Commit f2ae97062a48 ("firmware: smccc: Refactor SMCCC specific bits into
separate file") introduced the following build warning:

drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c:14:13: warning: no previous prototype for
	function 'arm_smccc_version_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 void __init arm_smccc_version_init(u32 version, enum arm_smccc_conduit conduit)
             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Fix the same by adding the missing prototype in arm-smccc.h

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200521110836.57252-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

For backward compatibility reasons, PSCI maintains SMCCC version as
SMCCC didn't provide ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_FUNC_ID until v1.1.

PSCI initialises both the SMCCC version and conduit. Similar to the
conduit, let us provide accessors to fetch the SMCCC version also so
that other SMCCC v1.1+ features can use it.

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Tested-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@st.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200518091222.27467-7-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Add the definition for SMCCC v1.2 version and new error code added.
While at it, also add a note that ARM DEN 0070A is deprecated and is
now merged into the main SMCCC specification(ARM DEN 0028C).

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Tested-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@st.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200518091222.27467-4-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

The current link gets redirected to the revision B published in November
2016 though it actually points to the original revision A published in
June 2013.

Let us update the link to point to the latest version, so that it
doesn't get stale anytime soon. Currently it points to v1.2 published in
March 2020(i.e. DEN0028C).

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Tested-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@st.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200518091222.27467-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

SMCCC 1.1 calls may use either HVC or SMC depending on the PSCI
conduit. Rather than coding this in every call site, provide a macro
which uses the correct instruction. The macro also handles the case
where no conduit is configured/available returning a not supported error
in res, along with returning the conduit used for the call.

This allow us to remove some duplicated code and will be useful later
when adding paravirtualized time hypervisor calls.

Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

This provides a mechanism for querying which paravirtualized time
features are available in this hypervisor.

Also add the header file which defines the ABI for the paravirtualized
time features we're about to add.

Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

SMCCC callers are currently amassing a collection of enums for the SMCCC
conduit, and are having to dig into the PSCI driver's internals in order
to figure out what to do.

Let's clean this up, with common SMCCC_CONDUIT_* definitions, and an
arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() helper that abstracts the PSCI driver's
internal state.

We can kill off the PSCI_CONDUIT_* definitions once we've migrated users
over to the new interface.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):

  this software is licensed under the terms of the gnu general public
  license version 2 as published by the free software foundation and
  may be copied distributed and modified under those terms this
  program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but
  without any warranty without even the implied warranty of
  merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu
  general public license for more details

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

  GPL-2.0-only

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 285 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190529141900.642774971@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

If someone has the silly idea to write something along those lines:

	extern u64 foo(void);

	void bar(struct arm_smccc_res *res)
	{
		arm_smccc_1_1_smc(0xbad, foo(), res);
	}

they are in for a surprise, as this gets compiled as:

	0000000000000588 <bar>:
	 588:   a9be7bfd        stp     x29, x30, [sp, #-32]!
	 58c:   910003fd        mov     x29, sp
	 590:   f9000bf3        str     x19, [sp, #16]
	 594:   aa0003f3        mov     x19, x0
	 598:   aa1e03e0        mov     x0, x30
	 59c:   94000000        bl      0 <_mcount>
	 5a0:   94000000        bl      0 <foo>
	 5a4:   aa0003e1        mov     x1, x0
	 5a8:   d4000003        smc     #0x0
	 5ac:   b4000073        cbz     x19, 5b8 <bar+0x30>
	 5b0:   a9000660        stp     x0, x1, [x19]
	 5b4:   a9010e62        stp     x2, x3, [x19, #16]
	 5b8:   f9400bf3        ldr     x19, [sp, #16]
	 5bc:   a8c27bfd        ldp     x29, x30, [sp], #32
	 5c0:   d65f03c0        ret
	 5c4:   d503201f        nop

The call to foo "overwrites" the x0 register for the return value,
and we end up calling the wrong secure service.

A solution is to evaluate all the parameters before assigning
anything to specific registers, leading to the expected result:

	0000000000000588 <bar>:
	 588:   a9be7bfd        stp     x29, x30, [sp, #-32]!
	 58c:   910003fd        mov     x29, sp
	 590:   f9000bf3        str     x19, [sp, #16]
	 594:   aa0003f3        mov     x19, x0
	 598:   aa1e03e0        mov     x0, x30
	 59c:   94000000        bl      0 <_mcount>
	 5a0:   94000000        bl      0 <foo>
	 5a4:   aa0003e1        mov     x1, x0
	 5a8:   d28175a0        mov     x0, #0xbad
	 5ac:   d4000003        smc     #0x0
	 5b0:   b4000073        cbz     x19, 5bc <bar+0x34>
	 5b4:   a9000660        stp     x0, x1, [x19]
	 5b8:   a9010e62        stp     x2, x3, [x19, #16]
	 5bc:   f9400bf3        ldr     x19, [sp, #16]
	 5c0:   a8c27bfd        ldp     x29, x30, [sp], #32
	 5c4:   d65f03c0        ret

Reported-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

An unfortunate consequence of having a strong typing for the input
values to the SMC call is that it also affects the type of the
return values, limiting r0 to 32 bits and r{1,2,3} to whatever
was passed as an input.

Let's turn everything into "unsigned long", which satisfies the
requirements of both architectures, and allows for the full
range of return values.

Reported-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>