linux-stable.git/kernel/bpf/syscall.c, branch v5.10.87 Linux kernel stable tree bpf: Fix toctou on read-only map's constant scalar tracking 2021-12-01T08:18:58+00:00 Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net 2021-11-09T18:48:08+00:00 33fe044f6a9e8977686a6a09f0bf33e5cc75257e commit 353050be4c19e102178ccc05988101887c25ae53 upstream. Commit a23740ec43ba ("bpf: Track contents of read-only maps as scalars") is checking whether maps are read-only both from BPF program side and user space side, and then, given their content is constant, reading out their data via map->ops->map_direct_value_addr() which is then subsequently used as known scalar value for the register, that is, it is marked as __mark_reg_known() with the read value at verification time. Before a23740ec43ba, the register content was marked as an unknown scalar so the verifier could not make any assumptions about the map content. The current implementation however is prone to a TOCTOU race, meaning, the value read as known scalar for the register is not guaranteed to be exactly the same at a later point when the program is executed, and as such, the prior made assumptions of the verifier with regards to the program will be invalid which can cause issues such as OOB access, etc. While the BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG map flag is always fixed and required to be specified at map creation time, the map->frozen property is initially set to false for the map given the map value needs to be populated, e.g. for global data sections. Once complete, the loader "freezes" the map from user space such that no subsequent updates/deletes are possible anymore. For the rest of the lifetime of the map, this freeze one-time trigger cannot be undone anymore after a successful BPF_MAP_FREEZE cmd return. Meaning, any new BPF_* cmd calls which would update/delete map entries will be rejected with -EPERM since map_get_sys_perms() removes the FMODE_CAN_WRITE permission. This also means that pending update/delete map entries must still complete before this guarantee is given. This corner case is not an issue for loaders since they create and prepare such program private map in successive steps. However, a malicious user is able to trigger this TOCTOU race in two different ways: i) via userfaultfd, and ii) via batched updates. For i) userfaultfd is used to expand the competition interval, so that map_update_elem() can modify the contents of the map after map_freeze() and bpf_prog_load() were executed. This works, because userfaultfd halts the parallel thread which triggered a map_update_elem() at the time where we copy key/value from the user buffer and this already passed the FMODE_CAN_WRITE capability test given at that time the map was not "frozen". Then, the main thread performs the map_freeze() and bpf_prog_load(), and once that had completed successfully, the other thread is woken up to complete the pending map_update_elem() which then changes the map content. For ii) the idea of the batched update is similar, meaning, when there are a large number of updates to be processed, it can increase the competition interval between the two. It is therefore possible in practice to modify the contents of the map after executing map_freeze() and bpf_prog_load(). One way to fix both i) and ii) at the same time is to expand the use of the map's map->writecnt. The latter was introduced in fc9702273e2e ("bpf: Add mmap() support for BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY") and further refined in 1f6cb19be2e2 ("bpf: Prevent re-mmap()'ing BPF map as writable for initially r/o mapping") with the rationale to make a writable mmap()'ing of a map mutually exclusive with read-only freezing. The counter indicates writable mmap() mappings and then prevents/fails the freeze operation. Its semantics can be expanded beyond just mmap() by generally indicating ongoing write phases. This would essentially span any parallel regular and batched flavor of update/delete operation and then also have map_freeze() fail with -EBUSY. For the check_mem_access() in the verifier we expand upon the bpf_map_is_rdonly() check ensuring that all last pending writes have completed via bpf_map_write_active() test. Once the map->frozen is set and bpf_map_write_active() indicates a map->writecnt of 0 only then we are really guaranteed to use the map's data as known constants. For map->frozen being set and pending writes in process of still being completed we fall back to marking that register as unknown scalar so we don't end up making assumptions about it. With this, both TOCTOU reproducers from i) and ii) are fixed. Note that the map->writecnt has been converted into a atomic64 in the fix in order to avoid a double freeze_mutex mutex_{un,}lock() pair when updating map->writecnt in the various map update/delete BPF_* cmd flavors. Spanning the freeze_mutex over entire map update/delete operations in syscall side would not be possible due to then causing everything to be serialized. Similarly, something like synchronize_rcu() after setting map->frozen to wait for update/deletes to complete is not possible either since it would also have to span the user copy which can sleep. On the libbpf side, this won't break d66562fba1ce ("libbpf: Add BPF object skeleton support") as the anonymous mmap()-ed "map initialization image" is remapped as a BPF map-backed mmap()-ed memory where for .rodata it's non-writable. Fixes: a23740ec43ba ("bpf: Track contents of read-only maps as scalars") Reported-by: w1tcher.bupt@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> [fix conflict to call bpf_map_write_active_dec() in err_put block. fix conflict to insert new functions after find_and_alloc_map().] Reference: CVE-2021-4001 Signed-off-by: Masami Ichikawa(CIP) <masami.ichikawa@cybertrust.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 353050be4c19e102178ccc05988101887c25ae53 upstream.

Commit a23740ec43ba ("bpf: Track contents of read-only maps as scalars") is
checking whether maps are read-only both from BPF program side and user space
side, and then, given their content is constant, reading out their data via
map->ops->map_direct_value_addr() which is then subsequently used as known
scalar value for the register, that is, it is marked as __mark_reg_known()
with the read value at verification time. Before a23740ec43ba, the register
content was marked as an unknown scalar so the verifier could not make any
assumptions about the map content.

The current implementation however is prone to a TOCTOU race, meaning, the
value read as known scalar for the register is not guaranteed to be exactly
the same at a later point when the program is executed, and as such, the
prior made assumptions of the verifier with regards to the program will be
invalid which can cause issues such as OOB access, etc.

While the BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG map flag is always fixed and required to be
specified at map creation time, the map->frozen property is initially set to
false for the map given the map value needs to be populated, e.g. for global
data sections. Once complete, the loader "freezes" the map from user space
such that no subsequent updates/deletes are possible anymore. For the rest
of the lifetime of the map, this freeze one-time trigger cannot be undone
anymore after a successful BPF_MAP_FREEZE cmd return. Meaning, any new BPF_*
cmd calls which would update/delete map entries will be rejected with -EPERM
since map_get_sys_perms() removes the FMODE_CAN_WRITE permission. This also
means that pending update/delete map entries must still complete before this
guarantee is given. This corner case is not an issue for loaders since they
create and prepare such program private map in successive steps.

However, a malicious user is able to trigger this TOCTOU race in two different
ways: i) via userfaultfd, and ii) via batched updates. For i) userfaultfd is
used to expand the competition interval, so that map_update_elem() can modify
the contents of the map after map_freeze() and bpf_prog_load() were executed.
This works, because userfaultfd halts the parallel thread which triggered a
map_update_elem() at the time where we copy key/value from the user buffer and
this already passed the FMODE_CAN_WRITE capability test given at that time the
map was not "frozen". Then, the main thread performs the map_freeze() and
bpf_prog_load(), and once that had completed successfully, the other thread
is woken up to complete the pending map_update_elem() which then changes the
map content. For ii) the idea of the batched update is similar, meaning, when
there are a large number of updates to be processed, it can increase the
competition interval between the two. It is therefore possible in practice to
modify the contents of the map after executing map_freeze() and bpf_prog_load().

One way to fix both i) and ii) at the same time is to expand the use of the
map's map->writecnt. The latter was introduced in fc9702273e2e ("bpf: Add mmap()
support for BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY") and further refined in 1f6cb19be2e2 ("bpf:
Prevent re-mmap()'ing BPF map as writable for initially r/o mapping") with
the rationale to make a writable mmap()'ing of a map mutually exclusive with
read-only freezing. The counter indicates writable mmap() mappings and then
prevents/fails the freeze operation. Its semantics can be expanded beyond
just mmap() by generally indicating ongoing write phases. This would essentially
span any parallel regular and batched flavor of update/delete operation and
then also have map_freeze() fail with -EBUSY. For the check_mem_access() in
the verifier we expand upon the bpf_map_is_rdonly() check ensuring that all
last pending writes have completed via bpf_map_write_active() test. Once the
map->frozen is set and bpf_map_write_active() indicates a map->writecnt of 0
only then we are really guaranteed to use the map's data as known constants.
For map->frozen being set and pending writes in process of still being completed
we fall back to marking that register as unknown scalar so we don't end up
making assumptions about it. With this, both TOCTOU reproducers from i) and
ii) are fixed.

Note that the map->writecnt has been converted into a atomic64 in the fix in
order to avoid a double freeze_mutex mutex_{un,}lock() pair when updating
map->writecnt in the various map update/delete BPF_* cmd flavors. Spanning
the freeze_mutex over entire map update/delete operations in syscall side
would not be possible due to then causing everything to be serialized.
Similarly, something like synchronize_rcu() after setting map->frozen to wait
for update/deletes to complete is not possible either since it would also
have to span the user copy which can sleep. On the libbpf side, this won't
break d66562fba1ce ("libbpf: Add BPF object skeleton support") as the
anonymous mmap()-ed "map initialization image" is remapped as a BPF map-backed
mmap()-ed memory where for .rodata it's non-writable.

Fixes: a23740ec43ba ("bpf: Track contents of read-only maps as scalars")
Reported-by: w1tcher.bupt@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
[fix conflict to call bpf_map_write_active_dec() in err_put block.
fix conflict to insert new functions after find_and_alloc_map().]
Reference: CVE-2021-4001
Signed-off-by: Masami Ichikawa(CIP) <masami.ichikawa@cybertrust.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Fix error usage of map_fd and fdget() in generic_map_update_batch() 2021-11-02T18:48:21+00:00 Xu Kuohai xukuohai@huawei.com 2021-10-19T03:29:34+00:00 ee4908f909b3761ded2e32c79a6ea5ed20e1fdc6 commit fda7a38714f40b635f5502ec4855602c6b33dad2 upstream. 1. The ufd in generic_map_update_batch() should be read from batch.map_fd; 2. A call to fdget() should be followed by a symmetric call to fdput(). Fixes: aa2e93b8e58e ("bpf: Add generic support for update and delete batch ops") Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211019032934.1210517-1-xukuohai@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit fda7a38714f40b635f5502ec4855602c6b33dad2 upstream.

1. The ufd in generic_map_update_batch() should be read from batch.map_fd;
2. A call to fdget() should be followed by a symmetric call to fdput().

Fixes: aa2e93b8e58e ("bpf: Add generic support for update and delete batch ops")
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211019032934.1210517-1-xukuohai@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Fix potential race in tail call compatibility check 2021-11-02T18:48:21+00:00 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen toke@redhat.com 2021-10-26T11:00:19+00:00 dd2260ec643d309d8c58ceac3aa77f80db765488 commit 54713c85f536048e685258f880bf298a74c3620d upstream. Lorenzo noticed that the code testing for program type compatibility of tail call maps is potentially racy in that two threads could encounter a map with an unset type simultaneously and both return true even though they are inserting incompatible programs. The race window is quite small, but artificially enlarging it by adding a usleep_range() inside the check in bpf_prog_array_compatible() makes it trivial to trigger from userspace with a program that does, essentially: map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY, 4, 4, 2, 0); pid = fork(); if (pid) { key = 0; value = xdp_fd; } else { key = 1; value = tc_fd; } err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key, &value, 0); While the race window is small, it has potentially serious ramifications in that triggering it would allow a BPF program to tail call to a program of a different type. So let's get rid of it by protecting the update with a spinlock. The commit in the Fixes tag is the last commit that touches the code in question. v2: - Use a spinlock instead of an atomic variable and cmpxchg() (Alexei) v3: - Put lock and the members it protects into an embedded 'owner' struct (Daniel) Fixes: 3324b584b6f6 ("ebpf: misc core cleanup") Reported-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026110019.363464-1-toke@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 54713c85f536048e685258f880bf298a74c3620d upstream.

Lorenzo noticed that the code testing for program type compatibility of
tail call maps is potentially racy in that two threads could encounter a
map with an unset type simultaneously and both return true even though they
are inserting incompatible programs.

The race window is quite small, but artificially enlarging it by adding a
usleep_range() inside the check in bpf_prog_array_compatible() makes it
trivial to trigger from userspace with a program that does, essentially:

        map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY, 4, 4, 2, 0);
        pid = fork();
        if (pid) {
                key = 0;
                value = xdp_fd;
        } else {
                key = 1;
                value = tc_fd;
        }
        err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key, &value, 0);

While the race window is small, it has potentially serious ramifications in
that triggering it would allow a BPF program to tail call to a program of a
different type. So let's get rid of it by protecting the update with a
spinlock. The commit in the Fixes tag is the last commit that touches the
code in question.

v2:
- Use a spinlock instead of an atomic variable and cmpxchg() (Alexei)
v3:
- Put lock and the members it protects into an embedded 'owner' struct (Daniel)

Fixes: 3324b584b6f6 ("ebpf: misc core cleanup")
Reported-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026110019.363464-1-toke@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bpf: Prevent double bpf_prog_put call from bpf_tracing_prog_attach 2021-01-27T10:55:07+00:00 Jiri Olsa jolsa@kernel.org 2021-01-11T19:16:50+00:00 7c7b2b560583e45ab1dfd17d29ead8942c6548c4 [ Upstream commit 5541075a348b6ca6ac668653f7d2c423ae8e00b6 ] The bpf_tracing_prog_attach error path calls bpf_prog_put on prog, which causes refcount underflow when it's called from link_create function. link_create prog = bpf_prog_get <-- get ... tracing_bpf_link_attach(prog.. bpf_tracing_prog_attach(prog.. out_put_prog: bpf_prog_put(prog); <-- put if (ret < 0) bpf_prog_put(prog); <-- put Removing bpf_prog_put call from bpf_tracing_prog_attach and making sure its callers call it instead. Fixes: 4a1e7c0c63e0 ("bpf: Support attaching freplace programs to multiple attach points") Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210111191650.1241578-1-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 5541075a348b6ca6ac668653f7d2c423ae8e00b6 ]

The bpf_tracing_prog_attach error path calls bpf_prog_put
on prog, which causes refcount underflow when it's called
from link_create function.

  link_create
    prog = bpf_prog_get              <-- get
    ...
    tracing_bpf_link_attach(prog..
      bpf_tracing_prog_attach(prog..
        out_put_prog:
          bpf_prog_put(prog);        <-- put

    if (ret < 0)
      bpf_prog_put(prog);            <-- put

Removing bpf_prog_put call from bpf_tracing_prog_attach
and making sure its callers call it instead.

Fixes: 4a1e7c0c63e0 ("bpf: Support attaching freplace programs to multiple attach points")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210111191650.1241578-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bpf: Remove unneeded break 2020-10-19T18:40:21+00:00 Tom Rix trix@redhat.com 2020-10-19T17:38:46+00:00 76702a2e7280594a0add4c1283623c81a868373f A break is not needed if it is preceded by a return. Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201019173846.1021-1-trix@redhat.com 
A break is not needed if it is preceded by a return.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201019173846.1021-1-trix@redhat.com
bpf: Deref map in BPF_PROG_BIND_MAP when it's already used 2020-10-03T02:21:25+00:00 Stanislav Fomichev sdf@google.com 2020-10-03T00:25:44+00:00 1028ae4069991e26d1522e957939fb61d2da1d12 We are missing a deref for the case when we are doing BPF_PROG_BIND_MAP on a map that's being already held by the program. There is 'if (ret) bpf_map_put(map)' below which doesn't trigger because we don't consider this an error. Let's add missing bpf_map_put() for this specific condition. Fixes: ef15314aa5de ("bpf: Add BPF_PROG_BIND_MAP syscall") Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201003002544.3601440-1-sdf@google.com 
We are missing a deref for the case when we are doing BPF_PROG_BIND_MAP
on a map that's being already held by the program.
There is 'if (ret) bpf_map_put(map)' below which doesn't trigger
because we don't consider this an error.
Let's add missing bpf_map_put() for this specific condition.

Fixes: ef15314aa5de ("bpf: Add BPF_PROG_BIND_MAP syscall")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201003002544.3601440-1-sdf@google.com
bpf: Support attaching freplace programs to multiple attach points 2020-09-29T20:09:24+00:00 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen toke@redhat.com 2020-09-29T12:45:51+00:00 4a1e7c0c63e02daad751842b7880f9bbcdfb6e89 This enables support for attaching freplace programs to multiple attach points. It does this by amending the UAPI for bpf_link_Create with a target btf ID that can be used to supply the new attachment point along with the target program fd. The target must be compatible with the target that was supplied at program load time. The implementation reuses the checks that were factored out of check_attach_btf_id() to ensure compatibility between the BTF types of the old and new attachment. If these match, a new bpf_tracing_link will be created for the new attach target, allowing multiple attachments to co-exist simultaneously. The code could theoretically support multiple-attach of other types of tracing programs as well, but since I don't have a use case for any of those, there is no API support for doing so. Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/160138355169.48470.17165680973640685368.stgit@toke.dk 
This enables support for attaching freplace programs to multiple attach
points. It does this by amending the UAPI for bpf_link_Create with a target
btf ID that can be used to supply the new attachment point along with the
target program fd. The target must be compatible with the target that was
supplied at program load time.

The implementation reuses the checks that were factored out of
check_attach_btf_id() to ensure compatibility between the BTF types of the
old and new attachment. If these match, a new bpf_tracing_link will be
created for the new attach target, allowing multiple attachments to
co-exist simultaneously.

The code could theoretically support multiple-attach of other types of
tracing programs as well, but since I don't have a use case for any of
those, there is no API support for doing so.

Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/160138355169.48470.17165680973640685368.stgit@toke.dk
bpf: Move prog->aux->linked_prog and trampoline into bpf_link on attach 2020-09-29T20:09:23+00:00 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen toke@redhat.com 2020-09-29T12:45:50+00:00 3aac1ead5eb6b76f3d2b8d111e6de1c2de23fb34 In preparation for allowing multiple attachments of freplace programs, move the references to the target program and trampoline into the bpf_tracing_link structure when that is created. To do this atomically, introduce a new mutex in prog->aux to protect writing to the two pointers to target prog and trampoline, and rename the members to make it clear that they are related. With this change, it is no longer possible to attach the same tracing program multiple times (detaching in-between), since the reference from the tracing program to the target disappears on the first attach. However, since the next patch will let the caller supply an attach target, that will also make it possible to attach to the same place multiple times. Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/160138355059.48470.2503076992210324984.stgit@toke.dk 
In preparation for allowing multiple attachments of freplace programs, move
the references to the target program and trampoline into the
bpf_tracing_link structure when that is created. To do this atomically,
introduce a new mutex in prog->aux to protect writing to the two pointers
to target prog and trampoline, and rename the members to make it clear that
they are related.

With this change, it is no longer possible to attach the same tracing
program multiple times (detaching in-between), since the reference from the
tracing program to the target disappears on the first attach. However,
since the next patch will let the caller supply an attach target, that will
also make it possible to attach to the same place multiple times.

Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/160138355059.48470.2503076992210324984.stgit@toke.dk
bpf: Enable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN for raw_tracepoint 2020-09-28T19:52:36+00:00 Song Liu songliubraving@fb.com 2020-09-25T20:54:29+00:00 1b4d60ec162f82ea29a2e7a907b5c6cc9f926321 Add .test_run for raw_tracepoint. Also, introduce a new feature that runs the target program on a specific CPU. This is achieved by a new flag in bpf_attr.test, BPF_F_TEST_RUN_ON_CPU. When this flag is set, the program is triggered on cpu with id bpf_attr.test.cpu. This feature is needed for BPF programs that handle perf_event and other percpu resources, as the program can access these resource locally. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200925205432.1777-2-songliubraving@fb.com 
Add .test_run for raw_tracepoint. Also, introduce a new feature that runs
the target program on a specific CPU. This is achieved by a new flag in
bpf_attr.test, BPF_F_TEST_RUN_ON_CPU. When this flag is set, the program
is triggered on cpu with id bpf_attr.test.cpu. This feature is needed for
BPF programs that handle perf_event and other percpu resources, as the
program can access these resource locally.

Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200925205432.1777-2-songliubraving@fb.com
Revert "bpf: Fix potential call bpf_link_free() in atomic context" 2020-09-24T02:14:11+00:00 Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org 2020-09-24T02:10:38+00:00 f00f2f7fe86036a586e26bd55ad86310477199a3 This reverts commit 31f23a6a181c81543b10a1a9056b0e6c7ef1c747. This change made many selftests/bpf flaky: flow_dissector, sk_lookup, sk_assign and others. There was no issue in the code. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> 
This reverts commit 31f23a6a181c81543b10a1a9056b0e6c7ef1c747.

This change made many selftests/bpf flaky: flow_dissector, sk_lookup, sk_assign and others.
There was no issue in the code.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>