<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux-stable.git/include/linux/bpf.h, branch v5.18.3</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>x86/speculation: Add missing prototype for unpriv_ebpf_notify()</title>
<updated>2022-06-09T08:30:04+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Josh Poimboeuf</name>
<email>jpoimboe@redhat.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-04-25T23:40:02+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=38eee09e4344a4895b917f41e0f1f495ea88d734'/>
<id>38eee09e4344a4895b917f41e0f1f495ea88d734</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 2147c438fde135d6c145a96e373d9348e7076f7f ]

Fix the following warnings seen with "make W=1":

  kernel/sysctl.c:183:13: warning: no previous prototype for ‘unpriv_ebpf_notify’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    183 | void __weak unpriv_ebpf_notify(int new_state)
        |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c:659:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘unpriv_ebpf_notify’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    659 | void unpriv_ebpf_notify(int new_state)
        |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Fixes: 44a3918c8245 ("x86/speculation: Include unprivileged eBPF status in Spectre v2 mitigation reporting")
Reported-by: kernel test robot &lt;lkp@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf &lt;jpoimboe@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov &lt;bp@suse.de&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5689d065f739602ececaee1e05e68b8644009608.1650930000.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 2147c438fde135d6c145a96e373d9348e7076f7f ]

Fix the following warnings seen with "make W=1":

  kernel/sysctl.c:183:13: warning: no previous prototype for ‘unpriv_ebpf_notify’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    183 | void __weak unpriv_ebpf_notify(int new_state)
        |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c:659:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘unpriv_ebpf_notify’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    659 | void unpriv_ebpf_notify(int new_state)
        |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Fixes: 44a3918c8245 ("x86/speculation: Include unprivileged eBPF status in Spectre v2 mitigation reporting")
Reported-by: kernel test robot &lt;lkp@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf &lt;jpoimboe@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov &lt;bp@suse.de&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5689d065f739602ececaee1e05e68b8644009608.1650930000.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Move rcu lock management out of BPF_PROG_RUN routines</title>
<updated>2022-06-09T08:29:59+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Stanislav Fomichev</name>
<email>sdf@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-04-14T16:12:33+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=710a8989b4b4067903f5b61314eda491667b6ab3'/>
<id>710a8989b4b4067903f5b61314eda491667b6ab3</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 055eb95533273bc334794dbc598400d10800528f ]

Commit 7d08c2c91171 ("bpf: Refactor BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY family of macros
into functions") switched a bunch of BPF_PROG_RUN macros to inline
routines. This changed the semantic a bit. Due to arguments expansion
of macros, it used to be:

	rcu_read_lock();
	array = rcu_dereference(cgrp-&gt;bpf.effective[atype]);
	...

Now, with with inline routines, we have:
	array_rcu = rcu_dereference(cgrp-&gt;bpf.effective[atype]);
	/* array_rcu can be kfree'd here */
	rcu_read_lock();
	array = rcu_dereference(array_rcu);

I'm assuming in practice rcu subsystem isn't fast enough to trigger
this but let's use rcu API properly.

Also, rename to lower caps to not confuse with macros. Additionally,
drop and expand BPF_PROG_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS_RUN_ARRAY.

See [1] for more context.

  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAKH8qBs60fOinFdxiiQikK_q0EcVxGvNTQoWvHLEUGbgcj1UYg@mail.gmail.com/T/#u

v2
- keep rcu locks inside by passing cgroup_bpf

Fixes: 7d08c2c91171 ("bpf: Refactor BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY family of macros into functions")
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev &lt;sdf@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau &lt;kafai@fb.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220414161233.170780-1-sdf@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 055eb95533273bc334794dbc598400d10800528f ]

Commit 7d08c2c91171 ("bpf: Refactor BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY family of macros
into functions") switched a bunch of BPF_PROG_RUN macros to inline
routines. This changed the semantic a bit. Due to arguments expansion
of macros, it used to be:

	rcu_read_lock();
	array = rcu_dereference(cgrp-&gt;bpf.effective[atype]);
	...

Now, with with inline routines, we have:
	array_rcu = rcu_dereference(cgrp-&gt;bpf.effective[atype]);
	/* array_rcu can be kfree'd here */
	rcu_read_lock();
	array = rcu_dereference(array_rcu);

I'm assuming in practice rcu subsystem isn't fast enough to trigger
this but let's use rcu API properly.

Also, rename to lower caps to not confuse with macros. Additionally,
drop and expand BPF_PROG_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS_RUN_ARRAY.

