linux-stable.git/fs, branch v3.10.16 Linux kernel stable tree Btrfs: remove ourselves from the cluster list under lock 2013-10-13T23:08:34+00:00 Josef Bacik jbacik@fusionio.com 2013-08-22T21:03:29+00:00 322d9a97c490b890975e0d61f2b034bc18ea1100 commit b8d0c69b9469ffd33df30fee3e990f2d4aa68a09 upstream. A user was reporting weird warnings from btrfs_put_delayed_ref() and I noticed that we were doing this list_del_init() on our head ref outside of delayed_refs->lock. This is a problem if we have people still on the list, we could end up modifying old pointers and such. Fix this by removing us from the list before we do our run_delayed_ref on our head ref. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit b8d0c69b9469ffd33df30fee3e990f2d4aa68a09 upstream.

A user was reporting weird warnings from btrfs_put_delayed_ref() and I noticed
that we were doing this list_del_init() on our head ref outside of
delayed_refs->lock.  This is a problem if we have people still on the list, we
could end up modifying old pointers and such.  Fix this by removing us from the
list before we do our run_delayed_ref on our head ref.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Btrfs: skip subvol entries when checking if we've created a dir already 2013-10-13T23:08:34+00:00 Josef Bacik jbacik@fusionio.com 2013-08-12T14:56:14+00:00 0ac5762ca876c8554cea6e8a05422d561b98947f commit a05254143cd183b18002cbba7759a1e4629aa762 upstream. We have logic to see if we've already created a parent directory by check to see if an inode inside of that directory has a lower inode number than the one we are currently processing. The logic is that if there is a lower inode number then we would have had to made sure the directory was created at that previous point. The problem is that subvols inode numbers count from the lowest objectid in the root tree, which may be less than our current progress. So just skip if our dir item key is a root item. This fixes the original test and the xfstest version I made that added an extra subvol create. Thanks, Reported-by: Emil Karlson <jekarlson@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit a05254143cd183b18002cbba7759a1e4629aa762 upstream.

We have logic to see if we've already created a parent directory by check to see
if an inode inside of that directory has a lower inode number than the one we
are currently processing.  The logic is that if there is a lower inode number
then we would have had to made sure the directory was created at that previous
point.  The problem is that subvols inode numbers count from the lowest objectid
in the root tree, which may be less than our current progress.  So just skip if
our dir item key is a root item.  This fixes the original test and the xfstest
version I made that added an extra subvol create.  Thanks,

Reported-by: Emil Karlson <jekarlson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Btrfs: change how we queue blocks for backref checking 2013-10-13T23:08:34+00:00 Josef Bacik jbacik@fusionio.com 2013-07-30T20:30:30+00:00 34aa872c2cea9518bba66ab8d88bc0f90dbeb2ba commit b6c60c8018c4e9beb2f83fc82c09f9d033766571 upstream. Previously we only added blocks to the list to have their backrefs checked if the level of the block is right above the one we are searching for. This is because we want to make sure we don't add the entire path up to the root to the lists to make sure we process things one at a time. This assumes that if any blocks in the path to the root are going to be not checked (shared in other words) then they will be in the level right above the current block on up. This isn't quite right though since we can have blocks higher up the list that are shared because they are attached to a reloc root. But we won't add this block to be checked and then later on we will BUG_ON(!upper->checked). So instead keep track of wether or not we've queued a block to be checked in this current search, and if we haven't go ahead and queue it to be checked. This patch fixed the panic I was seeing where we BUG_ON(!upper->checked). Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit b6c60c8018c4e9beb2f83fc82c09f9d033766571 upstream.

Previously we only added blocks to the list to have their backrefs checked if
the level of the block is right above the one we are searching for.  This is
because we want to make sure we don't add the entire path up to the root to the
lists to make sure we process things one at a time.  This assumes that if any
blocks in the path to the root are going to be not checked (shared in other
words) then they will be in the level right above the current block on up.  This
isn't quite right though since we can have blocks higher up the list that are
shared because they are attached to a reloc root.  But we won't add this block
to be checked and then later on we will BUG_ON(!upper->checked).  So instead
keep track of wether or not we've queued a block to be checked in this current
search, and if we haven't go ahead and queue it to be checked.  This patch fixed
the panic I was seeing where we BUG_ON(!upper->checked).  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
xfs: fix node forward in xfs_node_toosmall 2013-10-13T23:08:34+00:00 Mark Tinguely tinguely@sgi.com 2013-09-23T17:18:58+00:00 1fe36ec4914c34f63ea93c87ce6997606098628d commit 997def25e4b9cee3b01609e18a52f926bca8bd2b upstream. Commit f5ea1100 cleans up the disk to host conversions for node directory entries, but because a variable is reused in xfs_node_toosmall() the next node is not correctly found. If the original node is small enough (<= 3/8 of the node size), this change may incorrectly cause a node collapse when it should not. That will cause an assert in xfstest generic/319: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: /root/newest/xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 569 Keep the original node header to get the correct forward node. (When a node is considered for a merge with a sibling, it overwrites the sibling pointers of the original incore nodehdr with the sibling's pointers. This leads to loop considering the original node as a merge candidate with itself in the second pass, and so it incorrectly determines a merge should occur.) [v3: added Dave Chinner's (slightly modified) suggestion to the commit header, cleaned up whitespace. -bpm] Signed-off-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 997def25e4b9cee3b01609e18a52f926bca8bd2b upstream.

Commit f5ea1100 cleans up the disk to host conversions for
node directory entries, but because a variable is reused in
xfs_node_toosmall() the next node is not correctly found.
If the original node is small enough (<= 3/8 of the node size),
this change may incorrectly cause a node collapse when it should
not. That will cause an assert in xfstest generic/319:

   Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length),
   file: /root/newest/xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 569

Keep the original node header to get the correct forward node.

(When a node is considered for a merge with a sibling, it overwrites the
 sibling pointers of the original incore nodehdr with the sibling's
 pointers.  This leads to loop considering the original node as a merge
 candidate with itself in the second pass, and so it incorrectly
 determines a merge should occur.)

[v3: added Dave Chinner's (slightly modified) suggestion to the commit header,
	cleaned up whitespace.  -bpm]

Signed-off-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
NFSv4.1: nfs4_fl_prepare_ds - fix bugs when the connect attempt fails 2013-10-13T23:08:33+00:00 Trond Myklebust Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com 2013-09-26T18:08:36+00:00 28f7ae257183e8064119db486190d2229caae369 commit 52b26a3e1bb3e065c32b3febdac1e1f117d88e15 upstream. - Fix an Oops when nfs4_ds_connect() returns an error. - Always check the device status after waiting for a connect to complete. Reported-by: Andy Adamson <andros@netapp.com> Reported-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 52b26a3e1bb3e065c32b3febdac1e1f117d88e15 upstream.

- Fix an Oops when nfs4_ds_connect() returns an error.
- Always check the device status after waiting for a connect to complete.

Reported-by: Andy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Reported-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
nilfs2: fix issue with race condition of competition between segments for dirty blocks 2013-10-13T23:08:32+00:00 Vyacheslav Dubeyko slava@dubeyko.com 2013-09-30T20:45:12+00:00 d8974c7fe717ee8fb0706e35cc92e0bcdf660ec5 commit 7f42ec3941560f0902fe3671e36f2c20ffd3af0a upstream. Many NILFS2 users were reported about strange file system corruption (for example): NILFS: bad btree node (blocknr=185027): level = 0, flags = 0x0, nchildren = 768 NILFS error (device sda4): nilfs_bmap_last_key: broken bmap (inode number=11540) But such error messages are consequence of file system's issue that takes place more earlier. Fortunately, Jerome Poulin <jeromepoulin@gmail.com> and Anton Eliasson <devel@antoneliasson.se> were reported about another issue not so recently. These reports describe the issue with segctor thread's crash: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000000004c83 IP: nilfs_end_page_io+0x12/0xd0 [nilfs2] Call Trace: nilfs_segctor_do_construct+0xf25/0x1b20 [nilfs2] nilfs_segctor_construct+0x17b/0x290 [nilfs2] nilfs_segctor_thread+0x122/0x3b0 [nilfs2] kthread+0xc0/0xd0 ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 These two issues have one reason. This reason can raise third issue too. Third issue results in hanging of segctor thread with eating of 100% CPU. REPRODUCING PATH: One of the possible way or the issue reproducing was described by Jermoe me Poulin <jeromepoulin@gmail.com>: 1. init S to get to single user mode. 2. sysrq+E to make sure only my shell is running 3. start network-manager to get my wifi connection up 4. login as root and launch "screen" 5. cd /boot/log/nilfs which is a ext3 mount point and can log when NILFS dies. 6. lscp | xz -9e > lscp.txt.xz 7. mount my snapshot using mount -o cp=3360839,ro /dev/vgUbuntu/root /mnt/nilfs 8. start a screen to dump /proc/kmsg to text file since rsyslog is killed 9. start a screen and launch strace -f -o find-cat.log -t find /mnt/nilfs -type f -exec cat {} > /dev/null \; 10. start a screen and launch strace -f -o apt-get.log -t apt-get update 11. launch the last command again as it did not crash the first time 12. apt-get crashes 13. ps aux > ps-aux-crashed.log 13. sysrq+W 14. sysrq+E wait for everything to terminate 15. sysrq+SUSB Simplified way of the issue reproducing is starting kernel compilation task and "apt-get update" in parallel. REPRODUCIBILITY: The issue is reproduced not stable [60% - 80%]. It is very important to have proper environment for the issue reproducing. The critical conditions for successful reproducing: (1) It should have big modified file by mmap() way. (2) This file should have the count of dirty blocks are greater that several segments in size (for example, two or three) from time to time during processing. (3) It should be intensive background activity of files modification in another thread. INVESTIGATION: First of all, it is possible to see that the reason of crash is not valid page address: NILFS [nilfs_segctor_complete_write]:2100 bh->b_count 0, bh->b_blocknr 13895680, bh->b_size 13897727, bh->b_page 0000000000001a82 NILFS [nilfs_segctor_complete_write]:2101 segbuf->sb_segnum 6783 Moreover, value of b_page (0x1a82) is 6786. This value looks like segment number. And b_blocknr with b_size values look like block numbers. So, buffer_head's pointer points on not proper address value. Detailed investigation of the issue is discovered such picture: [-----------------------------SEGMENT 6783-------------------------------] NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2310 nilfs_segctor_begin_construction NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2321 nilfs_segctor_collect NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2336 nilfs_segctor_assign NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2367 nilfs_segctor_update_segusage NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2371 nilfs_segctor_prepare_write NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2376 nilfs_add_checksums_on_logs NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2381 nilfs_segctor_write NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bio]:464 bio->bi_sector 111149024, segbuf->sb_segnum 6783 [-----------------------------SEGMENT 6784-------------------------------] NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2310 nilfs_segctor_begin_construction NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2321 nilfs_segctor_collect NILFS [nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers]:782 bh->b_count 1, bh->b_page ffffea000709b000, page->index 0, i_ino 1033103, i_size 25165824 NILFS [nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers]:783 bh->b_assoc_buffers.next ffff8802174a6798, bh->b_assoc_buffers.prev ffff880221cffee8 NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2336 nilfs_segctor_assign NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2367 nilfs_segctor_update_segusage NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2371 nilfs_segctor_prepare_write NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2376 nilfs_add_checksums_on_logs NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2381 nilfs_segctor_write NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bh]:575 bh->b_count 1, bh->b_page ffffea000709b000, page->index 0, i_ino 1033103, i_size 25165824 NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bh]:576 segbuf->sb_segnum 6784 NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bh]:577 bh->b_assoc_buffers.next ffff880218a0d5f8, bh->b_assoc_buffers.prev ffff880218bcdf50 NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bio]:464 bio->bi_sector 111150080, segbuf->sb_segnum 6784, segbuf->sb_nbio 0 [----------] ditto NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bio]:464 bio->bi_sector 111164416, segbuf->sb_segnum 6784, segbuf->sb_nbio 15 [-----------------------------SEGMENT 6785-------------------------------] NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2310 nilfs_segctor_begin_construction NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2321 nilfs_segctor_collect NILFS [nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers]:782 bh->b_count 2, bh->b_page ffffea000709b000, page->index 0, i_ino 1033103, i_size 25165824 NILFS [nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers]:783 bh->b_assoc_buffers.next ffff880219277e80, bh->b_assoc_buffers.prev ffff880221cffc88 NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2367 nilfs_segctor_update_segusage NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2371 nilfs_segctor_prepare_write NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2376 nilfs_add_checksums_on_logs NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2381 nilfs_segctor_write NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bh]:575 bh->b_count 2, bh->b_page ffffea000709b000, page->index 0, i_ino 1033103, i_size 25165824 NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bh]:576 segbuf->sb_segnum 6785 NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bh]:577 bh->b_assoc_buffers.next ffff880218a0d5f8, bh->b_assoc_buffers.prev ffff880222cc7ee8 NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bio]:464 bio->bi_sector 111165440, segbuf->sb_segnum 6785, segbuf->sb_nbio 0 [----------] ditto NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bio]:464 bio->bi_sector 111177728, segbuf->sb_segnum 6785, segbuf->sb_nbio 12 NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2399 nilfs_segctor_wait NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_wait]:676 segbuf->sb_segnum 6783 NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_wait]:676 segbuf->sb_segnum 6784 NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_wait]:676 segbuf->sb_segnum 6785 NILFS [nilfs_segctor_complete_write]:2100 bh->b_count 0, bh->b_blocknr 13895680, bh->b_size 13897727, bh->b_page 0000000000001a82 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000000001a82 IP: [<ffffffffa024d0f2>] nilfs_end_page_io+0x12/0xd0 [nilfs2] Usually, for every segment we collect dirty files in list. Then, dirty blocks are gathered for every dirty file, prepared for write and submitted by means of nilfs_segbuf_submit_bh() call. Finally, it takes place complete write phase after calling nilfs_end_bio_write() on the block layer. Buffers/pages are marked as not dirty on final phase and processed files removed from the list of dirty files. It is possible to see that we had three prepare_write and submit_bio phases before segbuf_wait and complete_write phase. Moreover, segments compete between each other for dirty blocks because on every iteration of segments processing dirty buffer_heads are added in several lists of payload_buffers: [SEGMENT 6784]: bh->b_assoc_buffers.next ffff880218a0d5f8, bh->b_assoc_buffers.prev ffff880218bcdf50 [SEGMENT 6785]: bh->b_assoc_buffers.next ffff880218a0d5f8, bh->b_assoc_buffers.prev ffff880222cc7ee8 The next pointer is the same but prev pointer has changed. It means that buffer_head has next pointer from one list but prev pointer from another. Such modification can be made several times. And, finally, it can be resulted in various issues: (1) segctor hanging, (2) segctor crashing, (3) file system metadata corruption. FIX: This patch adds: (1) setting of BH_Async_Write flag in nilfs_segctor_prepare_write() for every proccessed dirty block; (2) checking of BH_Async_Write flag in nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers() and nilfs_lookup_dirty_node_buffers(); (3) clearing of BH_Async_Write flag in nilfs_segctor_complete_write(), nilfs_abort_logs(), nilfs_forget_buffer(), nilfs_clear_dirty_page(). Reported-by: Jerome Poulin <jeromepoulin@gmail.com> Reported-by: Anton Eliasson <devel@antoneliasson.se> Cc: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com> Cc: ARAI Shun-ichi <hermes@ceres.dti.ne.jp> Cc: Piotr Szymaniak <szarpaj@grubelek.pl> Cc: Juan Barry Manuel Canham <Linux@riotingpacifist.net> Cc: Zahid Chowdhury <zahid.chowdhury@starsolutions.com> Cc: Elmer Zhang <freeboy6716@gmail.com> Cc: Kenneth Langga <klangga@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Acked-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 7f42ec3941560f0902fe3671e36f2c20ffd3af0a upstream.

Many NILFS2 users were reported about strange file system corruption
(for example):

   NILFS: bad btree node (blocknr=185027): level = 0, flags = 0x0, nchildren = 768
   NILFS error (device sda4): nilfs_bmap_last_key: broken bmap (inode number=11540)

But such error messages are consequence of file system's issue that takes
place more earlier.  Fortunately, Jerome Poulin <jeromepoulin@gmail.com>
and Anton Eliasson <devel@antoneliasson.se> were reported about another
issue not so recently.  These reports describe the issue with segctor
thread's crash:

  BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000000004c83
  IP: nilfs_end_page_io+0x12/0xd0 [nilfs2]

  Call Trace:
   nilfs_segctor_do_construct+0xf25/0x1b20 [nilfs2]
   nilfs_segctor_construct+0x17b/0x290 [nilfs2]
   nilfs_segctor_thread+0x122/0x3b0 [nilfs2]
   kthread+0xc0/0xd0
   ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0

These two issues have one reason.  This reason can raise third issue
too.  Third issue results in hanging of segctor thread with eating of
100% CPU.

REPRODUCING PATH:

One of the possible way or the issue reproducing was described by
Jermoe me Poulin <jeromepoulin@gmail.com>:

1. init S to get to single user mode.
2. sysrq+E to make sure only my shell is running
3. start network-manager to get my wifi connection up
4. login as root and launch "screen"
5. cd /boot/log/nilfs which is a ext3 mount point and can log when NILFS dies.
6. lscp | xz -9e > lscp.txt.xz
7. mount my snapshot using mount -o cp=3360839,ro /dev/vgUbuntu/root /mnt/nilfs
8. start a screen to dump /proc/kmsg to text file since rsyslog is killed
9. start a screen and launch strace -f -o find-cat.log -t find
/mnt/nilfs -type f -exec cat {} > /dev/null \;
10. start a screen and launch strace -f -o apt-get.log -t apt-get update
11. launch the last command again as it did not crash the first time
12. apt-get crashes
13. ps aux > ps-aux-crashed.log
13. sysrq+W
14. sysrq+E  wait for everything to terminate
15. sysrq+SUSB

Simplified way of the issue reproducing is starting kernel compilation
task and "apt-get update" in parallel.

REPRODUCIBILITY:

The issue is reproduced not stable [60% - 80%].  It is very important to
have proper environment for the issue reproducing.  The critical
conditions for successful reproducing:

(1) It should have big modified file by mmap() way.

(2) This file should have the count of dirty blocks are greater that
    several segments in size (for example, two or three) from time to time
    during processing.

(3) It should be intensive background activity of files modification
    in another thread.

INVESTIGATION:

First of all, it is possible to see that the reason of crash is not valid
page address:

  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_complete_write]:2100 bh->b_count 0, bh->b_blocknr 13895680, bh->b_size 13897727, bh->b_page 0000000000001a82
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_complete_write]:2101 segbuf->sb_segnum 6783

Moreover, value of b_page (0x1a82) is 6786.  This value looks like segment
number.  And b_blocknr with b_size values look like block numbers.  So,
buffer_head's pointer points on not proper address value.

Detailed investigation of the issue is discovered such picture:

  [-----------------------------SEGMENT 6783-------------------------------]
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2310 nilfs_segctor_begin_construction
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2321 nilfs_segctor_collect
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2336 nilfs_segctor_assign
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2367 nilfs_segctor_update_segusage
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2371 nilfs_segctor_prepare_write
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2376 nilfs_add_checksums_on_logs
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2381 nilfs_segctor_write
  NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bio]:464 bio->bi_sector 111149024, segbuf->sb_segnum 6783

  [-----------------------------SEGMENT 6784-------------------------------]
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2310 nilfs_segctor_begin_construction
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2321 nilfs_segctor_collect
  NILFS [nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers]:782 bh->b_count 1, bh->b_page ffffea000709b000, page->index 0, i_ino 1033103, i_size 25165824
  NILFS [nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers]:783 bh->b_assoc_buffers.next ffff8802174a6798, bh->b_assoc_buffers.prev ffff880221cffee8
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2336 nilfs_segctor_assign
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2367 nilfs_segctor_update_segusage
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2371 nilfs_segctor_prepare_write
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2376 nilfs_add_checksums_on_logs
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2381 nilfs_segctor_write
  NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bh]:575 bh->b_count 1, bh->b_page ffffea000709b000, page->index 0, i_ino 1033103, i_size 25165824
  NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bh]:576 segbuf->sb_segnum 6784
  NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bh]:577 bh->b_assoc_buffers.next ffff880218a0d5f8, bh->b_assoc_buffers.prev ffff880218bcdf50
  NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bio]:464 bio->bi_sector 111150080, segbuf->sb_segnum 6784, segbuf->sb_nbio 0
  [----------] ditto
  NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bio]:464 bio->bi_sector 111164416, segbuf->sb_segnum 6784, segbuf->sb_nbio 15

  [-----------------------------SEGMENT 6785-------------------------------]
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2310 nilfs_segctor_begin_construction
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2321 nilfs_segctor_collect
  NILFS [nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers]:782 bh->b_count 2, bh->b_page ffffea000709b000, page->index 0, i_ino 1033103, i_size 25165824
  NILFS [nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers]:783 bh->b_assoc_buffers.next ffff880219277e80, bh->b_assoc_buffers.prev ffff880221cffc88
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2367 nilfs_segctor_update_segusage
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2371 nilfs_segctor_prepare_write
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2376 nilfs_add_checksums_on_logs
  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2381 nilfs_segctor_write
  NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bh]:575 bh->b_count 2, bh->b_page ffffea000709b000, page->index 0, i_ino 1033103, i_size 25165824
  NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bh]:576 segbuf->sb_segnum 6785
  NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bh]:577 bh->b_assoc_buffers.next ffff880218a0d5f8, bh->b_assoc_buffers.prev ffff880222cc7ee8
  NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bio]:464 bio->bi_sector 111165440, segbuf->sb_segnum 6785, segbuf->sb_nbio 0
  [----------] ditto
  NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_submit_bio]:464 bio->bi_sector 111177728, segbuf->sb_segnum 6785, segbuf->sb_nbio 12

