<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux-stable.git/kernel/bpf/core.c, branch v7.1.4</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Prefer dirty packs for eBPF allocations</title>
<updated>2026-07-18T14:55:17+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Pawan Gupta</name>
<email>pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-07-09T22:24:47+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=29d3f527bc1af1fef124c0e55ba4ed3f746fe720'/>
<id>29d3f527bc1af1fef124c0e55ba4ed3f746fe720</id>
<content type='text'>
commit b72e29e0f7ee329d89f86db8700c8ea99b4a370a upstream.

The pack allocator only flushes predictors when reusing a dirty pack for
cBPF, eBPF allocations never trigger a flush. Currently, eBPF picks the
first free pack, which could be a clean pack. As an optimization, leaving
a clean pack for cBPF can avoid flushes.

Prefer dirty packs for eBPF and keep clean packs free for cBPF. This
mirrors the existing cBPF preference for clean packs: each program kind
prefers the pack that avoids an extra flush, and falls back to the other
kind only when no preferred pack has room. eBPF reuse of a dirty pack is
harmless since eBPF being privileged does not flush.

Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta &lt;pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com&gt;
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit b72e29e0f7ee329d89f86db8700c8ea99b4a370a upstream.

The pack allocator only flushes predictors when reusing a dirty pack for
cBPF, eBPF allocations never trigger a flush. Currently, eBPF picks the
first free pack, which could be a clean pack. As an optimization, leaving
a clean pack for cBPF can avoid flushes.

Prefer dirty packs for eBPF and keep clean packs free for cBPF. This
mirrors the existing cBPF preference for clean packs: each program kind
prefers the pack that avoids an extra flush, and falls back to the other
kind only when no preferred pack has room. eBPF reuse of a dirty pack is
harmless since eBPF being privileged does not flush.

Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta &lt;pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com&gt;
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Prefer packs that won't trigger an IBPB flush on allocation</title>
<updated>2026-07-18T14:55:17+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Pawan Gupta</name>
<email>pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-07-09T22:24:31+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=3448efcb18aecb5c635e60958d1a29b1f53f0ac6'/>
<id>3448efcb18aecb5c635e60958d1a29b1f53f0ac6</id>
<content type='text'>
commit a9b1f19a6a673ba06820898d0f1ad02883ea1639 upstream.

Currently BPF pack allocator picks the chunks from the first available
pack. While this is okay, it naturally leads to more frequent flushes
when there are multiple packs in the system that weren't used since the
last flush.

As an optimization prefer allocating the new programs from packs that
are unused since last flush. When all packs are dirty, allocation forces
a flush and marks all packs clean.

Below are some future optimizations ideas:

  1. Currently, the "dirty" tracking is only done at the pack-level.
     Flush frequency can further be reduced with chunk-level tracking.
     This requires a new bitmap per-pack to track the dirty state.
  2. IBPB flush is done on all CPUs, even if only a single CPU ran the
     BPF program. On a system with hundreds of CPUs this could be a
     major bottleneck forcing hundreds of IPIs to deliver the flush.
     The solution is to track the CPUs where a BPF program ran, and
     issue IBPB only on those CPUs.
  3. Avoid IBPB when flush is already done at other sources (e.g.
     context switch).

Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta &lt;pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com&gt;
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit a9b1f19a6a673ba06820898d0f1ad02883ea1639 upstream.

Currently BPF pack allocator picks the chunks from the first available
pack. While this is okay, it naturally leads to more frequent flushes
when there are multiple packs in the system that weren't used since the
last flush.

As an optimization prefer allocating the new programs from packs that
are unused since last flush. When all packs are dirty, allocation forces
a flush and marks all packs clean.

Below are some future optimizations ideas:

  1. Currently, the "dirty" tracking is only done at the pack-level.
     Flush frequency can further be reduced with chunk-level tracking.
     This requires a new bitmap per-pack to track the dirty state.
  2. IBPB flush is done on all CPUs, even if only a single CPU ran the
     BPF program. On a system with hundreds of CPUs this could be a
     major bottleneck forcing hundreds of IPIs to deliver the flush.
     The solution is to track the CPUs where a BPF program ran, and
     issue IBPB only on those CPUs.
  3. Avoid IBPB when flush is already done at other sources (e.g.
     context switch).

Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta &lt;pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com&gt;
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Skip redundant IBPB in pack allocator</title>
<updated>2026-07-18T14:55:17+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Pawan Gupta</name>
<email>pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-07-09T22:23:56+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=80a96785fe42062cadac701dfc08049b13ac741a'/>
<id>80a96785fe42062cadac701dfc08049b13ac741a</id>
<content type='text'>
commit a23c1c5396a91680703360d1ee28a44657c503c4 upstream.

bpf_prog_pack_alloc() issues IBPB on all CPUs on every cBPF allocation,
even when reusing chunks from an existing pack where no new memory was
touched since the last IBPB.

Since IBPB on all CPUs is heavy, Dave Hansen suggested to track allocation
since last IBPB, and only issue IBPB at reuse for the chunks that have not
seen an IBPB since they were last freed.

Track per-pack whether an IBPB is needed via arch_flush_needed. Set it when
allocating a chunk, reset on IBPB flush. On reuse, conditionally issue the
flush. Since IBPB invalidates all BTB entries, clear the flag on all packs
after flushing.

Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta &lt;pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com&gt;
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit a23c1c5396a91680703360d1ee28a44657c503c4 upstream.

bpf_prog_pack_alloc() issues IBPB on all CPUs on every cBPF allocation,
even when reusing chunks from an existing pack where no new memory was
touched since the last IBPB.

Since IBPB on all CPUs is heavy, Dave Hansen suggested to track allocation
since last IBPB, and only issue IBPB at reuse for the chunks that have not
seen an IBPB since they were last freed.

Track per-pack whether an IBPB is needed via arch_flush_needed. Set it when
allocating a chunk, reset on IBPB flush. On reuse, conditionally issue the
flush. Since IBPB invalidates all BTB entries, clear the flag on all packs
after flushing.

Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta &lt;pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com&gt;
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Restrict JIT predictor flush to cBPF</title>
<updated>2026-07-18T14:55:17+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Pawan Gupta</name>
<email>pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-07-09T22:23:41+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=7ff3b159b8b71714f747fee50cbd93f0b5d6a1dc'/>
<id>7ff3b159b8b71714f747fee50cbd93f0b5d6a1dc</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 0bb99f2cfaae6822d734d69722de30af823efdf3 upstream.

Currently predictor flush on memory reuse is done for all BPF JIT
allocations, but only cBPF programs can be loaded by an unprivileged user.
eBPF is privileged by default, and flushing predictors for all CPUs on
every eBPF reuse penalizes the common case for no security benefit.

eBPF allocations can be frequent on busy systems, only flush predictors
for cBPF programs. Trampoline and dispatcher allocations also skip the
flush as they are eBPF-only.

Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta &lt;pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com&gt;
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 0bb99f2cfaae6822d734d69722de30af823efdf3 upstream.

Currently predictor flush on memory reuse is done for all BPF JIT
allocations, but only cBPF programs can be loaded by an unprivileged user.
eBPF is privileged by default, and flushing predictors for all CPUs on
every eBPF reuse penalizes the common case for no security benefit.

eBPF allocations can be frequent on busy systems, only flush predictors
for cBPF programs. Trampoline and dispatcher allocations also skip the
flush as they are eBPF-only.

Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta &lt;pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com&gt;
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Support for hardening against JIT spraying</title>
<updated>2026-07-18T14:55:17+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Pawan Gupta</name>
<email>pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-07-09T22:23:10+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=7a6c171c6a1ac6d1509752dac131d941a3de0b37'/>
<id>7a6c171c6a1ac6d1509752dac131d941a3de0b37</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 96cce16e26dd02a8678f1e87f88a4b5cdb63b995 upstream.

The BPF JIT allocator packs many small programs into larger executable
allocations and reuses space within those allocations as programs are
loaded and freed. When fresh code is written into space that a previous
program occupied, an indirect jump into the new program can reuse a branch
prediction left behind by the old one.

Flush the indirect branch predictors before reusing JIT memory so that
indirect jumps into a newly written program don't reuse predictions from an
old program that occupied the same space.

Introduce bpf_arch_pred_flush_enabled static key and bpf_arch_pred_flush
static call for flushing the branch predictors on JIT memory reuse.
Architectures that need a flush, can update it to a predictor flush
function. By default, its a NOP and does not emit any CALL.

Allocations larger than a pack are not covered by this flush. That is safe
because cBPF programs (the unprivileged attack surface) are bounded well
below a pack size. Issue a warning if this assumption is ever violated
while the flush is active.

Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta &lt;pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com&gt;
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 96cce16e26dd02a8678f1e87f88a4b5cdb63b995 upstream.

The BPF JIT allocator packs many small programs into larger executable
allocations and reuses space within those allocations as programs are
loaded and freed. When fresh code is written into space that a previous
program occupied, an indirect jump into the new program can reuse a branch
prediction left behind by the old one.

Flush the indirect branch predictors before reusing JIT memory so that
indirect jumps into a newly written program don't reuse predictions from an
old program that occupied the same space.

Introduce bpf_arch_pred_flush_enabled static key and bpf_arch_pred_flush
static call for flushing the branch predictors on JIT memory reuse.
Architectures that need a flush, can update it to a predictor flush
function. By default, its a NOP and does not emit any CALL.

Allocations larger than a pack are not covered by this flush. That is safe
because cBPF programs (the unprivileged attack surface) are bounded well
below a pack size. Issue a warning if this assumption is ever violated
while the flush is active.

Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta &lt;pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com&gt;
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Fix s16 truncation for large bpf-to-bpf call offsets</title>
<updated>2026-05-11T15:27:02+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yazhou Tang</name>
<email>tangyazhou518@outlook.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-05-06T09:47:13+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=58a8f3e2501dc14b8e00e883d6aaf0600a239da7'/>
<id>58a8f3e2501dc14b8e00e883d6aaf0600a239da7</id>
<content type='text'>
Currently, the BPF instruction set allows bpf-to-bpf calls (or internal
calls, pseudo calls) to use a 32-bit imm field to represent the relative
jump offset.

However, when JIT is disabled or falls back to the interpreter, the
verifier invokes bpf_patch_call_args() to rewrite the call instruction.
In this function, the 32-bit imm is downcast to s16 and stored in the off
field.

    void bpf_patch_call_args(struct bpf_insn *insn, u32 stack_depth)
    {
        stack_depth = max_t(u32, stack_depth, 1);
        insn-&gt;off = (s16) insn-&gt;imm;
        insn-&gt;imm = interpreters_args[(round_up(stack_depth, 32) / 32) - 1] -
            __bpf_call_base_args;
        insn-&gt;code = BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL_ARGS;
    }

If the original imm exceeds the s16 range (i.e., a jump offset greater
than 32767 instructions), this downcast silently truncates the offset,
resulting in an incorrect call target.

Fix this by:
1. In bpf_patch_call_args(), keeping the imm field unchanged and using the
   off field to store the index of the interpreter function.
2. In ___bpf_prog_run() for the JMP_CALL_ARGS case, retrieving the
   interpreter function pointer from the interpreters_args array using the
   off field as the index, and passing the original imm to calculate the
   last argument of the interpreter function.

After these changes, the truncation issue is resolved, and __bpf_call_base_args
is also no longer needed and can be removed, which makes the code cleaner.

Performance: In ___bpf_prog_run() for the JMP_CALL_ARGS case, changing the
retrieval of the interpreter function pointer from pointer addition to
direct array indexing improves performance. The possible reason is that the
latter has better instruction-level parallelism. See the v5 discussion [1]
for more details.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/f120c3c4-6999-414a-b514-518bb64b4758@zju.edu.cn/

To avoid requiring bpftool changes, keep the new imm/off encoding internal
and restore the legacy xlated dump layout in bpf_insn_prepare_dump().
For bpf-to-bpf call offsets that do not fit in s16, export off as 0 instead
of a truncated and misleading value.

Fixes: 1ea47e01ad6e ("bpf: add support for bpf_call to interpreter")
Fixes: 7105e828c087 ("bpf: allow for correlation of maps and helpers in dump")
Suggested-by: Xu Kuohai &lt;xukuohai@huaweicloud.com&gt;
Suggested-by: Puranjay Mohan &lt;puranjay@kernel.org&gt;
Co-developed-by: Tianci Cao &lt;ziye@zju.edu.cn&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tianci Cao &lt;ziye@zju.edu.cn&gt;
Co-developed-by: Shenghao Yuan &lt;shenghaoyuan0928@163.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shenghao Yuan &lt;shenghaoyuan0928@163.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Yazhou Tang &lt;tangyazhou518@outlook.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260506094714.419842-3-tangyazhou@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;

</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Currently, the BPF instruction set allows bpf-to-bpf calls (or internal
calls, pseudo calls) to use a 32-bit imm field to represent the relative
jump offset.

However, when JIT is disabled or falls back to the interpreter, the
verifier invokes bpf_patch_call_args() to rewrite the call instruction.
In this function, the 32-bit imm is downcast to s16 and stored in the off
field.

    void bpf_patch_call_args(struct bpf_insn *insn, u32 stack_depth)
    {
        stack_depth = max_t(u32, stack_depth, 1);
        insn-&gt;off = (s16) insn-&gt;imm;
        insn-&gt;imm = interpreters_args[(round_up(stack_depth, 32) / 32) - 1] -
            __bpf_call_base_args;
        insn-&gt;code = BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL_ARGS;
    }

If the original imm exceeds the s16 range (i.e., a jump offset greater
than 32767 instructions), this downcast silently truncates the offset,
resulting in an incorrect call target.

Fix this by:
1. In bpf_patch_call_args(), keeping the imm field unchanged and using the
   off field to store the index of the interpreter function.
2. In ___bpf_prog_run() for the JMP_CALL_ARGS case, retrieving the
   interpreter function pointer from the interpreters_args array using the
   off field as the index, and passing the original imm to calculate the
   last argument of the interpreter function.

After these changes, the truncation issue is resolved, and __bpf_call_base_args
is also no longer needed and can be removed, which makes the code cleaner.

Performance: In ___bpf_prog_run() for the JMP_CALL_ARGS case, changing the
retrieval of the interpreter function pointer from pointer addition to
direct array indexing improves performance. The possible reason is that the
latter has better instruction-level parallelism. See the v5 discussion [1]
for more details.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/f120c3c4-6999-414a-b514-518bb64b4758@zju.edu.cn/

To avoid requiring bpftool changes, keep the new imm/off encoding internal
and restore the legacy xlated dump layout in bpf_insn_prepare_dump().
For bpf-to-bpf call offsets that do not fit in s16, export off as 0 instead
of a truncated and misleading value.

Fixes: 1ea47e01ad6e ("bpf: add support for bpf_call to interpreter")
Fixes: 7105e828c087 ("bpf: allow for correlation of maps and helpers in dump")
Suggested-by: Xu Kuohai &lt;xukuohai@huaweicloud.com&gt;
Suggested-by: Puranjay Mohan &lt;puranjay@kernel.org&gt;
Co-developed-by: Tianci Cao &lt;ziye@zju.edu.cn&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tianci Cao &lt;ziye@zju.edu.cn&gt;
Co-developed-by: Shenghao Yuan &lt;shenghaoyuan0928@163.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shenghao Yuan &lt;shenghaoyuan0928@163.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Yazhou Tang &lt;tangyazhou518@outlook.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260506094714.419842-3-tangyazhou@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;

</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Fix out-of-bounds read in bpf_patch_call_args()</title>
<updated>2026-05-11T15:27:01+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yazhou Tang</name>
<email>tangyazhou518@outlook.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-05-06T09:47:12+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=4314a44564eb1565349fed7a4192344c5f46fc85'/>
<id>4314a44564eb1565349fed7a4192344c5f46fc85</id>
<content type='text'>
The interpreters_args array only accommodates stack depths up to
MAX_BPF_STACK (512 bytes). However, do_misc_fixups() may allow a larger
stack depth if JIT is requested.

If JIT compilation later fails and falls back to the interpreter, the
verifier invokes bpf_patch_call_args() with this oversized stack depth.
This causes a load-time out-of-bounds (OOB) read when calculating the
interpreter function pointer index.

Fix this by changing bpf_patch_call_args() to return an int and explicitly
rejecting the JIT fallback (returning -EINVAL) if the stack depth exceeds
MAX_BPF_STACK.

Fixes: 1ea47e01ad6e ("bpf: add support for bpf_call to interpreter")
Co-developed-by: Tianci Cao &lt;ziye@zju.edu.cn&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tianci Cao &lt;ziye@zju.edu.cn&gt;
Co-developed-by: Shenghao Yuan &lt;shenghaoyuan0928@163.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shenghao Yuan &lt;shenghaoyuan0928@163.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Yazhou Tang &lt;tangyazhou518@outlook.com&gt;
Acked-by: Xu Kuohai &lt;xukuohai@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260506094714.419842-2-tangyazhou@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;

</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The interpreters_args array only accommodates stack depths up to
MAX_BPF_STACK (512 bytes). However, do_misc_fixups() may allow a larger
stack depth if JIT is requested.

If JIT compilation later fails and falls back to the interpreter, the
verifier invokes bpf_patch_call_args() with this oversized stack depth.
This causes a load-time out-of-bounds (OOB) read when calculating the
interpreter function pointer index.

Fix this by changing bpf_patch_call_args() to return an int and explicitly
rejecting the JIT fallback (returning -EINVAL) if the stack depth exceeds
MAX_BPF_STACK.

Fixes: 1ea47e01ad6e ("bpf: add support for bpf_call to interpreter")
Co-developed-by: Tianci Cao &lt;ziye@zju.edu.cn&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tianci Cao &lt;ziye@zju.edu.cn&gt;
Co-developed-by: Shenghao Yuan &lt;shenghaoyuan0928@163.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shenghao Yuan &lt;shenghaoyuan0928@163.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Yazhou Tang &lt;tangyazhou518@outlook.com&gt;
Acked-by: Xu Kuohai &lt;xukuohai@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260506094714.419842-2-tangyazhou@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;

</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Add helper to detect indirect jump targets</title>
<updated>2026-04-16T14:03:40+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Xu Kuohai</name>
<email>xukuohai@huawei.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-04-16T06:43:39+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=07ae6c130b46cf5e3e1a7dc5c1889fefe9adc2d3'/>
<id>07ae6c130b46cf5e3e1a7dc5c1889fefe9adc2d3</id>
<content type='text'>
Introduce helper bpf_insn_is_indirect_target to check whether a BPF
instruction is an indirect jump target.

Since the verifier knows which instructions are indirect jump targets,
add a new flag indirect_target to struct bpf_insn_aux_data to mark
them. The verifier sets this flag when verifying an indirect jump target
instruction, and the helper checks the flag to determine whether an
instruction is an indirect jump target.

Reviewed-by: Anton Protopopov &lt;a.s.protopopov@gmail.com&gt; #v8
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis &lt;emil@etsalapatis.com&gt; #v12
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai &lt;xukuohai@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260416064341.151802-4-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;

</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Introduce helper bpf_insn_is_indirect_target to check whether a BPF
instruction is an indirect jump target.

Since the verifier knows which instructions are indirect jump targets,
add a new flag indirect_target to struct bpf_insn_aux_data to mark
them. The verifier sets this flag when verifying an indirect jump target
instruction, and the helper checks the flag to determine whether an
instruction is an indirect jump target.

Reviewed-by: Anton Protopopov &lt;a.s.protopopov@gmail.com&gt; #v8
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis &lt;emil@etsalapatis.com&gt; #v12
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai &lt;xukuohai@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260416064341.151802-4-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;

</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Pass bpf_verifier_env to JIT</title>
<updated>2026-04-16T14:03:40+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Xu Kuohai</name>
<email>xukuohai@huawei.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-04-16T06:43:38+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=d9ef13f72711f2dad64cd4445472ded98fb6c954'/>
<id>d9ef13f72711f2dad64cd4445472ded98fb6c954</id>
<content type='text'>
Pass bpf_verifier_env to bpf_int_jit_compile(). The follow-up patch will
use env-&gt;insn_aux_data in the JIT stage to detect indirect jump targets.

Since bpf_prog_select_runtime() can be called by cbpf and lib/test_bpf.c
code without verifier, introduce helper __bpf_prog_select_runtime()
to accept the env parameter.

Remove the call to bpf_prog_select_runtime() in bpf_prog_load(), and
switch to call __bpf_prog_select_runtime() in the verifier, with env
variable passed. The original bpf_prog_select_runtime() is preserved for
cbpf and lib/test_bpf.c, where env is NULL.

Now all constants blinding calls are moved into the verifier, except
the cbpf and lib/test_bpf.c cases. The instructions arrays are adjusted
by bpf_patch_insn_data() function for normal cases, so there is no need
to call adjust_insn_arrays() in bpf_jit_blind_constants(). Remove it.

Reviewed-by: Anton Protopopov &lt;a.s.protopopov@gmail.com&gt; # v8
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis &lt;emil@etsalapatis.com&gt; # v12
Acked-by: Hengqi Chen &lt;hengqi.chen@gmail.com&gt; # v14
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai &lt;xukuohai@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260416064341.151802-3-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;

</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Pass bpf_verifier_env to bpf_int_jit_compile(). The follow-up patch will
use env-&gt;insn_aux_data in the JIT stage to detect indirect jump targets.

Since bpf_prog_select_runtime() can be called by cbpf and lib/test_bpf.c
code without verifier, introduce helper __bpf_prog_select_runtime()
to accept the env parameter.

Remove the call to bpf_prog_select_runtime() in bpf_prog_load(), and
switch to call __bpf_prog_select_runtime() in the verifier, with env
variable passed. The original bpf_prog_select_runtime() is preserved for
cbpf and lib/test_bpf.c, where env is NULL.

Now all constants blinding calls are moved into the verifier, except
the cbpf and lib/test_bpf.c cases. The instructions arrays are adjusted
by bpf_patch_insn_data() function for normal cases, so there is no need
to call adjust_insn_arrays() in bpf_jit_blind_constants(). Remove it.

Reviewed-by: Anton Protopopov &lt;a.s.protopopov@gmail.com&gt; # v8
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis &lt;emil@etsalapatis.com&gt; # v12
Acked-by: Hengqi Chen &lt;hengqi.chen@gmail.com&gt; # v14
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai &lt;xukuohai@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260416064341.151802-3-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;

</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Move constants blinding out of arch-specific JITs</title>
<updated>2026-04-16T14:03:40+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Xu Kuohai</name>
<email>xukuohai@huawei.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-04-16T06:43:37+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=d3e945223e0158c85dbde23de4f89493a2a817f6'/>
<id>d3e945223e0158c85dbde23de4f89493a2a817f6</id>
<content type='text'>
During the JIT stage, constants blinding rewrites instructions but only
rewrites the private instruction copy of the JITed subprog, leaving the
global env-&gt;prog-&gt;insnsi and env-&gt;insn_aux_data untouched. This causes a
mismatch between subprog instructions and the global state, making it
difficult to use the global data in the JIT.

To avoid this mismatch, and given that all arch-specific JITs already
support constants blinding, move it to the generic verifier code, and
switch to rewrite the global env-&gt;prog-&gt;insnsi with the global states
adjusted, as other rewrites in the verifier do.

This removes the constants blinding calls in each JIT, which are largely
duplicated code across architectures.

Since constants blinding is only required for JIT, and there are two
JIT entry functions, jit_subprogs() for BPF programs with multiple
subprogs and bpf_prog_select_runtime() for programs with no subprogs,
move the constants blinding invocation into these two functions.

In the verifier path, bpf_patch_insn_data() is used to keep global
verifier auxiliary data in sync with patched instructions. A key
question is whether this global auxiliary data should be restored
on the failure path.

Besides instructions, bpf_patch_insn_data() adjusts:
  - prog-&gt;aux-&gt;poke_tab
  - env-&gt;insn_array_maps
  - env-&gt;subprog_info
  - env-&gt;insn_aux_data

For prog-&gt;aux-&gt;poke_tab, it is only used by JIT or only meaningful after
JIT succeeds, so it does not need to be restored on the failure path.

For env-&gt;insn_array_maps, when JIT fails, programs using insn arrays
are rejected by bpf_insn_array_ready() due to missing JIT addresses.
Hence, env-&gt;insn_array_maps is only meaningful for JIT and does not need
to be restored.

For subprog_info, if jit_subprogs fails and CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
is not enabled, kernel falls back to interpreter. In this case,
env-&gt;subprog_info is used to determine subprogram stack depth. So it
must be restored on failure.

For env-&gt;insn_aux_data, it is freed by clear_insn_aux_data() at the
end of bpf_check(). Before freeing, clear_insn_aux_data() loops over
env-&gt;insn_aux_data to release jump targets recorded in it. The loop
uses env-&gt;prog-&gt;len as the array length, but this length no longer
matches the actual size of the adjusted env-&gt;insn_aux_data array after
constants blinding.

To address it, a simple approach is to keep insn_aux_data as adjusted
after failure, since it will be freed shortly, and record its actual size
for the loop in clear_insn_aux_data(). But since clear_insn_aux_data()
uses the same index to loop over both env-&gt;prog-&gt;insnsi and env-&gt;insn_aux_data,
this approach results in incorrect index for the insnsi array. So an
alternative approach is adopted: clone the original env-&gt;insn_aux_data
before blinding and restore it after failure, similar to env-&gt;prog.

For classic BPF programs, constants blinding works as before since it
is still invoked from bpf_prog_select_runtime().

Reviewed-by: Anton Protopopov &lt;a.s.protopopov@gmail.com&gt; # v8
Reviewed-by: Hari Bathini &lt;hbathini@linux.ibm.com&gt; # powerpc jit
Reviewed-by: Pu Lehui &lt;pulehui@huawei.com&gt; # riscv jit
Acked-by: Hengqi Chen &lt;hengqi.chen@gmail.com&gt; # loongarch jit
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai &lt;xukuohai@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260416064341.151802-2-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;

</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
During the JIT stage, constants blinding rewrites instructions but only
rewrites the private instruction copy of the JITed subprog, leaving the
global env-&gt;prog-&gt;insnsi and env-&gt;insn_aux_data untouched. This causes a
mismatch between subprog instructions and the global state, making it
difficult to use the global data in the JIT.

To avoid this mismatch, and given that all arch-specific JITs already
support constants blinding, move it to the generic verifier code, and
switch to rewrite the global env-&gt;prog-&gt;insnsi with the global states
adjusted, as other rewrites in the verifier do.

This removes the constants blinding calls in each JIT, which are largely
duplicated code across architectures.

Since constants blinding is only required for JIT, and there are two
JIT entry functions, jit_subprogs() for BPF programs with multiple
subprogs and bpf_prog_select_runtime() for programs with no subprogs,
move the constants blinding invocation into these two functions.

In the verifier path, bpf_patch_insn_data() is used to keep global
verifier auxiliary data in sync with patched instructions. A key
question is whether this global auxiliary data should be restored
on the failure path.

Besides instructions, bpf_patch_insn_data() adjusts:
  - prog-&gt;aux-&gt;poke_tab
  - env-&gt;insn_array_maps
  - env-&gt;subprog_info
  - env-&gt;insn_aux_data

For prog-&gt;aux-&gt;poke_tab, it is only used by JIT or only meaningful after
JIT succeeds, so it does not need to be restored on the failure path.

For env-&gt;insn_array_maps, when JIT fails, programs using insn arrays
are rejected by bpf_insn_array_ready() due to missing JIT addresses.
Hence, env-&gt;insn_array_maps is only meaningful for JIT and does not need
to be restored.

For subprog_info, if jit_subprogs fails and CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
is not enabled, kernel falls back to interpreter. In this case,
env-&gt;subprog_info is used to determine subprogram stack depth. So it
must be restored on failure.

For env-&gt;insn_aux_data, it is freed by clear_insn_aux_data() at the
end of bpf_check(). Before freeing, clear_insn_aux_data() loops over
env-&gt;insn_aux_data to release jump targets recorded in it. The loop
uses env-&gt;prog-&gt;len as the array length, but this length no longer
matches the actual size of the adjusted env-&gt;insn_aux_data array after
constants blinding.

To address it, a simple approach is to keep insn_aux_data as adjusted
after failure, since it will be freed shortly, and record its actual size
for the loop in clear_insn_aux_data(). But since clear_insn_aux_data()
uses the same index to loop over both env-&gt;prog-&gt;insnsi and env-&gt;insn_aux_data,
this approach results in incorrect index for the insnsi array. So an
alternative approach is adopted: clone the original env-&gt;insn_aux_data
before blinding and restore it after failure, similar to env-&gt;prog.

For classic BPF programs, constants blinding works as before since it
is still invoked from bpf_prog_select_runtime().

Reviewed-by: Anton Protopopov &lt;a.s.protopopov@gmail.com&gt; # v8
Reviewed-by: Hari Bathini &lt;hbathini@linux.ibm.com&gt; # powerpc jit
Reviewed-by: Pu Lehui &lt;pulehui@huawei.com&gt; # riscv jit
Acked-by: Hengqi Chen &lt;hengqi.chen@gmail.com&gt; # loongarch jit
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai &lt;xukuohai@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260416064341.151802-2-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;

</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
