linux-stable.git/fs, branch v5.7.3

fat: don't allow to mount if the FAT length == 0

2020-06-17T14:43:03+00:00

commit b1b65750b8db67834482f758fc385bfa7560d228 upstream.

If FAT length == 0, the image doesn't have any data. And it can be the
cause of overlapping the root dir and FAT entries.

Also Windows treats it as invalid format.

Reported-by: syzbot+6f1624f937d9d6911e2d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Marco Elver 
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/87r1wz8mrd.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

proc: Use new_inode not new_inode_pseudo

2020-06-17T14:42:59+00:00

commit ef1548adada51a2f32ed7faef50aa465e1b4c5da upstream.

Recently syzbot reported that unmounting proc when there is an ongoing
inotify watch on the root directory of proc could result in a use
after free when the watch is removed after the unmount of proc
when the watcher exits.

Commit 69879c01a0c3 ("proc: Remove the now unnecessary internal mount
of proc") made it easier to unmount proc and allowed syzbot to see the
problem, but looking at the code it has been around for a long time.

Looking at the code the fsnotify watch should have been removed by
fsnotify_sb_delete in generic_shutdown_super.  Unfortunately the inode
was allocated with new_inode_pseudo instead of new_inode so the inode
was not on the sb->s_inodes list.  Which prevented
fsnotify_unmount_inodes from finding the inode and removing the watch
as well as made it so the "VFS: Busy inodes after unmount" warning
could not find the inodes to warn about them.

Make all of the inodes in proc visible to generic_shutdown_super,
and fsnotify_sb_delete by using new_inode instead of new_inode_pseudo.
The only functional difference is that new_inode places the inodes
on the sb->s_inodes list.

I wrote a small test program and I can verify that without changes it
can trigger this issue, and by replacing new_inode_pseudo with
new_inode the issues goes away.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/000000000000d788c905a7dfa3f4@google.com
Reported-by: syzbot+7d2debdcdb3cb93c1e5e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 0097875bd415 ("proc: Implement /proc/thread-self to point at the directory of the current thread")
Fixes: 021ada7dff22 ("procfs: switch /proc/self away from proc_dir_entry")
Fixes: 51f0885e5415 ("vfs,proc: guarantee unique inodes in /proc")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

exfat: fix incorrect update of stream entry in __exfat_truncate()

2020-06-17T14:42:59+00:00

commit 29bbb14bfc80dd760b07d2be0a27e610562982e3 upstream.

At truncate, there is a problem of incorrect updating in the file entry
pointer instead of stream entry. This will cause the problem of
overwriting the time field of the file entry to new_size. Fix it to
update stream entry.

Fixes: 98d917047e8b ("exfat: add file operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

exfat: fix memory leak in exfat_parse_param()

2020-06-17T14:42:59+00:00

commit f341a7d8dcc4e3d01544d7bc145633f062ef6249 upstream.

butt3rflyh4ck reported memory leak found by syzkaller.

A param->string held by exfat_mount_options.

BUG: memory leak

unreferenced object 0xffff88801972e090 (size 8):
  comm "syz-executor.2", pid 16298, jiffies 4295172466 (age 14.060s)
  hex dump (first 8 bytes):
    6b 6f 69 38 2d 75 00 00                          koi8-u..
  backtrace:
    [<000000005bfe35d6>] kstrdup+0x36/0x70 mm/util.c:60
    [<0000000018ed3277>] exfat_parse_param+0x160/0x5e0
fs/exfat/super.c:276
    [<000000007680462b>] vfs_parse_fs_param+0x2b4/0x610
fs/fs_context.c:147
    [<0000000097c027f2>] vfs_parse_fs_string+0xe6/0x150
fs/fs_context.c:191
    [<00000000371bf78f>] generic_parse_monolithic+0x16f/0x1f0
fs/fs_context.c:231
    [<000000005ce5eb1b>] do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2812 [inline]
    [<000000005ce5eb1b>] do_mount+0x12bb/0x1b30 fs/namespace.c:3141
    [<00000000b642040c>] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3350 [inline]
    [<00000000b642040c>] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3327 [inline]
    [<00000000b642040c>] __x64_sys_mount+0x18f/0x230 fs/namespace.c:3327
    [<000000003b024e98>] do_syscall_64+0xf6/0x7d0
arch/x86/entry/common.c:295
    [<00000000ce2b698c>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3

exfat_free() should call exfat_free_iocharset(), to prevent a leak
in case we fail after parsing iocharset= but before calling
get_tree_bdev().

Additionally, there's no point copying param->string in
exfat_parse_param() - just steal it, leaving NULL in param->string.
That's independent from the leak or fix thereof - it's simply
avoiding an extra copy.

Fixes: 719c1e182916 ("exfat: add super block operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7
Reported-by: butt3rflyh4ck 
Signed-off-by: Al Viro 
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ovl: initialize error in ovl_copy_xattr

2020-06-17T14:42:59+00:00

commit 520da69d265a91c6536c63851cbb8a53946974f0 upstream.

In ovl_copy_xattr, if all the xattrs to be copied are overlayfs private
xattrs, the copy loop will terminate without assigning anything to the
error variable, thus returning an uninitialized value.

If ovl_copy_xattr is called from ovl_clear_empty, this uninitialized error
value is put into a pointer by ERR_PTR(), causing potential invalid memory
accesses down the line.

This commit initialize error with 0. This is the correct value because when
there's no xattr to copy, because all xattrs are private, ovl_copy_xattr
should succeed.

This bug is discovered with the help of INIT_STACK_ALL and clang.

Signed-off-by: Yuxuan Shui 
Link: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1050405
Fixes: 0956254a2d5b ("ovl: don't copy up opaqueness")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.8
Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko 
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ovl: fix out of bounds access warning in ovl_check_fb_len()

2020-06-17T14:42:59+00:00

commit 522f6e6cba6880a038e2bd88e10390b84cd3febd upstream.

syzbot reported out of bounds memory access from open_by_handle_at()
with a crafted file handle that looks like this:

  { .handle_bytes = 2, .handle_type = OVL_FILEID_V1 }

handle_bytes gets rounded down to 0 and we end up calling:
  ovl_check_fh_len(fh, 0) => ovl_check_fb_len(fh + 3, -3)

But fh buffer is only 2 bytes long, so accessing struct ovl_fb at
fh + 3 is illegal.

Fixes: cbe7fba8edfc ("ovl: make sure that real fid is 32bit aligned in memory")
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+61958888b1c60361a791@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc:  # v5.5
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein 
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

nilfs2: fix null pointer dereference at nilfs_segctor_do_construct()

2020-06-17T14:42:53+00:00

commit 8301c719a2bd131436438e49130ee381d30933f5 upstream.

After commit c3aab9a0bd91 ("mm/filemap.c: don't initiate writeback if
mapping has no dirty pages"), the following null pointer dereference has
been reported on nilfs2:

  BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000a8
  #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
  #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
  PGD 0 P4D 0
  Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
  ...
  RIP: 0010:percpu_counter_add_batch+0xa/0x60
  ...
  Call Trace:
    __test_set_page_writeback+0x2d3/0x330
    nilfs_segctor_do_construct+0x10d3/0x2110 [nilfs2]
    nilfs_segctor_construct+0x168/0x260 [nilfs2]
    nilfs_segctor_thread+0x127/0x3b0 [nilfs2]
    kthread+0xf8/0x130
    ...

This crash turned out to be caused by set_page_writeback() call for
segment summary buffers at nilfs_segctor_prepare_write().

set_page_writeback() can call inc_wb_stat(inode_to_wb(inode),
WB_WRITEBACK) where inode_to_wb(inode) is NULL if the inode of
underlying block device does not have an associated wb.

This fixes the issue by calling inode_attach_wb() in advance to ensure
to associate the bdev inode with its wb.

Fixes: c3aab9a0bd91 ("mm/filemap.c: don't initiate writeback if mapping has no dirty pages")
Reported-by: Walton Hoops 
Reported-by: Tomas Hlavaty 
Reported-by: ARAI Shun-ichi 
Reported-by: Hideki EIRAKU 
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi 
Cc: 	[5.4+]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200608.011819.1399059588922299158.konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

smb3: fix typo in mount options displayed in /proc/mounts

2020-06-17T14:42:51+00:00

commit 7866c177a03b18be3d83175014c643546e5b53c6 upstream.

Missing the final 's' in "max_channels" mount option when displayed in
/proc/mounts (or by mount command)

CC: Stable 
Signed-off-by: Steve French 
Reviewed-by: Shyam Prasad N 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

smb3: add indatalen that can be a non-zero value to calculation of credit charge in smb2 ioctl

2020-06-17T14:42:51+00:00

commit ebf57440ec59a36e1fc5fe91e31d66ae0d1662d0 upstream.

Some of tests in xfstests failed with cifsd kernel server since commit
e80ddeb2f70e. cifsd kernel server validates credit charge from client
by calculating it base on max((InputCount + OutputCount) and
(MaxInputResponse + MaxOutputResponse)) according to specification.

MS-SMB2 specification describe credit charge calculation of smb2 ioctl :

If Connection.SupportsMultiCredit is TRUE, the server MUST validate
CreditCharge based on the maximum of (InputCount + OutputCount) and
(MaxInputResponse + MaxOutputResponse), as specified in section 3.3.5.2.5.
If the validation fails, it MUST fail the IOCTL request with
STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER.

This patch add indatalen that can be a non-zero value to calculation of
credit charge in SMB2_ioctl_init().

Fixes: e80ddeb2f70e ("smb3: fix incorrect number of credits when ioctl
MaxOutputResponse > 64K")
Cc: Stable 
Reviewed-by: Aurelien Aptel 
Cc: Steve French 
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon 
Signed-off-by: Steve French 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

smb3: fix incorrect number of credits when ioctl MaxOutputResponse > 64K

2020-06-17T14:42:51+00:00

commit e80ddeb2f70ebd0786aa7cdba3e58bc931fa0bb5 upstream.

We were not checking to see if ioctl requests asked for more than
64K (ie when CIFSMaxBufSize was > 64K) so when setting larger
CIFSMaxBufSize then ioctls would fail with invalid parameter errors.
When requests ask for more than 64K in MaxOutputResponse then we
need to ask for more than 1 credit.

Signed-off-by: Steve French 
CC: Stable 
Reviewed-by: Aurelien Aptel 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman