linux-stable.git/fs, branch v6.7.9 Linux kernel stable tree NFS: Fix data corruption caused by congestion. 2024-03-06T14:53:58+00:00 NeilBrown neilb@suse.de 2024-02-27T23:23:31+00:00 5fa917a67a03451cded859349249b8b7d08c3865 when AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE is returned (as NFS does when it detects congestion) it is important that the folio is redirtied. nfs_writepage_locked() doesn't do this, so files can become corrupted as writes can be lost. Note that this is not needed in v6.8 as AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE cannot be returned. It is needed for kernels v5.18..v6.7. Prior to 6.3 the patch is different as it needs to mention "page", not "folio". Reported-and-tested-by: Jacek Tomaka <Jacek.Tomaka@poczta.fm> Fixes: 6df25e58532b ("nfs: remove reliance on bdi congestion") Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
when AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE is returned (as NFS does when it detects
congestion) it is important that the folio is redirtied.
nfs_writepage_locked() doesn't do this, so files can become corrupted as
writes can be lost.

Note that this is not needed in v6.8 as AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE cannot be
returned.  It is needed for kernels v5.18..v6.7.  Prior to 6.3 the patch
is different as it needs to mention "page", not "folio".

Reported-and-tested-by: Jacek Tomaka <Jacek.Tomaka@poczta.fm>
Fixes: 6df25e58532b ("nfs: remove reliance on bdi congestion")
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
efivarfs: Request at most 512 bytes for variable names 2024-03-06T14:53:57+00:00 Tim Schumacher timschumi@gmx.de 2024-01-26T16:25:23+00:00 cbf12e716a52d260fabecdca7d5f6e7cd07aed6c commit f45812cc23fb74bef62d4eb8a69fe7218f4b9f2a upstream. Work around a quirk in a few old (2011-ish) UEFI implementations, where a call to `GetNextVariableName` with a buffer size larger than 512 bytes will always return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER. There is some lore around EFI variable names being up to 1024 bytes in size, but this has no basis in the UEFI specification, and the upper bounds are typically platform specific, and apply to the entire variable (name plus payload). Given that Linux does not permit creating files with names longer than NAME_MAX (255) bytes, 512 bytes (== 256 UTF-16 characters) is a reasonable limit. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.1+ Signed-off-by: Tim Schumacher <timschumi@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit f45812cc23fb74bef62d4eb8a69fe7218f4b9f2a upstream.

Work around a quirk in a few old (2011-ish) UEFI implementations, where
a call to `GetNextVariableName` with a buffer size larger than 512 bytes
will always return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER.

There is some lore around EFI variable names being up to 1024 bytes in
size, but this has no basis in the UEFI specification, and the upper
bounds are typically platform specific, and apply to the entire variable
(name plus payload).

Given that Linux does not permit creating files with names longer than
NAME_MAX (255) bytes, 512 bytes (== 256 UTF-16 characters) is a
reasonable limit.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.1+
Signed-off-by: Tim Schumacher <timschumi@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ceph: switch to corrected encoding of max_xattr_size in mdsmap 2024-03-06T14:53:56+00:00 Xiubo Li xiubli@redhat.com 2024-02-19T05:14:32+00:00 f375123fdb150c9d2325b5c3ad410a3279de154e commit 51d31149a88b5c5a8d2d33f06df93f6187a25b4c upstream. The addition of bal_rank_mask with encoding version 17 was merged into ceph.git in Oct 2022 and made it into v18.2.0 release normally. A few months later, the much delayed addition of max_xattr_size got merged, also with encoding version 17, placed before bal_rank_mask in the encoding -- but it didn't make v18.2.0 release. The way this ended up being resolved on the MDS side is that bal_rank_mask will continue to be encoded in version 17 while max_xattr_size is now encoded in version 18. This does mean that older kernels will misdecode version 17, but this is also true for v18.2.0 and v18.2.1 clients in userspace. The best we can do is backport this adjustment -- see ceph.git commit 78abfeaff27fee343fb664db633de5b221699a73 for details. [ idryomov: changelog ] Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64440 Fixes: d93231a6bc8a ("ceph: prevent a client from exceeding the MDS maximum xattr size") Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Venky Shankar <vshankar@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 51d31149a88b5c5a8d2d33f06df93f6187a25b4c upstream.

The addition of bal_rank_mask with encoding version 17 was merged
into ceph.git in Oct 2022 and made it into v18.2.0 release normally.
A few months later, the much delayed addition of max_xattr_size got
merged, also with encoding version 17, placed before bal_rank_mask
in the encoding -- but it didn't make v18.2.0 release.

The way this ended up being resolved on the MDS side is that
bal_rank_mask will continue to be encoded in version 17 while
max_xattr_size is now encoded in version 18.  This does mean that
older kernels will misdecode version 17, but this is also true for
v18.2.0 and v18.2.1 clients in userspace.

The best we can do is backport this adjustment -- see ceph.git
commit 78abfeaff27fee343fb664db633de5b221699a73 for details.

[ idryomov: changelog ]

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64440
Fixes: d93231a6bc8a ("ceph: prevent a client from exceeding the MDS maximum xattr size")
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Venky Shankar <vshankar@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
btrfs: send: don't issue unnecessary zero writes for trailing hole 2024-03-06T14:53:55+00:00 Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com 2024-02-16T22:17:10+00:00 2261f926954f83344b79b9b5f21def6b7cfc7d29 commit 5897710b28cabab04ea6c7547f27b7989de646ae upstream. If we have a sparse file with a trailing hole (from the last extent's end to i_size) and then create an extent in the file that ends before the file's i_size, then when doing an incremental send we will issue a write full of zeroes for the range that starts immediately after the new extent ends up to i_size. While this isn't incorrect because the file ends up with exactly the same data, it unnecessarily results in using extra space at the destination with one or more extents full of zeroes instead of having a hole. In same cases this results in using megabytes or even gigabytes of unnecessary space. Example, reproducer: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdh MNT=/mnt/sdh mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT # Create 1G sparse file. xfs_io -f -c "truncate 1G" $MNT/foobar # Create base snapshot. btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/mysnap1 # Create send stream (full send) for the base snapshot. btrfs send -f /tmp/1.snap $MNT/mysnap1 # Now write one extent at the beginning of the file and one somewhere # in the middle, leaving a gap between the end of this second extent # and the file's size. xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 128K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcd 512M 128K" \ $MNT/foobar # Now create a second snapshot which is going to be used for an # incremental send operation. btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/mysnap2 # Create send stream (incremental send) for the second snapshot. btrfs send -p $MNT/mysnap1 -f /tmp/2.snap $MNT/mysnap2 # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and # verify we get the same content that the original filesystem had # and file foobar has only two extents with a size of 128K each. umount $MNT mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/1.snap $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/2.snap $MNT echo -e "\nFile fiemap in the second snapshot:" # Should have: # # 128K extent at file range [0, 128K[ # hole at file range [128K, 512M[ # 128K extent file range [512M, 512M + 128K[ # hole at file range [512M + 128K, 1G[ xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" $MNT/mysnap2/foobar # File should be using 256K of data (two 128K extents). echo -e "\nSpace used by the file: $(du -h $MNT/mysnap2/foobar | cut -f 1)" umount $MNT Running the test, we can see with fiemap that we get an extent for the range [512M, 1G[, while in the source filesystem we have an extent for the range [512M, 512M + 128K[ and a hole for the rest of the file (the range [512M + 128K, 1G[): $ ./test.sh (...) File fiemap in the second snapshot: /mnt/sdh/mysnap2/foobar: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..255]: 26624..26879 256 0x0 1: [256..1048575]: hole 1048320 2: [1048576..2097151]: 2156544..3205119 1048576 0x1 Space used by the file: 513M This happens because once we finish processing an inode, at finish_inode_if_needed(), we always issue a hole (write operations full of zeros) if there's a gap between the end of the last processed extent and the file's size, even if that range is already a hole in the parent snapshot. Fix this by issuing the hole only if the range is not already a hole. After this change, running the test above, we get the expected layout: $ ./test.sh (...) File fiemap in the second snapshot: /mnt/sdh/mysnap2/foobar: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..255]: 26624..26879 256 0x0 1: [256..1048575]: hole 1048320 2: [1048576..1048831]: 26880..27135 256 0x1 3: [1048832..2097151]: hole 1048320 Space used by the file: 256K A test case for fstests will follow soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reported-by: Dorai Ashok S A <dash.btrfs@inix.me> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/c0bf7818-9c45-46a8-b3d3-513230d0c86e@inix.me/ Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 5897710b28cabab04ea6c7547f27b7989de646ae upstream.

If we have a sparse file with a trailing hole (from the last extent's end
to i_size) and then create an extent in the file that ends before the
file's i_size, then when doing an incremental send we will issue a write
full of zeroes for the range that starts immediately after the new extent
ends up to i_size. While this isn't incorrect because the file ends up
with exactly the same data, it unnecessarily results in using extra space
at the destination with one or more extents full of zeroes instead of
having a hole. In same cases this results in using megabytes or even
gigabytes of unnecessary space.

Example, reproducer:

   $ cat test.sh
   #!/bin/bash

   DEV=/dev/sdh
   MNT=/mnt/sdh

   mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
   mount $DEV $MNT

   # Create 1G sparse file.
   xfs_io -f -c "truncate 1G" $MNT/foobar

   # Create base snapshot.
   btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/mysnap1

   # Create send stream (full send) for the base snapshot.
   btrfs send -f /tmp/1.snap $MNT/mysnap1

   # Now write one extent at the beginning of the file and one somewhere
   # in the middle, leaving a gap between the end of this second extent
   # and the file's size.
   xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 128K" \
          -c "pwrite -S 0xcd 512M 128K" \
          $MNT/foobar

   # Now create a second snapshot which is going to be used for an
   # incremental send operation.
   btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/mysnap2

   # Create send stream (incremental send) for the second snapshot.
   btrfs send -p $MNT/mysnap1 -f /tmp/2.snap $MNT/mysnap2

   # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and
   # verify we get the same content that the original filesystem had
   # and file foobar has only two extents with a size of 128K each.
   umount $MNT
   mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
   mount $DEV $MNT

   btrfs receive -f /tmp/1.snap $MNT
   btrfs receive -f /tmp/2.snap $MNT

   echo -e "\nFile fiemap in the second snapshot:"
   # Should have:
   #
   # 128K extent at file range [0, 128K[
   # hole at file range [128K, 512M[
   # 128K extent file range [512M, 512M + 128K[
   # hole at file range [512M + 128K, 1G[
   xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" $MNT/mysnap2/foobar

   # File should be using 256K of data (two 128K extents).
   echo -e "\nSpace used by the file: $(du -h $MNT/mysnap2/foobar | cut -f 1)"

   umount $MNT

Running the test, we can see with fiemap that we get an extent for the
range [512M, 1G[, while in the source filesystem we have an extent for
the range [512M, 512M + 128K[ and a hole for the rest of the file (the
range [512M + 128K, 1G[):

   $ ./test.sh
   (...)
   File fiemap in the second snapshot:
   /mnt/sdh/mysnap2/foobar:
    EXT: FILE-OFFSET        BLOCK-RANGE        TOTAL FLAGS
      0: [0..255]:          26624..26879         256   0x0
      1: [256..1048575]:    hole             1048320
      2: [1048576..2097151]: 2156544..3205119 1048576   0x1

   Space used by the file: 513M

This happens because once we finish processing an inode, at
finish_inode_if_needed(), we always issue a hole (write operations full
of zeros) if there's a gap between the end of the last processed extent
and the file's size, even if that range is already a hole in the parent
snapshot. Fix this by issuing the hole only if the range is not already
a hole.

After this change, running the test above, we get the expected layout:

   $ ./test.sh
   (...)
   File fiemap in the second snapshot:
   /mnt/sdh/mysnap2/foobar:
    EXT: FILE-OFFSET        BLOCK-RANGE      TOTAL FLAGS
      0: [0..255]:          26624..26879       256   0x0
      1: [256..1048575]:    hole             1048320
      2: [1048576..1048831]: 26880..27135       256   0x1
      3: [1048832..2097151]: hole             1048320

   Space used by the file: 256K

A test case for fstests will follow soon.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reported-by: Dorai Ashok S A <dash.btrfs@inix.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/c0bf7818-9c45-46a8-b3d3-513230d0c86e@inix.me/
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
btrfs: dev-replace: properly validate device names 2024-03-06T14:53:55+00:00 David Sterba dsterba@suse.com 2024-02-14T15:19:24+00:00 343eecb4ff49a7b1cc1dfe86958a805cf2341cfb commit 9845664b9ee47ce7ee7ea93caf47d39a9d4552c4 upstream. There's a syzbot report that device name buffers passed to device replace are not properly checked for string termination which could lead to a read out of bounds in getname_kernel(). Add a helper that validates both source and target device name buffers. For devid as the source initialize the buffer to empty string in case something tries to read it later. This was originally analyzed and fixed in a different way by Edward Adam Davis (see links). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000d1a1d1060cc9c5e7@google.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/tencent_44CA0665C9836EF9EEC80CB9E7E206DF5206@qq.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ CC: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+33f23b49ac24f986c9e8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 9845664b9ee47ce7ee7ea93caf47d39a9d4552c4 upstream.

There's a syzbot report that device name buffers passed to device
replace are not properly checked for string termination which could lead
to a read out of bounds in getname_kernel().

Add a helper that validates both source and target device name buffers.
For devid as the source initialize the buffer to empty string in case
something tries to read it later.

This was originally analyzed and fixed in a different way by Edward Adam
Davis (see links).

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000d1a1d1060cc9c5e7@google.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/tencent_44CA0665C9836EF9EEC80CB9E7E206DF5206@qq.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
CC: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+33f23b49ac24f986c9e8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
btrfs: fix double free of anonymous device after snapshot creation failure 2024-03-06T14:53:55+00:00 Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com 2024-02-23T16:38:43+00:00 c8ab7521665bd0f8bc4a900244d1d5a7095cc3b9 commit e2b54eaf28df0c978626c9736b94f003b523b451 upstream. When creating a snapshot we may do a double free of an anonymous device in case there's an error committing the transaction. The second free may result in freeing an anonymous device number that was allocated by some other subsystem in the kernel or another btrfs filesystem. The steps that lead to this: 1) At ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we allocate an anonymous device number and assign it to pending_snapshot->anon_dev; 2) Then we call btrfs_commit_transaction() and end up at transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot(); 3) There we call btrfs_get_new_fs_root() and pass it the anonymous device number stored in pending_snapshot->anon_dev; 4) btrfs_get_new_fs_root() frees that anonymous device number because btrfs_lookup_fs_root() returned a root - someone else did a lookup of the new root already, which could some task doing backref walking; 5) After that some error happens in the transaction commit path, and at ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we jump to the 'fail' label, and after that we free again the same anonymous device number, which in the meanwhile may have been reallocated somewhere else, because pending_snapshot->anon_dev still has the same value as in step 1. Recently syzbot ran into this and reported the following trace: ------------[ cut here ]------------ ida_free called for id=51 which is not allocated. WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 31038 at lib/idr.c:525 ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 31038 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc4-syzkaller-00410-gc02197fc9076 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024 RIP: 0010:ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525 Code: 10 42 80 3c 28 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffc90015a67300 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: be5130472f5dd000 RBX: 0000000000000033 RCX: 0000000000040000 RDX: ffffc90009a7a000 RSI: 000000000003ffff RDI: 0000000000040000 RBP: ffffc90015a673f0 R08: ffffffff81577992 R09: 1ffff92002b4cdb4 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52002b4cdb5 R12: 0000000000000246 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffffffff8e256b80 R15: 0000000000000246 FS: 00007fca3f4b46c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f167a17b978 CR3: 000000001ed26000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> btrfs_get_root_ref+0xa48/0xaf0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1346 create_pending_snapshot+0xff2/0x2bc0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1837 create_pending_snapshots+0x195/0x1d0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1931 btrfs_commit_transaction+0xf1c/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2404 create_snapshot+0x507/0x880 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:848 btrfs_mksubvol+0x5d0/0x750 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:998 btrfs_mksnapshot+0xb5/0xf0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1044 __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x387/0x4b0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1306 btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x1ca/0x400 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1393 btrfs_ioctl+0xa74/0xd40 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfe/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:857 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77 RIP: 0033:0x7fca3e67dda9 Code: 28 00 00 00 (...) RSP: 002b:00007fca3f4b40c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fca3e7abf80 RCX: 00007fca3e67dda9 RDX: 00000000200005c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007fca3e6ca47a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fca3e7abf80 R15: 00007fff6bf95658 </TASK> Where we get an explicit message where we attempt to free an anonymous device number that is not currently allocated. It happens in a different code path from the example below, at btrfs_get_root_ref(), so this change may not fix the case triggered by syzbot. To fix at least the code path from the example above, change btrfs_get_root_ref() and its callers to receive a dev_t pointer argument for the anonymous device number, so that in case it frees the number, it also resets it to 0, so that up in the call chain we don't attempt to do the double free. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000f673a1061202f630@google.com/ Fixes: e03ee2fe873e ("btrfs: do not ASSERT() if the newly created subvolume already got read") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit e2b54eaf28df0c978626c9736b94f003b523b451 upstream.

When creating a snapshot we may do a double free of an anonymous device
in case there's an error committing the transaction. The second free may
result in freeing an anonymous device number that was allocated by some
other subsystem in the kernel or another btrfs filesystem.

The steps that lead to this:

1) At ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we allocate an anonymous device number
   and assign it to pending_snapshot->anon_dev;

2) Then we call btrfs_commit_transaction() and end up at
   transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot();

3) There we call btrfs_get_new_fs_root() and pass it the anonymous device
   number stored in pending_snapshot->anon_dev;

4) btrfs_get_new_fs_root() frees that anonymous device number because
   btrfs_lookup_fs_root() returned a root - someone else did a lookup
   of the new root already, which could some task doing backref walking;

5) After that some error happens in the transaction commit path, and at
   ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we jump to the 'fail' label, and after
   that we free again the same anonymous device number, which in the
   meanwhile may have been reallocated somewhere else, because
   pending_snapshot->anon_dev still has the same value as in step 1.

Recently syzbot ran into this and reported the following trace:

  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  ida_free called for id=51 which is not allocated.
  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 31038 at lib/idr.c:525 ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 1 PID: 31038 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc4-syzkaller-00410-gc02197fc9076 #0
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024
  RIP: 0010:ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525
  Code: 10 42 80 3c 28 (...)
  RSP: 0018:ffffc90015a67300 EFLAGS: 00010246
  RAX: be5130472f5dd000 RBX: 0000000000000033 RCX: 0000000000040000
  RDX: ffffc90009a7a000 RSI: 000000000003ffff RDI: 0000000000040000
  RBP: ffffc90015a673f0 R08: ffffffff81577992 R09: 1ffff92002b4cdb4
  R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52002b4cdb5 R12: 0000000000000246
  R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffffffff8e256b80 R15: 0000000000000246
  FS:  00007fca3f4b46c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007f167a17b978 CR3: 000000001ed26000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   btrfs_get_root_ref+0xa48/0xaf0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1346
   create_pending_snapshot+0xff2/0x2bc0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1837
   create_pending_snapshots+0x195/0x1d0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1931
   btrfs_commit_transaction+0xf1c/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2404
   create_snapshot+0x507/0x880 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:848
   btrfs_mksubvol+0x5d0/0x750 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:998
   btrfs_mksnapshot+0xb5/0xf0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1044
   __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x387/0x4b0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1306
   btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x1ca/0x400 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1393
   btrfs_ioctl+0xa74/0xd40
   vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
   __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline]
   __se_sys_ioctl+0xfe/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:857
   do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77
  RIP: 0033:0x7fca3e67dda9
  Code: 28 00 00 00 (...)
  RSP: 002b:00007fca3f4b40c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fca3e7abf80 RCX: 00007fca3e67dda9
  RDX: 00000000200005c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003
  RBP: 00007fca3e6ca47a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
  R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fca3e7abf80 R15: 00007fff6bf95658
   </TASK>

Where we get an explicit message where we attempt to free an anonymous
device number that is not currently allocated. It happens in a different
code path from the example below, at btrfs_get_root_ref(), so this change
may not fix the case triggered by syzbot.

To fix at least the code path from the example above, change
btrfs_get_root_ref() and its callers to receive a dev_t pointer argument
for the anonymous device number, so that in case it frees the number, it
also resets it to 0, so that up in the call chain we don't attempt to do
the double free.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000f673a1061202f630@google.com/
Fixes: e03ee2fe873e ("btrfs: do not ASSERT() if the newly created subvolume already got read")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
btrfs: fix race between ordered extent completion and fiemap 2024-03-06T14:53:54+00:00 Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com 2024-02-22T12:29:26+00:00 31d07a757c6d3430e03cc22799921569999b9a12 [ Upstream commit a1a4a9ca77f143c00fce69c1239887ff8b813bec ] For fiemap we recently stopped locking the target extent range for the whole duration of the fiemap call, in order to avoid a deadlock in a scenario where the fiemap buffer happens to be a memory mapped range of the same file. This use case is very unlikely to be useful in practice but it may be triggered by fuzz testing (syzbot, etc). However by not locking the target extent range for the whole duration of the fiemap call we can race with an ordered extent. This happens like this: 1) The fiemap task finishes processing a file extent item that covers the file range [512K, 1M[, and that file extent item is the last item in the leaf currently being processed; 2) And ordered extent for the file range [768K, 2M[, in COW mode, completes (btrfs_finish_one_ordered()) and the file extent item covering the range [512K, 1M[ is trimmed to cover the range [512K, 768K[ and then a new file extent item for the range [768K, 2M[ is inserted in the inode's subvolume tree; 3) The fiemap task calls fiemap_next_leaf_item(), which then calls btrfs_next_leaf() to find the next leaf / item. This finds that the the next key following the one we previously processed (its type is BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY and its offset is 512K), is the key corresponding to the new file extent item inserted by the ordered extent, which has a type of BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY and an offset of 768K; 4) Later the fiemap code ends up at emit_fiemap_extent() and triggers the warning: if (cache->offset + cache->len > offset) { WARN_ON(1); return -EINVAL; } Since we get 1M > 768K, because the previously emitted entry for the old extent covering the file range [512K, 1M[ ends at an offset that is greater than the new extent's start offset (768K). This makes fiemap fail with -EINVAL besides triggering the warning that produces a stack trace like the following: [1621.677651] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [1621.677656] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 204366 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2492 emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs] [1621.677899] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic (...) [1621.677951] CPU: 1 PID: 204366 Comm: pool Not tainted 6.8.0-rc5-btrfs-next-151+ #1 [1621.677954] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [1621.677956] RIP: 0010:emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs] [1621.678033] Code: 2b 4c 89 63 (...) [1621.678035] RSP: 0018:ffffab16089ffd20 EFLAGS: 00010206 [1621.678037] RAX: 00000000004fa000 RBX: ffffab16089ffe08 RCX: 0000000000009000 [1621.678039] RDX: 00000000004f9000 RSI: 00000000004f1000 RDI: ffffab16089ffe90 [1621.678040] RBP: 00000000004f9000 R08: 0000000000001000 R09: 0000000000000000 [1621.678041] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: 0000000041d78000 [1621.678043] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff9434f0b17850 [1621.678044] FS: 00007fa6e20006c0(0000) GS:ffff943bdfa40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1621.678046] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1621.678048] CR2: 00007fa6b0801000 CR3: 000000012d404002 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 [1621.678053] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [1621.678055] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [1621.678056] Call Trace: [1621.678074] <TASK> [1621.678076] ? __warn+0x80/0x130 [1621.678082] ? emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs] [1621.678159] ? report_bug+0x1f4/0x200 [1621.678164] ? handle_bug+0x42/0x70 [1621.678167] ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70 [1621.678170] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 [1621.678178] ? emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs] [1621.678253] extent_fiemap+0x766/0xa30 [btrfs] [1621.678339] btrfs_fiemap+0x45/0x80 [btrfs] [1621.678420] do_vfs_ioctl+0x1e4/0x870 [1621.678431] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6a/0xc0 [1621.678434] do_syscall_64+0x52/0x120 [1621.678445] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 There's also another case where before calling btrfs_next_leaf() we are processing a hole or a prealloc extent and we had several delalloc ranges within that hole or prealloc extent. In that case if the ordered extents complete before we find the next key, we may end up finding an extent item with an offset smaller than (or equals to) the offset in cache->offset. So fix this by changing emit_fiemap_extent() to address these three scenarios like this: 1) For the first case, steps listed above, adjust the length of the previously cached extent so that it does not overlap with the current extent, emit the previous one and cache the current file extent item; 2) For the second case where he had a hole or prealloc extent with multiple delalloc ranges inside the hole or prealloc extent's range, and the current file extent item has an offset that matches the offset in the fiemap cache, just discard what we have in the fiemap cache and assign the current file extent item to the cache, since it's more up to date; 3) For the third case where he had a hole or prealloc extent with multiple delalloc ranges inside the hole or prealloc extent's range and the offset of the file extent item we just found is smaller than what we have in the cache, just skip the current file extent item if its range end at or behind the cached extent's end, because we may have emitted (to the fiemap user space buffer) delalloc ranges that overlap with the current file extent item's range. If the file extent item's range goes beyond the end offset of the cached extent, just emit the cached extent and cache a subrange of the file extent item, that goes from the end offset of the cached extent to the end offset of the file extent item. Dealing with those cases in those ways makes everything consistent by reflecting the current state of file extent items in the btree and without emitting extents that have overlapping ranges (which would be confusing and violating expectations). This issue could be triggered often with test case generic/561, and was also hit and reported by Wang Yugui. Reported-by: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20240223104619.701F.409509F4@e16-tech.com/ Fixes: b0ad381fa769 ("btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent locking") Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit a1a4a9ca77f143c00fce69c1239887ff8b813bec ]

For fiemap we recently stopped locking the target extent range for the
whole duration of the fiemap call, in order to avoid a deadlock in a
scenario where the fiemap buffer happens to be a memory mapped range of
the same file. This use case is very unlikely to be useful in practice but
it may be triggered by fuzz testing (syzbot, etc).

However by not locking the target extent range for the whole duration of
the fiemap call we can race with an ordered extent. This happens like
this:

1) The fiemap task finishes processing a file extent item that covers
   the file range [512K, 1M[, and that file extent item is the last item
   in the leaf currently being processed;

2) And ordered extent for the file range [768K, 2M[, in COW mode,
   completes (btrfs_finish_one_ordered()) and the file extent item
   covering the range [512K, 1M[ is trimmed to cover the range
   [512K, 768K[ and then a new file extent item for the range [768K, 2M[
   is inserted in the inode's subvolume tree;

3) The fiemap task calls fiemap_next_leaf_item(), which then calls
   btrfs_next_leaf() to find the next leaf / item. This finds that the
   the next key following the one we previously processed (its type is
   BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY and its offset is 512K), is the key corresponding
   to the new file extent item inserted by the ordered extent, which has
   a type of BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY and an offset of 768K;

4) Later the fiemap code ends up at emit_fiemap_extent() and triggers
   the warning:

      if (cache->offset + cache->len > offset) {
               WARN_ON(1);
               return -EINVAL;
      }

   Since we get 1M > 768K, because the previously emitted entry for the
   old extent covering the file range [512K, 1M[ ends at an offset that
   is greater than the new extent's start offset (768K). This makes fiemap
   fail with -EINVAL besides triggering the warning that produces a stack
   trace like the following:

     [1621.677651] ------------[ cut here ]------------
     [1621.677656] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 204366 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2492 emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs]
     [1621.677899] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic (...)
     [1621.677951] CPU: 1 PID: 204366 Comm: pool Not tainted 6.8.0-rc5-btrfs-next-151+ #1
     [1621.677954] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
     [1621.677956] RIP: 0010:emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs]
     [1621.678033] Code: 2b 4c 89 63 (...)
     [1621.678035] RSP: 0018:ffffab16089ffd20 EFLAGS: 00010206
     [1621.678037] RAX: 00000000004fa000 RBX: ffffab16089ffe08 RCX: 0000000000009000
     [1621.678039] RDX: 00000000004f9000 RSI: 00000000004f1000 RDI: ffffab16089ffe90
     [1621.678040] RBP: 00000000004f9000 R08: 0000000000001000 R09: 0000000000000000
     [1621.678041] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: 0000000041d78000
     [1621.678043] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff9434f0b17850
     [1621.678044] FS:  00007fa6e20006c0(0000) GS:ffff943bdfa40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
     [1621.678046] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
     [1621.678048] CR2: 00007fa6b0801000 CR3: 000000012d404002 CR4: 0000000000370ef0
     [1621.678053] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
     [1621.678055] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
     [1621.678056] Call Trace:
     [1621.678074]  <TASK>
     [1621.678076]  ? __warn+0x80/0x130
     [1621.678082]  ? emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs]
     [1621.678159]  ? report_bug+0x1f4/0x200
     [1621.678164]  ? handle_bug+0x42/0x70
     [1621.678167]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70
     [1621.678170]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
     [1621.678178]  ? emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs]
     [1621.678253]  extent_fiemap+0x766/0xa30 [btrfs]
     [1621.678339]  btrfs_fiemap+0x45/0x80 [btrfs]
     [1621.678420]  do_vfs_ioctl+0x1e4/0x870
     [1621.678431]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6a/0xc0
     [1621.678434]  do_syscall_64+0x52/0x120
     [1621.678445]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76

There's also another case where before calling btrfs_next_leaf() we are
processing a hole or a prealloc extent and we had several delalloc ranges
within that hole or prealloc extent. In that case if the ordered extents
complete before we find the next key, we may end up finding an extent item
with an offset smaller than (or equals to) the offset in cache->offset.

So fix this by changing emit_fiemap_extent() to address these three
scenarios like this:

1) For the first case, steps listed above, adjust the length of the
   previously cached extent so that it does not overlap with the current
   extent, emit the previous one and cache the current file extent item;

2) For the second case where he had a hole or prealloc extent with
   multiple delalloc ranges inside the hole or prealloc extent's range,
   and the current file extent item has an offset that matches the offset
   in the fiemap cache, just discard what we have in the fiemap cache and
   assign the current file extent item to the cache, since it's more up
   to date;

3) For the third case where he had a hole or prealloc extent with
   multiple delalloc ranges inside the hole or prealloc extent's range
   and the offset of the file extent item we just found is smaller than
   what we have in the cache, just skip the current file extent item
   if its range end at or behind the cached extent's end, because we may
   have emitted (to the fiemap user space buffer) delalloc ranges that
   overlap with the current file extent item's range. If the file extent
   item's range goes beyond the end offset of the cached extent, just
   emit the cached extent and cache a subrange of the file extent item,
   that goes from the end offset of the cached extent to the end offset
   of the file extent item.

Dealing with those cases in those ways makes everything consistent by
reflecting the current state of file extent items in the btree and
without emitting extents that have overlapping ranges (which would be
confusing and violating expectations).

This issue could be triggered often with test case generic/561, and was
also hit and reported by Wang Yugui.

Reported-by: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20240223104619.701F.409509F4@e16-tech.com/
Fixes: b0ad381fa769 ("btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent locking")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
afs: Fix endless loop in directory parsing 2024-03-06T14:53:53+00:00 David Howells dhowells@redhat.com 2024-02-23T13:15:02+00:00 fe02316e4933befc621fa125efb8f8b4d04cceec [ Upstream commit 5f7a07646655fb4108da527565dcdc80124b14c4 ] If a directory has a block with only ".__afsXXXX" files in it (from uncompleted silly-rename), these .__afsXXXX files are skipped but without advancing the file position in the dir_context. This leads to afs_dir_iterate() repeating the block again and again. Fix this by making the code that skips the .__afsXXXX file also manually advance the file position. The symptoms are a soft lookup: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 52s! [check:5737] ... RIP: 0010:afs_dir_iterate_block+0x39/0x1fd ... ? watchdog_timer_fn+0x1a6/0x213 ... ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 ? afs_dir_iterate_block+0x39/0x1fd afs_dir_iterate+0x10a/0x148 afs_readdir+0x30/0x4a iterate_dir+0x93/0xd3 __do_sys_getdents64+0x6b/0xd4 This is almost certainly the actual fix for: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218496 Fixes: 57e9d49c5452 ("afs: Hide silly-rename files from userspace") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/786185.1708694102@warthog.procyon.org.uk Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: Markus Suvanto <markus.suvanto@gmail.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 5f7a07646655fb4108da527565dcdc80124b14c4 ]

If a directory has a block with only ".__afsXXXX" files in it (from
uncompleted silly-rename), these .__afsXXXX files are skipped but without
advancing the file position in the dir_context.  This leads to
afs_dir_iterate() repeating the block again and again.

Fix this by making the code that skips the .__afsXXXX file also manually
advance the file position.

The symptoms are a soft lookup:

        watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 52s! [check:5737]
        ...
        RIP: 0010:afs_dir_iterate_block+0x39/0x1fd
        ...
         ? watchdog_timer_fn+0x1a6/0x213
        ...
         ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20
         ? afs_dir_iterate_block+0x39/0x1fd
         afs_dir_iterate+0x10a/0x148
         afs_readdir+0x30/0x4a
         iterate_dir+0x93/0xd3
         __do_sys_getdents64+0x6b/0xd4

This is almost certainly the actual fix for:

        https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218496

Fixes: 57e9d49c5452 ("afs: Hide silly-rename files from userspace")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/786185.1708694102@warthog.procyon.org.uk
Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: Markus Suvanto <markus.suvanto@gmail.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
fs/ntfs3: fix build without CONFIG_NTFS3_LZX_XPRESS 2024-03-02T17:23:50+00:00 Mark O'Donovan shiftee@posteo.net 2024-02-21T10:43:58+00:00 1752a632a68268573a92a18d9d656cf0c8fccfc2 commit c8e314624a1666ed2eec28549713021a8ec801e9 upstream. When CONFIG_NTFS3_LZX_XPRESS is not set then we get the following build error: fs/ntfs3/frecord.c:2460:16: error: unused variable ‘i_size’ Signed-off-by: Mark O'Donovan <shiftee@posteo.net> Fixes: 4fd6c08a16d7 ("fs/ntfs3: Use i_size_read and i_size_write") Tested-by: Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Reported-by: Rainer Fiebig <jrf@mailbox.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit c8e314624a1666ed2eec28549713021a8ec801e9 upstream.

When CONFIG_NTFS3_LZX_XPRESS is not set then we get the following build
error:

  fs/ntfs3/frecord.c:2460:16: error: unused variable ‘i_size’

Signed-off-by: Mark O'Donovan <shiftee@posteo.net>
Fixes: 4fd6c08a16d7 ("fs/ntfs3: Use i_size_read and i_size_write")
Tested-by: Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Reported-by: Rainer Fiebig <jrf@mailbox.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
afs: Increase buffer size in afs_update_volume_status() 2024-03-01T12:41:55+00:00 Daniil Dulov d.dulov@aladdin.ru 2024-02-19T14:39:03+00:00 d34a5e57632bb5ff825196ddd9a48ca403626dfa [ Upstream commit 6ea38e2aeb72349cad50e38899b0ba6fbcb2af3d ] The max length of volume->vid value is 20 characters. So increase idbuf[] size up to 24 to avoid overflow. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. [DH: Actually, it's 20 + NUL, so increase it to 24 and use snprintf()] Fixes: d2ddc776a458 ("afs: Overhaul volume and server record caching and fileserver rotation") Signed-off-by: Daniil Dulov <d.dulov@aladdin.ru> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240211150442.3416-1-d.dulov@aladdin.ru/ # v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212083347.10742-1-d.dulov@aladdin.ru/ # v2 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240219143906.138346-3-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 6ea38e2aeb72349cad50e38899b0ba6fbcb2af3d ]

The max length of volume->vid value is 20 characters.
So increase idbuf[] size up to 24 to avoid overflow.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

[DH: Actually, it's 20 + NUL, so increase it to 24 and use snprintf()]

Fixes: d2ddc776a458 ("afs: Overhaul volume and server record caching and fileserver rotation")
Signed-off-by: Daniil Dulov <d.dulov@aladdin.ru>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240211150442.3416-1-d.dulov@aladdin.ru/ # v1
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212083347.10742-1-d.dulov@aladdin.ru/ # v2
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240219143906.138346-3-dhowells@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>