linux-stable.git/fs, branch v5.4.40

cifs: do not share tcons with DFS

2020-05-10T08:31:27+00:00

[ Upstream commit 65303de829dd6d291a4947c1a31de31896f8a060 ]

This disables tcon re-use for DFS shares.

tcon->dfs_path stores the path that the tcon should connect to when
doing failing over.

If that tcon is used multiple times e.g. 2 mounts using it with
different prefixpath, each will need a different dfs_path but there is
only one tcon. The other solution would be to split the tcon in 2
tcons during failover but that is much harder.

tcons could not be shared with DFS in cifs.ko because in a
DFS namespace like:

          //domain/dfsroot -> /serverA/dfsroot, /serverB/dfsroot

          //serverA/dfsroot/link -> /serverA/target1/aa/bb

          //serverA/dfsroot/link2 -> /serverA/target1/cc/dd

you can see that link and link2 are two DFS links that both resolve to
the same target share (/serverA/target1), so cifs.ko will only contain a
single tcon for both link and link2.

The problem with that is, if we (auto)mount "link" and "link2", cifs.ko
will only contain a single tcon for both DFS links so we couldn't
perform failover or refresh the DFS cache for both links because
tcon->dfs_path was set to either "link" or "link2", but not both --
which is wrong.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) 
Reviewed-by: Aurelien Aptel 
Reviewed-by: Ronnie Sahlberg 
Signed-off-by: Steve French 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cifs: protect updating server->dstaddr with a spinlock

2020-05-10T08:31:27+00:00

[ Upstream commit fada37f6f62995cc449b36ebba1220594bfe55fe ]

We use a spinlock while we are reading and accessing the destination address for a server.
We need to also use this spinlock to protect when we are modifying this address from
reconn_set_ipaddr().

Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg 
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton 
Signed-off-by: Steve French 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

nfs: Fix potential posix_acl refcnt leak in nfs3_set_acl

2020-05-06T06:15:16+00:00

commit 7648f939cb919b9d15c21fff8cd9eba908d595dc upstream.

nfs3_set_acl keeps track of the acl it allocated locally to determine if an acl
needs to be released at the end.  This results in a memory leak when the
function allocates an acl as well as a default acl.  Fix by releasing acls
that differ from the acl originally passed into nfs3_set_acl.

Fixes: b7fa0554cf1b ("[PATCH] NFS: Add support for NFSv3 ACLs")
Reported-by: Xiyu Yang 
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher 
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Fix use after free in get_tree_bdev()

2020-05-06T06:15:15+00:00

commit dd7bc8158b413e0b580c491e8bd18cb91057c7c2 upstream.

Commit 6fcf0c72e4b9, a fix to get_tree_bdev() put a missing blkdev_put() in
the wrong place, before a warnf() that displays the bdev under
consideration rather after it.

This results in a silent lockup in printk("%pg") called via warnf() from
get_tree_bdev() under some circumstances when there's a race with the
blockdev being frozen.  This can be caused by xfstests/tests/generic/085 in
combination with Lukas Czerner's ext4 mount API conversion patchset.  It
looks like it ought to occur with other users of get_tree_bdev() such as
XFS, but apparently doesn't.

Fix this by switching the order of the lines.

Fixes: 6fcf0c72e4b9 ("vfs: add missing blkdev_put() in get_tree_bdev()")
Reported-by: Lukas Czerner 
Signed-off-by: David Howells 
cc: Ian Kent 
cc: Al Viro 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

dlmfs_file_write(): fix the bogosity in handling non-zero *ppos

2020-05-06T06:15:09+00:00

commit 3815f1be546e752327b5868af103ccdddcc4db77 upstream.

'count' is how much you want written, not the final position.
Moreover, it can legitimately be less than the current position...

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: transaction: Avoid deadlock due to bad initialization timing of fs_info::journal_info

2020-05-06T06:15:06+00:00

commit fcc99734d1d4ced30167eb02e17f656735cb9928 upstream.

[BUG]
One run of btrfs/063 triggered the following lockdep warning:
  ============================================
  WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
  5.6.0-rc7-custom+ #48 Not tainted
  --------------------------------------------
  kworker/u24:0/7 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs]

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs]

  other info that might help us debug this:
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0
         ----
    lock(sb_internal#2);
    lock(sb_internal#2);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

   May be due to missing lock nesting notation

  4 locks held by kworker/u24:0/7:
   #0: ffff88817b495948 ((wq_completion)btrfs-endio-write){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80
   #1: ffff888189ea7db8 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80
   #2: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs]
   #3: ffff888174ca4da8 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}, at: btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x83/0xd0 [btrfs]

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/u24:0 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc7-custom+ #48
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
  Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0xc2/0x11a
   __lock_acquire.cold+0xce/0x214
   lock_acquire+0xe6/0x210
   __sb_start_write+0x14e/0x290
   start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs]
   btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs]
   find_free_extent+0x1504/0x1a50 [btrfs]
   btrfs_reserve_extent+0xd5/0x1f0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x1ac/0x570 [btrfs]
   btrfs_copy_root+0x213/0x580 [btrfs]
   create_reloc_root+0x3bd/0x470 [btrfs]
   btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2d2/0x310 [btrfs]
   record_root_in_trans+0x191/0x1d0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x90/0xd0 [btrfs]
   start_transaction+0x16e/0x890 [btrfs]
   btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs]
   btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x55d/0xcd0 [btrfs]
   finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs]
   btrfs_work_helper+0x116/0x9a0 [btrfs]
   process_one_work+0x632/0xb80
   worker_thread+0x80/0x690
   kthread+0x1a3/0x1f0
   ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

It's pretty hard to reproduce, only one hit so far.

