linux-stable.git/include, branch v4.19.49 Linux kernel stable tree of: overlay: validate overlay properties #address-cells and #size-cells 2019-06-09T07:17:24+00:00 Frank Rowand frank.rowand@sony.com 2018-10-05T03:32:04+00:00 15151d0013c9280921476bbeb7b43cfcc96008d6 commit 6f75118800acf77f8ad6afec61ca1b2349ade371 upstream. If overlay properties #address-cells or #size-cells are already in the live devicetree for any given node, then the values in the overlay must match the values in the live tree. If the properties are already in the live tree then there is no need to create a changeset entry to add them since they must have the same value. This reduces the memory used by the changeset and eliminates a possible memory leak. Tested-by: Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 6f75118800acf77f8ad6afec61ca1b2349ade371 upstream.

If overlay properties #address-cells or #size-cells are already in
the live devicetree for any given node, then the values in the
overlay must match the values in the live tree.

If the properties are already in the live tree then there is no
need to create a changeset entry to add them since they must
have the same value.  This reduces the memory used by the
changeset and eliminates a possible memory leak.

Tested-by: Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
include/linux/module.h: copy __init/__exit attrs to init/cleanup_module 2019-06-09T07:17:23+00:00 Miguel Ojeda miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com 2019-01-19T19:59:34+00:00 9468870f7cbdb4d7ca828d02d4ff507c01fe591d commit a6e60d84989fa0e91db7f236eda40453b0e44afa upstream. The upcoming GCC 9 release extends the -Wmissing-attributes warnings (enabled by -Wall) to C and aliases: it warns when particular function attributes are missing in the aliases but not in their target. In particular, it triggers for all the init/cleanup_module aliases in the kernel (defined by the module_init/exit macros), ending up being very noisy. These aliases point to the __init/__exit functions of a module, which are defined as __cold (among other attributes). However, the aliases themselves do not have the __cold attribute. Since the compiler behaves differently when compiling a __cold function as well as when compiling paths leading to calls to __cold functions, the warning is trying to point out the possibly-forgotten attribute in the alias. In order to keep the warning enabled, we decided to silence this case. Ideally, we would mark the aliases directly as __init/__exit. However, there are currently around 132 modules in the kernel which are missing __init/__exit in their init/cleanup functions (either because they are missing, or for other reasons, e.g. the functions being called from somewhere else); and a section mismatch is a hard error. A conservative alternative was to mark the aliases as __cold only. However, since we would like to eventually enforce __init/__exit to be always marked, we chose to use the new __copy function attribute (introduced by GCC 9 as well to deal with this). With it, we copy the attributes used by the target functions into the aliases. This way, functions that were not marked as __init/__exit won't have their aliases marked either, and therefore there won't be a section mismatch. Note that the warning would go away marking either the extern declaration, the definition, or both. However, we only mark the definition of the alias, since we do not want callers (which only see the declaration) to be compiled as if the function was __cold (and therefore the paths leading to those calls would be assumed to be unlikely). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190123173707.GA16603@gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190206175627.GA20399@gmail.com/ Suggested-by: Martin Sebor <msebor@gcc.gnu.org> Acked-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit a6e60d84989fa0e91db7f236eda40453b0e44afa upstream.

The upcoming GCC 9 release extends the -Wmissing-attributes warnings
(enabled by -Wall) to C and aliases: it warns when particular function
attributes are missing in the aliases but not in their target.

In particular, it triggers for all the init/cleanup_module
aliases in the kernel (defined by the module_init/exit macros),
ending up being very noisy.

These aliases point to the __init/__exit functions of a module,
which are defined as __cold (among other attributes). However,
the aliases themselves do not have the __cold attribute.

Since the compiler behaves differently when compiling a __cold
function as well as when compiling paths leading to calls
to __cold functions, the warning is trying to point out
the possibly-forgotten attribute in the alias.

