Qualcomm remoteproc drivers such as qcom_q6v5_mss, which do not use the
Peripheral Authentication Service (PAS), always map the MBA region before
use and unmap it once the usage is complete. This behavior was introduced
to avoid issues seen in the past where speculative accesses from the
application processor to the MBA region after it was assigned to the remote
Q6 led to an XPU violation. The issue was mitigated by unmapping the region
before handing control to the remote Q6.

Currently, most Qualcomm SoCs using the PAS driver run either with a
standalone QHEE or the Gunyah hypervisor. In these environments, the
hypervisor unmaps the Q6 memory from HLOS Stage-2 and remaps it into the
Q6 Stage-2 page table. As a result, speculative accesses from HLOS cannot
reach the region even if it remains mapped in HLOS Stage-1; therefore, XPU
violations cannot occur.

However, when the same SoC runs Linux at EL2, Linux itself must perform the
unmapping to avoid such issues. It is still correct to apply this mapping/
unmapping sequence even for SoCs that run under Gunyah, so this behavior
should not be conditional.

Introduce qcom_pas_ctx_map() in qcom_pas.h to centralise the ioremap_wc
pattern used by both qcom_q6v5_pas and qcom_mdt_pas_load, and use it in
both places.

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260724182858.1868271-5-mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>

Qcom platforms has the legacy of using non-standard SCM calls
splintered over the various kernel drivers. These SCM calls aren't
compliant with the standard SMC calling conventions which is a
prerequisite to enable migration to the FF-A specifications from Arm.

OP-TEE as an alternative trusted OS to Qualcomm TEE (QTEE) can't
support these non-standard SCM calls. And even for newer architectures
using S-EL2 with Hafnium support, QTEE won't be able to support SCM
calls either with FF-A requirements coming in. And with both OP-TEE
and QTEE drivers well integrated in the TEE subsystem, it makes further
sense to reuse the TEE bus client drivers infrastructure.

The added benefit of TEE bus infrastructure is that there is support
for discoverable/enumerable services. With that client drivers don't
have to manually invoke a special SCM call to know the service status.

So enable the generic Peripheral Authentication Service (PAS) provided
by the firmware. It acts as the common layer with different TZ
backends plugged in whether it's an SCM implementation or a proper
TEE bus based PAS service implementation.

Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
Tested-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com> # Lemans
Reviewed-by: Harshal Dev <harshal.dev@oss.qualcomm.com>
Tested-by: Vignesh Viswanathan <vignesh.viswanathan@oss.qualcomm.com> # IPQ9650
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@oss.qualcomm.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260702115835.167602-2-sumit.garg@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>