[ Upstream commit ebf7f6f0a6cdcc17a3da52b81e4b3a98c4005028 ]

In the current code, the actual max tail call count is 33 which is greater
than MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT (defined as 32). The actual limit is not consistent
with the meaning of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT and thus confusing at first glance.
We can see the historical evolution from commit 04fd61ab36ec ("bpf: allow
bpf programs to tail-call other bpf programs") and commit f9dabe016b63
("bpf: Undo off-by-one in interpreter tail call count limit"). In order
to avoid changing existing behavior, the actual limit is 33 now, this is
reasonable.

After commit 874be05f525e ("bpf, tests: Add tail call test suite"), we can
see there exists failed testcase.

On all archs when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set:
 # echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
 # modprobe test_bpf
 # dmesg | grep -w FAIL
 Tail call error path, max count reached jited:0 ret 34 != 33 FAIL

On some archs:
 # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
 # modprobe test_bpf
 # dmesg | grep -w FAIL
 Tail call error path, max count reached jited:1 ret 34 != 33 FAIL

Although the above failed testcase has been fixed in commit 18935a72eb25
("bpf/tests: Fix error in tail call limit tests"), it would still be good
to change the value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT from 32 to 33 to make the code
more readable.

The 32-bit x86 JIT was using a limit of 32, just fix the wrong comments and
limit to 33 tail calls as the constant MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT updated. For the
mips64 JIT, use "ori" instead of "addiu" as suggested by Johan Almbladh.
For the riscv JIT, use RV_REG_TCC directly to save one register move as
suggested by Björn Töpel. For the other implementations, no function changes,
it does not change the current limit 33, the new value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT
can reflect the actual max tail call count, the related tail call testcases
in test_bpf module and selftests can work well for the interpreter and the
JIT.

Here are the test results on x86_64:

 # uname -m
 x86_64
 # echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
 # modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls
 # dmesg | tail -1
 test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/8 JIT'ed]
 # rmmod test_bpf
 # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
 # modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls
 # dmesg | tail -1
 test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [8/8 JIT'ed]
 # rmmod test_bpf
 # ./test_progs -t tailcalls
 #142 tailcalls:OK
 Summary: 1/11 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1636075800-3264-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

The initial implementation of migrate_disable() for mainline was a
wrapper around preempt_disable(). RT kernels substituted this with a
real migrate disable implementation.

Later on mainline gained true migrate disable support, but neither
documentation nor affected code were updated.

Remove stale comments claiming that migrate_disable() is PREEMPT_RT only.

Don't use __this_cpu_inc() in the !PREEMPT_RT path because preemption is
not disabled and the RMW operation can be preempted.

Fixes: 74d862b682f51 ("sched: Make migrate_disable/enable() independent of RT")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211127163200.10466-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de

The arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher function does not have a prototype, and
yields the following warning when W=1 is enabled for the kernel build.

  >> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:2188:5: warning: no previous \
  prototype for 'arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
        2188 | int arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher(void *image, s64 *funcs, \
	int num_funcs)
             |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Remove the warning by adding a function declaration to include/linux/bpf.h.

Fixes: 75ccbef6369e ("bpf: Introduce BPF dispatcher")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211117125708.769168-1-bjorn@kernel.org

Commit a23740ec43ba ("bpf: Track contents of read-only maps as scalars") is
checking whether maps are read-only both from BPF program side and user space
side, and then, given their content is constant, reading out their data via
map->ops->map_direct_value_addr() which is then subsequently used as known
scalar value for the register, that is, it is marked as __mark_reg_known()
with the read value at verification time. Before a23740ec43ba, the register
content was marked as an unknown scalar so the verifier could not make any
assumptions about the map content.

The current implementation however is prone to a TOCTOU race, meaning, the
value read as known scalar for the register is not guaranteed to be exactly
the same at a later point when the program is executed, and as such, the
prior made assumptions of the verifier with regards to the program will be
invalid which can cause issues such as OOB access, etc.

While the BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG map flag is always fixed and required to be
specified at map creation time, the map->frozen property is initially set to
false for the map given the map value needs to be populated, e.g. for global
data sections. Once complete, the loader "freezes" the map from user space
such that no subsequent updates/deletes are possible anymore. For the rest
of the lifetime of the map, this freeze one-time trigger cannot be undone
anymore after a successful BPF_MAP_FREEZE cmd return. Meaning, any new BPF_*
cmd calls which would update/delete map entries will be rejected with -EPERM
since map_get_sys_perms() removes the FMODE_CAN_WRITE permission. This also
means that pending update/delete map entries must still complete before this
guarantee is given. This corner case is not an issue for loaders since they
create and prepare such program private map in successive steps.

However, a malicious user is able to trigger this TOCTOU race in two different
ways: i) via userfaultfd, and ii) via batched updates. For i) userfaultfd is
used to expand the competition interval, so that map_update_elem() can modify
the contents of the map after map_freeze() and bpf_prog_load() were executed.
This works, because userfaultfd halts the parallel thread which triggered a
map_update_elem() at the time where we copy key/value from the user buffer and
this already passed the FMODE_CAN_WRITE capability test given at that time the
map was not "frozen". Then, the main thread performs the map_freeze() and
bpf_prog_load(), and once that had completed successfully, the other thread
is woken up to complete the pending map_update_elem() which then changes the
map content. For ii) the idea of the batched update is similar, meaning, when
there are a large number of updates to be processed, it can increase the
competition interval between the two. It is therefore possible in practice to
modify the contents of the map after executing map_freeze() and bpf_prog_load().

One way to fix both i) and ii) at the same time is to expand the use of the
map's map->writecnt. The latter was introduced in fc9702273e2e ("bpf: Add mmap()
support for BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY") and further refined in 1f6cb19be2e2 ("bpf:
Prevent re-mmap()'ing BPF map as writable for initially r/o mapping") with
the rationale to make a writable mmap()'ing of a map mutually exclusive with
read-only freezing. The counter indicates writable mmap() mappings and then
prevents/fails the freeze operation. Its semantics can be expanded beyond
just mmap() by generally indicating ongoing write phases. This would essentially
span any parallel regular and batched flavor of update/delete operation and
then also have map_freeze() fail with -EBUSY. For the check_mem_access() in
the verifier we expand upon the bpf_map_is_rdonly() check ensuring that all
last pending writes have completed via bpf_map_write_active() test. Once the
map->frozen is set and bpf_map_write_active() indicates a map->writecnt of 0
only then we are really guaranteed to use the map's data as known constants.
For map->frozen being set and pending writes in process of still being completed
we fall back to marking that register as unknown scalar so we don't end up
making assumptions about it. With this, both TOCTOU reproducers from i) and
ii) are fixed.

Note that the map->writecnt has been converted into a atomic64 in the fix in
order to avoid a double freeze_mutex mutex_{un,}lock() pair when updating
map->writecnt in the various map update/delete BPF_* cmd flavors. Spanning
the freeze_mutex over entire map update/delete operations in syscall side
would not be possible due to then causing everything to be serialized.
Similarly, something like synchronize_rcu() after setting map->frozen to wait
for update/deletes to complete is not possible either since it would also
have to span the user copy which can sleep. On the libbpf side, this won't
break d66562fba1ce ("libbpf: Add BPF object skeleton support") as the
anonymous mmap()-ed "map initialization image" is remapped as a BPF map-backed
mmap()-ed memory where for .rodata it's non-writable.

Fixes: a23740ec43ba ("bpf: Track contents of read-only maps as scalars")
Reported-by: w1tcher.bupt@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

This patch is to fix an out-of-bound access issue when jit-ing the
bpf_pseudo_func insn (i.e. ld_imm64 with src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC)

In jit_subprog(), it currently reuses the subprog index cached in
insn[1].imm.  This subprog index is an index into a few array related
to subprogs.  For example, in jit_subprog(), it is an index to the newly
allocated 'struct bpf_prog **func' array.

The subprog index was cached in insn[1].imm after add_subprog().  However,
this could become outdated (and too big in this case) if some subprogs
are completely removed during dead code elimination (in
adjust_subprog_starts_after_remove).  The cached index in insn[1].imm
is not updated accordingly and causing out-of-bound issue in the later
jit_subprog().

Unlike bpf_pseudo_'func' insn, the current bpf_pseudo_'call' insn
is handling the DCE properly by calling find_subprog(insn->imm) to
figure out the index instead of caching the subprog index.
The existing bpf_adj_branches() will adjust the insn->imm
whenever insn is added or removed.

Instead of having two ways handling subprog index,
this patch is to make bpf_pseudo_func works more like
bpf_pseudo_call.

First change is to stop caching the subprog index result
in insn[1].imm after add_subprog().  The verification
process will use find_subprog(insn->imm) to figure
out the subprog index.

Second change is in bpf_adj_branches() and have it to
adjust the insn->imm for the bpf_pseudo_func insn also
whenever insn is added or removed.

Third change is in jit_subprog().  Like the bpf_pseudo_call handling,
bpf_pseudo_func temporarily stores the find_subprog() result
in insn->off.  It is fine because the prog's insn has been finalized
at this point.  insn->off will be reset back to 0 later to avoid
confusing the userspace prog dump tool.

Fixes: 69c087ba6225 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211106014014.651018-1-kafai@fb.com

Alexei Starovoitov says:

====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2021-11-01

We've added 181 non-merge commits during the last 28 day(s) which contain
a total of 280 files changed, 11791 insertions(+), 5879 deletions(-).

The main changes are:

1) Fix bpf verifier propagation of 64-bit bounds, from Alexei.

2) Parallelize bpf test_progs, from Yucong and Andrii.

3) Deprecate various libbpf apis including af_xdp, from Andrii, Hengqi, Magnus.

4) Improve bpf selftests on s390, from Ilya.

5) bloomfilter bpf map type, from Joanne.

6) Big improvements to JIT tests especially on Mips, from Johan.

7) Support kernel module function calls from bpf, from Kumar.

8) Support typeless and weak ksym in light skeleton, from Kumar.

9) Disallow unprivileged bpf by default, from Pawan.

10) BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG support, from Yonghong.

11) Various bpftool cleanups, from Quentin.

* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (181 commits)
  libbpf: Deprecate AF_XDP support
  kbuild: Unify options for BTF generation for vmlinux and modules
  selftests/bpf: Add a testcase for 64-bit bounds propagation issue.
  bpf: Fix propagation of signed bounds from 64-bit min/max into 32-bit.
  bpf: Fix propagation of bounds from 64-bit min/max into 32-bit and var_off.
  selftests/bpf: Fix also no-alu32 strobemeta selftest
  bpf: Add missing map_delete_elem method to bloom filter map
  selftests/bpf: Add bloom map success test for userspace calls
  bpf: Add alignment padding for "map_extra" + consolidate holes
  bpf: Bloom filter map naming fixups
  selftests/bpf: Add test cases for struct_ops prog
  bpf: Add dummy BPF STRUCT_OPS for test purpose
  bpf: Factor out helpers for ctx access checking
  bpf: Factor out a helper to prepare trampoline for struct_ops prog
  selftests, bpf: Fix broken riscv build
  riscv, libbpf: Add RISC-V (RV64) support to bpf_tracing.h
  tools, build: Add RISC-V to HOSTARCH parsing
  riscv, bpf: Increase the maximum number of iterations
  selftests, bpf: Add one test for sockmap with strparser
  selftests, bpf: Fix test_txmsg_ingress_parser error
  ...
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211102013123.9005-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

This patch makes 2 changes regarding alignment padding
for the "map_extra" field.

1) In the kernel header, "map_extra" and "btf_value_type_id"
are rearranged to consolidate the hole.

Before:
struct bpf_map {
	...
        u32		max_entries;	/*    36     4	*/
        u32		map_flags;	/*    40     4	*/

        /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */

        u64		map_extra;	/*    48     8	*/
        int		spin_lock_off;	/*    56     4	*/
        int		timer_off;	/*    60     4	*/
        /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
        u32		id;		/*    64     4	*/
        int		numa_node;	/*    68     4	*/
	...
        bool		frozen;		/*   117     1	*/

        /* XXX 10 bytes hole, try to pack */

        /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) --- */
	...
        struct work_struct	work;	/*   144    72	*/

        /* --- cacheline 3 boundary (192 bytes) was 24 bytes ago --- */
	struct mutex	freeze_mutex;	/*   216   144 	*/

        /* --- cacheline 5 boundary (320 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */
        u64		writecnt; 	/*   360     8	*/

    /* size: 384, cachelines: 6, members: 26 */
    /* sum members: 354, holes: 2, sum holes: 14 */
    /* padding: 16 */
    /* forced alignments: 2, forced holes: 1, sum forced holes: 10 */

} __attribute__((__aligned__(64)));

After:
struct bpf_map {
	...
        u32		max_entries;	/*    36     4	*/
        u64		map_extra;	/*    40     8 	*/
        u32		map_flags;	/*    48     4	*/
        int		spin_lock_off;	/*    52     4	*/
        int		timer_off;	/*    56     4	*/
        u32		id;		/*    60     4	*/

        /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
        int		numa_node;	/*    64     4	*/
	...
	bool		frozen		/*   113     1  */

        /* XXX 14 bytes hole, try to pack */

        /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) --- */
	...
        struct work_struct	work;	/*   144    72	*/

        /* --- cacheline 3 boundary (192 bytes) was 24 bytes ago --- */
        struct mutex	freeze_mutex;	/*   216   144	*/

        /* --- cacheline 5 boundary (320 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */
        u64		writecnt;       /*   360     8	*/

    /* size: 384, cachelines: 6, members: 26 */
    /* sum members: 354, holes: 1, sum holes: 14 */
    /* padding: 16 */
    /* forced alignments: 2, forced holes: 1, sum forced holes: 14 */

} __attribute__((__aligned__(64)));

2) Add alignment padding to the bpf_map_info struct
More details can be found in commit 36f9814a494a ("bpf: fix uapi hole
for 32 bit compat applications")

Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211029224909.1721024-3-joannekoong@fb.com

Currently the test of BPF STRUCT_OPS depends on the specific bpf
implementation of tcp_congestion_ops, but it can not cover all
basic functionalities (e.g, return value handling), so introduce
a dummy BPF STRUCT_OPS for test purpose.

Loading a bpf_dummy_ops implementation from userspace is prohibited,
and its only purpose is to run BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS program
through bpf(BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN). Now programs for test_1() & test_2()
are supported. The following three cases are exercised in
bpf_dummy_struct_ops_test_run():

(1) test and check the value returned from state arg in test_1(state)
The content of state is copied from userspace pointer and copied back
after calling test_1(state). The user pointer is saved in an u64 array
and the array address is passed through ctx_in.

(2) test and check the return value of test_1(NULL)
Just simulate the case in which an invalid input argument is passed in.

(3) test multiple arguments passing in test_2(state, ...)
5 arguments are passed through ctx_in in form of u64 array. The first
element of array is userspace pointer of state and others 4 arguments
follow.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025064025.2567443-4-houtao1@huawei.com

Factor out two helpers to check the read access of ctx for raw tp
and BTF function. bpf_tracing_ctx_access() is used to check
the read access to argument is valid, and bpf_tracing_btf_ctx_access()
checks whether the btf type of argument is valid besides the checking
of argument read. bpf_tracing_btf_ctx_access() will be used by the
following patch.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025064025.2567443-3-houtao1@huawei.com

Factor out a helper bpf_struct_ops_prepare_trampoline() to prepare
trampoline for BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS prog. It will be used by
.test_run callback in following patch.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025064025.2567443-2-houtao1@huawei.com