[CAUSE]
This is because we're calling btrfs_join_transaction() without re-using
the current running one:

btrfs_finish_ordered_io()
|- btrfs_join_transaction()		<<< Call #1
   |- btrfs_record_root_in_trans()
      |- btrfs_reserve_extent()
	 |- btrfs_join_transaction()	<<< Call #2

Normally such btrfs_join_transaction() call should re-use the existing
one, without trying to re-start a transaction.

But the problem is, in btrfs_join_transaction() call #1, we call
btrfs_record_root_in_trans() before initializing current::journal_info.

And in btrfs_join_transaction() call #2, we're relying on
current::journal_info to avoid such deadlock.

[FIX]
Call btrfs_record_root_in_trans() after we have initialized
current::journal_info.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: fix partial loss of prealloc extent past i_size after fsync

2020-05-06T06:15:05+00:00

commit f135cea30de5f74d5bfb5116682073841fb4af8f upstream.

When we have an inode with a prealloc extent that starts at an offset
lower than the i_size and there is another prealloc extent that starts at
an offset beyond i_size, we can end up losing part of the first prealloc
extent (the part that starts at i_size) and have an implicit hole if we
fsync the file and then have a power failure.

Consider the following example with comments explaining how and why it
happens.

$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt

# Create our test file with 2 consecutive prealloc extents, each with a
# size of 128Kb, and covering the range from 0 to 256Kb, with a file
# size of 0.
$ xfs_io -f -c "falloc -k 0 128K" /mnt/foo
$ xfs_io -c "falloc -k 128K 128K" /mnt/foo

# Fsync the file to record both extents in the log tree.
$ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/foo

# Now do a redudant extent allocation for the range from 0 to 64Kb.
# This will merely increase the file size from 0 to 64Kb. Instead we
# could also do a truncate to set the file size to 64Kb.
$ xfs_io -c "falloc 0 64K" /mnt/foo

# Fsync the file, so we update the inode item in the log tree with the
# new file size (64Kb). This also ends up setting the number of bytes
# for the first prealloc extent to 64Kb. This is done by the truncation
# at btrfs_log_prealloc_extents().
# This means that if a power failure happens after this, a write into
# the file range 64Kb to 128Kb will not use the prealloc extent and
# will result in allocation of a new extent.
$ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/foo

# Now set the file size to 256K with a truncate and then fsync the file.
# Since no changes happened to the extents, the fsync only updates the
# i_size in the inode item at the log tree. This results in an implicit
# hole for the file range from 64Kb to 128Kb, something which fsck will
# complain when not using the NO_HOLES feature if we replay the log
# after a power failure.
$ xfs_io -c "truncate 256K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo

So instead of always truncating the log to the inode's current i_size at
btrfs_log_prealloc_extents(), check first if there's a prealloc extent
that starts at an offset lower than the i_size and with a length that
crosses the i_size - if there is one, just make sure we truncate to a
size that corresponds to the end offset of that prealloc extent, so
that we don't lose the part of that extent that starts at i_size if a
power failure happens.

A test case for fstests follows soon.

Fixes: 31d11b83b96f ("Btrfs: fix duplicate extents after fsync of file with prealloc extents")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana
Signed-off-by: David Sterba
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: fix block group leak when removing fails

2020-05-06T06:15:05+00:00

commit f6033c5e333238f299c3ae03fac8cc1365b23b77 upstream.

btrfs_remove_block_group() invokes btrfs_lookup_block_group(), which
returns a local reference of the block group that contains the given
bytenr to "block_group" with increased refcount.

When btrfs_remove_block_group() returns, "block_group" becomes invalid,
so the refcount should be decreased to keep refcount balanced.

The reference counting issue happens in several exception handling paths
of btrfs_remove_block_group(). When those error scenarios occur such as
btrfs_alloc_path() returns NULL, the function forgets to decrease its
refcnt increased by btrfs_lookup_block_group() and will cause a refcnt
leak.

Fix this issue by jumping to "out_put_group" label and calling
btrfs_put_block_group() when those error scenarios occur.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Xiyu Yang 
Signed-off-by: Xin Tan 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: fix transaction leak in btrfs_recover_relocation

2020-05-06T06:15:05+00:00

commit 1402d17dfd9657be0da8458b2079d03c2d61c86a upstream.

btrfs_recover_relocation() invokes btrfs_join_transaction(), which joins
a btrfs_trans_handle object into transactions and returns a reference of
it with increased refcount to "trans".

When btrfs_recover_relocation() returns, "trans" becomes invalid, so the
refcount should be decreased to keep refcount balanced.

The reference counting issue happens in one exception handling path of
btrfs_recover_relocation(). When read_fs_root() failed, the refcnt
increased by btrfs_join_transaction() is not decreased, causing a refcnt
leak.

Fix this issue by calling btrfs_end_transaction() on this error path
when read_fs_root() failed.

Fixes: 79787eaab461 ("btrfs: replace many BUG_ONs with proper error handling")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana 
Signed-off-by: Xiyu Yang 
Signed-off-by: Xin Tan 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

NFSv4.1: fix handling of backchannel binding in BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION

2020-05-06T06:15:05+00:00

commit dff58530c4ca8ce7ee5a74db431c6e35362cf682 upstream.

Currently, if the client sends BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION with
NFS4_CDFC4_FORE_OR_BOTH but only gets NFS4_CDFS4_FORE back it ignores
that it wasn't able to enable a backchannel.

To make sure, the client sends BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION as the first
operation on the connections (ie., no other session compounds haven't
been sent before), and if the client's request to bind the backchannel
is not satisfied, then reset the connection and retry.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia 
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman