linux-stable.git/fs, branch v4.9.91

staging: ncpfs: memory corruption in ncp_read_kernel()

2018-03-28T16:39:23+00:00

commit 4c41aa24baa4ed338241d05494f2c595c885af8f upstream.

If the server is malicious then *bytes_read could be larger than the
size of the "target" buffer.  It would lead to memory corruption when we
do the memcpy().

Reported-by: Dr Silvio Cesare of InfoSect 
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter 
Cc: stable 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

nfsd: remove blocked locks on client teardown

2018-03-28T16:39:21+00:00

commit 68ef3bc3166468678d5e1fdd216628c35bd1186f upstream.

We had some reports of panics in nfsd4_lm_notify, and that showed a
nfs4_lockowner that had outlived its so_client.

Ensure that we walk any leftover lockowners after tearing down all of
the stateids, and remove any blocked locks that they hold.

With this change, we also don't need to walk the nbl_lru on nfsd_net
shutdown, as that will happen naturally when we tear down the clients.

Fixes: 76d348fadff5 (nfsd: have nfsd4_lock use blocking locks for v4.1+ locks)
Reported-by: Frank Sorenson 
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

nfsd4: permit layoutget of executable-only files

2018-03-24T10:00:26+00:00

[ Upstream commit 66282ec1cf004c09083c29cb5e49019037937bbd ]

Clients must be able to read a file in order to execute it, and for pNFS
that means the client needs to be able to perform a LAYOUTGET on the file.

This behavior for executable-only files was added for OPEN in commit
a043226bc140 "nfsd4: permit read opens of executable-only files".

This fixes up xfstests generic/126 on block/scsi layouts.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington 
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cifs: small underflow in cnvrtDosUnixTm()

2018-03-24T10:00:21+00:00

[ Upstream commit 564277eceeca01e02b1ef3e141cfb939184601b4 ]

January is month 1.  There is no zero-th month.  If someone passes a
zero month then it means we read from one space before the start of the
total_days_of_prev_months[] array.

We may as well also be strict about days as well.

Fixes: 1bd5bbcb6531 ("[CIFS] Legacy time handling for Win9x and OS/2 part 1")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter 
Signed-off-by: Steve French 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

pNFS: Fix a deadlock when coalescing writes and returning the layout

2018-03-24T10:00:21+00:00

[ Upstream commit 61f454e30c18a28924e96be12592c0d5e24bcc81 ]

Consider the following deadlock:

Process P1	Process P2		Process P3
==========	==========		==========
					lock_page(page)

		lseg = pnfs_update_layout(inode)

lo = NFS_I(inode)->layout
pnfs_error_mark_layout_for_return(lo)

		lock_page(page)

					lseg = pnfs_update_layout(inode)

In this scenario,
- P1 has declared the layout to be in error, but P2 holds a reference to
  a layout segment on that inode, so the layoutreturn is deferred.
- P2 is waiting for a page lock held by P3.
- P3 is asking for a new layout segment, but is blocked waiting
  for the layoutreturn.

The fix is to ensure that pnfs_error_mark_layout_for_return() does
not set the NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN flag, which blocks P3. Instead, we allow
the latter to call LAYOUTGET so that it can make progress and unblock
P2.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

jbd2: Fix lockdep splat with generic/270 test

2018-03-24T10:00:18+00:00

[ Upstream commit c52c47e4b4fbe4284602fc2ccbfc4a4d8dc05b49 ]

I've hit a lockdep splat with generic/270 test complaining that:

3216.fsstress.b/3533 is trying to acquire lock:
 (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [] jbd2_log_wait_commit+0x0/0x150

but task is already holding lock:
 (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [] start_this_handle+0x35b/0x850

The underlying problem is that jbd2_journal_force_commit_nested()
(called from ext4_should_retry_alloc()) may get called while a
transaction handle is started. In such case it takes care to not wait
for commit of the running transaction (which would deadlock) but only
for a commit of a transaction that is already committing (which is safe
as that doesn't wait for any filesystem locks).

In fact there are also other callers of jbd2_log_wait_commit() that take
care to pass tid of a transaction that is already committing and for
those cases, the lockdep instrumentation is too restrictive and leading
to false positive reports. Fix the problem by calling
jbd2_might_wait_for_commit() from jbd2_log_wait_commit() only if the
transaction isn't already committing.

Fixes: 1eaa566d368b214d99cbb973647c1b0b8102a9ae
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

orangefs: do not wait for timeout if umounting

2018-03-24T10:00:16+00:00

[ Upstream commit b5a9d61eebdd0016ccb383b25a5c3d04977a6549 ]

When the computer is turned off, all the processes are killed and then
all the filesystems are umounted.  OrangeFS should not wait for the
userspace daemon to come back in that case.

This only works for plain umount(2).  To actually take advantage of this
interactively, `umount -f' is needed; otherwise umount will issue a
statfs first, which will wait for the userspace daemon to come back.

Signed-off-by: Martin Brandenburg 
Signed-off-by: Mike Marshall 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Btrfs: fix extent map leak during fallocate error path

2018-03-24T10:00:16+00:00

[ Upstream commit be2d253cc98244765323a7c94cc1ac5cd5a17072 ]

If the call to btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() failed, we were leaking an
extent map structure. The failure can happen either due to an -ENOMEM
condition or, when quotas are enabled, due to -EDQUOT for example.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Btrfs: send, fix file hole not being preserved due to inline extent

2018-03-24T10:00:16+00:00

[ Upstream commit e1cbfd7bf6dabdac561c75d08357571f44040a45 ]

Normally we don't have inline extents followed by regular extents, but
there's currently at least one harmless case where this happens. For
example, when the page size is 4Kb and compression is enabled:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
  $ mount -o compress /dev/sdb /mnt
  $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 4K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foobar
  $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 8K 4K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foobar

In this case we get a compressed inline extent, representing 4Kb of
data, followed by a hole extent and then a regular data extent. The
inline extent was not expanded/converted to a regular extent exactly
because it represents 4Kb of data. This does not cause any apparent
problem (such as the issue solved by commit e1699d2d7bf6
("btrfs: add missing memset while reading compressed inline extents"))
except trigger an unexpected case in the incremental send code path
that makes us issue an operation to write a hole when it's not needed,
resulting in more writes at the receiver and wasting space at the
receiver.

So teach the incremental send code to deal with this particular case.

The issue can be currently triggered by running fstests btrfs/137 with
compression enabled (MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o compress" ./check btrfs/137).

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana 
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Btrfs: fix incorrect space accounting after failure to insert inline extent

2018-03-24T10:00:16+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1c81ba237bcecad9bc885a1ddcf02d725ea38482 ]

When using compression, if we fail to insert an inline extent we
incorrectly end up attempting to free the reserved data space twice,
once through extent_clear_unlock_delalloc(), because we pass it the
flag EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING, and once through a direct call to
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota(). This results in a trace
like the following:

[  834.576240] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  834.576825] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 486 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4316 btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota+0x60/0x9f [btrfs]
[  834.579501] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq ppdev i2c_piix4 acpi_cpufreq psmouse tpm_tis parport_pc pcspkr serio_raw tpm_tis_core sg parport evdev i2c_core tpm button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix virtio_pci libata virtio_ring virtio scsi_mod e1000 floppy [last unloaded: btrfs]
[  834.592116] CPU: 2 PID: 486 Comm: kworker/u32:4 Not tainted 4.10.0-rc8-btrfs-next-37+ #2
[  834.593316] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.9.1-0-gb3ef39f-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[  834.595273] Workqueue: btrfs-delalloc btrfs_delalloc_helper [btrfs]
[  834.596103] Call Trace:
[  834.596103]  dump_stack+0x67/0x90
[  834.596103]  __warn+0xc2/0xdd
[  834.596103]  warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f
[  834.596103]  btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota+0x60/0x9f [btrfs]
[  834.596103]  compress_file_range.constprop.42+0x2fa/0x3fc [btrfs]
[  834.596103]  ? submit_compressed_extents+0x3a7/0x3a7 [btrfs]
[  834.596103]  async_cow_start+0x32/0x4d [btrfs]
[  834.596103]  btrfs_scrubparity_helper+0x187/0x3e7 [btrfs]
[  834.596103]  btrfs_delalloc_helper+0xe/0x10 [btrfs]
[  834.596103]  process_one_work+0x273/0x4e4
[  834.596103]  worker_thread+0x1eb/0x2ca
[  834.596103]  ? rescuer_thread+0x2b6/0x2b6
[  834.596103]  kthread+0x100/0x108
[  834.596103]  ? __list_del_entry+0x22/0x22
[  834.596103]  ret_from_fork+0x2e/0x40
[  834.611656] ---[ end trace 719902fe6bdef08f ]---

So fix this by not calling directly btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota()
if an error happened.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman