linux-stable.git/include/linux/hugetlb.h, branch v4.9.321

mm/hugetlb: initialize hugetlb_usage in mm_init

2021-09-22T09:43:08+00:00

commit 13db8c50477d83ad3e3b9b0ae247e5cd833a7ae4 upstream.

After fork, the child process will get incorrect (2x) hugetlb_usage.  If
a process uses 5 2MB hugetlb pages in an anonymous mapping,

	HugetlbPages:	   10240 kB

and then forks, the child will show,

	HugetlbPages:	   20480 kB

The reason for double the amount is because hugetlb_usage will be copied
from the parent and then increased when we copy page tables from parent
to child.  Child will have 2x actual usage.

Fix this by adding hugetlb_count_init in mm_init.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210826071742.877-1-liuzixian4@huawei.com
Fixes: 5d317b2b6536 ("mm: hugetlb: proc: add HugetlbPages field to /proc/PID/status")
Signed-off-by: Liu Zixian 
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi 
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz 
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm, futex: fix shared futex pgoff on shmem huge page

2021-07-11T10:46:40+00:00

[ Upstream commit fe19bd3dae3d15d2fbfdb3de8839a6ea0fe94264 ]

If more than one futex is placed on a shmem huge page, it can happen
that waking the second wakes the first instead, and leaves the second
waiting: the key's shared.pgoff is wrong.

When 3.11 commit 13d60f4b6ab5 ("futex: Take hugepages into account when
generating futex_key"), the only shared huge pages came from hugetlbfs,
and the code added to deal with its exceptional page->index was put into
hugetlb source.  Then that was missed when 4.8 added shmem huge pages.

page_to_pgoff() is what others use for this nowadays: except that, as
currently written, it gives the right answer on hugetlbfs head, but
nonsense on hugetlbfs tails.  Fix that by calling hugetlbfs-specific
hugetlb_basepage_index() on PageHuge tails as well as on head.

Yes, it's unconventional to declare hugetlb_basepage_index() there in
pagemap.h, rather than in hugetlb.h; but I do not expect anything but
page_to_pgoff() ever to need it.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: give hugetlb_basepage_index() prototype the correct scope]

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b17d946b-d09-326e-b42a-52884c36df32@google.com
Fixes: 800d8c63b2e9 ("shmem: add huge pages support")
Reported-by: Neel Natu 
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins 
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" 
Cc: Zhang Yi 
Cc: Mel Gorman 
Cc: Mike Kravetz 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Darren Hart 
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso 
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 

Note on stable backport: leave redundant #include 
in kernel/futex.c, to avoid conflict over the header files included.
Resolved trivial conflicts in include/linux/hugetlb.h.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

hugetlbfs: hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash() cleanup

2021-06-03T06:23:33+00:00

commit 552546366a30d88bd1d6f5efe848b2ab50fd57e5 upstream.

A new clang diagnostic (-Wsizeof-array-div) warns about the calculation
to determine the number of u32's in an array of unsigned longs.
Suppress warning by adding parentheses.

While looking at the above issue, noticed that the 'address' parameter
to hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash is no longer used.  So, remove it from the
definition and all callers.

No functional change.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190919011847.18400-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz 
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor 
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor 
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso 
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Nick Desaulniers 
Cc: Ilie Halip 
Cc: David Bolvansky 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: hugetlbfs: fix cannot migrate the fallocated HugeTLB page

2021-02-10T08:09:26+00:00

commit 585fc0d2871c9318c949fbf45b1f081edd489e96 upstream.

If a new hugetlb page is allocated during fallocate it will not be
marked as active (set_page_huge_active) which will result in a later
isolate_huge_page failure when the page migration code would like to
move that page.  Such a failure would be unexpected and wrong.

Only export set_page_huge_active, just leave clear_page_huge_active as
static.  Because there are no external users.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210115124942.46403-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Fixes: 70c3547e36f5 (hugetlbfs: add hugetlbfs_fallocate())
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz 
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador 
Cc: David Hildenbrand 
Cc: Yang Shi 
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

hugetlb: use same fault hash key for shared and private mappings

2019-05-31T13:48:12+00:00

commit 1b426bac66e6cc83c9f2d92b96e4e72acf43419a upstream.

hugetlb uses a fault mutex hash table to prevent page faults of the
same pages concurrently.  The key for shared and private mappings is
different.  Shared keys off address_space and file index.  Private keys
off mm and virtual address.  Consider a private mappings of a populated
hugetlbfs file.  A fault will map the page from the file and if needed
do a COW to map a writable page.

Hugetlbfs hole punch uses the fault mutex to prevent mappings of file
pages.  It uses the address_space file index key.  However, private
mappings will use a different key and could race with this code to map
the file page.  This causes problems (BUG) for the page cache remove
code as it expects the page to be unmapped.  A sample stack is:

page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_mapped(page))
kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:169!
...
RIP: 0010:unaccount_page_cache_page+0x1b8/0x200
...
Call Trace:
__delete_from_page_cache+0x39/0x220
delete_from_page_cache+0x45/0x70
remove_inode_hugepages+0x13c/0x380
? __add_to_page_cache_locked+0x162/0x380
hugetlbfs_fallocate+0x403/0x540
? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
? __inode_security_revalidate+0x5d/0x70
? selinux_file_permission+0x100/0x130
vfs_fallocate+0x13f/0x270
ksys_fallocate+0x3c/0x80
__x64_sys_fallocate+0x1a/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x180
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

There seems to be another potential COW issue/race with this approach
of different private and shared keys as noted in commit 8382d914ebf7
("mm, hugetlb: improve page-fault scalability").

Since every hugetlb mapping (even anon and private) is actually a file
mapping, just use the address_space index key for all mappings.  This
results in potentially more hash collisions.  However, this should not
be the common case.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190328234704.27083-3-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190412165235.t4sscoujczfhuiyt@linux-r8p5
Fixes: b5cec28d36f5 ("hugetlbfs: truncate_hugepages() takes a range of pages")
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz 
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi 
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso 
Cc: Joonsoo Kim 
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" 
Cc: Michal Hocko 
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: migration: fix migration of huge PMD shared pages

2018-11-21T08:26:03+00:00

commit 017b1660df89f5fb4bfe66c34e35f7d2031100c7 upstream.

The page migration code employs try_to_unmap() to try and unmap the source
page.  This is accomplished by using rmap_walk to find all vmas where the
page is mapped.  This search stops when page mapcount is zero.  For shared
PMD huge pages, the page map count is always 1 no matter the number of
mappings.  Shared mappings are tracked via the reference count of the PMD
page.  Therefore, try_to_unmap stops prematurely and does not completely
unmap all mappings of the source page.

This problem can result is data corruption as writes to the original
source page can happen after contents of the page are copied to the target
page.  Hence, data is lost.

This problem was originally seen as DB corruption of shared global areas
after a huge page was soft offlined due to ECC memory errors.  DB
developers noticed they could reproduce the issue by (hotplug) offlining
memory used to back huge pages.  A simple testcase can reproduce the
problem by creating a shared PMD mapping (note that this must be at least
PUD_SIZE in size and PUD_SIZE aligned (1GB on x86)), and using
migrate_pages() to migrate process pages between nodes while continually
writing to the huge pages being migrated.

To fix, have the try_to_unmap_one routine check for huge PMD sharing by
calling huge_pmd_unshare for hugetlbfs huge pages.  If it is a shared
mapping it will be 'unshared' which removes the page table entry and drops
the reference on the PMD page.  After this, flush caches and TLB.

mmu notifiers are called before locking page tables, but we can not be
sure of PMD sharing until page tables are locked.  Therefore, check for
the possibility of PMD sharing before locking so that notifiers can
prepare for the worst possible case.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180823205917.16297-2-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
[mike.kravetz@oracle.com: make _range_in_vma() a static inline]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6063f215-a5c8-2f0c-465a-2c515ddc952d@oracle.com
Fixes: 39dde65c9940 ("shared page table for hugetlb page")
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz 
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov 
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Cc: Vlastimil Babka 
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso 
Cc: Jerome Glisse 
Cc: Mike Kravetz 
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz 
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: remove unnecessary condition in remove_inode_hugepages

2016-10-08T01:46:29+00:00

When the huge page is added to the page cahce (huge_add_to_page_cache),
the page private flag will be cleared.  since this code
(remove_inode_hugepages) will only be called for pages in the page
cahce, PagePrivate(page) will always be false.

The patch remove the code without any functional change.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1475113323-29368-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang 
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi 
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz 
Tested-by: Mike Kravetz 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/hugetlb: check for reserved hugepages during memory offline

2016-10-08T01:46:29+00:00

In dissolve_free_huge_pages(), free hugepages will be dissolved without
making sure that there are enough of them left to satisfy hugepage
reservations.

Fix this by adding a return value to dissolve_free_huge_pages() and
checking h->free_huge_pages vs.  h->resv_huge_pages.  Note that this may
lead to the situation where dissolve_free_huge_page() returns an error
and all free hugepages that were dissolved before that error are lost,
while the memory block still cannot be set offline.

Fixes: c8721bbb ("mm: memory-hotplug: enable memory hotplug to handle hugepage")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160926172811.94033-3-gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi 
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" 
Cc: Vlastimil Babka 
Cc: Mike Kravetz 
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" 
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky 
Cc: Heiko Carstens 
Cc: Rui Teng 
Cc: Dave Hansen 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

include/linux/hugetlb.h: use bool instead of int for hugepage_migration_supported()

2016-05-21T00:58:30+00:00

It is used as a pure bool function within kernel source wide.

Signed-off-by: Chen Gang 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

include/linux/hugetlb*.h: clean up code

2016-05-21T00:58:30+00:00

Macro HUGETLBFS_SB is clear enough, so one statement is clearer than 3
lines statements.

Remove redundant return statements for non-return functions, which can
save lines, at least.

Signed-off-by: Chen Gang 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds