linux-stable.git/kernel/bpf/helpers.c, branch v6.6.78

bpf: Add MEM_WRITE attribute

2024-11-01T00:58:30+00:00

[ Upstream commit 6fad274f06f038c29660aa53fbad14241c9fd976 ]

Add a MEM_WRITE attribute for BPF helper functions which can be used in
bpf_func_proto to annotate an argument type in order to let the verifier
know that the helper writes into the memory passed as an argument. In
the past MEM_UNINIT has been (ab)used for this function, but the latter
merely tells the verifier that the passed memory can be uninitialized.

There have been bugs with overloading the latter but aside from that
there are also cases where the passed memory is read + written which
currently cannot be expressed, see also 4b3786a6c539 ("bpf: Zero former
ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} args in case of error").

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241021152809.33343-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Stable-dep-of: 8ea607330a39 ("bpf: Fix overloading of MEM_UNINIT's meaning")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Zero former ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} args in case of error

2024-10-04T14:29:23+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4b3786a6c5397dc220b1483d8e2f4867743e966f ]

For all non-tracing helpers which formerly had ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} as input
arguments, zero the value for the case of an error as otherwise it could leak
memory. For tracing, it is not needed given CAP_PERFMON can already read all
kernel memory anyway hence bpf_get_func_arg() and bpf_get_func_ret() is skipped
in here.

Also, the MTU helpers mtu_len pointer value is being written but also read.
Technically, the MEM_UNINIT should not be there in order to always force init.
Removing MEM_UNINIT needs more verifier rework though: MEM_UNINIT right now
implies two things actually: i) write into memory, ii) memory does not have
to be initialized. If we lift MEM_UNINIT, it then becomes: i) read into memory,
ii) memory must be initialized. This means that for bpf_*_check_mtu() we're
readding the issue we're trying to fix, that is, it would then be able to
write back into things like .rodata BPF maps. Follow-up work will rework the
MEM_UNINIT semantics such that the intent can be better expressed. For now
just clear the *mtu_len on error path which can be lifted later again.

Fixes: 8a67f2de9b1d ("bpf: expose bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul to all program types")
Fixes: d7a4cb9b6705 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul helpers")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e5edd241-59e7-5e39-0ee5-a51e31b6840a@iogearbox.net
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913191754.13290-5-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Fix helper writes to read-only maps

2024-10-04T14:29:23+00:00

[ Upstream commit 32556ce93bc45c730829083cb60f95a2728ea48b ]

Lonial found an issue that despite user- and BPF-side frozen BPF map
(like in case of .rodata), it was still possible to write into it from
a BPF program side through specific helpers having ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT}
as arguments.

In check_func_arg() when the argument is as mentioned, the meta->raw_mode
is never set. Later, check_helper_mem_access(), under the case of
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE as register base type, it assumes BPF_READ for the
subsequent call to check_map_access_type() and given the BPF map is
read-only it succeeds.

The helpers really need to be annotated as ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} | MEM_UNINIT
when results are written into them as opposed to read out of them. The
latter indicates that it's okay to pass a pointer to uninitialized memory
as the memory is written to anyway.

However, ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} is a special case of ARG_PTR_TO_FIXED_SIZE_MEM
just with additional alignment requirement. So it is better to just get
rid of the ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} special cases altogether and reuse the
fixed size memory types. For this, add MEM_ALIGNED to additionally ensure
alignment given these helpers write directly into the args via * = val.
The .arg*_size has been initialized reflecting the actual sizeof(*).

MEM_ALIGNED can only be used in combination with MEM_FIXED_SIZE annotated
argument types, since in !MEM_FIXED_SIZE cases the verifier does not know
the buffer size a priori and therefore cannot blindly write * = val.

Fixes: 57c3bb725a3d ("bpf: Introduce ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG} arg types")
Reported-by: Lonial Con 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913191754.13290-3-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Fix bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul helpers for 32bit

2024-10-04T14:29:22+00:00

[ Upstream commit cfe69c50b05510b24e26ccb427c7cc70beafd6c1 ]

The bpf_strtol() and bpf_strtoul() helpers are currently broken on 32bit:

The argument type ARG_PTR_TO_LONG is BPF-side "long", not kernel-side "long"
and therefore always considered fixed 64bit no matter if 64 or 32bit underlying
architecture.

This contract breaks in case of the two mentioned helpers since their BPF_CALL
definition for the helpers was added with {unsigned,}long *res. Meaning, the
transition from BPF-side "long" (BPF program) to kernel-side "long" (BPF helper)
breaks here.

Both helpers call __bpf_strtoll() with "long long" correctly, but later assigning
the result into 32-bit "*(long *)" on 32bit architectures. From a BPF program
point of view, this means upper bits will be seen as uninitialised.

Therefore, fix both BPF_CALL signatures to {s,u}64 types to fix this situation.

Now, changing also uapi/bpf.h helper documentation which generates bpf_helper_defs.h
for BPF programs is tricky: Changing signatures there to __{s,u}64 would trigger
compiler warnings (incompatible pointer types passing 'long *' to parameter of type
'__s64 *' (aka 'long long *')) for existing BPF programs.

Leaving the signatures as-is would be fine as from BPF program point of view it is
still BPF-side "long" and thus equivalent to __{s,u}64 on 64 or 32bit underlying
architectures.

Note that bpf_strtol() and bpf_strtoul() are the only helpers with this issue.

Fixes: d7a4cb9b6705 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul helpers")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/481fcec8-c12c-9abb-8ecb-76c71c009959@iogearbox.net
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913191754.13290-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Fail bpf_timer_cancel when callback is being cancelled

2024-07-18T11:21:14+00:00

[ Upstream commit d4523831f07a267a943f0dde844bf8ead7495f13 ]

Given a schedule:

timer1 cb			timer2 cb

bpf_timer_cancel(timer2);	bpf_timer_cancel(timer1);

Both bpf_timer_cancel calls would wait for the other callback to finish
executing, introducing a lockup.

Add an atomic_t count named 'cancelling' in bpf_hrtimer. This keeps
track of all in-flight cancellation requests for a given BPF timer.
Whenever cancelling a BPF timer, we must check if we have outstanding
cancellation requests, and if so, we must fail the operation with an
error (-EDEADLK) since cancellation is synchronous and waits for the
callback to finish executing. This implies that we can enter a deadlock
situation involving two or more timer callbacks executing in parallel
and attempting to cancel one another.

Note that we avoid incrementing the cancelling counter for the target
timer (the one being cancelled) if bpf_timer_cancel is not invoked from
a callback, to avoid spurious errors. The whole point of detecting
cur->cancelling and returning -EDEADLK is to not enter a busy wait loop
(which may or may not lead to a lockup). This does not apply in case the
caller is in a non-callback context, the other side can continue to
cancel as it sees fit without running into errors.

Background on prior attempts:

Earlier versions of this patch used a bool 'cancelling' bit and used the
following pattern under timer->lock to publish cancellation status.

lock(t->lock);
t->cancelling = true;
mb();
if (cur->cancelling)
	return -EDEADLK;
unlock(t->lock);
hrtimer_cancel(t->timer);
t->cancelling = false;

The store outside the critical section could overwrite a parallel
requests t->cancelling assignment to true, to ensure the parallely
executing callback observes its cancellation status.

It would be necessary to clear this cancelling bit once hrtimer_cancel
is done, but lack of serialization introduced races. Another option was
explored where bpf_timer_start would clear the bit when (re)starting the
timer under timer->lock. This would ensure serialized access to the
cancelling bit, but may allow it to be cleared before in-flight
hrtimer_cancel has finished executing, such that lockups can occur
again.

Thus, we choose an atomic counter to keep track of all outstanding
cancellation requests and use it to prevent lockups in case callbacks
attempt to cancel each other while executing in parallel.

Reported-by: Dohyun Kim 
Reported-by: Neel Natu 
Fixes: b00628b1c7d5 ("bpf: Introduce bpf timers.")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240709185440.1104957-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: replace bpf_timer_init with a generic helper

2024-07-18T11:21:13+00:00

[ Upstream commit 56b4a177ae6322173360a93ea828ad18570a5a14 ]

No code change except for the new flags argument being stored in the
local data struct.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420-bpf_wq-v2-2-6c986a5a741f@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Stable-dep-of: d4523831f07a ("bpf: Fail bpf_timer_cancel when callback is being cancelled")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: make timer data struct more generic

2024-07-18T11:21:13+00:00

[ Upstream commit be2749beff62e0d63cf97fe63cabc79a68443139 ]

To be able to add workqueues and reuse most of the timer code, we need
to make bpf_hrtimer more generic.

There is no code change except that the new struct gets a new u64 flags
attribute. We are still below 2 cache lines, so this shouldn't impact
the current running codes.

The ordering is also changed. Everything related to async callback
is now on top of bpf_hrtimer.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420-bpf_wq-v2-1-6c986a5a741f@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Stable-dep-of: d4523831f07a ("bpf: Fail bpf_timer_cancel when callback is being cancelled")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Mark bpf_spin_{lock,unlock}() helpers with notrace correctly

2024-03-26T22:19:29+00:00

[ Upstream commit 178c54666f9c4d2f49f2ea661d0c11b52f0ed190 ]

Currently tracing is supposed not to allow for bpf_spin_{lock,unlock}()
helper calls. This is to prevent deadlock for the following cases:
  - there is a prog (prog-A) calling bpf_spin_{lock,unlock}().
  - there is a tracing program (prog-B), e.g., fentry, attached
    to bpf_spin_lock() and/or bpf_spin_unlock().
  - prog-B calls bpf_spin_{lock,unlock}().
For such a case, when prog-A calls bpf_spin_{lock,unlock}(),
a deadlock will happen.

The related source codes are below in kernel/bpf/helpers.c:
  notrace BPF_CALL_1(bpf_spin_lock, struct bpf_spin_lock *, lock)
  notrace BPF_CALL_1(bpf_spin_unlock, struct bpf_spin_lock *, lock)
notrace is supposed to prevent fentry prog from attaching to
bpf_spin_{lock,unlock}().

But actually this is not the case and fentry prog can successfully
attached to bpf_spin_lock(). Siddharth Chintamaneni reported
the issue in [1]. The following is the macro definition for
above BPF_CALL_1:
  #define BPF_CALL_x(x, name, ...)                                               \
        static __always_inline                                                 \
        u64 ____##name(__BPF_MAP(x, __BPF_DECL_ARGS, __BPF_V, __VA_ARGS__));   \
        typedef u64 (*btf_##name)(__BPF_MAP(x, __BPF_DECL_ARGS, __BPF_V, __VA_ARGS__)); \
        u64 name(__BPF_REG(x, __BPF_DECL_REGS, __BPF_N, __VA_ARGS__));         \
        u64 name(__BPF_REG(x, __BPF_DECL_REGS, __BPF_N, __VA_ARGS__))          \
        {                                                                      \
                return ((btf_##name)____##name)(__BPF_MAP(x,__BPF_CAST,__BPF_N,__VA_ARGS__));\
        }                                                                      \
        static __always_inline                                                 \
        u64 ____##name(__BPF_MAP(x, __BPF_DECL_ARGS, __BPF_V, __VA_ARGS__))

  #define BPF_CALL_1(name, ...)   BPF_CALL_x(1, name, __VA_ARGS__)

The notrace attribute is actually applied to the static always_inline function
____bpf_spin_{lock,unlock}(). The actual callback function
bpf_spin_{lock,unlock}() is not marked with notrace, hence
allowing fentry prog to attach to two helpers, and this
may cause the above mentioned deadlock. Siddharth Chintamaneni
actually has a reproducer in [2].

To fix the issue, a new macro NOTRACE_BPF_CALL_1 is introduced which
will add notrace attribute to the original function instead of
the hidden always_inline function and this fixed the problem.

  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAE5sdEigPnoGrzN8WU7Tx-h-iFuMZgW06qp0KHWtpvoXxf1OAQ@mail.gmail.com/
  [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAE5sdEg6yUc_Jz50AnUXEEUh6O73yQ1Z6NV2srJnef0ZrQkZew@mail.gmail.com/

Fixes: d83525ca62cf ("bpf: introduce bpf_spin_lock")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song 
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240207070102.335167-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Fix racing between bpf_timer_cancel_and_free and bpf_timer_cancel

2024-03-01T12:35:07+00:00

[ Upstream commit 0281b919e175bb9c3128bd3872ac2903e9436e3f ]

The following race is possible between bpf_timer_cancel_and_free
and bpf_timer_cancel. It will lead a UAF on the timer->timer.

bpf_timer_cancel();
	spin_lock();
	t = timer->time;
	spin_unlock();

					bpf_timer_cancel_and_free();
						spin_lock();
						t = timer->timer;
						timer->timer = NULL;
						spin_unlock();
						hrtimer_cancel(&t->timer);
						kfree(t);

	/* UAF on t */
	hrtimer_cancel(&t->timer);

In bpf_timer_cancel_and_free, this patch frees the timer->timer
after a rcu grace period. This requires a rcu_head addition
to the "struct bpf_hrtimer". Another kfree(t) happens in bpf_timer_init,
this does not need a kfree_rcu because it is still under the
spin_lock and timer->timer has not been visible by others yet.

In bpf_timer_cancel, rcu_read_lock() is added because this helper
can be used in a non rcu critical section context (e.g. from
a sleepable bpf prog). Other timer->timer usages in helpers.c
have been audited, bpf_timer_cancel() is the only place where
timer->timer is used outside of the spin_lock.

Another solution considered is to mark a t->flag in bpf_timer_cancel
and clear it after hrtimer_cancel() is done.  In bpf_timer_cancel_and_free,
it busy waits for the flag to be cleared before kfree(t). This patch
goes with a straight forward solution and frees timer->timer after
a rcu grace period.

Fixes: b00628b1c7d5 ("bpf: Introduce bpf timers.")
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Acked-by: Hou Tao 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240215211218.990808-1-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Check rcu_read_lock_trace_held() before calling bpf map helpers

2024-02-05T20:14:20+00:00

[ Upstream commit 169410eba271afc9f0fb476d996795aa26770c6d ]

These three bpf_map_{lookup,update,delete}_elem() helpers are also
available for sleepable bpf program, so add the corresponding lock
assertion for sleepable bpf program, otherwise the following warning
will be reported when a sleepable bpf program manipulates bpf map under
interpreter mode (aka bpf_jit_enable=0):

  WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4985 at kernel/bpf/helpers.c:40 ......
  CPU: 3 PID: 4985 Comm: test_progs Not tainted 6.6.0+ #2
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) ......
  RIP: 0010:bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60
  ......
  Call Trace:
   
   ? __warn+0xa5/0x240
   ? bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60
   ? report_bug+0x1ba/0x1f0
   ? handle_bug+0x40/0x80
   ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x50
   ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20
   ? __pfx_bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x10/0x10
   ? rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online+0x65/0xb0
   ? rcu_is_watching+0x23/0x50
   ? bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60
   ? __pfx_bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x10/0x10
   ___bpf_prog_run+0x513/0x3b70
   __bpf_prog_run32+0x9d/0xd0
   ? __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur+0xad/0x120
   ? __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur+0x3e/0x120
   bpf_trampoline_6442580665+0x4d/0x1000
   __x64_sys_getpgid+0x5/0x30
   ? do_syscall_64+0x36/0xb0
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
   

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204140425.1480317-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin