Lots of easy overlapping changes in the confict
resolutions here.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Pull networking fixes from David Miller:
 "Let's begin the holiday weekend with some networking fixes:

   1) Whoops need to restrict cfg80211 wiphy names even more to 64
      bytes. From Eric Biggers.

   2) Fix flags being ignored when using kernel_connect() with SCTP,
      from Xin Long.

   3) Use after free in DCCP, from Alexey Kodanev.

   4) Need to check rhltable_init() return value in ipmr code, from Eric
      Dumazet.

   5) XDP handling fixes in virtio_net from Jason Wang.

   6) Missing RTA_TABLE in rtm_ipv4_policy[], from Roopa Prabhu.

   7) Need to use IRQ disabling spinlocks in mlx4_qp_lookup(), from Jack
      Morgenstein.

   8) Prevent out-of-bounds speculation using indexes in BPF, from
      Daniel Borkmann.

   9) Fix regression added by AF_PACKET link layer cure, from Willem de
      Bruijn.

  10) Correct ENIC dma mask, from Govindarajulu Varadarajan.

  11) Missing config options for PMTU tests, from Stefano Brivio"

* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net: (48 commits)
  ibmvnic: Fix partial success login retries
  selftests/net: Add missing config options for PMTU tests
  mlx4_core: allocate ICM memory in page size chunks
  enic: set DMA mask to 47 bit
  ppp: remove the PPPIOCDETACH ioctl
  ipv4: remove warning in ip_recv_error
  net : sched: cls_api: deal with egdev path only if needed
  vhost: synchronize IOTLB message with dev cleanup
  packet: fix reserve calculation
  net/mlx5: IPSec, Fix a race between concurrent sandbox QP commands
  net/mlx5e: When RXFCS is set, add FCS data into checksum calculation
  bpf: properly enforce index mask to prevent out-of-bounds speculation
  net/mlx4: Fix irq-unsafe spinlock usage
  net: phy: broadcom: Fix bcm_write_exp()
  net: phy: broadcom: Fix auxiliary control register reads
  net: ipv4: add missing RTA_TABLE to rtm_ipv4_policy
  net/mlx4: fix spelling mistake: "Inrerface" -> "Interface" and rephrase message
  ibmvnic: Only do H_EOI for mobility events
  tuntap: correctly set SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE
  virtio-net: fix leaking page for gso packet during mergeable XDP
  ...

While reviewing the verifier code, I recently noticed that the
following two program variants in relation to tail calls can be
loaded.

Variant 1:

  # bpftool p d x i 15
    0: (15) if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+3
    1: (18) r2 = map[id:5]
    3: (05) goto pc+2
    4: (18) r2 = map[id:6]
    6: (b7) r3 = 7
    7: (35) if r3 >= 0xa0 goto pc+2
    8: (54) (u32) r3 &= (u32) 255
    9: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12
   10: (b7) r0 = 1
   11: (95) exit

  # bpftool m s i 5
    5: prog_array  flags 0x0
        key 4B  value 4B  max_entries 4  memlock 4096B
  # bpftool m s i 6
    6: prog_array  flags 0x0
        key 4B  value 4B  max_entries 160  memlock 4096B

Variant 2:

  # bpftool p d x i 20
    0: (15) if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+3
    1: (18) r2 = map[id:8]
    3: (05) goto pc+2
    4: (18) r2 = map[id:7]
    6: (b7) r3 = 7
    7: (35) if r3 >= 0x4 goto pc+2
    8: (54) (u32) r3 &= (u32) 3
    9: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12
   10: (b7) r0 = 1
   11: (95) exit

  # bpftool m s i 8
    8: prog_array  flags 0x0
        key 4B  value 4B  max_entries 160  memlock 4096B
  # bpftool m s i 7
    7: prog_array  flags 0x0
        key 4B  value 4B  max_entries 4  memlock 4096B

In both cases the index masking inserted by the verifier in order
to control out of bounds speculation from a CPU via b2157399cc98
("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") seems to be incorrect
in what it is enforcing. In the 1st variant, the mask is applied
from the map with the significantly larger number of entries where
we would allow to a certain degree out of bounds speculation for
the smaller map, and in the 2nd variant where the mask is applied
from the map with the smaller number of entries, we get buggy
behavior since we truncate the index of the larger map.

The original intent from commit b2157399cc98 is to reject such
occasions where two or more different tail call maps are used
in the same tail call helper invocation. However, the check on
the BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON is never hit since we never poisoned the
saved pointer in the first place! We do this explicitly for map
lookups but in case of tail calls we basically used the tail
call map in insn_aux_data that was processed in the most recent
path which the verifier walked. Thus any prior path that stored
a pointer in insn_aux_data at the helper location was always
overridden.

Fix it by moving the map pointer poison logic into a small helper
that covers both BPF helpers with the same logic. After that in
fixup_bpf_calls() the poison check is then hit for tail calls
and the program rejected. Latter only happens in unprivileged
case since this is the *only* occasion where a rewrite needs to
happen, and where such rewrite is specific to the map (max_entries,
index_mask). In the privileged case the rewrite is generic for
the insn->imm / insn->code update so multiple maps from different
paths can be handled just fine since all the remaining logic
happens in the instruction processing itself. This is similar
to the case of map lookups: in case there is a collision of
maps in fixup_bpf_calls() we must skip the inlined rewrite since
this will turn the generic instruction sequence into a non-
generic one. Thus the patch_call_imm will simply update the
insn->imm location where the bpf_map_lookup_elem() will later
take care of the dispatch. Given we need this 'poison' state
as a check, the information of whether a map is an unpriv_array
gets lost, so enforcing it prior to that needs an additional
state. In general this check is needed since there are some
complex and tail call intensive BPF programs out there where
LLVM tends to generate such code occasionally. We therefore
convert the map_ptr rather into map_state to store all this
w/o extra memory overhead, and the bit whether one of the maps
involved in the collision was from an unpriv_array thus needs
to be retained as well there.

Fixes: b2157399cc98 ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Detect code patterns where malicious 'speculative store bypass' can be used
and sanitize such patterns.

 39: (bf) r3 = r10
 40: (07) r3 += -216
 41: (79) r8 = *(u64 *)(r7 +0)   // slow read
 42: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -72) = 0  // verifier inserts this instruction
 43: (7b) *(u64 *)(r8 +0) = r3   // this store becomes slow due to r8
 44: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r6 +0)   // cpu speculatively executes this load
 45: (71) r2 = *(u8 *)(r1 +0)    // speculatively arbitrary 'load byte'
                                 // is now sanitized

Above code after x86 JIT becomes:
 e5: mov    %rbp,%rdx
 e8: add    $0xffffffffffffff28,%rdx
 ef: mov    0x0(%r13),%r14
 f3: movq   $0x0,-0x48(%rbp)
 fb: mov    %rdx,0x0(%r14)
 ff: mov    0x0(%rbx),%rdi
103: movzbq 0x0(%rdi),%rsi

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

__printf is useful to verify format and arguments. ‘bpf_verifier_vlog’
function is used twice in verifier.c in both cases the caller function
already uses the __printf gcc attribute.

Remove the following warning, triggered with W=1:

  kernel/bpf/verifier.c:176:2: warning: function might be possible candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

It is better to centre all subprog information fields into one structure.
This structure could later serve as function node in call graph.

Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

Currently, verifier treat main prog and subprog differently. All subprogs
detected are kept in env->subprog_starts while main prog is not kept there.
Instead, main prog is implicitly defined as the prog start at 0.

There is actually no difference between main prog and subprog, it is better
to unify them, and register all progs detected into env->subprog_starts.

This could also help simplifying some code logic.

Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

The BTF (BPF Type Format) verifier needs to reuse the current
BPF verifier log.  Hence, it requires the following changes:

(1) Expose log_write() in verifier.c for other users.
    Its name is renamed to bpf_verifier_vlog().

(2) The BTF verifier also needs to check
'log->level && log->ubuf && !bpf_verifier_log_full(log);'
independently outside of the current log_write().  It is
because the BTF verifier will do one-check before
making multiple calls to btf_verifier_vlog to log
the details of a type.

Hence, this check is also re-factored to a new function
bpf_verifier_log_needed().  Since it is re-factored,
we can check it before va_start() in the current
bpf_verifier_log_write() and verbose().

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

bpf_verifer_log =>
bpf_verifier_log

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

Rename the BPF verifier `verbose()` to `bpf_verifier_log_write()` and
export it, so that other components (in particular, drivers for BPF
offload) can reuse the user buffer log to dump error messages at
verification time.

Renaming `verbose()` was necessary in order to avoid a name so generic
to be exported to the global namespace. However to prevent too much pain
for backports, the calls to `verbose()` in the kernel BPF verifier were
not changed. Instead, use function aliasing to make `verbose` point to
`bpf_verifier_log_write`. Another solution could consist in making a
wrapper around `verbose()`, but since it is a variadic function, I don't
see a clean way without creating two identical wrappers, one for the
verifier and one to export.

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>