linux-stable.git/fs, branch v3.2.50

nfsd: nfsd_open: when dentry_open returns an error do not propagate as struct file

2013-08-02T20:15:05+00:00

commit e4daf1ffbe6cc3b12aab4d604e627829e93e9914 upstream.

The following call chain:
------------------------------------------------------------
nfs4_get_vfs_file
- nfsd_open
  - dentry_open
    - do_dentry_open
      - __get_file_write_access
        - get_write_access
          - return atomic_inc_unless_negative(&inode->i_writecount) ? 0 : -ETXTBSY;
------------------------------------------------------------

can result in the following state:
------------------------------------------------------------
struct nfs4_file {
...
  fi_fds = {0xffff880c1fa65c80, 0xffffffffffffffe6, 0x0},
  fi_access = {{
      counter = 0x1
    }, {
      counter = 0x0
    }},
...
------------------------------------------------------------

1) First time around, in nfs4_get_vfs_file() fp->fi_fds[O_WRONLY] is
NULL, hence nfsd_open() is called where we get status set to an error
and fp->fi_fds[O_WRONLY] to -ETXTBSY. Thus we do not reach
nfs4_file_get_access() and fi_access[O_WRONLY] is not incremented.

2) Second time around, in nfs4_get_vfs_file() fp->fi_fds[O_WRONLY] is
NOT NULL (-ETXTBSY), so nfsd_open() is NOT called, but
nfs4_file_get_access() IS called and fi_access[O_WRONLY] is incremented.
Thus we leave a landmine in the form of the nfs4_file data structure in
an incorrect state.

3) Eventually, when __nfs4_file_put_access() is called it finds
fi_access[O_WRONLY] being non-zero, it decrements it and calls
nfs4_file_put_fd() which tries to fput -ETXTBSY.
------------------------------------------------------------
...
     [exception RIP: fput+0x9]
     RIP: ffffffff81177fa9  RSP: ffff88062e365c90  RFLAGS: 00010282
     RAX: ffff880c2b3d99cc  RBX: ffff880c2b3d9978  RCX: 0000000000000002
     RDX: dead000000100101  RSI: 0000000000000001  RDI: ffffffffffffffe6
     RBP: ffff88062e365c90   R8: ffff88041fe797d8   R9: ffff88062e365d58
     R10: 0000000000000008  R11: 0000000000000000  R12: 0000000000000001
     R13: 0000000000000007  R14: 0000000000000000  R15: 0000000000000000
     ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
  #9 [ffff88062e365c98] __nfs4_file_put_access at ffffffffa0562334 [nfsd]
 #10 [ffff88062e365cc8] nfs4_file_put_access at ffffffffa05623ab [nfsd]
 #11 [ffff88062e365ce8] free_generic_stateid at ffffffffa056634d [nfsd]
 #12 [ffff88062e365d18] release_open_stateid at ffffffffa0566e4b [nfsd]
 #13 [ffff88062e365d38] nfsd4_close at ffffffffa0567401 [nfsd]
 #14 [ffff88062e365d88] nfsd4_proc_compound at ffffffffa0557f28 [nfsd]
 #15 [ffff88062e365dd8] nfsd_dispatch at ffffffffa054543e [nfsd]
 #16 [ffff88062e365e18] svc_process_common at ffffffffa04ba5a4 [sunrpc]
 #17 [ffff88062e365e98] svc_process at ffffffffa04babe0 [sunrpc]
 #18 [ffff88062e365eb8] nfsd at ffffffffa0545b62 [nfsd]
 #19 [ffff88062e365ee8] kthread at ffffffff81090886
 #20 [ffff88062e365f48] kernel_thread at ffffffff8100c14a
------------------------------------------------------------

Signed-off-by: Harshula Jayasuriya 
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields 
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

Btrfs: re-add root to dead root list if we stop dropping it

2013-08-02T20:15:00+00:00

commit d29a9f629e009c9b90e5859bce581070fd6247fc upstream.

If we stop dropping a root for whatever reason we need to add it back to the
dead root list so that we will re-start the dropping next transaction commit.
The other case this happens is if we recover a drop because we will add a root
without adding it to the fs radix tree, so we can leak it's root and commit root
extent buffer, adding this to the dead root list makes this cleanup happen.
Thanks,

Reported-by: Alex Lyakas 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

Btrfs: fix lock leak when resuming snapshot deletion

2013-08-02T20:15:00+00:00

commit fec386ac1428f9c0e672df952cbca5cebd4e4e2f upstream.

We aren't setting path->locks[level] when we resume a snapshot deletion which
means we won't unlock the buffer when we free the path.  This causes deadlocks
if we happen to re-allocate the block before we've evicted the extent buffer
from cache.  Thanks,

Reported-by: Alex Lyakas 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ext4: don't allow ext4_free_blocks() to fail due to ENOMEM

2013-08-02T20:14:55+00:00

commit e7676a704ee0a1ef71a6b23760b5a8f6896cb1a1 upstream.

The filesystem should not be marked inconsistent if ext4_free_blocks()
is not able to allocate memory.  Unfortunately some callers (most
notably ext4_truncate) don't have a way to reflect an error back up to
the VFS.  And even if we did, most userspace applications won't deal
with most system calls returning ENOMEM anyway.

Reported-by: Nagachandra P 
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

lockd: protect nlm_blocked access in nlmsvc_retry_blocked

2013-08-02T20:14:54+00:00

commit 1c327d962fc420aea046c16215a552710bde8231 upstream.

In nlmsvc_retry_blocked, the check that the list is non-empty and acquiring
the pointer of the first entry is unprotected by any lock.  This allows a rare
race condition when there is only one entry on the list.  A function such as
nlmsvc_grant_callback() can be called, which will temporarily remove the entry
from the list.  Between the list_empty() and list_entry(),the list may become
empty, causing an invalid pointer to be used as an nlm_block, leading to a
possible crash.

This patch adds the nlm_block_lock around these calls to prevent concurrent
use of the nlm_blocked list.

This was a regression introduced by
f904be9cc77f361d37d71468b13ff3d1a1823dea  "lockd: Mostly remove BKL from
the server".

Cc: Bryan Schumaker 
Signed-off-by: David Jeffery 
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

fanotify: info leak in copy_event_to_user()

2013-08-02T20:14:53+00:00

commit de1e0c40aceb9d5bff09c3a3b97b2f1b178af53f upstream.

The ->reserved field isn't cleared so we leak one byte of stack
information to userspace.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter 
Cc: Eric Paris 
Cc: Al Viro 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ext4: fix data offset overflow in ext4_xattr_fiemap() on 32-bit archs

2013-07-27T04:34:34+00:00

commit a60697f411eb365fb09e639e6f183fe33d1eb796 upstream.

On 32-bit architectures with 32-bit sector_t computation of data offset
in ext4_xattr_fiemap() can overflow resulting in reporting bogus data
location. Fix the problem by typing block number to proper type before
shifting.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ext4: fix overflow when counting used blocks on 32-bit architectures

2013-07-27T04:34:34+00:00

commit 8af8eecc1331dbf5e8c662022272cf667e213da5 upstream.

The arithmetics adding delalloc blocks to the number of used blocks in
ext4_getattr() can easily overflow on 32-bit archs as we first multiply
number of blocks by blocksize and then divide back by 512. Make the
arithmetics more clever and also use proper type (unsigned long long
instead of unsigned long).

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ceph: fix statvfs fr_size

2013-07-27T04:34:32+00:00

commit 92a49fb0f79f3300e6e50ddf56238e70678e4202 upstream.

Different versions of glibc are broken in different ways, but the short of
it is that for the time being, frsize should == bsize, and be used as the
multiple for the blocks, free, and available fields.  This mirrors what is
done for NFS.  The previous reporting of the page size for frsize meant
that newer glibc and df would report a very small value for the fs size.

Fixes http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3793.

Signed-off-by: Sage Weil 
Reviewed-by: Greg Farnum 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

hpfs: better test for errors

2013-07-27T04:34:29+00:00

commit 3ebacb05044f82c5f0bb456a894eb9dc57d0ed90 upstream.

The test if bitmap access is out of bound could errorneously pass if the
device size is divisible by 16384 sectors and we are asking for one bitmap
after the end.

Check for invalid size in the superblock. Invalid size could cause integer
overflows in the rest of the code.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings