linux-stable.git/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h, branch v4.17.2

Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net

2018-05-26T02:54:42+00:00

Pull networking fixes from David Miller:
 "Let's begin the holiday weekend with some networking fixes:

   1) Whoops need to restrict cfg80211 wiphy names even more to 64
      bytes. From Eric Biggers.

   2) Fix flags being ignored when using kernel_connect() with SCTP,
      from Xin Long.

   3) Use after free in DCCP, from Alexey Kodanev.

   4) Need to check rhltable_init() return value in ipmr code, from Eric
      Dumazet.

   5) XDP handling fixes in virtio_net from Jason Wang.

   6) Missing RTA_TABLE in rtm_ipv4_policy[], from Roopa Prabhu.

   7) Need to use IRQ disabling spinlocks in mlx4_qp_lookup(), from Jack
      Morgenstein.

   8) Prevent out-of-bounds speculation using indexes in BPF, from
      Daniel Borkmann.

   9) Fix regression added by AF_PACKET link layer cure, from Willem de
      Bruijn.

  10) Correct ENIC dma mask, from Govindarajulu Varadarajan.

  11) Missing config options for PMTU tests, from Stefano Brivio"

* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net: (48 commits)
  ibmvnic: Fix partial success login retries
  selftests/net: Add missing config options for PMTU tests
  mlx4_core: allocate ICM memory in page size chunks
  enic: set DMA mask to 47 bit
  ppp: remove the PPPIOCDETACH ioctl
  ipv4: remove warning in ip_recv_error
  net : sched: cls_api: deal with egdev path only if needed
  vhost: synchronize IOTLB message with dev cleanup
  packet: fix reserve calculation
  net/mlx5: IPSec, Fix a race between concurrent sandbox QP commands
  net/mlx5e: When RXFCS is set, add FCS data into checksum calculation
  bpf: properly enforce index mask to prevent out-of-bounds speculation
  net/mlx4: Fix irq-unsafe spinlock usage
  net: phy: broadcom: Fix bcm_write_exp()
  net: phy: broadcom: Fix auxiliary control register reads
  net: ipv4: add missing RTA_TABLE to rtm_ipv4_policy
  net/mlx4: fix spelling mistake: "Inrerface" -> "Interface" and rephrase message
  ibmvnic: Only do H_EOI for mobility events
  tuntap: correctly set SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE
  virtio-net: fix leaking page for gso packet during mergeable XDP
  ...

bpf: properly enforce index mask to prevent out-of-bounds speculation

2018-05-24T15:15:43+00:00

While reviewing the verifier code, I recently noticed that the
following two program variants in relation to tail calls can be
loaded.

Variant 1:

  # bpftool p d x i 15
    0: (15) if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+3
    1: (18) r2 = map[id:5]
    3: (05) goto pc+2
    4: (18) r2 = map[id:6]
    6: (b7) r3 = 7
    7: (35) if r3 >= 0xa0 goto pc+2
    8: (54) (u32) r3 &= (u32) 255
    9: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12
   10: (b7) r0 = 1
   11: (95) exit

  # bpftool m s i 5
    5: prog_array  flags 0x0
        key 4B  value 4B  max_entries 4  memlock 4096B
  # bpftool m s i 6
    6: prog_array  flags 0x0
        key 4B  value 4B  max_entries 160  memlock 4096B

Variant 2:

  # bpftool p d x i 20
    0: (15) if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+3
    1: (18) r2 = map[id:8]
    3: (05) goto pc+2
    4: (18) r2 = map[id:7]
    6: (b7) r3 = 7
    7: (35) if r3 >= 0x4 goto pc+2
    8: (54) (u32) r3 &= (u32) 3
    9: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12
   10: (b7) r0 = 1
   11: (95) exit

  # bpftool m s i 8
    8: prog_array  flags 0x0
        key 4B  value 4B  max_entries 160  memlock 4096B
  # bpftool m s i 7
    7: prog_array  flags 0x0
        key 4B  value 4B  max_entries 4  memlock 4096B

In both cases the index masking inserted by the verifier in order
to control out of bounds speculation from a CPU via b2157399cc98
("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") seems to be incorrect
in what it is enforcing. In the 1st variant, the mask is applied
from the map with the significantly larger number of entries where
we would allow to a certain degree out of bounds speculation for
the smaller map, and in the 2nd variant where the mask is applied
from the map with the smaller number of entries, we get buggy
behavior since we truncate the index of the larger map.

The original intent from commit b2157399cc98 is to reject such
occasions where two or more different tail call maps are used
in the same tail call helper invocation. However, the check on
the BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON is never hit since we never poisoned the
saved pointer in the first place! We do this explicitly for map
lookups but in case of tail calls we basically used the tail
call map in insn_aux_data that was processed in the most recent
path which the verifier walked. Thus any prior path that stored
a pointer in insn_aux_data at the helper location was always
overridden.

Fix it by moving the map pointer poison logic into a small helper
that covers both BPF helpers with the same logic. After that in
fixup_bpf_calls() the poison check is then hit for tail calls
and the program rejected. Latter only happens in unprivileged
case since this is the *only* occasion where a rewrite needs to
happen, and where such rewrite is specific to the map (max_entries,
index_mask). In the privileged case the rewrite is generic for
the insn->imm / insn->code update so multiple maps from different
paths can be handled just fine since all the remaining logic
happens in the instruction processing itself. This is similar
to the case of map lookups: in case there is a collision of
maps in fixup_bpf_calls() we must skip the inlined rewrite since
this will turn the generic instruction sequence into a non-
generic one. Thus the patch_call_imm will simply update the
insn->imm location where the bpf_map_lookup_elem() will later
take care of the dispatch. Given we need this 'poison' state
as a check, the information of whether a map is an unpriv_array
gets lost, so enforcing it prior to that needs an additional
state. In general this check is needed since there are some
complex and tail call intensive BPF programs out there where
LLVM tends to generate such code occasionally. We therefore
convert the map_ptr rather into map_state to store all this
w/o extra memory overhead, and the bit whether one of the maps
involved in the collision was from an unpriv_array thus needs
to be retained as well there.

Fixes: b2157399cc98 ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann 
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Prevent memory disambiguation attack

2018-05-19T18:44:24+00:00

Detect code patterns where malicious 'speculative store bypass' can be used
and sanitize such patterns.

 39: (bf) r3 = r10
 40: (07) r3 += -216
 41: (79) r8 = *(u64 *)(r7 +0)   // slow read
 42: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -72) = 0  // verifier inserts this instruction
 43: (7b) *(u64 *)(r8 +0) = r3   // this store becomes slow due to r8
 44: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r6 +0)   // cpu speculatively executes this load
 45: (71) r2 = *(u8 *)(r1 +0)    // speculatively arbitrary 'load byte'
                                 // is now sanitized

Above code after x86 JIT becomes:
 e5: mov    %rbp,%rdx
 e8: add    $0xffffffffffffff28,%rdx
 ef: mov    0x0(%r13),%r14
 f3: movq   $0x0,-0x48(%rbp)
 fb: mov    %rdx,0x0(%r14)
 ff: mov    0x0(%rbx),%rdi
103: movzbq 0x0(%rdi),%rsi

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner

bpf: Add bpf_verifier_vlog() and bpf_verifier_log_needed()

2018-03-26T07:58:17+00:00

The BTF (BPF Type Format) verifier needs to reuse the current
BPF verifier log.  Hence, it requires the following changes:

(1) Expose log_write() in verifier.c for other users.
    Its name is renamed to bpf_verifier_vlog().

(2) The BTF verifier also needs to check
'log->level && log->ubuf && !bpf_verifier_log_full(log);'
independently outside of the current log_write().  It is
because the BTF verifier will do one-check before
making multiple calls to btf_verifier_vlog to log
the details of a type.

Hence, this check is also re-factored to a new function
bpf_verifier_log_needed().  Since it is re-factored,
we can check it before va_start() in the current
bpf_verifier_log_write() and verbose().

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau 
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: Rename bpf_verifer_log

2018-03-26T07:58:17+00:00

bpf_verifer_log =>
bpf_verifier_log

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau 
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: export function to write into verifier log buffer

2018-01-10T12:49:36+00:00

Rename the BPF verifier `verbose()` to `bpf_verifier_log_write()` and
export it, so that other components (in particular, drivers for BPF
offload) can reuse the user buffer log to dump error messages at
verification time.

Renaming `verbose()` was necessary in order to avoid a name so generic
to be exported to the global namespace. However to prevent too much pain
for backports, the calls to `verbose()` in the kernel BPF verifier were
not changed. Instead, use function aliasing to make `verbose` point to
`bpf_verifier_log_write`. Another solution could consist in making a
wrapper around `verbose()`, but since it is a variadic function, I don't
see a clean way without creating two identical wrappers, one for the
verifier and one to export.

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet 
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: offload: allow netdev to disappear while verifier is running

2017-12-31T15:12:23+00:00

To allow verifier instruction callbacks without any extra locking
NETDEV_UNREGISTER notification would wait on a waitqueue for verifier
to finish.  This design decision was made when rtnl lock was providing
all the locking.  Use the read/write lock instead and remove the
workqueue.

Verifier will now call into the offload code, so dev_ops are moved
to offload structure.  Since verifier calls are all under
bpf_prog_is_dev_bound() we no longer need static inline implementations
to please builds with CONFIG_NET=n.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski 
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet 
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next

2017-12-28T01:40:32+00:00

Daniel Borkmann says:

====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2017-12-28

The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.

The main changes are:

1) Fix incorrect state pruning related to recognition of zero initialized
   stack slots, where stacksafe exploration would mistakenly return a
   positive pruning verdict too early ignoring other slots, from Gianluca.

2) Various BPF to BPF calls related follow-up fixes. Fix an off-by-one
   in maximum call depth check, and rework maximum stack depth tracking
   logic to fix a bypass of the total stack size check reported by Jann.
   Also fix a bug in arm64 JIT where prog->jited_len was uninitialized.
   Addition of various test cases to BPF selftests, from Alexei.

3) Addition of a BPF selftest to test_verifier that is related to BPF to
   BPF calls which demonstrates a late caller stack size increase and
   thus out of bounds access. Fixed above in 2). Test case from Jann.

4) Addition of correlating BPF helper calls, BPF to BPF calls as well
   as BPF maps to bpftool xlated dump in order to allow for better
   BPF program introspection and debugging, from Daniel.

5) Fixing several bugs in BPF to BPF calls kallsyms handling in order
   to get it actually to work for subprogs, from Daniel.

6) Extending sparc64 JIT support for BPF to BPF calls and fix a couple
   of build errors for libbpf on sparc64, from David.

7) Allow narrower context access for BPF dev cgroup typed programs in
   order to adapt to LLVM code generation. Also adjust memlock rlimit
   in the test_dev_cgroup BPF selftest, from Yonghong.

8) Add netdevsim Kconfig entry to BPF selftests since test_offload.py
   relies on netdevsim device being available, from Jakub.

9) Reduce scope of xdp_do_generic_redirect_map() to being static,
   from Xiongwei.

10) Minor cleanups and spelling fixes in BPF verifier, from Colin.
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: fix maximum stack depth tracking logic

2017-12-27T17:36:23+00:00

Instead of computing max stack depth for current call chain
during the main verifier pass track stack depth of each
function independently and after do_check() is done do
another pass over all instructions analyzing depth
of all possible call stacks.

Fixes: f4d7e40a5b71 ("bpf: introduce function calls (verification)")
Reported-by: Jann Horn 
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net

2017-12-22T16:16:31+00:00

Lots of overlapping changes.  Also on the net-next side
the XDP state management is handled more in the generic
layers so undo the 'net' nfp fix which isn't applicable
in net-next.

Include a necessary change by Jakub Kicinski, with log message:

====================
cls_bpf no longer takes care of offload tracking.  Make sure
netdevsim performs necessary checks.  This fixes a warning
caused by TC trying to remove a filter it has not added.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski 
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet 
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller