Remove the @pwm: line to prevent the kernel-doc warning:

include/linux/pwm.h:87: warning: Excess struct member 'pwm' description in 'pwm_device'

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc:  <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: f3e25e68ceb2 ("pwm: Drop unused member "pwm" from struct pwm_device")
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

In order to make the transition to the new pwm_apply_might_sleep() a bit
smoother, add a compatibility stub. This will prevent new calls to the
old function introduced via other subsystems from breaking builds. Once
the next merge window has closed we can take another stab at removing
the stub.

Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

These functions are unused. Also I think there is no valid use case
where these are correct to be called. So drop them.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

Some PWM devices require sleeping, for example if the pwm device is
connected over I2C. However, many PWM devices could be used from atomic
context, e.g. memory mapped PWM. This is useful for, for example, the
pwm-ir-tx driver which requires precise timing. Sleeping causes havoc
with the generated IR signal.

Since not all PWM devices can support atomic context, we also add a
pwm_might_sleep() function to check if is not supported.

Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

According to Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst ENOTSUPP is
not recommended and EOPNOTSUPP should be used instead.

Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

In order to introduce a pwm api which can be used from atomic context,
we will need two functions for applying pwm changes:

	int pwm_apply_might_sleep(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *);
	int pwm_apply_atomic(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *);

This commit just deals with renaming pwm_apply_state(), a following
commit will introduce the pwm_apply_atomic() function.

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> # for input
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

Commit c572f3b9c8b7 ("pwm: Replace PWM chip unique base by unique ID")
changed the members of struct pwm_chip, but failed to update the
documentation accordingly. Catch up and document the new member and drop
description for the two removed ones.

Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

Traditionally each PWM device had a unique ID stored in the "pwm" member
of struct pwm_device. However this number was hardly used and dropped
in the previous commit. To identify a certain PWM you're supposed to use
the chip's ID and the hwpwm of the PWM device now.

With the PWM chip base gone PWM chips can get their IDs better and
simpler using an idr.

This is expected to change the numbering of PWM chips, but nothing
should rely on the numbering anyhow.

Other than that the side effects are:

 - The PWM chip IDs are smaller and in most cases consecutive.
 - The ordering in /sys/kernel/debug/pwm is ordered by ascending PWM
   chip ID.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

This member is only assigned to and never read. So drop it.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

These enums are passed to set/test_bit().  The set/test_bit() functions
take a bit number instead of a shifted value.  Passing a shifted value
is a double shift bug like doing BIT(BIT(1)).  The double shift bug
doesn't cause a problem here because we are only checking 0 and 1 but
if the value was 5 or above then it can lead to a buffer overflow.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>