linux-stable.git/fs, branch v4.4.236

affs: fix basic permission bits to actually work

2020-09-12T09:45:32+00:00

[ Upstream commit d3a84a8d0dde4e26bc084b36ffcbdc5932ac85e2 ]

The basic permission bits (protection bits in AmigaOS) have been broken
in Linux' AFFS - it would only set bits, but never delete them.
Also, contrary to the documentation, the Archived bit was not handled.

Let's fix this for good, and set the bits such that Linux and classic
AmigaOS can coexist in the most peaceful manner.

Also, update the documentation to represent the current state of things.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Max Staudt 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fs/affs: use octal for permissions

2020-09-12T09:45:32+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1bafd6f164d9ec9bf2fa9829051fbeb36342be0b ]

According to commit f90774e1fd27 ("checkpatch: look for symbolic
permissions and suggest octal instead")

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170109191208.6085-5-fabf@skynet.be
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick 
Cc: Al Viro 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: fix potential deadlock in the search ioctl

2020-09-12T09:45:29+00:00

[ Upstream commit a48b73eca4ceb9b8a4b97f290a065335dbcd8a04 ]

With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following
lockdep splat:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  compsize/11122 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff889fabca8768 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x3e/0x90

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #2 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_write_nested+0x3b/0x70
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x120
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x756/0x990
	 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xb4
	 __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x270
	 btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x168/0x230
	 btrfs_work_helper+0xd4/0x570
	 process_one_work+0x2ad/0x5f0
	 worker_thread+0x3a/0x3d0
	 kthread+0x133/0x150
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  -> #1 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
	 btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x50/0x440
	 btrfs_update_inode+0x8a/0xf0
	 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5b/0xd0
	 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0
	 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60
	 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640
	 do_mmap+0x376/0x580
	 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120
	 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230
	 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
	 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
	 __might_fault+0x68/0x90
	 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
	 copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
	 search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
	 btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
	 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
	 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &mm->mmap_lock#2 --> &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-fs-00

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-fs-00);
				 lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
				 lock(btrfs-fs-00);
    lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  1 lock held by compsize/11122:
   #0: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 17 PID: 11122 Comm: compsize Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922
  Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x78/0xa0
   check_noncircular+0x165/0x180
   __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
   lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
   ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
   ? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90
   __might_fault+0x68/0x90
   ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
   _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
   copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
   ? btrfs_search_forward+0x2a6/0x360
   search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
   btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
   btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
   ? __do_sys_newfstat+0x5a/0x70
   ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
   ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
   do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

The problem is we're doing a copy_to_user() while holding tree locks,
which can deadlock if we have to do a page fault for the copy_to_user().
This exists even without my locking changes, so it needs to be fixed.
Rework the search ioctl to do the pre-fault and then
copy_to_user_nofault for the copying.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: set the lockdep class for log tree extent buffers

2020-09-12T09:45:29+00:00

[ Upstream commit d3beaa253fd6fa40b8b18a216398e6e5376a9d21 ]

These are special extent buffers that get rewound in order to lookup
the state of the tree at a specific point in time.  As such they do not
go through the normal initialization paths that set their lockdep class,
so handle them appropriately when they are created and before they are
locked.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: Remove extraneous extent_buffer_get from tree_mod_log_rewind

2020-09-12T09:45:29+00:00

[ Upstream commit 24cee18a1c1d7c731ea5987e0c99daea22ae7f4a ]

When a rewound buffer is created it already has a ref count of 1 and the
dummy flag set. Then another ref is taken bumping the count to 2.
Finally when this buffer is released from btrfs_release_path the extra
reference is decremented by the special handling code in
free_extent_buffer.

However, this special code is in fact redundant sinca ref count of 1 is
still correct since the buffer is only accessed via btrfs_path struct.
This paves the way forward of removing the special handling in
free_extent_buffer.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: Remove redundant extent_buffer_get in get_old_root

2020-09-12T09:45:29+00:00

[ Upstream commit 6c122e2a0c515cfb3f3a9cefb5dad4cb62109c78 ]

get_old_root used used only by btrfs_search_old_slot to initialise the
path structure. The old root is always a cloned buffer (either via alloc
dummy or via btrfs_clone_extent_buffer) and its reference count is 2: 1
from allocation, 1 from extent_buffer_get call in get_old_root.

This latter explicit ref count acquire operation is in fact unnecessary
since the semantic is such that the newly allocated buffer is handed
over to the btrfs_path for lifetime management. Considering this just
remove the extra extent_buffer_get in get_old_root.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: drop path before adding new uuid tree entry

2020-09-12T09:45:28+00:00

commit 9771a5cf937129307d9f58922d60484d58ababe7 upstream.

With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following
lockdep splat:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.8.0-rc7-00167-g0d7ba0c5b375-dirty #925 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  btrfs-uuid/7955 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff88bfbafec0f8 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff88bfbafef2a8 (btrfs-uuid-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #1 (btrfs-uuid-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_read_nested+0x3e/0x140
	 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
	 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x4bd/0x990
	 btrfs_uuid_tree_add+0x89/0x2d0
	 btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x330/0x390
	 kthread+0x133/0x150
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  -> #0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
	 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
	 down_read_nested+0x3e/0x140
	 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
	 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x4bd/0x990
	 btrfs_find_root+0x45/0x1b0
	 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x100
	 btrfs_get_root_ref.part.50+0x143/0x630
	 btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate+0x207/0x314
	 btrfs_uuid_rescan_kthread+0x12/0x50
	 kthread+0x133/0x150
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  other info that might help us debug this:

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-uuid-00);
				 lock(btrfs-root-00);
				 lock(btrfs-uuid-00);
    lock(btrfs-root-00);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  1 lock held by btrfs-uuid/7955:
   #0: ffff88bfbafef2a8 (btrfs-uuid-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 73 PID: 7955 Comm: btrfs-uuid Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00167-g0d7ba0c5b375-dirty #925
  Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x78/0xa0
   check_noncircular+0x165/0x180
   __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
   lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
   ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
   ? btrfs_root_node+0x1c/0x1d0
   down_read_nested+0x3e/0x140
   ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
   __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
   __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50
   btrfs_search_slot+0x4bd/0x990
   btrfs_find_root+0x45/0x1b0
   btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x100
   btrfs_get_root_ref.part.50+0x143/0x630
   btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate+0x207/0x314
   ? btree_readpage+0x20/0x20
   btrfs_uuid_rescan_kthread+0x12/0x50
   kthread+0x133/0x150
   ? kthread_create_on_node+0x60/0x60
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

This problem exists because we have two different rescan threads,
btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread which creates the uuid tree, and
btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate that goes through and updates or deletes any out
of date roots.  The problem is they both do things in different order.
btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread() reads the tree_root, and then inserts entries
into the uuid_root.  btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate() scans the uuid_root, but
then does a btrfs_get_fs_root() which can read from the tree_root.

It's actually easy enough to not be holding the path in
btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread() when we add a uuid entry, as we already drop
it further down and re-start the search when we loop.  So simply move
the path release before we add our entry to the uuid tree.

This also fixes a problem where we're holding a path open after we do
btrfs_end_transaction(), which has it's own problems.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fix regression in "epoll: Keep a reference on files added to the check list"

2020-09-12T09:45:28+00:00

[ Upstream commit 77f4689de17c0887775bb77896f4cc11a39bf848 ]

epoll_loop_check_proc() can run into a file already committed to destruction;
we can't grab a reference on those and don't need to add them to the set for
reverse path check anyway.

Tested-by: Marc Zyngier 
Fixes: a9ed4a6560b8 ("epoll: Keep a reference on files added to the check list")
Signed-off-by: Al Viro 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ceph: don't allow setlease on cephfs

2020-09-12T09:45:27+00:00

[ Upstream commit 496ceaf12432b3d136dcdec48424312e71359ea7 ]

Leases don't currently work correctly on kcephfs, as they are not broken
when caps are revoked. They could eventually be implemented similarly to
how we did them in libcephfs, but for now don't allow them.

[ idryomov: no need for simple_nosetlease() in ceph_dir_fops and
  ceph_snapdir_fops ]

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton 
Reviewed-by: Ilya Dryomov 
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: check the right error variable in btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log

2020-09-03T09:19:28+00:00

[ Upstream commit fb2fecbad50964b9f27a3b182e74e437b40753ef ]

With my new locking code dbench is so much faster that I tripped over a
transaction abort from ENOSPC.  This turned out to be because
btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log was checking for ret == -ENOSPC, but this
function sets err on error, and returns err.  So instead of properly
marking the inode as needing a full commit, we were returning -ENOSPC
and aborting in __btrfs_unlink_inode.  Fix this by checking the proper
variable so that we return the correct thing in the case of ENOSPC.

The ENOENT needs to be checked, because btrfs_lookup_dir_item_index()
can return -ENOENT if the dir item isn't in the tree log (which would
happen if we hadn't fsync'ed this guy).  We actually handle that case in
__btrfs_unlink_inode, so it's an expected error to get back.

Fixes: 4a500fd178c8 ("Btrfs: Metadata ENOSPC handling for tree log")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
[ add note and comment about ENOENT ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin