linux-stable.git/fs, branch v5.4.280

nilfs2: fix kernel bug on rename operation of broken directory

2024-07-18T09:40:56+00:00

commit a9e1ddc09ca55746079cc479aa3eb6411f0d99d4 upstream.

Syzbot reported that in rename directory operation on broken directory on
nilfs2, __block_write_begin_int() called to prepare block write may fail
BUG_ON check for access exceeding the folio/page size.

This is because nilfs_dotdot(), which gets parent directory reference
entry ("..") of the directory to be moved or renamed, does not check
consistency enough, and may return location exceeding folio/page size for
broken directories.

Fix this issue by checking required directory entries ("." and "..") in
the first chunk of the directory in nilfs_dotdot().

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240628165107.9006-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi 
Reported-by: syzbot+d3abed1ad3d367fa2627@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d3abed1ad3d367fa2627
Fixes: 2ba466d74ed7 ("nilfs2: directory entry operations")
Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi 
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

vfs: don't mod negative dentry count when on shrinker list

2024-07-18T09:40:53+00:00

[ Upstream commit aabfe57ebaa75841db47ea59091ec3c5a06d2f52 ]

The nr_dentry_negative counter is intended to only account negative
dentries that are present on the superblock LRU. Therefore, the LRU
add, remove and isolate helpers modify the counter based on whether
the dentry is negative, but the shrinker list related helpers do not
modify the counter, and the paths that change a dentry between
positive and negative only do so if DCACHE_LRU_LIST is set.

The problem with this is that a dentry on a shrinker list still has
DCACHE_LRU_LIST set to indicate ->d_lru is in use. The additional
DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST flag denotes whether the dentry is on LRU or a
shrink related list. Therefore if a relevant operation (i.e. unlink)
occurs while a dentry is present on a shrinker list, and the
associated codepath only checks for DCACHE_LRU_LIST, then it is
technically possible to modify the negative dentry count for a
dentry that is off the LRU. Since the shrinker list related helpers
do not modify the negative dentry count (because non-LRU dentries
should not be included in the count) when the dentry is ultimately
removed from the shrinker list, this can cause the negative dentry
count to become permanently inaccurate.

This problem can be reproduced via a heavy file create/unlink vs.
drop_caches workload. On an 80xcpu system, I start 80 tasks each
running a 1k file create/delete loop, and one task spinning on
drop_caches. After 10 minutes or so of runtime, the idle/clean cache
negative dentry count increases from somewhere in the range of 5-10
entries to several hundred (and increasingly grows beyond
nr_dentry_unused).

Tweak the logic in the paths that turn a dentry negative or positive
to filter out the case where the dentry is present on a shrink
related list. This allows the above workload to maintain an accurate
negative dentry count.

Fixes: af0c9af1b3f6 ("fs/dcache: Track & report number of negative dentries")
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240703121301.247680-1-bfoster@redhat.com
Acked-by: Ian Kent 
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long 
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fs/dcache: Re-use value stored to dentry->d_flags instead of re-reading

2024-07-18T09:40:52+00:00

[ Upstream commit 8bfb40be31ddea0cb4664b352e1797cfe6c91976 ]

Currently, the __d_clear_type_and_inode() writes the value flags to
dentry->d_flags, then immediately re-reads it in order to use it in a if
statement. This re-read is useless because no other update to
dentry->d_flags can occur at this point.

This commit therefore re-use flags in the if statement instead of
re-reading dentry->d_flags.

Signed-off-by: linke li 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/tencent_5E187BD0A61BA28605E85405F15228254D0A@qq.com
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner 
Stable-dep-of: aabfe57ebaa7 ("vfs: don't mod negative dentry count when on shrinker list")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

filelock: fix potential use-after-free in posix_lock_inode

2024-07-18T09:40:52+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1b3ec4f7c03d4b07bad70697d7e2f4088d2cfe92 ]

Light Hsieh reported a KASAN UAF warning in trace_posix_lock_inode().
The request pointer had been changed earlier to point to a lock entry
that was added to the inode's list. However, before the tracepoint could
fire, another task raced in and freed that lock.

Fix this by moving the tracepoint inside the spinlock, which should
ensure that this doesn't happen.

Fixes: 74f6f5912693 ("locks: fix KASAN: use-after-free in trace_event_raw_event_filelock_lock")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/724ffb0a2962e912ea62bb0515deadf39c325112.camel@kernel.org/
Reported-by: Light Hsieh (謝明燈) 
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240702-filelock-6-10-v1-1-96e766aadc98@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Alexander Aring 
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

nilfs2: fix incorrect inode allocation from reserved inodes

2024-07-18T09:40:52+00:00

commit 93aef9eda1cea9e84ab2453fcceb8addad0e46f1 upstream.

If the bitmap block that manages the inode allocation status is corrupted,
nilfs_ifile_create_inode() may allocate a new inode from the reserved
inode area where it should not be allocated.

Previous fix commit d325dc6eb763 ("nilfs2: fix use-after-free bug of
struct nilfs_root"), fixed the problem that reserved inodes with inode
numbers less than NILFS_USER_INO (=11) were incorrectly reallocated due to
bitmap corruption, but since the start number of non-reserved inodes is
read from the super block and may change, in which case inode allocation
may occur from the extended reserved inode area.

If that happens, access to that inode will cause an IO error, causing the
file system to degrade to an error state.

Fix this potential issue by adding a wraparound option to the common
metadata object allocation routine and by modifying
nilfs_ifile_create_inode() to disable the option so that it only allocates
inodes with inode numbers greater than or equal to the inode number read
in "nilfs->ns_first_ino", regardless of the bitmap status of reserved
inodes.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-4-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi 
Cc: Hillf Danton 
Cc: Jan Kara 
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

nilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory entries

2024-07-18T09:40:51+00:00

commit bb76c6c274683c8570ad788f79d4b875bde0e458 upstream.

Syzbot reported that mounting and unmounting a specific pattern of
corrupted nilfs2 filesystem images causes a use-after-free of metadata
file inodes, which triggers a kernel bug in lru_add_fn().

As Jan Kara pointed out, this is because the link count of a metadata file
gets corrupted to 0, and nilfs_evict_inode(), which is called from iput(),
tries to delete that inode (ifile inode in this case).

The inconsistency occurs because directories containing the inode numbers
of these metadata files that should not be visible in the namespace are
read without checking.

Fix this issue by treating the inode numbers of these internal files as
errors in the sanity check helper when reading directory folios/pages.

Also thanks to Hillf Danton and Matthew Wilcox for their initial mm-layer
analysis.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-3-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi 
Reported-by: syzbot+d79afb004be235636ee8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d79afb004be235636ee8
Reported-by: Jan Kara 
Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240617075758.wewhukbrjod5fp5o@quack3
Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi 
Cc: Hillf Danton 
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

nilfs2: fix inode number range checks

2024-07-18T09:40:51+00:00

commit e2fec219a36e0993642844be0f345513507031f4 upstream.

Patch series "nilfs2: fix potential issues related to reserved inodes".

This series fixes one use-after-free issue reported by syzbot, caused by
nilfs2's internal inode being exposed in the namespace on a corrupted
filesystem, and a couple of flaws that cause problems if the starting
number of non-reserved inodes written in the on-disk super block is
intentionally (or corruptly) changed from its default value.


This patch (of 3):

In the current implementation of nilfs2, "nilfs->ns_first_ino", which
gives the first non-reserved inode number, is read from the superblock,
but its lower limit is not checked.

As a result, if a number that overlaps with the inode number range of
reserved inodes such as the root directory or metadata files is set in the
super block parameter, the inode number test macros (NILFS_MDT_INODE and
NILFS_VALID_INODE) will not function properly.

In addition, these test macros use left bit-shift calculations using with
the inode number as the shift count via the BIT macro, but the result of a
shift calculation that exceeds the bit width of an integer is undefined in
the C specification, so if "ns_first_ino" is set to a large value other
than the default value NILFS_USER_INO (=11), the macros may potentially
malfunction depending on the environment.

Fix these issues by checking the lower bound of "nilfs->ns_first_ino" and
by preventing bit shifts equal to or greater than the NILFS_USER_INO
constant in the inode number test macros.

Also, change the type of "ns_first_ino" from signed integer to unsigned
integer to avoid the need for type casting in comparisons such as the
lower bound check introduced this time.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-2-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi 
Cc: Hillf Danton 
Cc: Jan Kara 
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

jffs2: Fix potential illegal address access in jffs2_free_inode

2024-07-18T09:40:49+00:00

[ Upstream commit af9a8730ddb6a4b2edd779ccc0aceb994d616830 ]

During the stress testing of the jffs2 file system,the following
abnormal printouts were found:
[ 2430.649000] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0069696969696948
[ 2430.649622] Mem abort info:
[ 2430.649829]   ESR = 0x96000004
[ 2430.650115]   EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[ 2430.650564]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
[ 2430.650795]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[ 2430.651032]   FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
[ 2430.651446] Data abort info:
[ 2430.651683]   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004
[ 2430.652001]   CM = 0, WnR = 0
[ 2430.652558] [0069696969696948] address between user and kernel address ranges
[ 2430.653265] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 2430.654512] CPU: 2 PID: 20919 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.15.25-g512f31242bf6 #33
[ 2430.655008] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[ 2430.655517] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 2430.656142] pc : kfree+0x78/0x348
[ 2430.656630] lr : jffs2_free_inode+0x24/0x48
[ 2430.657051] sp : ffff800009eebd10
[ 2430.657355] x29: ffff800009eebd10 x28: 0000000000000001 x27: 0000000000000000
[ 2430.658327] x26: ffff000038f09d80 x25: 0080000000000000 x24: ffff800009d38000
[ 2430.658919] x23: 5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a x22: ffff000038f09d80 x21: ffff8000084f0d14
[ 2430.659434] x20: ffff0000bf9a6ac0 x19: 0169696969696940 x18: 0000000000000000
[ 2430.659969] x17: ffff8000b6506000 x16: ffff800009eec000 x15: 0000000000004000
[ 2430.660637] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 00000001000820a1 x12: 00000000000d1b19
[ 2430.661345] x11: 0004000800000000 x10: 0000000000000001 x9 : ffff8000084f0d14
[ 2430.662025] x8 : ffff0000bf9a6b40 x7 : ffff0000bf9a6b48 x6 : 0000000003470302
[ 2430.662695] x5 : ffff00002e41dcc0 x4 : ffff0000bf9aa3b0 x3 : 0000000003470342
[ 2430.663486] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff8000084f0d14 x0 : fffffc0000000000
[ 2430.664217] Call trace:
[ 2430.664528]  kfree+0x78/0x348
[ 2430.664855]  jffs2_free_inode+0x24/0x48
[ 2430.665233]  i_callback+0x24/0x50
[ 2430.665528]  rcu_do_batch+0x1ac/0x448
[ 2430.665892]  rcu_core+0x28c/0x3c8
[ 2430.666151]  rcu_core_si+0x18/0x28
[ 2430.666473]  __do_softirq+0x138/0x3cc
[ 2430.666781]  irq_exit+0xf0/0x110
[ 2430.667065]  handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0x98
[ 2430.667447]  gic_handle_irq+0xac/0xe8
[ 2430.667739]  call_on_irq_stack+0x28/0x54
The parameter passed to kfree was 5a5a5a5a, which corresponds to the target field of
the jffs_inode_info structure. It was found that all variables in the jffs_inode_info
structure were 5a5a5a5a, except for the first member sem. It is suspected that these
variables are not initialized because they were set to 5a5a5a5a during memory testing,
which is meant to detect uninitialized memory.The sem variable is initialized in the
function jffs2_i_init_once, while other members are initialized in
the function jffs2_init_inode_info.

The function jffs2_init_inode_info is called after iget_locked,
but in the iget_locked function, the destroy_inode process is triggered,
which releases the inode and consequently, the target member of the inode
is not initialized.In concurrent high pressure scenarios, iget_locked
may enter the destroy_inode branch as described in the code.

Since the destroy_inode functionality of jffs2 only releases the target,
the fix method is to set target to NULL in jffs2_i_init_once.

Signed-off-by: Wang Yong 
Reviewed-by: Lu Zhongjun 
Reviewed-by: Yang Tao 
Cc: Xu Xin 
Cc: Yang Yang 
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

orangefs: fix out-of-bounds fsid access

2024-07-18T09:40:49+00:00

[ Upstream commit 53e4efa470d5fc6a96662d2d3322cfc925818517 ]

Arnd Bergmann sent a patch to fsdevel, he says:

"orangefs_statfs() copies two consecutive fields of the superblock into
the statfs structure, which triggers a warning from the string fortification
helpers"

Jan Kara suggested an alternate way to do the patch to make it more readable.

I ran both ideas through xfstests and both seem fine. This patch
is based on Jan Kara's suggestion.

Signed-off-by: Mike Marshall 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

nfs: Leave pages in the pagecache if readpage failed

2024-07-05T07:08:32+00:00

commit 0b768a9610c6de9811c6d33900bebfb665192ee1 upstream.

The pagecache handles readpage failing by itself; it doesn't want
filesystems to remove pages from under it.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman