<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux-stable.git/include/kunit/test.h, branch linux-6.5.y</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>kunit: Move kunit_abort() call out of kunit_do_failed_assertion()</title>
<updated>2023-06-01T19:04:46+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>David Gow</name>
<email>davidgow@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-05-31T05:21:57+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=260755184cbdb267a046e7ffd397c1d2ba09bb5e'/>
<id>260755184cbdb267a046e7ffd397c1d2ba09bb5e</id>
<content type='text'>
KUnit aborts the current thread when an assertion fails. Currently, this
is done conditionally as part of the kunit_do_failed_assertion()
function, but this hides the kunit_abort() call from the compiler
(particularly if it's in another module). This, in turn, can lead to
both suboptimal code generation (the compiler can't know if
kunit_do_failed_assertion() will return), and to static analysis tools
like smatch giving false positives.

Moving the kunit_abort() call into the macro should give the compiler
and tools a better chance at understanding what's going on. Doing so
requires exporting kunit_abort(), though it's recommended to continue to
use assertions in lieu of aborting directly.

In addition, kunit_abort() and kunit_do_failed_assertion() are renamed
to make it clear they they're intended for internal KUnit use, to:
__kunit_do_failed_assertion() and __kunit_abort()

Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter &lt;dan.carpenter@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda &lt;ojeda@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
KUnit aborts the current thread when an assertion fails. Currently, this
is done conditionally as part of the kunit_do_failed_assertion()
function, but this hides the kunit_abort() call from the compiler
(particularly if it's in another module). This, in turn, can lead to
both suboptimal code generation (the compiler can't know if
kunit_do_failed_assertion() will return), and to static analysis tools
like smatch giving false positives.

Moving the kunit_abort() call into the macro should give the compiler
and tools a better chance at understanding what's going on. Doing so
requires exporting kunit_abort(), though it's recommended to continue to
use assertions in lieu of aborting directly.

In addition, kunit_abort() and kunit_do_failed_assertion() are renamed
to make it clear they they're intended for internal KUnit use, to:
__kunit_do_failed_assertion() and __kunit_abort()

Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter &lt;dan.carpenter@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda &lt;ojeda@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kunit: Update kunit_print_ok_not_ok function</title>
<updated>2023-05-26T14:44:09+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Michal Wajdeczko</name>
<email>michal.wajdeczko@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-05-17T11:18:16+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=b1eaa8b2a55c9d5d22f5d2929f4d9973d6392241'/>
<id>b1eaa8b2a55c9d5d22f5d2929f4d9973d6392241</id>
<content type='text'>
There is no need use opaque test_or_suite pointer and is_test flag
as we don't use anything from the suite struct. Always expect test
pointer and use NULL as indication that provided results are from
the suite so we can treat them differently.

Since results could be from nested tests, like parameterized tests,
add explicit level parameter to properly indent output messages and
thus allow to reuse this function from other places.

While around, remove small code duplication near skip directive.

Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko &lt;michal.wajdeczko@intel.com&gt;
Cc: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Cc: Rae Moar &lt;rmoar@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
There is no need use opaque test_or_suite pointer and is_test flag
as we don't use anything from the suite struct. Always expect test
pointer and use NULL as indication that provided results are from
the suite so we can treat them differently.

Since results could be from nested tests, like parameterized tests,
add explicit level parameter to properly indent output messages and
thus allow to reuse this function from other places.

While around, remove small code duplication near skip directive.

Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko &lt;michal.wajdeczko@intel.com&gt;
Cc: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Cc: Rae Moar &lt;rmoar@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kunit: kmalloc_array: Use kunit_add_action()</title>
<updated>2023-05-25T14:53:07+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>David Gow</name>
<email>davidgow@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-05-25T04:21:30+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=57e3cded99e9c840bc5310878d0a7f4e7768a296'/>
<id>57e3cded99e9c840bc5310878d0a7f4e7768a296</id>
<content type='text'>
The kunit_add_action() function is much simpler and cleaner to use that
the full KUnit resource API for simple things like the
kunit_kmalloc_array() functionality.

Replacing it allows us to get rid of a number of helper functions, and
leaves us with no uses of kunit_alloc_resource(), which has some
usability problems and is going to have its behaviour modified in an
upcoming patch.

Note that we need to use kunit_defer_trigger_all() to implement
kunit_kfree().

Reviewed-by: Benjamin Berg &lt;benjamin.berg@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard &lt;maxime@cerno.tech&gt;
Tested-by: Maxime Ripard &lt;maxime@cerno.tech&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The kunit_add_action() function is much simpler and cleaner to use that
the full KUnit resource API for simple things like the
kunit_kmalloc_array() functionality.

Replacing it allows us to get rid of a number of helper functions, and
leaves us with no uses of kunit_alloc_resource(), which has some
usability problems and is going to have its behaviour modified in an
upcoming patch.

Note that we need to use kunit_defer_trigger_all() to implement
kunit_kfree().

Reviewed-by: Benjamin Berg &lt;benjamin.berg@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard &lt;maxime@cerno.tech&gt;
Tested-by: Maxime Ripard &lt;maxime@cerno.tech&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Documentation: kunit: Warn that exit functions run even if init fails</title>
<updated>2023-05-12T00:17:35+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>David Gow</name>
<email>davidgow@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-05-10T05:38:31+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=cdc87bda607518e70b6a6745cd593458d725b5a7'/>
<id>cdc87bda607518e70b6a6745cd593458d725b5a7</id>
<content type='text'>
KUnit's exit functions will run even if the corresponding init function
fails. It's easy, when writing an exit function, to assume the init
function succeeded, and (for example) access uninitialised memory or
dereference NULL pointers.

Note that this case exists and should be handled in the documentation.

Suggested-by: Benjamin Berg &lt;benjamin@sipsolutions.net&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/a39af0400abedb2e9b31d84c37551cecc3eed0e1.camel@sipsolutions.net/
Reviewed-by: Sadiya Kazi &lt;sadiyakazi@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
KUnit's exit functions will run even if the corresponding init function
fails. It's easy, when writing an exit function, to assume the init
function succeeded, and (for example) access uninitialised memory or
dereference NULL pointers.

Note that this case exists and should be handled in the documentation.

Suggested-by: Benjamin Berg &lt;benjamin@sipsolutions.net&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/a39af0400abedb2e9b31d84c37551cecc3eed0e1.camel@sipsolutions.net/
Reviewed-by: Sadiya Kazi &lt;sadiyakazi@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kunit: increase KUNIT_LOG_SIZE to 2048 bytes</title>
<updated>2023-03-30T00:55:41+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Heiko Carstens</name>
<email>hca@linux.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-03-27T11:53:31+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=7232282dd47cce6a780c9414bd9baccf232c7686'/>
<id>7232282dd47cce6a780c9414bd9baccf232c7686</id>
<content type='text'>
The s390 specific test_unwind kunit test has 39 parameterized tests. The
results in debugfs are truncated since the full log doesn't fit into 1500
bytes.
Therefore increase KUNIT_LOG_SIZE to 2048 bytes in a similar way like it
was done recently with commit "kunit: fix bug in debugfs logs of
parameterized tests". With that the whole test result is present.

Reported-by: Alexander Egorenkov &lt;egorenar@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens &lt;hca@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar &lt;rmoar@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The s390 specific test_unwind kunit test has 39 parameterized tests. The
results in debugfs are truncated since the full log doesn't fit into 1500
bytes.
Therefore increase KUNIT_LOG_SIZE to 2048 bytes in a similar way like it
was done recently with commit "kunit: fix bug in debugfs logs of
parameterized tests". With that the whole test result is present.

Reported-by: Alexander Egorenkov &lt;egorenar@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens &lt;hca@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar &lt;rmoar@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kunit: fix bug of extra newline characters in debugfs logs</title>
<updated>2023-03-10T20:59:43+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rae Moar</name>
<email>rmoar@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-03-08T20:39:52+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=2c6a96dad5797e57b4cf04101d6c8d5c7a571603'/>
<id>2c6a96dad5797e57b4cf04101d6c8d5c7a571603</id>
<content type='text'>
Fix bug of the extra newline characters in debugfs logs. When a
line is added to debugfs with a newline character at the end,
an extra line appears in the debugfs log.

This is due to a discrepancy between how the lines are printed and how they
are added to the logs. Remove this discrepancy by checking if a newline
character is present before adding a newline character. This should closely
match the printk behavior.

Add kunit_log_newline_test to provide test coverage for this issue.  (Also,
move kunit_log_test above suite definition to remove the unnecessary
declaration prior to the suite definition)

As an example, say we add these two lines to the log:

kunit_log(..., "KTAP version 1\n");
kunit_log(..., "1..1");

The debugfs log before this fix:

 KTAP version 1

 1..1

The debugfs log after this fix:

 KTAP version 1
 1..1

Signed-off-by: Rae Moar &lt;rmoar@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Fix bug of the extra newline characters in debugfs logs. When a
line is added to debugfs with a newline character at the end,
an extra line appears in the debugfs log.

This is due to a discrepancy between how the lines are printed and how they
are added to the logs. Remove this discrepancy by checking if a newline
character is present before adding a newline character. This should closely
match the printk behavior.

Add kunit_log_newline_test to provide test coverage for this issue.  (Also,
move kunit_log_test above suite definition to remove the unnecessary
declaration prior to the suite definition)

As an example, say we add these two lines to the log:

kunit_log(..., "KTAP version 1\n");
kunit_log(..., "1..1");

The debugfs log before this fix:

 KTAP version 1

 1..1

The debugfs log after this fix:

 KTAP version 1
 1..1

Signed-off-by: Rae Moar &lt;rmoar@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kunit: fix bug in debugfs logs of parameterized tests</title>
<updated>2023-03-10T20:59:32+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rae Moar</name>
<email>rmoar@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-03-08T20:39:50+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=887d85a0736ff346cbfe5efaf51cf20c7ca195a3'/>
<id>887d85a0736ff346cbfe5efaf51cf20c7ca195a3</id>
<content type='text'>
Fix bug in debugfs logs that causes individual parameterized results to not
appear because the log is reinitialized (cleared) when each parameter is
run.

Ensure these results appear in the debugfs logs, increase log size to
allow for the size of parameterized results. As a result, append lines to
the log directly rather than using an intermediate variable that can cause
stack size warnings due to the increased log size.

Here is the debugfs log of ext4_inode_test which uses parameterized tests
before the fix:

     KTAP version 1

     # Subtest: ext4_inode_test
     1..1
 # Totals: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16
 ok 1 ext4_inode_test

As you can see, this log does not include any of the individual
parametrized results.

After (in combination with the next two fixes to remove extra empty line
and ensure KTAP valid format):

 KTAP version 1
 1..1
     KTAP version 1
     # Subtest: ext4_inode_test
     1..1
        KTAP version 1
         # Subtest: inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding
         ok 1 1901-12-13 Lower bound of 32bit &lt; 0 timestamp, no extra bits
         ... (the rest of the individual parameterized tests)
         ok 16 2446-05-10 Upper bound of 32bit &gt;=0 timestamp. All extra
     # inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16
     ok 1 inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding
 # Totals: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16
 ok 1 ext4_inode_test

Signed-off-by: Rae Moar &lt;rmoar@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Fix bug in debugfs logs that causes individual parameterized results to not
appear because the log is reinitialized (cleared) when each parameter is
run.

Ensure these results appear in the debugfs logs, increase log size to
allow for the size of parameterized results. As a result, append lines to
the log directly rather than using an intermediate variable that can cause
stack size warnings due to the increased log size.

Here is the debugfs log of ext4_inode_test which uses parameterized tests
before the fix:

     KTAP version 1

     # Subtest: ext4_inode_test
     1..1
 # Totals: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16
 ok 1 ext4_inode_test

As you can see, this log does not include any of the individual
parametrized results.

After (in combination with the next two fixes to remove extra empty line
and ensure KTAP valid format):

 KTAP version 1
 1..1
     KTAP version 1
     # Subtest: ext4_inode_test
     1..1
        KTAP version 1
         # Subtest: inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding
         ok 1 1901-12-13 Lower bound of 32bit &lt; 0 timestamp, no extra bits
         ... (the rest of the individual parameterized tests)
         ok 16 2446-05-10 Upper bound of 32bit &gt;=0 timestamp. All extra
     # inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16
     ok 1 inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding
 # Totals: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16
 ok 1 ext4_inode_test

Signed-off-by: Rae Moar &lt;rmoar@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kunit: fix kunit_test_init_section_suites(...)</title>
<updated>2023-01-31T16:10:38+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Brendan Higgins</name>
<email>brendan.higgins@linux.dev</email>
</author>
<published>2023-01-31T02:35:03+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=254c71374a70051a043676b67ba4f7ad392b5fe6'/>
<id>254c71374a70051a043676b67ba4f7ad392b5fe6</id>
<content type='text'>
Looks like kunit_test_init_section_suites(...) was messed up in a merge
conflict. This fixes it.

kunit_test_init_section_suites(...) was not updated to avoid the extra
level of indirection when .kunit_test_suites was flattened. Given no-one
was actively using it, this went unnoticed for a long period of time.

Fixes: e5857d396f35 ("kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites")
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendan.higgins@linux.dev&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Tested-by: Martin Fernandez &lt;martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Looks like kunit_test_init_section_suites(...) was messed up in a merge
conflict. This fixes it.

kunit_test_init_section_suites(...) was not updated to avoid the extra
level of indirection when .kunit_test_suites was flattened. Given no-one
was actively using it, this went unnoticed for a long period of time.

Fixes: e5857d396f35 ("kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites")
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins &lt;brendan.higgins@linux.dev&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Tested-by: Martin Fernandez &lt;martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kunit: fix bug in KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ</title>
<updated>2023-01-30T21:46:46+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rae Moar</name>
<email>rmoar@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-01-27T20:39:50+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=dd2f0a0a2f751b7aafaea5cbba8e65a55fd12f94'/>
<id>dd2f0a0a2f751b7aafaea5cbba8e65a55fd12f94</id>
<content type='text'>
In KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ and KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ, add check if one of the
inputs is NULL and fail if this is the case.

Currently, the kernel crashes if one of the inputs is NULL. Instead,
fail the test and add an appropriate error message.

Fixes: b8a926bea8b1 ("kunit: Introduce KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ and KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ macros")

This was found by the kernel test robot:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202212191448.D6EDPdOh-lkp@intel.com/

Reported-by: kernel test robot &lt;lkp@intel.com&gt;

Signed-off-by: Rae Moar &lt;rmoar@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
In KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ and KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ, add check if one of the
inputs is NULL and fail if this is the case.

Currently, the kernel crashes if one of the inputs is NULL. Instead,
fail the test and add an appropriate error message.

Fixes: b8a926bea8b1 ("kunit: Introduce KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ and KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ macros")

This was found by the kernel test robot:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202212191448.D6EDPdOh-lkp@intel.com/

Reported-by: kernel test robot &lt;lkp@intel.com&gt;

Signed-off-by: Rae Moar &lt;rmoar@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>kunit: Provide a static key to check if KUnit is actively running tests</title>
<updated>2022-12-12T21:13:47+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>David Gow</name>
<email>davidgow@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-11-25T08:43:04+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=908d0c177bbc7c34ab9129c6f2bcd87487115632'/>
<id>908d0c177bbc7c34ab9129c6f2bcd87487115632</id>
<content type='text'>
KUnit does a few expensive things when enabled. This hasn't been a
problem because KUnit was only enabled on test kernels, but with a few
people enabling (but not _using_) KUnit on production systems, we need a
runtime way of handling this.

Provide a 'kunit_running' static key (defaulting to false), which allows
us to hide any KUnit code behind a static branch. This should reduce the
performance impact (on other code) of having KUnit enabled to a single
NOP when no tests are running.

Note that, while it looks unintuitive, tests always run entirely within
__kunit_test_suites_init(), so it's safe to decrement the static key at
the end of this function, rather than in __kunit_test_suites_exit(),
which is only there to clean up results in debugfs.

Signed-off-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
KUnit does a few expensive things when enabled. This hasn't been a
problem because KUnit was only enabled on test kernels, but with a few
people enabling (but not _using_) KUnit on production systems, we need a
runtime way of handling this.

Provide a 'kunit_running' static key (defaulting to false), which allows
us to hide any KUnit code behind a static branch. This should reduce the
performance impact (on other code) of having KUnit enabled to a single
NOP when no tests are running.

Note that, while it looks unintuitive, tests always run entirely within
__kunit_test_suites_init(), so it's safe to decrement the static key at
the end of this function, rather than in __kunit_test_suites_exit(),
which is only there to clean up results in debugfs.

Signed-off-by: David Gow &lt;davidgow@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov &lt;dlatypov@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan &lt;skhan@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