See [1] for more context.

  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAKH8qBs60fOinFdxiiQikK_q0EcVxGvNTQoWvHLEUGbgcj1UYg@mail.gmail.com/T/#u

v2
- keep rcu locks inside by passing cgroup_bpf

Fixes: 7d08c2c91171 ("bpf: Refactor BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY family of macros into functions")
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev &lt;sdf@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau &lt;kafai@fb.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220414161233.170780-1-sdf@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/bpf: Add missing trampoline program type to trampoline_count test</title>
<updated>2022-06-09T08:29:46+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yuntao Wang</name>
<email>ytcoode@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-05-19T15:06:10+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=b1ddce7ce3e422887f98bc163618b858edca7e71'/>
<id>b1ddce7ce3e422887f98bc163618b858edca7e71</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit b23316aabffa835ecc516cb81daeef5b9155e8a5 ]

Currently the trampoline_count test doesn't include any fmod_ret bpf
programs, fix it to make the test cover all possible trampoline program
types.

Since fmod_ret bpf programs can't be attached to __set_task_comm function,
as it's neither whitelisted for error injection nor a security hook, change
it to bpf_modify_return_test.

This patch also does some other cleanups such as removing duplicate code,
dropping inconsistent comments, etc.

Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang &lt;ytcoode@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko &lt;andrii@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yhs@fb.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220519150610.601313-1-ytcoode@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit b23316aabffa835ecc516cb81daeef5b9155e8a5 ]

Currently the trampoline_count test doesn't include any fmod_ret bpf
programs, fix it to make the test cover all possible trampoline program
types.

Since fmod_ret bpf programs can't be attached to __set_task_comm function,
as it's neither whitelisted for error injection nor a security hook, change
it to bpf_modify_return_test.

This patch also does some other cleanups such as removing duplicate code,
dropping inconsistent comments, etc.

Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang &lt;ytcoode@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko &lt;andrii@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yhs@fb.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220519150610.601313-1-ytcoode@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next</title>
<updated>2022-03-22T18:18:49+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-03-22T17:36:56+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=0db8640df59512dbd423c32077919f10cf35ebc6'/>
<id>0db8640df59512dbd423c32077919f10cf35ebc6</id>
<content type='text'>
Alexei Starovoitov says:

====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2022-03-21 v2

We've added 137 non-merge commits during the last 17 day(s) which contain
a total of 143 files changed, 7123 insertions(+), 1092 deletions(-).

The main changes are:

1) Custom SEC() handling in libbpf, from Andrii.

2) subskeleton support, from Delyan.

3) Use btf_tag to recognize __percpu pointers in the verifier, from Hao.

4) Fix net.core.bpf_jit_harden race, from Hou.

5) Fix bpf_sk_lookup remote_port on big-endian, from Jakub.

6) Introduce fprobe (multi kprobe) _without_ arch bits, from Masami.
The arch specific bits will come later.

7) Introduce multi_kprobe bpf programs on top of fprobe, from Jiri.

8) Enable non-atomic allocations in local storage, from Joanne.

9) Various var_off ptr_to_btf_id fixed, from Kumar.

10) bpf_ima_file_hash helper, from Roberto.

11) Add "live packet" mode for XDP in BPF_PROG_RUN, from Toke.

* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (137 commits)
  selftests/bpf: Fix kprobe_multi test.
  Revert "rethook: x86: Add rethook x86 implementation"
  Revert "arm64: rethook: Add arm64 rethook implementation"
  Revert "powerpc: Add rethook support"
  Revert "ARM: rethook: Add rethook arm implementation"
  bpftool: Fix a bug in subskeleton code generation
  bpf: Fix bpf_prog_pack when PMU_SIZE is not defined
  bpf: Fix bpf_prog_pack for multi-node setup
  bpf: Fix warning for cast from restricted gfp_t in verifier
  bpf, arm: Fix various typos in comments
  libbpf: Close fd in bpf_object__reuse_map
  bpftool: Fix print error when show bpf map
  bpf: Fix kprobe_multi return probe backtrace
  Revert "bpf: Add support to inline bpf_get_func_ip helper on x86"
  bpf: Simplify check in btf_parse_hdr()
  selftests/bpf/test_lirc_mode2.sh: Exit with proper code
  bpf: Check for NULL return from bpf_get_btf_vmlinux
  selftests/bpf: Test skipping stacktrace
  bpf: Adjust BPF stack helper functions to accommodate skip &gt; 0
  bpf: Select proper size for bpf_prog_pack
  ...
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322050159.5507-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Alexei Starovoitov says:

====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2022-03-21 v2

We've added 137 non-merge commits during the last 17 day(s) which contain
a total of 143 files changed, 7123 insertions(+), 1092 deletions(-).

The main changes are:

1) Custom SEC() handling in libbpf, from Andrii.

2) subskeleton support, from Delyan.

3) Use btf_tag to recognize __percpu pointers in the verifier, from Hao.

4) Fix net.core.bpf_jit_harden race, from Hou.

5) Fix bpf_sk_lookup remote_port on big-endian, from Jakub.

6) Introduce fprobe (multi kprobe) _without_ arch bits, from Masami.
The arch specific bits will come later.

7) Introduce multi_kprobe bpf programs on top of fprobe, from Jiri.

8) Enable non-atomic allocations in local storage, from Joanne.

9) Various var_off ptr_to_btf_id fixed, from Kumar.

10) bpf_ima_file_hash helper, from Roberto.

11) Add "live packet" mode for XDP in BPF_PROG_RUN, from Toke.

* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (137 commits)
  selftests/bpf: Fix kprobe_multi test.
  Revert "rethook: x86: Add rethook x86 implementation"
  Revert "arm64: rethook: Add arm64 rethook implementation"
  Revert "powerpc: Add rethook support"
  Revert "ARM: rethook: Add rethook arm implementation"
  bpftool: Fix a bug in subskeleton code generation
  bpf: Fix bpf_prog_pack when PMU_SIZE is not defined
  bpf: Fix bpf_prog_pack for multi-node setup
  bpf: Fix warning for cast from restricted gfp_t in verifier
  bpf, arm: Fix various typos in comments
  libbpf: Close fd in bpf_object__reuse_map
  bpftool: Fix print error when show bpf map
  bpf: Fix kprobe_multi return probe backtrace
  Revert "bpf: Add support to inline bpf_get_func_ip helper on x86"
  bpf: Simplify check in btf_parse_hdr()
  selftests/bpf/test_lirc_mode2.sh: Exit with proper code
  bpf: Check for NULL return from bpf_get_btf_vmlinux
  selftests/bpf: Test skipping stacktrace
  bpf: Adjust BPF stack helper functions to accommodate skip &gt; 0
  bpf: Select proper size for bpf_prog_pack
  ...
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322050159.5507-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net</title>
<updated>2022-03-11T01:16:56+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-03-11T01:16:56+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=1e8a3f0d2a1ef544611a7ea4a7c1512c732e0e43'/>
<id>1e8a3f0d2a1ef544611a7ea4a7c1512c732e0e43</id>
<content type='text'>
net/dsa/dsa2.c
  commit afb3cc1a397d ("net: dsa: unlock the rtnl_mutex when dsa_master_setup() fails")
  commit e83d56537859 ("net: dsa: replay master state events in dsa_tree_{setup,teardown}_master")
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220307101436.7ae87da0@canb.auug.org.au/

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice.h
  commit 97b0129146b1 ("ice: Fix error with handling of bonding MTU")
  commit 43113ff73453 ("ice: add TTY for GNSS module for E810T device")
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220310112843.3233bcf1@canb.auug.org.au/

drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_lte.c
  commit fc7f750dc9d1 ("staging: gdm724x: fix use after free in gdm_lte_rx()")
  commit 4bcc4249b4cf ("staging: Use netif_rx().")
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220308111043.1018a59d@canb.auug.org.au/

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
net/dsa/dsa2.c
  commit afb3cc1a397d ("net: dsa: unlock the rtnl_mutex when dsa_master_setup() fails")
  commit e83d56537859 ("net: dsa: replay master state events in dsa_tree_{setup,teardown}_master")
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220307101436.7ae87da0@canb.auug.org.au/

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice.h
  commit 97b0129146b1 ("ice: Fix error with handling of bonding MTU")
  commit 43113ff73453 ("ice: add TTY for GNSS module for E810T device")
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220310112843.3233bcf1@canb.auug.org.au/

drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_lte.c
  commit fc7f750dc9d1 ("staging: gdm724x: fix use after free in gdm_lte_rx()")
  commit 4bcc4249b4cf ("staging: Use netif_rx().")
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220308111043.1018a59d@canb.auug.org.au/

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge tag 'x86_bugs_for_v5.17' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip</title>
<updated>2022-03-08T01:29:47+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Linus Torvalds</name>
<email>torvalds@linux-foundation.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-03-08T01:29:47+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=4a01e748a51cdc0527fdc913546dd46e822aa00d'/>
<id>4a01e748a51cdc0527fdc913546dd46e822aa00d</id>
<content type='text'>
Pull x86 spectre fixes from Borislav Petkov:

 - Mitigate Spectre v2-type Branch History Buffer attacks on machines
   which support eIBRS, i.e., the hardware-assisted speculation
   restriction after it has been shown that such machines are vulnerable
   even with the hardware mitigation.

 - Do not use the default LFENCE-based Spectre v2 mitigation on AMD as
   it is insufficient to mitigate such attacks. Instead, switch to
   retpolines on all AMD by default.

 - Update the docs and add some warnings for the obviously vulnerable
   cmdline configurations.

* tag 'x86_bugs_for_v5.17' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  x86/speculation: Warn about eIBRS + LFENCE + Unprivileged eBPF + SMT
  x86/speculation: Warn about Spectre v2 LFENCE mitigation
  x86/speculation: Update link to AMD speculation whitepaper
  x86/speculation: Use generic retpoline by default on AMD
  x86/speculation: Include unprivileged eBPF status in Spectre v2 mitigation reporting
  Documentation/hw-vuln: Update spectre doc
  x86/speculation: Add eIBRS + Retpoline options
  x86/speculation: Rename RETPOLINE_AMD to RETPOLINE_LFENCE
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Pull x86 spectre fixes from Borislav Petkov:

 - Mitigate Spectre v2-type Branch History Buffer attacks on machines
   which support eIBRS, i.e., the hardware-assisted speculation
   restriction after it has been shown that such machines are vulnerable
   even with the hardware mitigation.

 - Do not use the default LFENCE-based Spectre v2 mitigation on AMD as
   it is insufficient to mitigate such attacks. Instead, switch to
   retpolines on all AMD by default.

 - Update the docs and add some warnings for the obviously vulnerable
   cmdline configurations.

* tag 'x86_bugs_for_v5.17' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  x86/speculation: Warn about eIBRS + LFENCE + Unprivileged eBPF + SMT
  x86/speculation: Warn about Spectre v2 LFENCE mitigation
  x86/speculation: Update link to AMD speculation whitepaper
  x86/speculation: Use generic retpoline by default on AMD
  x86/speculation: Include unprivileged eBPF status in Spectre v2 mitigation reporting
  Documentation/hw-vuln: Update spectre doc
  x86/speculation: Add eIBRS + Retpoline options
  x86/speculation: Rename RETPOLINE_AMD to RETPOLINE_LFENCE
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Reject programs that try to load __percpu memory.</title>
<updated>2022-03-06T02:38:15+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Hao Luo</name>
<email>haoluo@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-03-04T19:16:56+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=5844101a1be9b8636024cb31c865ef13c7cc6db3'/>
<id>5844101a1be9b8636024cb31c865ef13c7cc6db3</id>
<content type='text'>
With the introduction of the btf_type_tag "percpu", we can add a
MEM_PERCPU to identify those pointers that point to percpu memory.
The ability of differetiating percpu pointers from regular memory
pointers have two benefits:

 1. It forbids unexpected use of percpu pointers, such as direct loads.
    In kernel, there are special functions used for accessing percpu
    memory. Directly loading percpu memory is meaningless. We already
    have BPF helpers like bpf_per_cpu_ptr() and bpf_this_cpu_ptr() that
    wrap the kernel percpu functions. So we can now convert percpu
    pointers into regular pointers in a safe way.

 2. Previously, bpf_per_cpu_ptr() and bpf_this_cpu_ptr() only work on
    PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID, a special reg_type which describes static
    percpu variables in kernel (we rely on pahole to encode them into
    vmlinux BTF). Now, since we can identify __percpu tagged pointers,
    we can also identify dynamically allocated percpu memory as well.
    It means we can use bpf_xxx_cpu_ptr() on dynamic percpu memory.
    This would be very convenient when accessing fields like
    "cgroup-&gt;rstat_cpu".

Signed-off-by: Hao Luo &lt;haoluo@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yhs@fb.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304191657.981240-4-haoluo@google.com
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
With the introduction of the btf_type_tag "percpu", we can add a
MEM_PERCPU to identify those pointers that point to percpu memory.
The ability of differetiating percpu pointers from regular memory
pointers have two benefits:

 1. It forbids unexpected use of percpu pointers, such as direct loads.
    In kernel, there are special functions used for accessing percpu
    memory. Directly loading percpu memory is meaningless. We already
    have BPF helpers like bpf_per_cpu_ptr() and bpf_this_cpu_ptr() that
    wrap the kernel percpu functions. So we can now convert percpu
    pointers into regular pointers in a safe way.

 2. Previously, bpf_per_cpu_ptr() and bpf_this_cpu_ptr() only work on
    PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID, a special reg_type which describes static
    percpu variables in kernel (we rely on pahole to encode them into
    vmlinux BTF). Now, since we can identify __percpu tagged pointers,
    we can also identify dynamically allocated percpu memory as well.
    It means we can use bpf_xxx_cpu_ptr() on dynamic percpu memory.
    This would be very convenient when accessing fields like
    "cgroup-&gt;rstat_cpu".

Signed-off-by: Hao Luo &lt;haoluo@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yhs@fb.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304191657.981240-4-haoluo@google.com
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>x86/speculation: Include unprivileged eBPF status in Spectre v2 mitigation reporting</title>
<updated>2022-02-21T09:21:47+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Josh Poimboeuf</name>
<email>jpoimboe@redhat.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-02-18T19:49:08+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=44a3918c8245ab10c6c9719dd12e7a8d291980d8'/>
<id>44a3918c8245ab10c6c9719dd12e7a8d291980d8</id>
<content type='text'>
With unprivileged eBPF enabled, eIBRS (without retpoline) is vulnerable
to Spectre v2 BHB-based attacks.

When both are enabled, print a warning message and report it in the
'spectre_v2' sysfs vulnerabilities file.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf &lt;jpoimboe@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov &lt;bp@suse.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
With unprivileged eBPF enabled, eIBRS (without retpoline) is vulnerable
to Spectre v2 BHB-based attacks.

When both are enabled, print a warning message and report it in the
'spectre_v2' sysfs vulnerabilities file.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf &lt;jpoimboe@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov &lt;bp@suse.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net</title>
<updated>2022-02-17T20:22:28+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-02-17T20:22:28+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=93d11e0d76e3c5a8350c77d1463d9f845bdc9307'/>
<id>93d11e0d76e3c5a8350c77d1463d9f845bdc9307</id>
<content type='text'>
Fast path bpf marge for some -next work.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Fast path bpf marge for some -next work.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bpf: Fix a bpf_timer initialization issue</title>
<updated>2022-02-11T21:21:47+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yonghong Song</name>
<email>yhs@fb.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-02-11T19:49:53+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=5eaed6eedbe9612f642ad2b880f961d1c6c8ec2b'/>
<id>5eaed6eedbe9612f642ad2b880f961d1c6c8ec2b</id>
<content type='text'>
The patch in [1] intends to fix a bpf_timer related issue,
but the fix caused existing 'timer' selftest to fail with
hang or some random errors. After some debug, I found
an issue with check_and_init_map_value() in the hashtab.c.
More specifically, in hashtab.c, we have code
  l_new = bpf_map_kmalloc_node(&amp;htab-&gt;map, ...)
  check_and_init_map_value(&amp;htab-&gt;map, l_new...)
Note that bpf_map_kmalloc_node() does not do initialization
so l_new contains random value.

The function check_and_init_map_value() intends to zero the
bpf_spin_lock and bpf_timer if they exist in the map.
But I found bpf_spin_lock is zero'ed but bpf_timer is not zero'ed.
With [1], later copy_map_value() skips copying of
bpf_spin_lock and bpf_timer. The non-zero bpf_timer caused
random failures for 'timer' selftest.
Without [1], for both bpf_spin_lock and bpf_timer case,
bpf_timer will be zero'ed, so 'timer' self test is okay.

For check_and_init_map_value(), why bpf_spin_lock is zero'ed
properly while bpf_timer not. In bpf uapi header, we have
  struct bpf_spin_lock {
        __u32   val;
  };
  struct bpf_timer {
        __u64 :64;
        __u64 :64;
  } __attribute__((aligned(8)));

The initialization code:
  *(struct bpf_spin_lock *)(dst + map-&gt;spin_lock_off) =
      (struct bpf_spin_lock){};
  *(struct bpf_timer *)(dst + map-&gt;timer_off) =
      (struct bpf_timer){};
It appears the compiler has no obligation to initialize anonymous fields.
For example, let us use clang with bpf target as below:
  $ cat t.c
  struct bpf_timer {
        unsigned long long :64;
  };
  struct bpf_timer2 {
        unsigned long long a;
  };

  void test(struct bpf_timer *t) {
    *t = (struct bpf_timer){};
  }
  void test2(struct bpf_timer2 *t) {
    *t = (struct bpf_timer2){};
  }
  $ clang -target bpf -O2 -c -g t.c
  $ llvm-objdump -d t.o
   ...
   0000000000000000 &lt;test&gt;:
       0:       95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit
   0000000000000008 &lt;test2&gt;:
       1:       b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0
       2:       7b 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r1 + 0) = r2
       3:       95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit

gcc11.2 does not have the above issue. But from
  INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ©ISO/IEC ISO/IEC 9899:201x
  Programming languages — C
  http://www.open-std.org/Jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1547.pdf
  page 157:
  Except where explicitly stated otherwise, for the purposes of
  this subclause unnamed members of objects of structure and union
  type do not participate in initialization. Unnamed members of
  structure objects have indeterminate value even after initialization.

To fix the problem, let use memset for bpf_timer case in
check_and_init_map_value(). For consistency, memset is also
used for bpf_spin_lock case.

  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220209070324.1093182-2-memxor@gmail.com/

Fixes: 68134668c17f3 ("bpf: Add map side support for bpf timers.")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yhs@fb.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220211194953.3142152-1-yhs@fb.com
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The patch in [1] intends to fix a bpf_timer related issue,
but the fix caused existing 'timer' selftest to fail with
hang or some random errors. After some debug, I found
an issue with check_and_init_map_value() in the hashtab.c.
More specifically, in hashtab.c, we have code
  l_new = bpf_map_kmalloc_node(&amp;htab-&gt;map, ...)
  check_and_init_map_value(&amp;htab-&gt;map, l_new...)
Note that bpf_map_kmalloc_node() does not do initialization
so l_new contains random value.

The function check_and_init_map_value() intends to zero the
bpf_spin_lock and bpf_timer if they exist in the map.
But I found bpf_spin_lock is zero'ed but bpf_timer is not zero'ed.
With [1], later copy_map_value() skips copying of
bpf_spin_lock and bpf_timer. The non-zero bpf_timer caused
random failures for 'timer' selftest.
Without [1], for both bpf_spin_lock and bpf_timer case,
bpf_timer will be zero'ed, so 'timer' self test is okay.

For check_and_init_map_value(), why bpf_spin_lock is zero'ed
properly while bpf_timer not. In bpf uapi header, we have
  struct bpf_spin_lock {
        __u32   val;
  };
  struct bpf_timer {
        __u64 :64;
        __u64 :64;
  } __attribute__((aligned(8)));

The initialization code:
  *(struct bpf_spin_lock *)(dst + map-&gt;spin_lock_off) =
      (struct bpf_spin_lock){};
  *(struct bpf_timer *)(dst + map-&gt;timer_off) =
      (struct bpf_timer){};
It appears the compiler has no obligation to initialize anonymous fields.
For example, let us use clang with bpf target as below:
  $ cat t.c
  struct bpf_timer {
        unsigned long long :64;
  };
  struct bpf_timer2 {
        unsigned long long a;
  };

  void test(struct bpf_timer *t) {
    *t = (struct bpf_timer){};
  }
  void test2(struct bpf_timer2 *t) {
    *t = (struct bpf_timer2){};
  }
  $ clang -target bpf -O2 -c -g t.c
  $ llvm-objdump -d t.o
   ...
   0000000000000000 &lt;test&gt;:
       0:       95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit
   0000000000000008 &lt;test2&gt;:
       1:       b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0
       2:       7b 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r1 + 0) = r2
       3:       95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit

gcc11.2 does not have the above issue. But from
  INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ©ISO/IEC ISO/IEC 9899:201x
  Programming languages — C
  http://www.open-std.org/Jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1547.pdf
  page 157:
  Except where explicitly stated otherwise, for the purposes of
  this subclause unnamed members of objects of structure and union
  type do not participate in initialization. Unnamed members of
  structure objects have indeterminate value even after initialization.

To fix the problem, let use memset for bpf_timer case in
check_and_init_map_value(). For consistency, memset is also
used for bpf_spin_lock case.

  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220209070324.1093182-2-memxor@gmail.com/

Fixes: 68134668c17f3 ("bpf: Add map side support for bpf timers.")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song &lt;yhs@fb.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220211194953.3142152-1-yhs@fb.com
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
