<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux-stable.git/include/linux/filter.h, branch v6.17.8</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Don't use %pK through printk</title>
<updated>2025-11-13T20:36:46+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Thomas Weißschuh</name>
<email>thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de</email>
</author>
<published>2025-08-11T12:08:04+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=c5b5d71cd91760eccd2499f035956670053487fc'/>
<id>c5b5d71cd91760eccd2499f035956670053487fc</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 2caa6b88e0ba0231fb4ff0ba8e73cedd5fb81fc8 ]

In the past %pK was preferable to %p as it would not leak raw pointer
values into the kernel log.
Since commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
the regular %p has been improved to avoid this issue.
Furthermore, restricted pointers ("%pK") were never meant to be used
through printk(). They can still unintentionally leak raw pointers or
acquire sleeping locks in atomic contexts.

Switch to the regular pointer formatting which is safer and
easier to reason about.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh &lt;thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko &lt;andrii@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250811-restricted-pointers-bpf-v1-1-a1d7cc3cb9e7@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 2caa6b88e0ba0231fb4ff0ba8e73cedd5fb81fc8 ]

In the past %pK was preferable to %p as it would not leak raw pointer
values into the kernel log.
Since commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
the regular %p has been improved to avoid this issue.
Furthermore, restricted pointers ("%pK") were never meant to be used
through printk(). They can still unintentionally leak raw pointers or
acquire sleeping locks in atomic contexts.

Switch to the regular pointer formatting which is safer and
easier to reason about.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh &lt;thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko &lt;andrii@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250811-restricted-pointers-bpf-v1-1-a1d7cc3cb9e7@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge tag 'bpf-next-6.17' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next</title>
<updated>2025-07-30T16:58:50+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Linus Torvalds</name>
<email>torvalds@linux-foundation.org</email>
</author>
<published>2025-07-30T16:58:50+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=d9104cec3e8fe4b458b74709853231385779001f'/>
<id>d9104cec3e8fe4b458b74709853231385779001f</id>
<content type='text'>
Pull bpf updates from Alexei Starovoitov:

 - Remove usermode driver (UMD) framework (Thomas Weißschuh)

 - Introduce Strongly Connected Component (SCC) in the verifier to
   detect loops and refine register liveness (Eduard Zingerman)

 - Allow 'void *' cast using bpf_rdonly_cast() and corresponding
   '__arg_untrusted' for global function parameters (Eduard Zingerman)

 - Improve precision for BPF_ADD and BPF_SUB operations in the verifier
   (Harishankar Vishwanathan)

 - Teach the verifier that constant pointer to a map cannot be NULL
   (Ihor Solodrai)

 - Introduce BPF streams for error reporting of various conditions
   detected by BPF runtime (Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi)

 - Teach the verifier to insert runtime speculation barrier (lfence on
   x86) to mitigate speculative execution instead of rejecting the
   programs (Luis Gerhorst)

 - Various improvements for 'veristat' (Mykyta Yatsenko)

 - For CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL config warn on internal verifier errors to
   improve bug detection by syzbot (Paul Chaignon)

 - Support BPF private stack on arm64 (Puranjay Mohan)

 - Introduce bpf_cgroup_read_xattr() kfunc to read xattr of cgroup's
   node (Song Liu)

 - Introduce kfuncs for read-only string opreations (Viktor Malik)

 - Implement show_fdinfo() for bpf_links (Tao Chen)

 - Reduce verifier's stack consumption (Yonghong Song)

 - Implement mprog API for cgroup-bpf programs (Yonghong Song)

* tag 'bpf-next-6.17' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (192 commits)
  selftests/bpf: Migrate fexit_noreturns case into tracing_failure test suite
  selftests/bpf: Add selftest for attaching tracing programs to functions in deny list
  bpf: Add log for attaching tracing programs to functions in deny list
  bpf: Show precise rejected function when attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions
  bpf: Fix various typos in verifier.c comments
  bpf: Add third round of bounds deduction
  selftests/bpf: Test invariants on JSLT crossing sign
  selftests/bpf: Test cross-sign 64bits range refinement
  selftests/bpf: Update reg_bound range refinement logic
  bpf: Improve bounds when s64 crosses sign boundary
  bpf: Simplify bounds refinement from s32
  selftests/bpf: Enable private stack tests for arm64
  bpf, arm64: JIT support for private stack
  bpf: Move bpf_jit_get_prog_name() to core.c
  bpf, arm64: Fix fp initialization for exception boundary
  umd: Remove usermode driver framework
  bpf/preload: Don't select USERMODE_DRIVER
  selftests/bpf: Fix test dynptr/test_dynptr_memset_xdp_chunks failure
  selftests/bpf: Fix test dynptr/test_dynptr_copy_xdp failure
  selftests/bpf: Increase xdp data size for arm64 64K page size
  ...
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Pull bpf updates from Alexei Starovoitov:

 - Remove usermode driver (UMD) framework (Thomas Weißschuh)

 - Introduce Strongly Connected Component (SCC) in the verifier to
   detect loops and refine register liveness (Eduard Zingerman)

 - Allow 'void *' cast using bpf_rdonly_cast() and corresponding
   '__arg_untrusted' for global function parameters (Eduard Zingerman)

 - Improve precision for BPF_ADD and BPF_SUB operations in the verifier
   (Harishankar Vishwanathan)

 - Teach the verifier that constant pointer to a map cannot be NULL
   (Ihor Solodrai)

 - Introduce BPF streams for error reporting of various conditions
   detected by BPF runtime (Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi)

 - Teach the verifier to insert runtime speculation barrier (lfence on
   x86) to mitigate speculative execution instead of rejecting the
   programs (Luis Gerhorst)

 - Various improvements for 'veristat' (Mykyta Yatsenko)

 - For CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL config warn on internal verifier errors to
   improve bug detection by syzbot (Paul Chaignon)

 - Support BPF private stack on arm64 (Puranjay Mohan)

 - Introduce bpf_cgroup_read_xattr() kfunc to read xattr of cgroup's
   node (Song Liu)

 - Introduce kfuncs for read-only string opreations (Viktor Malik)

 - Implement show_fdinfo() for bpf_links (Tao Chen)

 - Reduce verifier's stack consumption (Yonghong Song)

 - Implement mprog API for cgroup-bpf programs (Yonghong Song)

* tag 'bpf-next-6.17' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (192 commits)
  selftests/bpf: Migrate fexit_noreturns case into tracing_failure test suite
  selftests/bpf: Add selftest for attaching tracing programs to functions in deny list
  bpf: Add log for attaching tracing programs to functions in deny list
  bpf: Show precise rejected function when attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions
  bpf: Fix various typos in verifier.c comments
  bpf: Add third round of bounds deduction
  selftests/bpf: Test invariants on JSLT crossing sign
  selftests/bpf: Test cross-sign 64bits range refinement
  selftests/bpf: Update reg_bound range refinement logic
  bpf: Improve bounds when s64 crosses sign boundary
  bpf: Simplify bounds refinement from s32
  selftests/bpf: Enable private stack tests for arm64
  bpf, arm64: JIT support for private stack
  bpf: Move bpf_jit_get_prog_name() to core.c
  bpf, arm64: Fix fp initialization for exception boundary
  umd: Remove usermode driver framework
  bpf/preload: Don't select USERMODE_DRIVER
  selftests/bpf: Fix test dynptr/test_dynptr_memset_xdp_chunks failure
  selftests/bpf: Fix test dynptr/test_dynptr_copy_xdp failure
  selftests/bpf: Increase xdp data size for arm64 64K page size
  ...
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Move bpf_jit_get_prog_name() to core.c</title>
<updated>2025-07-26T19:26:51+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Puranjay Mohan</name>
<email>puranjay@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2025-07-24T12:02:53+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=3ba58312e65665e5b9097c7969a51fa49914d85d'/>
<id>3ba58312e65665e5b9097c7969a51fa49914d85d</id>
<content type='text'>
bpf_jit_get_prog_name() will be used by all JITs when enabling support
for private stack. This function is currently implemented in the x86
JIT.

Move the function to core.c so that other JITs can easily use it in
their implementation of private stack.

Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan &lt;puranjay@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Acked-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yonghong.song@linux.dev&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250724120257.7299-2-puranjay@kernel.org
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
bpf_jit_get_prog_name() will be used by all JITs when enabling support
for private stack. This function is currently implemented in the x86
JIT.

Move the function to core.c so that other JITs can easily use it in
their implementation of private stack.

Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan &lt;puranjay@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Acked-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yonghong.song@linux.dev&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250724120257.7299-2-puranjay@kernel.org
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>net: track pfmemalloc drops via SKB_DROP_REASON_PFMEMALLOC</title>
<updated>2025-07-18T23:59:05+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jesper Dangaard Brouer</name>
<email>hawk@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2025-07-16T16:26:53+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=a6f190630d070173897a7e98a30188b7638ba0a1'/>
<id>a6f190630d070173897a7e98a30188b7638ba0a1</id>
<content type='text'>
Add a new SKB drop reason (SKB_DROP_REASON_PFMEMALLOC) to track packets
dropped due to memory pressure. In production environments, we've observed
memory exhaustion reported by memory layer stack traces, but these drops
were not properly tracked in the SKB drop reason infrastructure.

While most network code paths now properly report pfmemalloc drops, some
protocol-specific socket implementations still use sk_filter() without
drop reason tracking:
- Bluetooth L2CAP sockets
- CAIF sockets
- IUCV sockets
- Netlink sockets
- SCTP sockets
- Unix domain sockets

These remaining cases represent less common paths and could be converted
in a follow-up patch if needed. The current implementation provides
significantly improved observability into memory pressure events in the
network stack, especially for key protocols like TCP and UDP, helping to
diagnose problems in production environments.

Reported-by: Matt Fleming &lt;mfleming@cloudflare.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer &lt;hawk@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/175268316579.2407873.11634752355644843509.stgit@firesoul
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Add a new SKB drop reason (SKB_DROP_REASON_PFMEMALLOC) to track packets
dropped due to memory pressure. In production environments, we've observed
memory exhaustion reported by memory layer stack traces, but these drops
were not properly tracked in the SKB drop reason infrastructure.

While most network code paths now properly report pfmemalloc drops, some
protocol-specific socket implementations still use sk_filter() without
drop reason tracking:
- Bluetooth L2CAP sockets
- CAIF sockets
- IUCV sockets
- Netlink sockets
- SCTP sockets
- Unix domain sockets

These remaining cases represent less common paths and could be converted
in a follow-up patch if needed. The current implementation provides
significantly improved observability into memory pressure events in the
network stack, especially for key protocols like TCP and UDP, helping to
diagnose problems in production environments.

Reported-by: Matt Fleming &lt;mfleming@cloudflare.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer &lt;hawk@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/175268316579.2407873.11634752355644843509.stgit@firesoul
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf, arm64, powerpc: Change nospec to include v1 barrier</title>
<updated>2025-06-10T03:11:09+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Luis Gerhorst</name>
<email>luis.gerhorst@fau.de</email>
</author>
<published>2025-06-03T21:17:03+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=dff883d9e93a7f2f2fa4e38a9444b2c79d6da91a'/>
<id>dff883d9e93a7f2f2fa4e38a9444b2c79d6da91a</id>
<content type='text'>
This changes the semantics of BPF_NOSPEC (previously a v4-only barrier)
to always emit a speculation barrier that works against both Spectre v1
AND v4. If mitigation is not needed on an architecture, the backend
should set bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v4/v1().

As of now, this commit only has the user-visible implication that unpriv
BPF's performance on PowerPC is reduced. This is the case because we
have to emit additional v1 barrier instructions for BPF_NOSPEC now.

This commit is required for a future commit to allow us to rely on
BPF_NOSPEC for Spectre v1 mitigation. As of this commit, the feature
that nospec acts as a v1 barrier is unused.

Commit f5e81d111750 ("bpf: Introduce BPF nospec instruction for
mitigating Spectre v4") noted that mitigation instructions for v1 and v4
might be different on some archs. While this would potentially offer
improved performance on PowerPC, it was dismissed after the following
considerations:

* Only having one barrier simplifies the verifier and allows us to
  easily rely on v4-induced barriers for reducing the complexity of
  v1-induced speculative path verification.

* For the architectures that implemented BPF_NOSPEC, only PowerPC has
  distinct instructions for v1 and v4. Even there, some insns may be
  shared between the barriers for v1 and v4 (e.g., 'ori 31,31,0' and
  'sync'). If this is still found to impact performance in an
  unacceptable way, BPF_NOSPEC can be split into BPF_NOSPEC_V1 and
  BPF_NOSPEC_V4 later. As an optimization, we can already skip v1/v4
  insns from being emitted for PowerPC with this setup if
  bypass_spec_v1/v4 is set.

Vulnerability-status for BPF_NOSPEC-based Spectre mitigations (v4 as of
this commit, v1 in the future) is therefore:

* x86 (32-bit and 64-bit), ARM64, and PowerPC (64-bit): Mitigated - This
  patch implements BPF_NOSPEC for these architectures. The previous
  v4-only version was supported since commit f5e81d111750 ("bpf:
  Introduce BPF nospec instruction for mitigating Spectre v4") and
  commit b7540d625094 ("powerpc/bpf: Emit stf barrier instruction
  sequences for BPF_NOSPEC").

* LoongArch: Not Vulnerable - Commit a6f6a95f2580 ("LoongArch, bpf: Fix
  jit to skip speculation barrier opcode") is the only other past commit
  related to BPF_NOSPEC and indicates that the insn is not required
  there.

* MIPS: Vulnerable (if unprivileged BPF is enabled) -
  Commit a6f6a95f2580 ("LoongArch, bpf: Fix jit to skip speculation
  barrier opcode") indicates that it is not vulnerable, but this
  contradicts the kernel and Debian documentation. Therefore, I assume
  that there exist vulnerable MIPS CPUs (but maybe not from Loongson?).
  In the future, BPF_NOSPEC could be implemented for MIPS based on the
  GCC speculation_barrier [1]. For now, we rely on unprivileged BPF
  being disabled by default.

* Other: Unknown - To the best of my knowledge there is no definitive
  information available that indicates that any other arch is
  vulnerable. They are therefore left untouched (BPF_NOSPEC is not
  implemented, but bypass_spec_v1/v4 is also not set).

I did the following testing to ensure the insn encoding is correct:

* ARM64:
  * 'dsb nsh; isb' was successfully tested with the BPF CI in [2]
  * 'sb' locally using QEMU v7.2.15 -cpu max (emitted sb insn is
    executed for example with './test_progs -t verifier_array_access')

* PowerPC: The following configs were tested locally with ppc64le QEMU
  v8.2 '-machine pseries -cpu POWER9':
  * STF_BARRIER_EIEIO + CONFIG_PPC_BOOK32_64
  * STF_BARRIER_SYNC_ORI (forced on) + CONFIG_PPC_BOOK32_64
  * STF_BARRIER_FALLBACK (forced on) + CONFIG_PPC_BOOK32_64
  * CONFIG_PPC_E500 (forced on) + STF_BARRIER_EIEIO
  * CONFIG_PPC_E500 (forced on) + STF_BARRIER_SYNC_ORI (forced on)
  * CONFIG_PPC_E500 (forced on) + STF_BARRIER_FALLBACK (forced on)
  * CONFIG_PPC_E500 (forced on) + STF_BARRIER_NONE (forced on)
  Most of those cobinations should not occur in practice, but I was not
  able to get an PPC e6500 rootfs (for testing PPC_E500 without forcing
  it on). In any case, this should ensure that there are no unexpected
  conflicts between the insns when combined like this. Individual v1/v4
  barriers were already emitted elsewhere.

Hari's ack is for the PowerPC changes only.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=29b74545531f6afbee9fc38c267524326dbfbedf
    ("MIPS: Add speculation_barrier support")
[2] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/pull/8576

Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst &lt;luis.gerhorst@fau.de&gt;
Acked-by: Hari Bathini &lt;hbathini@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Cc: Henriette Herzog &lt;henriette.herzog@rub.de&gt;
Cc: Maximilian Ott &lt;ott@cs.fau.de&gt;
Cc: Milan Stephan &lt;milan.stephan@fau.de&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250603211703.337860-1-luis.gerhorst@fau.de
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This changes the semantics of BPF_NOSPEC (previously a v4-only barrier)
to always emit a speculation barrier that works against both Spectre v1
AND v4. If mitigation is not needed on an architecture, the backend
should set bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v4/v1().

As of now, this commit only has the user-visible implication that unpriv
BPF's performance on PowerPC is reduced. This is the case because we
have to emit additional v1 barrier instructions for BPF_NOSPEC now.

This commit is required for a future commit to allow us to rely on
BPF_NOSPEC for Spectre v1 mitigation. As of this commit, the feature
that nospec acts as a v1 barrier is unused.

Commit f5e81d111750 ("bpf: Introduce BPF nospec instruction for
mitigating Spectre v4") noted that mitigation instructions for v1 and v4
might be different on some archs. While this would potentially offer
improved performance on PowerPC, it was dismissed after the following
considerations:

* Only having one barrier simplifies the verifier and allows us to
  easily rely on v4-induced barriers for reducing the complexity of
  v1-induced speculative path verification.

* For the architectures that implemented BPF_NOSPEC, only PowerPC has
  distinct instructions for v1 and v4. Even there, some insns may be
  shared between the barriers for v1 and v4 (e.g., 'ori 31,31,0' and
  'sync'). If this is still found to impact performance in an
  unacceptable way, BPF_NOSPEC can be split into BPF_NOSPEC_V1 and
  BPF_NOSPEC_V4 later. As an optimization, we can already skip v1/v4
  insns from being emitted for PowerPC with this setup if
  bypass_spec_v1/v4 is set.

Vulnerability-status for BPF_NOSPEC-based Spectre mitigations (v4 as of
this commit, v1 in the future) is therefore:

* x86 (32-bit and 64-bit), ARM64, and PowerPC (64-bit): Mitigated - This
  patch implements BPF_NOSPEC for these architectures. The previous
  v4-only version was supported since commit f5e81d111750 ("bpf:
  Introduce BPF nospec instruction for mitigating Spectre v4") and
  commit b7540d625094 ("powerpc/bpf: Emit stf barrier instruction
  sequences for BPF_NOSPEC").

* LoongArch: Not Vulnerable - Commit a6f6a95f2580 ("LoongArch, bpf: Fix
  jit to skip speculation barrier opcode") is the only other past commit
  related to BPF_NOSPEC and indicates that the insn is not required
  there.

* MIPS: Vulnerable (if unprivileged BPF is enabled) -
  Commit a6f6a95f2580 ("LoongArch, bpf: Fix jit to skip speculation
  barrier opcode") indicates that it is not vulnerable, but this
  contradicts the kernel and Debian documentation. Therefore, I assume
  that there exist vulnerable MIPS CPUs (but maybe not from Loongson?).
  In the future, BPF_NOSPEC could be implemented for MIPS based on the
  GCC speculation_barrier [1]. For now, we rely on unprivileged BPF
  being disabled by default.

* Other: Unknown - To the best of my knowledge there is no definitive
  information available that indicates that any other arch is
  vulnerable. They are therefore left untouched (BPF_NOSPEC is not
  implemented, but bypass_spec_v1/v4 is also not set).

I did the following testing to ensure the insn encoding is correct:

* ARM64:
  * 'dsb nsh; isb' was successfully tested with the BPF CI in [2]
  * 'sb' locally using QEMU v7.2.15 -cpu max (emitted sb insn is
    executed for example with './test_progs -t verifier_array_access')

* PowerPC: The following configs were tested locally with ppc64le QEMU
  v8.2 '-machine pseries -cpu POWER9':
  * STF_BARRIER_EIEIO + CONFIG_PPC_BOOK32_64
  * STF_BARRIER_SYNC_ORI (forced on) + CONFIG_PPC_BOOK32_64
  * STF_BARRIER_FALLBACK (forced on) + CONFIG_PPC_BOOK32_64
  * CONFIG_PPC_E500 (forced on) + STF_BARRIER_EIEIO
  * CONFIG_PPC_E500 (forced on) + STF_BARRIER_SYNC_ORI (forced on)
  * CONFIG_PPC_E500 (forced on) + STF_BARRIER_FALLBACK (forced on)
  * CONFIG_PPC_E500 (forced on) + STF_BARRIER_NONE (forced on)
  Most of those cobinations should not occur in practice, but I was not
  able to get an PPC e6500 rootfs (for testing PPC_E500 without forcing
  it on). In any case, this should ensure that there are no unexpected
  conflicts between the insns when combined like this. Individual v1/v4
  barriers were already emitted elsewhere.

Hari's ack is for the PowerPC changes only.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=29b74545531f6afbee9fc38c267524326dbfbedf
    ("MIPS: Add speculation_barrier support")
[2] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/pull/8576

Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst &lt;luis.gerhorst@fau.de&gt;
Acked-by: Hari Bathini &lt;hbathini@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Cc: Henriette Herzog &lt;henriette.herzog@rub.de&gt;
Cc: Maximilian Ott &lt;ott@cs.fau.de&gt;
Cc: Milan Stephan &lt;milan.stephan@fau.de&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250603211703.337860-1-luis.gerhorst@fau.de
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge tag 'bpf-next-6.15' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next</title>
<updated>2025-03-30T19:43:03+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Linus Torvalds</name>
<email>torvalds@linux-foundation.org</email>
</author>
<published>2025-03-30T19:43:03+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=fa593d0f969dcfa41d390822fdf1a0ab48cd882c'/>
<id>fa593d0f969dcfa41d390822fdf1a0ab48cd882c</id>
<content type='text'>
Pull bpf updates from Alexei Starovoitov:
 "For this merge window we're splitting BPF pull request into three for
  higher visibility: main changes, res_spin_lock, try_alloc_pages.

  These are the main BPF changes:

   - Add DFA-based live registers analysis to improve verification of
     programs with loops (Eduard Zingerman)

   - Introduce load_acquire and store_release BPF instructions and add
     x86, arm64 JIT support (Peilin Ye)

   - Fix loop detection logic in the verifier (Eduard Zingerman)

   - Drop unnecesary lock in bpf_map_inc_not_zero() (Eric Dumazet)

   - Add kfunc for populating cpumask bits (Emil Tsalapatis)

   - Convert various shell based tests to selftests/bpf/test_progs
     format (Bastien Curutchet)

   - Allow passing referenced kptrs into struct_ops callbacks (Amery
     Hung)

   - Add a flag to LSM bpf hook to facilitate bpf program signing
     (Blaise Boscaccy)

   - Track arena arguments in kfuncs (Ihor Solodrai)

   - Add copy_remote_vm_str() helper for reading strings from remote VM
     and bpf_copy_from_user_task_str() kfunc (Jordan Rome)

   - Add support for timed may_goto instruction (Kumar Kartikeya
     Dwivedi)

   - Allow bpf_get_netns_cookie() int cgroup_skb programs (Mahe Tardy)

   - Reduce bpf_cgrp_storage_busy false positives when accessing cgroup
     local storage (Martin KaFai Lau)

   - Introduce bpf_dynptr_copy() kfunc (Mykyta Yatsenko)

   - Allow retrieving BTF data with BTF token (Mykyta Yatsenko)

   - Add BPF kfuncs to set and get xattrs with 'security.bpf.' prefix
     (Song Liu)

   - Reject attaching programs to noreturn functions (Yafang Shao)

   - Introduce pre-order traversal of cgroup bpf programs (Yonghong
     Song)"

* tag 'bpf-next-6.15' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (186 commits)
  selftests/bpf: Add selftests for load-acquire/store-release when register number is invalid
  bpf: Fix out-of-bounds read in check_atomic_load/store()
  libbpf: Add namespace for errstr making it libbpf_errstr
  bpf: Add struct_ops context information to struct bpf_prog_aux
  selftests/bpf: Sanitize pointer prior fclose()
  selftests/bpf: Migrate test_xdp_vlan.sh into test_progs
  selftests/bpf: test_xdp_vlan: Rename BPF sections
  bpf: clarify a misleading verifier error message
  selftests/bpf: Add selftest for attaching fexit to __noreturn functions
  bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions
  bpf: Only fails the busy counter check in bpf_cgrp_storage_get if it creates storage
  bpf: Make perf_event_read_output accessible in all program types.
  bpftool: Using the right format specifiers
  bpftool: Add -Wformat-signedness flag to detect format errors
  selftests/bpf: Test freplace from user namespace
  libbpf: Pass BPF token from find_prog_btf_id to BPF_BTF_GET_FD_BY_ID
  bpf: Return prog btf_id without capable check
  bpf: BPF token support for BPF_BTF_GET_FD_BY_ID
  bpf, x86: Fix objtool warning for timed may_goto
  bpf: Check map-&gt;record at the beginning of check_and_free_fields()
  ...
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Pull bpf updates from Alexei Starovoitov:
 "For this merge window we're splitting BPF pull request into three for
  higher visibility: main changes, res_spin_lock, try_alloc_pages.

  These are the main BPF changes:

   - Add DFA-based live registers analysis to improve verification of
     programs with loops (Eduard Zingerman)

   - Introduce load_acquire and store_release BPF instructions and add
     x86, arm64 JIT support (Peilin Ye)

   - Fix loop detection logic in the verifier (Eduard Zingerman)

   - Drop unnecesary lock in bpf_map_inc_not_zero() (Eric Dumazet)

   - Add kfunc for populating cpumask bits (Emil Tsalapatis)

   - Convert various shell based tests to selftests/bpf/test_progs
     format (Bastien Curutchet)

   - Allow passing referenced kptrs into struct_ops callbacks (Amery
     Hung)

   - Add a flag to LSM bpf hook to facilitate bpf program signing
     (Blaise Boscaccy)

   - Track arena arguments in kfuncs (Ihor Solodrai)

   - Add copy_remote_vm_str() helper for reading strings from remote VM
     and bpf_copy_from_user_task_str() kfunc (Jordan Rome)

   - Add support for timed may_goto instruction (Kumar Kartikeya
     Dwivedi)

   - Allow bpf_get_netns_cookie() int cgroup_skb programs (Mahe Tardy)

   - Reduce bpf_cgrp_storage_busy false positives when accessing cgroup
     local storage (Martin KaFai Lau)

   - Introduce bpf_dynptr_copy() kfunc (Mykyta Yatsenko)

   - Allow retrieving BTF data with BTF token (Mykyta Yatsenko)

   - Add BPF kfuncs to set and get xattrs with 'security.bpf.' prefix
     (Song Liu)

   - Reject attaching programs to noreturn functions (Yafang Shao)

   - Introduce pre-order traversal of cgroup bpf programs (Yonghong
     Song)"

* tag 'bpf-next-6.15' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (186 commits)
  selftests/bpf: Add selftests for load-acquire/store-release when register number is invalid
  bpf: Fix out-of-bounds read in check_atomic_load/store()
  libbpf: Add namespace for errstr making it libbpf_errstr
  bpf: Add struct_ops context information to struct bpf_prog_aux
  selftests/bpf: Sanitize pointer prior fclose()
  selftests/bpf: Migrate test_xdp_vlan.sh into test_progs
  selftests/bpf: test_xdp_vlan: Rename BPF sections
  bpf: clarify a misleading verifier error message
  selftests/bpf: Add selftest for attaching fexit to __noreturn functions
  bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions
  bpf: Only fails the busy counter check in bpf_cgrp_storage_get if it creates storage
  bpf: Make perf_event_read_output accessible in all program types.
  bpftool: Using the right format specifiers
  bpftool: Add -Wformat-signedness flag to detect format errors
  selftests/bpf: Test freplace from user namespace
  libbpf: Pass BPF token from find_prog_btf_id to BPF_BTF_GET_FD_BY_ID
  bpf: Return prog btf_id without capable check
  bpf: BPF token support for BPF_BTF_GET_FD_BY_ID
  bpf, x86: Fix objtool warning for timed may_goto
  bpf: Check map-&gt;record at the beginning of check_and_free_fields()
  ...
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Introduce load-acquire and store-release instructions</title>
<updated>2025-03-15T18:48:28+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Peilin Ye</name>
<email>yepeilin@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-03-04T01:06:13+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=880442305a3908589bf4d6fc1d79edb577ee497c'/>
<id>880442305a3908589bf4d6fc1d79edb577ee497c</id>
<content type='text'>
Introduce BPF instructions with load-acquire and store-release
semantics, as discussed in [1].  Define 2 new flags:

  #define BPF_LOAD_ACQ    0x100
  #define BPF_STORE_REL   0x110

A "load-acquire" is a BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC instruction with the 'imm'
field set to BPF_LOAD_ACQ (0x100).

Similarly, a "store-release" is a BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC instruction with
the 'imm' field set to BPF_STORE_REL (0x110).

Unlike existing atomic read-modify-write operations that only support
BPF_W (32-bit) and BPF_DW (64-bit) size modifiers, load-acquires and
store-releases also support BPF_B (8-bit) and BPF_H (16-bit).  As an
exception, however, 64-bit load-acquires/store-releases are not
supported on 32-bit architectures (to fix a build error reported by the
kernel test robot).

An 8- or 16-bit load-acquire zero-extends the value before writing it to
a 32-bit register, just like ARM64 instruction LDARH and friends.

Similar to existing atomic read-modify-write operations, misaligned
load-acquires/store-releases are not allowed (even if
BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT is set).

As an example, consider the following 64-bit load-acquire BPF
instruction (assuming little-endian):

  db 10 00 00 00 01 00 00  r0 = load_acquire((u64 *)(r1 + 0x0))

  opcode (0xdb): BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW | BPF_STX
  imm (0x00000100): BPF_LOAD_ACQ

Similarly, a 16-bit BPF store-release:

  cb 21 00 00 10 01 00 00  store_release((u16 *)(r1 + 0x0), w2)

  opcode (0xcb): BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_H | BPF_STX
  imm (0x00000110): BPF_STORE_REL

In arch/{arm64,s390,x86}/net/bpf_jit_comp.c, have
bpf_jit_supports_insn(..., /*in_arena=*/true) return false for the new
instructions, until the corresponding JIT compiler supports them in
arena.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240729183246.4110549-1-yepeilin@google.com/

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman &lt;eddyz87@gmail.com&gt;
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich &lt;iii@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Cc: kernel test robot &lt;lkp@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye &lt;yepeilin@google.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a217f46f0e445fbd573a1a024be5c6bf1d5fe716.1741049567.git.yepeilin@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Introduce BPF instructions with load-acquire and store-release
semantics, as discussed in [1].  Define 2 new flags:

  #define BPF_LOAD_ACQ    0x100
  #define BPF_STORE_REL   0x110

A "load-acquire" is a BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC instruction with the 'imm'
field set to BPF_LOAD_ACQ (0x100).

Similarly, a "store-release" is a BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC instruction with
the 'imm' field set to BPF_STORE_REL (0x110).

Unlike existing atomic read-modify-write operations that only support
BPF_W (32-bit) and BPF_DW (64-bit) size modifiers, load-acquires and
store-releases also support BPF_B (8-bit) and BPF_H (16-bit).  As an
exception, however, 64-bit load-acquires/store-releases are not
supported on 32-bit architectures (to fix a build error reported by the
kernel test robot).

An 8- or 16-bit load-acquire zero-extends the value before writing it to
a 32-bit register, just like ARM64 instruction LDARH and friends.

Similar to existing atomic read-modify-write operations, misaligned
load-acquires/store-releases are not allowed (even if
BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT is set).

As an example, consider the following 64-bit load-acquire BPF
instruction (assuming little-endian):

  db 10 00 00 00 01 00 00  r0 = load_acquire((u64 *)(r1 + 0x0))

  opcode (0xdb): BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW | BPF_STX
  imm (0x00000100): BPF_LOAD_ACQ

Similarly, a 16-bit BPF store-release:

  cb 21 00 00 10 01 00 00  store_release((u16 *)(r1 + 0x0), w2)

  opcode (0xcb): BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_H | BPF_STX
  imm (0x00000110): BPF_STORE_REL

In arch/{arm64,s390,x86}/net/bpf_jit_comp.c, have
bpf_jit_supports_insn(..., /*in_arena=*/true) return false for the new
instructions, until the corresponding JIT compiler supports them in
arena.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240729183246.4110549-1-yepeilin@google.com/

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman &lt;eddyz87@gmail.com&gt;
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich &lt;iii@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Cc: kernel test robot &lt;lkp@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye &lt;yepeilin@google.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a217f46f0e445fbd573a1a024be5c6bf1d5fe716.1741049567.git.yepeilin@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Add verifier support for timed may_goto</title>
<updated>2025-03-15T18:48:28+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi</name>
<email>memxor@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-03-04T00:32:38+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=e723608bf428014b15d9904e062f44f5fe473ad6'/>
<id>e723608bf428014b15d9904e062f44f5fe473ad6</id>
<content type='text'>
Implement support in the verifier for replacing may_goto implementation
from a counter-based approach to one which samples time on the local CPU
to have a bigger loop bound.

We implement it by maintaining 16-bytes per-stack frame, and using 8
bytes for maintaining the count for amortizing time sampling, and 8
bytes for the starting timestamp. To minimize overhead, we need to avoid
spilling and filling of registers around this sequence, so we push this
cost into the time sampling function 'arch_bpf_timed_may_goto'. This is
a JIT-specific wrapper around bpf_check_timed_may_goto which returns us
the count to store into the stack through BPF_REG_AX. All caller-saved
registers (r0-r5) are guaranteed to remain untouched.

The loop can be broken by returning count as 0, otherwise we dispatch
into the function when the count drops to 0, and the runtime chooses to
refresh it (by returning count as BPF_MAX_TIMED_LOOPS) or returning 0
and aborting the loop on next iteration.

Since the check for 0 is done right after loading the count from the
stack, all subsequent cond_break sequences should immediately break as
well, of the same loop or subsequent loops in the program.

We pass in the stack_depth of the count (and thus the timestamp, by
adding 8 to it) to the arch_bpf_timed_may_goto call so that it can be
passed in to bpf_check_timed_may_goto as an argument after r1 is saved,
by adding the offset to r10/fp. This adjustment will be arch specific,
and the next patch will introduce support for x86.

Note that depending on loop complexity, time spent in the loop can be
more than the current limit (250 ms), but imposing an upper bound on
program runtime is an orthogonal problem which will be addressed when
program cancellations are supported.

The current time afforded by cond_break may not be enough for cases
where BPF programs want to implement locking algorithms inline, and use
cond_break as a promise to the verifier that they will eventually
terminate.

Below are some benchmarking numbers on the time taken per-iteration for
an empty loop that counts the number of iterations until cond_break
fires. For comparison, we compare it against bpf_for/bpf_repeat which is
another way to achieve the same number of spins (BPF_MAX_LOOPS).  The
hardware used for benchmarking was a Sapphire Rapids Intel server with
performance governor enabled, mitigations were enabled.

+-----------------------------+--------------+--------------+------------------+
| Loop type                   | Iterations   |  Time (ms)   |   Time/iter (ns) |
+-----------------------------|--------------+--------------+------------------+
| may_goto                    | 8388608      |  3           |   0.36           |
| timed_may_goto (count=65535)| 589674932    |  250         |   0.42           |
| bpf_for                     | 8388608      |  10          |   1.19           |
+-----------------------------+--------------+--------------+------------------+

This gives a good approximation at low overhead while staying close to
the current implementation.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi &lt;memxor@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250304003239.2390751-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Implement support in the verifier for replacing may_goto implementation
from a counter-based approach to one which samples time on the local CPU
to have a bigger loop bound.

We implement it by maintaining 16-bytes per-stack frame, and using 8
bytes for maintaining the count for amortizing time sampling, and 8
bytes for the starting timestamp. To minimize overhead, we need to avoid
spilling and filling of registers around this sequence, so we push this
cost into the time sampling function 'arch_bpf_timed_may_goto'. This is
a JIT-specific wrapper around bpf_check_timed_may_goto which returns us
the count to store into the stack through BPF_REG_AX. All caller-saved
registers (r0-r5) are guaranteed to remain untouched.

The loop can be broken by returning count as 0, otherwise we dispatch
into the function when the count drops to 0, and the runtime chooses to
refresh it (by returning count as BPF_MAX_TIMED_LOOPS) or returning 0
and aborting the loop on next iteration.

Since the check for 0 is done right after loading the count from the
stack, all subsequent cond_break sequences should immediately break as
well, of the same loop or subsequent loops in the program.

We pass in the stack_depth of the count (and thus the timestamp, by
adding 8 to it) to the arch_bpf_timed_may_goto call so that it can be
passed in to bpf_check_timed_may_goto as an argument after r1 is saved,
by adding the offset to r10/fp. This adjustment will be arch specific,
and the next patch will introduce support for x86.

Note that depending on loop complexity, time spent in the loop can be
more than the current limit (250 ms), but imposing an upper bound on
program runtime is an orthogonal problem which will be addressed when
program cancellations are supported.

The current time afforded by cond_break may not be enough for cases
where BPF programs want to implement locking algorithms inline, and use
cond_break as a promise to the verifier that they will eventually
terminate.

Below are some benchmarking numbers on the time taken per-iteration for
an empty loop that counts the number of iterations until cond_break
fires. For comparison, we compare it against bpf_for/bpf_repeat which is
another way to achieve the same number of spins (BPF_MAX_LOOPS).  The
hardware used for benchmarking was a Sapphire Rapids Intel server with
performance governor enabled, mitigations were enabled.

+-----------------------------+--------------+--------------+------------------+
| Loop type                   | Iterations   |  Time (ms)   |   Time/iter (ns) |
+-----------------------------|--------------+--------------+------------------+
| may_goto                    | 8388608      |  3           |   0.36           |
| timed_may_goto (count=65535)| 589674932    |  250         |   0.42           |
| bpf_for                     | 8388608      |  10          |   1.19           |
+-----------------------------+--------------+--------------+------------------+

This gives a good approximation at low overhead while staying close to
the current implementation.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi &lt;memxor@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250304003239.2390751-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/bpf: Test gen_pro/epilogue that generate kfuncs</title>
<updated>2025-02-26T03:04:43+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Amery Hung</name>
<email>ameryhung@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-02-25T23:35:45+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=4e4136c6446753e6da4424a734f84de82c70600f'/>
<id>4e4136c6446753e6da4424a734f84de82c70600f</id>
<content type='text'>
Test gen_prologue and gen_epilogue that generate kfuncs that have not
been seen in the main program.

The main bpf program and return value checks are identical to
pro_epilogue.c introduced in commit 47e69431b57a ("selftests/bpf: Test
gen_prologue and gen_epilogue"). However, now when bpf_testmod_st_ops
detects a program name with prefix "test_kfunc_", it generates slightly
different prologue and epilogue: They still add 1000 to args-&gt;a in
prologue, add 10000 to args-&gt;a and set r0 to 2 * args-&gt;a in epilogue,
but involve kfuncs.

At high level, the alternative version of prologue and epilogue look
like this:

  cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(0);
  if (cgrp)
          bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp);
  else
          /* Perform what original bpf_testmod_st_ops prologue or
           * epilogue does
           */

Since 0 is never a valid cgroup id, the original prologue or epilogue
logic will be performed. As a result, the __retval check should expect
the exact same return value.

Signed-off-by: Amery Hung &lt;ameryhung@gmail.com&gt;
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau &lt;martin.lau@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250225233545.285481-2-ameryhung@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Test gen_prologue and gen_epilogue that generate kfuncs that have not
been seen in the main program.

The main bpf program and return value checks are identical to
pro_epilogue.c introduced in commit 47e69431b57a ("selftests/bpf: Test
gen_prologue and gen_epilogue"). However, now when bpf_testmod_st_ops
detects a program name with prefix "test_kfunc_", it generates slightly
different prologue and epilogue: They still add 1000 to args-&gt;a in
prologue, add 10000 to args-&gt;a and set r0 to 2 * args-&gt;a in epilogue,
but involve kfuncs.

At high level, the alternative version of prologue and epilogue look
like this:

  cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(0);
  if (cgrp)
          bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp);
  else
          /* Perform what original bpf_testmod_st_ops prologue or
           * epilogue does
           */

Since 0 is never a valid cgroup id, the original prologue or epilogue
logic will be performed. As a result, the __retval check should expect
the exact same return value.

Signed-off-by: Amery Hung &lt;ameryhung@gmail.com&gt;
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau &lt;martin.lau@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250225233545.285481-2-ameryhung@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Prevent unsafe access to the sock fields in the BPF timestamping callback</title>
<updated>2025-02-20T22:29:02+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jason Xing</name>
<email>kerneljasonxing@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-02-20T07:29:31+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=fd93eaffb3f977b23bc0a48d4c8616e654fcf133'/>
<id>fd93eaffb3f977b23bc0a48d4c8616e654fcf133</id>
<content type='text'>
The subsequent patch will implement BPF TX timestamping. It will
call the sockops BPF program without holding the sock lock.

This breaks the current assumption that all sock ops programs will
hold the sock lock. The sock's fields of the uapi's bpf_sock_ops
requires this assumption.

To address this, a new "u8 is_locked_tcp_sock;" field is added. This
patch sets it in the current sock_ops callbacks. The "is_fullsock"
test is then replaced by the "is_locked_tcp_sock" test during
sock_ops_convert_ctx_access().

The new TX timestamping callbacks added in the subsequent patch will
not have this set. This will prevent unsafe access from the new
timestamping callbacks.

Potentially, we could allow read-only access. However, this would
require identifying which callback is read-safe-only and also requires
additional BPF instruction rewrites in the covert_ctx. Since the BPF
program can always read everything from a socket (e.g., by using
bpf_core_cast), this patch keeps it simple and disables all read
and write access to any socket fields through the bpf_sock_ops
UAPI from the new TX timestamping callback.

Moreover, note that some of the fields in bpf_sock_ops are specific
to tcp_sock, and sock_ops currently only supports tcp_sock. In
the future, UDP timestamping will be added, which will also break
this assumption. The same idea used in this patch will be reused.
Considering that the current sock_ops only supports tcp_sock, the
variable is named is_locked_"tcp"_sock.

Signed-off-by: Jason Xing &lt;kerneljasonxing@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau &lt;martin.lau@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250220072940.99994-4-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The subsequent patch will implement BPF TX timestamping. It will
call the sockops BPF program without holding the sock lock.

This breaks the current assumption that all sock ops programs will
hold the sock lock. The sock's fields of the uapi's bpf_sock_ops
requires this assumption.

To address this, a new "u8 is_locked_tcp_sock;" field is added. This
patch sets it in the current sock_ops callbacks. The "is_fullsock"
test is then replaced by the "is_locked_tcp_sock" test during
sock_ops_convert_ctx_access().

The new TX timestamping callbacks added in the subsequent patch will
not have this set. This will prevent unsafe access from the new
timestamping callbacks.

Potentially, we could allow read-only access. However, this would
require identifying which callback is read-safe-only and also requires
additional BPF instruction rewrites in the covert_ctx. Since the BPF
program can always read everything from a socket (e.g., by using
bpf_core_cast), this patch keeps it simple and disables all read
and write access to any socket fields through the bpf_sock_ops
UAPI from the new TX timestamping callback.

Moreover, note that some of the fields in bpf_sock_ops are specific
to tcp_sock, and sock_ops currently only supports tcp_sock. In
the future, UDP timestamping will be added, which will also break
this assumption. The same idea used in this patch will be reused.
Considering that the current sock_ops only supports tcp_sock, the
variable is named is_locked_"tcp"_sock.

Signed-off-by: Jason Xing &lt;kerneljasonxing@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau &lt;martin.lau@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250220072940.99994-4-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