In order to keep the warning enabled, we decided to silence
this case. Ideally, we would mark the aliases directly
as __init/__exit. However, there are currently around 132 modules
in the kernel which are missing __init/__exit in their init/cleanup
functions (either because they are missing, or for other reasons,
e.g. the functions being called from somewhere else); and
a section mismatch is a hard error.

A conservative alternative was to mark the aliases as __cold only.
However, since we would like to eventually enforce __init/__exit
to be always marked,  we chose to use the new __copy function
attribute (introduced by GCC 9 as well to deal with this).
With it, we copy the attributes used by the target functions
into the aliases. This way, functions that were not marked
as __init/__exit won't have their aliases marked either,
and therefore there won't be a section mismatch.

Note that the warning would go away marking either the extern
declaration, the definition, or both. However, we only mark
the definition of the alias, since we do not want callers
(which only see the declaration) to be compiled as if the function
was __cold (and therefore the paths leading to those calls
would be assumed to be unlikely).

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190123173707.GA16603@gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190206175627.GA20399@gmail.com/
Suggested-by: Martin Sebor <msebor@gcc.gnu.org>
Acked-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Compiler Attributes: add support for __copy (gcc >= 9) 2019-06-09T07:17:23+00:00 Miguel Ojeda miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com 2019-02-08T22:51:05+00:00 2a0f719db71c69f5a04fcfc164f12f58f3ee7703 commit c0d9782f5b6d7157635ae2fd782a4b27d55a6013 upstream. From the GCC manual: copy copy(function) The copy attribute applies the set of attributes with which function has been declared to the declaration of the function to which the attribute is applied. The attribute is designed for libraries that define aliases or function resolvers that are expected to specify the same set of attributes as their targets. The copy attribute can be used with functions, variables, or types. However, the kind of symbol to which the attribute is applied (either function or variable) must match the kind of symbol to which the argument refers. The copy attribute copies only syntactic and semantic attributes but not attributes that affect a symbol’s linkage or visibility such as alias, visibility, or weak. The deprecated attribute is also not copied. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html The upcoming GCC 9 release extends the -Wmissing-attributes warnings (enabled by -Wall) to C and aliases: it warns when particular function attributes are missing in the aliases but not in their target, e.g.: void __cold f(void) {} void __alias("f") g(void); diagnoses: warning: 'g' specifies less restrictive attribute than its target 'f': 'cold' [-Wmissing-attributes] Using __copy(f) we can copy the __cold attribute from f to g: void __cold f(void) {} void __copy(f) __alias("f") g(void); This attribute is most useful to deal with situations where an alias is declared but we don't know the exact attributes the target has. For instance, in the kernel, the widely used module_init/exit macros define the init/cleanup_module aliases, but those cannot be marked always as __init/__exit since some modules do not have their functions marked as such. Suggested-by: Martin Sebor <msebor@gcc.gnu.org> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit c0d9782f5b6d7157635ae2fd782a4b27d55a6013 upstream.

From the GCC manual:

  copy
  copy(function)

    The copy attribute applies the set of attributes with which function
    has been declared to the declaration of the function to which
    the attribute is applied. The attribute is designed for libraries
    that define aliases or function resolvers that are expected
    to specify the same set of attributes as their targets. The copy
    attribute can be used with functions, variables, or types. However,
    the kind of symbol to which the attribute is applied (either
    function or variable) must match the kind of symbol to which
    the argument refers. The copy attribute copies only syntactic and
    semantic attributes but not attributes that affect a symbol’s
    linkage or visibility such as alias, visibility, or weak.
    The deprecated attribute is also not copied.

  https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html

The upcoming GCC 9 release extends the -Wmissing-attributes warnings
(enabled by -Wall) to C and aliases: it warns when particular function
attributes are missing in the aliases but not in their target, e.g.:

    void __cold f(void) {}
    void __alias("f") g(void);

diagnoses:

    warning: 'g' specifies less restrictive attribute than
    its target 'f': 'cold' [-Wmissing-attributes]

Using __copy(f) we can copy the __cold attribute from f to g:

    void __cold f(void) {}
    void __copy(f) __alias("f") g(void);

This attribute is most useful to deal with situations where an alias
is declared but we don't know the exact attributes the target has.

For instance, in the kernel, the widely used module_init/exit macros
define the init/cleanup_module aliases, but those cannot be marked
always as __init/__exit since some modules do not have their
functions marked as such.

Suggested-by: Martin Sebor <msebor@gcc.gnu.org>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
memcg: make it work on sparse non-0-node systems 2019-06-09T07:17:19+00:00 Jiri Slaby jslaby@suse.cz 2019-06-01T05:30:26+00:00 8b057ad846c5919ec4e3462fa373a86e75594a41 commit 3e8589963773a5c23e2f1fe4bcad0e9a90b7f471 upstream. We have a single node system with node 0 disabled: Scanning NUMA topology in Northbridge 24 Number of physical nodes 2 Skipping disabled node 0 Node 1 MemBase 0000000000000000 Limit 00000000fbff0000 NODE_DATA(1) allocated [mem 0xfbfda000-0xfbfeffff] This causes crashes in memcg when system boots: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008 #PF error: [normal kernel read fault] ... RIP: 0010:list_lru_add+0x94/0x170 ... Call Trace: d_lru_add+0x44/0x50 dput.part.34+0xfc/0x110 __fput+0x108/0x230 task_work_run+0x9f/0xc0 exit_to_usermode_loop+0xf5/0x100 It is reproducible as far as 4.12. I did not try older kernels. You have to have a new enough systemd, e.g. 241 (the reason is unknown -- was not investigated). Cannot be reproduced with systemd 234. The system crashes because the size of lru array is never updated in memcg_update_all_list_lrus and the reads are past the zero-sized array, causing dereferences of random memory. The root cause are list_lru_memcg_aware checks in the list_lru code. The test in list_lru_memcg_aware is broken: it assumes node 0 is always present, but it is not true on some systems as can be seen above. So fix this by avoiding checks on node 0. Remember the memcg-awareness by a bool flag in struct list_lru. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190522091940.3615-1-jslaby@suse.cz Fixes: 60d3fd32a7a9 ("list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists") Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Suggested-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 3e8589963773a5c23e2f1fe4bcad0e9a90b7f471 upstream.

We have a single node system with node 0 disabled:
  Scanning NUMA topology in Northbridge 24
  Number of physical nodes 2
  Skipping disabled node 0
  Node 1 MemBase 0000000000000000 Limit 00000000fbff0000
  NODE_DATA(1) allocated [mem 0xfbfda000-0xfbfeffff]

This causes crashes in memcg when system boots:
  BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008
  #PF error: [normal kernel read fault]
...
  RIP: 0010:list_lru_add+0x94/0x170
...
  Call Trace:
   d_lru_add+0x44/0x50
   dput.part.34+0xfc/0x110
   __fput+0x108/0x230
   task_work_run+0x9f/0xc0
   exit_to_usermode_loop+0xf5/0x100

It is reproducible as far as 4.12.  I did not try older kernels.  You have
to have a new enough systemd, e.g.  241 (the reason is unknown -- was not
investigated).  Cannot be reproduced with systemd 234.

The system crashes because the size of lru array is never updated in
memcg_update_all_list_lrus and the reads are past the zero-sized array,
causing dereferences of random memory.

The root cause are list_lru_memcg_aware checks in the list_lru code.  The
test in list_lru_memcg_aware is broken: it assumes node 0 is always
present, but it is not true on some systems as can be seen above.

So fix this by avoiding checks on node 0.  Remember the memcg-awareness by
a bool flag in struct list_lru.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190522091940.3615-1-jslaby@suse.cz
Fixes: 60d3fd32a7a9 ("list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Suggested-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
include/linux/bitops.h: sanitize rotate primitives 2019-06-09T07:17:11+00:00 Rasmus Villemoes linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk 2019-05-14T22:43:27+00:00 759766bf2aec0d10ea543135e8d85caadeca69a1 commit ef4d6f6b275c498f8e5626c99dbeefdc5027f843 upstream. The ror32 implementation (word >> shift) | (word << (32 - shift) has undefined behaviour if shift is outside the [1, 31] range. Similarly for the 64 bit variants. Most callers pass a compile-time constant (naturally in that range), but there's an UBSAN report that these may actually be called with a shift count of 0. Instead of special-casing that, we can make them DTRT for all values of shift while also avoiding UB. For some reason, this was already partly done for rol32 (which was well-defined for [0, 31]). gcc 8 recognizes these patterns as rotates, so for example __u32 rol32(__u32 word, unsigned int shift) { return (word << (shift & 31)) | (word >> ((-shift) & 31)); } compiles to 0000000000000020 <rol32>: 20: 89 f8 mov %edi,%eax 22: 89 f1 mov %esi,%ecx 24: d3 c0 rol %cl,%eax 26: c3 retq Older compilers unfortunately do not do as well, but this only affects the small minority of users that don't pass constants. Due to integer promotions, ro[lr]8 were already well-defined for shifts in [0, 8], and ro[lr]16 were mostly well-defined for shifts in [0, 16] (only mostly - u16 gets promoted to _signed_ int, so if bit 15 is set, word << 16 is undefined). For consistency, update those as well. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190410211906.2190-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reported-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@mellanox.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit ef4d6f6b275c498f8e5626c99dbeefdc5027f843 upstream.

The ror32 implementation (word >> shift) | (word << (32 - shift) has
undefined behaviour if shift is outside the [1, 31] range.  Similarly
for the 64 bit variants.  Most callers pass a compile-time constant
(naturally in that range), but there's an UBSAN report that these may
actually be called with a shift count of 0.

Instead of special-casing that, we can make them DTRT for all values of
shift while also avoiding UB.  For some reason, this was already partly
done for rol32 (which was well-defined for [0, 31]).  gcc 8 recognizes
these patterns as rotates, so for example

  __u32 rol32(__u32 word, unsigned int shift)
  {
	return (word << (shift & 31)) | (word >> ((-shift) & 31));
  }

compiles to

0000000000000020 <rol32>:
  20:   89 f8                   mov    %edi,%eax
  22:   89 f1                   mov    %esi,%ecx
  24:   d3 c0                   rol    %cl,%eax
  26:   c3                      retq

Older compilers unfortunately do not do as well, but this only affects
the small minority of users that don't pass constants.

Due to integer promotions, ro[lr]8 were already well-defined for shifts
in [0, 8], and ro[lr]16 were mostly well-defined for shifts in [0, 16]
(only mostly - u16 gets promoted to _signed_ int, so if bit 15 is set,
word << 16 is undefined).  For consistency, update those as well.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190410211906.2190-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Reported-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@mellanox.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
jump_label: move 'asm goto' support test to Kconfig 2019-06-04T06:02:34+00:00 Masahiro Yamada yamada.masahiro@socionext.com 2018-12-30T15:14:15+00:00 0276ebf16675f3745d8b6f384dcf917e1379eda2 commit e9666d10a5677a494260d60d1fa0b73cc7646eb3 upstream. Currently, CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL just means "I _want_ to use jump label". The jump label is controlled by HAVE_JUMP_LABEL, which is defined like this: #if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL) # define HAVE_JUMP_LABEL #endif We can improve this by testing 'asm goto' support in Kconfig, then make JUMP_LABEL depend on CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO. Ugly #ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL will go away, and CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL will match to the real kernel capability. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc) Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> [nc: Fix trivial conflicts in 4.19 arch/xtensa/kernel/jump_label.c doesn't exist yet Ensured CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO and HAVE_JUMP_LABEL were sufficiently eliminated] Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit e9666d10a5677a494260d60d1fa0b73cc7646eb3 upstream.

Currently, CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL just means "I _want_ to use jump label".

The jump label is controlled by HAVE_JUMP_LABEL, which is defined
like this:

  #if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)
  # define HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
  #endif

We can improve this by testing 'asm goto' support in Kconfig, then
make JUMP_LABEL depend on CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO.

Ugly #ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL will go away, and CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL will
match to the real kernel capability.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc)
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
[nc: Fix trivial conflicts in 4.19
     arch/xtensa/kernel/jump_label.c doesn't exist yet
     Ensured CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO and HAVE_JUMP_LABEL were sufficiently
     eliminated]
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
compiler.h: give up __compiletime_assert_fallback() 2019-06-04T06:02:34+00:00 Masahiro Yamada yamada.masahiro@socionext.com 2018-08-25T18:16:29+00:00 753328727cab4116410f2a3c150826ab6c555d6a commit 81b45683487a51b0f4d3b29d37f20d6d078544e4 upstream. __compiletime_assert_fallback() is supposed to stop building earlier by using the negative-array-size method in case the compiler does not support "error" attribute, but has never worked like that. You can simply try: BUILD_BUG_ON(1); GCC immediately terminates the build, but Clang does not report anything because Clang does not support the "error" attribute now. It will later fail at link time, but __compiletime_assert_fallback() is not working at least. The root cause is commit 1d6a0d19c855 ("bug.h: prevent double evaluation of `condition' in BUILD_BUG_ON"). Prior to that commit, BUILD_BUG_ON() was checked by the negative-array-size method *and* the link-time trick. Since that commit, the negative-array-size is not effective because '__cond' is no longer constant. As the comment in <linux/build_bug.h> says, GCC (and Clang as well) only emits the error for obvious cases. When '__cond' is a variable, ((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2 * __cond])) ... is not obvious for the compiler to know the array size is negative. Reverting that commit would break BUILD_BUG() because negative-size-array is evaluated before the code is optimized out. Let's give up __compiletime_assert_fallback(). This commit does not change the current behavior since it just rips off the useless code. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 81b45683487a51b0f4d3b29d37f20d6d078544e4 upstream.

__compiletime_assert_fallback() is supposed to stop building earlier
by using the negative-array-size method in case the compiler does not
support "error" attribute, but has never worked like that.

You can simply try:

    BUILD_BUG_ON(1);

GCC immediately terminates the build, but Clang does not report
anything because Clang does not support the "error" attribute now.
It will later fail at link time, but __compiletime_assert_fallback()
is not working at least.

The root cause is commit 1d6a0d19c855 ("bug.h: prevent double evaluation
of `condition' in BUILD_BUG_ON").  Prior to that commit, BUILD_BUG_ON()
was checked by the negative-array-size method *and* the link-time trick.
Since that commit, the negative-array-size is not effective because
'__cond' is no longer constant.  As the comment in <linux/build_bug.h>
says, GCC (and Clang as well) only emits the error for obvious cases.

When '__cond' is a variable,

    ((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2 * __cond]))

... is not obvious for the compiler to know the array size is negative.

Reverting that commit would break BUILD_BUG() because negative-size-array
is evaluated before the code is optimized out.

Let's give up __compiletime_assert_fallback().  This commit does not
change the current behavior since it just rips off the useless code.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
include/linux/compiler*.h: define asm_volatile_goto 2019-06-04T06:02:34+00:00 ndesaulniers@google.com ndesaulniers@google.com 2018-10-31T19:39:01+00:00 fd45cd4530ebc7c846f83b26fef526f4c960d1ee commit 8bd66d147c88bd441178c7b4c774ae5a185f19b8 upstream. asm_volatile_goto should also be defined for other compilers that support asm goto. Fixes commit 815f0ddb346c ("include/linux/compiler*.h: make compiler-*.h mutually exclusive"). Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 8bd66d147c88bd441178c7b4c774ae5a185f19b8 upstream.

asm_volatile_goto should also be defined for other compilers that support
asm goto.

Fixes commit 815f0ddb346c ("include/linux/compiler*.h: make compiler-*.h
mutually exclusive").

Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
tipc: Avoid copying bytes beyond the supplied data 2019-06-04T06:02:33+00:00 Chris Packham chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz 2019-05-20T03:45:36+00:00 4421d31753ecb45321be2341380e47c93d678ec5 TLV_SET is called with a data pointer and a len parameter that tells us how many bytes are pointed to by data. When invoking memcpy() we need to careful to only copy len bytes. Previously we would copy TLV_LENGTH(len) bytes which would copy an extra 4 bytes past the end of the data pointer which newer GCC versions complain about. In file included from test.c:17: In function 'TLV_SET', inlined from 'test' at test.c:186:5: /usr/include/linux/tipc_config.h:317:3: warning: 'memcpy' forming offset [33, 36] is out of the bounds [0, 32] of object 'bearer_name' with type 'char[32]' [-Warray-bounds] memcpy(TLV_DATA(tlv_ptr), data, tlv_len); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ test.c: In function 'test': test.c::161:10: note: 'bearer_name' declared here char bearer_name[TIPC_MAX_BEARER_NAME]; ^~~~~~~~~~~ We still want to ensure any padding bytes at the end are initialised, do this with a explicit memset() rather than copy bytes past the end of data. Apply the same logic to TCM_SET. Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
TLV_SET is called with a data pointer and a len parameter that tells us
how many bytes are pointed to by data. When invoking memcpy() we need
to careful to only copy len bytes.

Previously we would copy TLV_LENGTH(len) bytes which would copy an extra
4 bytes past the end of the data pointer which newer GCC versions
complain about.

 In file included from test.c:17:
 In function 'TLV_SET',
     inlined from 'test' at test.c:186:5:
 /usr/include/linux/tipc_config.h:317:3:
 warning: 'memcpy' forming offset [33, 36] is out of the bounds [0, 32]
 of object 'bearer_name' with type 'char[32]' [-Warray-bounds]
     memcpy(TLV_DATA(tlv_ptr), data, tlv_len);
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 test.c: In function 'test':
 test.c::161:10: note:
 'bearer_name' declared here
     char bearer_name[TIPC_MAX_BEARER_NAME];
          ^~~~~~~~~~~

We still want to ensure any padding bytes at the end are initialised, do
this with a explicit memset() rather than copy bytes past the end of
data. Apply the same logic to TCM_SET.

Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
inet: switch IP ID generator to siphash 2019-06-04T06:02:30+00:00 Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com 2019-03-27T19:40:33+00:00 07480da0c8a1979e0973d6dd783b6aed966dccf6 [ Upstream commit df453700e8d81b1bdafdf684365ee2b9431fb702 ] According to Amit Klein and Benny Pinkas, IP ID generation is too weak and might be used by attackers. Even with recent net_hash_mix() fix (netns: provide pure entropy for net_hash_mix()) having 64bit key and Jenkins hash is risky. It is time to switch to siphash and its 128bit keys. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reported-by: Amit Klein <aksecurity@gmail.com> Reported-by: Benny Pinkas <benny@pinkas.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
[ Upstream commit df453700e8d81b1bdafdf684365ee2b9431fb702 ]

According to Amit Klein and Benny Pinkas, IP ID generation is too weak
and might be used by attackers.

Even with recent net_hash_mix() fix (netns: provide pure entropy for net_hash_mix())
having 64bit key and Jenkins hash is risky.

It is time to switch to siphash and its 128bit keys.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Amit Klein <aksecurity@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Benny Pinkas <benny@pinkas.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>