialized. There have been bugs with overloading the latter but aside from that there are also cases where the passed memory is read + written which currently cannot be expressed, see also 4b3786a6c539 ("bpf: Zero former ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} args in case of error"). Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241021152809.33343-1-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
Add a MEM_WRITE attribute for BPF helper functions which can be used in
bpf_func_proto to annotate an argument type in order to let the verifier
know that the helper writes into the memory passed as an argument. In
the past MEM_UNINIT has been (ab)used for this function, but the latter
merely tells the verifier that the passed memory can be uninitialized.

There have been bugs with overloading the latter but aside from that
there are also cases where the passed memory is read + written which
currently cannot be expressed, see also 4b3786a6c539 ("bpf: Zero former
ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} args in case of error").

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241021152809.33343-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>