  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_do_construct]:2399 nilfs_segctor_wait
  NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_wait]:676 segbuf->sb_segnum 6783
  NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_wait]:676 segbuf->sb_segnum 6784
  NILFS [nilfs_segbuf_wait]:676 segbuf->sb_segnum 6785

  NILFS [nilfs_segctor_complete_write]:2100 bh->b_count 0, bh->b_blocknr 13895680, bh->b_size 13897727, bh->b_page 0000000000001a82

  BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000000001a82
  IP: [<ffffffffa024d0f2>] nilfs_end_page_io+0x12/0xd0 [nilfs2]

Usually, for every segment we collect dirty files in list.  Then, dirty
blocks are gathered for every dirty file, prepared for write and
submitted by means of nilfs_segbuf_submit_bh() call.  Finally, it takes
place complete write phase after calling nilfs_end_bio_write() on the
block layer.  Buffers/pages are marked as not dirty on final phase and
processed files removed from the list of dirty files.

It is possible to see that we had three prepare_write and submit_bio
phases before segbuf_wait and complete_write phase.  Moreover, segments
compete between each other for dirty blocks because on every iteration
of segments processing dirty buffer_heads are added in several lists of
payload_buffers:

  [SEGMENT 6784]: bh->b_assoc_buffers.next ffff880218a0d5f8, bh->b_assoc_buffers.prev ffff880218bcdf50
  [SEGMENT 6785]: bh->b_assoc_buffers.next ffff880218a0d5f8, bh->b_assoc_buffers.prev ffff880222cc7ee8

The next pointer is the same but prev pointer has changed.  It means
that buffer_head has next pointer from one list but prev pointer from
another.  Such modification can be made several times.  And, finally, it
can be resulted in various issues: (1) segctor hanging, (2) segctor
crashing, (3) file system metadata corruption.

FIX:
This patch adds:

(1) setting of BH_Async_Write flag in nilfs_segctor_prepare_write()
    for every proccessed dirty block;

(2) checking of BH_Async_Write flag in
    nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers() and
    nilfs_lookup_dirty_node_buffers();

(3) clearing of BH_Async_Write flag in nilfs_segctor_complete_write(),
    nilfs_abort_logs(), nilfs_forget_buffer(), nilfs_clear_dirty_page().

Reported-by: Jerome Poulin <jeromepoulin@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Anton Eliasson <devel@antoneliasson.se>
Cc: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
Cc: ARAI Shun-ichi <hermes@ceres.dti.ne.jp>
Cc: Piotr Szymaniak <szarpaj@grubelek.pl>
Cc: Juan Barry Manuel Canham <Linux@riotingpacifist.net>
Cc: Zahid Chowdhury <zahid.chowdhury@starsolutions.com>
Cc: Elmer Zhang <freeboy6716@gmail.com>
Cc: Kenneth Langga <klangga@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
Acked-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
fuse: fix fallocate vs. ftruncate race 2013-10-13T23:08:32+00:00 Maxim Patlasov MPatlasov@parallels.com 2013-09-13T15:20:16+00:00 9abd30b435085cf2d897a77d657a4b6b8a56fd2c commit 0ab08f576b9e6a6b689fc6b4e632079b978e619b upstream. A former patch introducing FUSE_I_SIZE_UNSTABLE flag provided detailed description of races between ftruncate and anyone who can extend i_size: > 1. As in the previous scenario fuse_dentry_revalidate() discovered that i_size > changed (due to our own fuse_do_setattr()) and is going to call > truncate_pagecache() for some 'new_size' it believes valid right now. But by > the time that particular truncate_pagecache() is called ... > 2. fuse_do_setattr() returns (either having called truncate_pagecache() or > not -- it doesn't matter). > 3. The file is extended either by write(2) or ftruncate(2) or fallocate(2). > 4. mmap-ed write makes a page in the extended region dirty. This patch adds necessary bits to fuse_file_fallocate() to protect from that race. Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 0ab08f576b9e6a6b689fc6b4e632079b978e619b upstream.

A former patch introducing FUSE_I_SIZE_UNSTABLE flag provided detailed
description of races between ftruncate and anyone who can extend i_size:

> 1. As in the previous scenario fuse_dentry_revalidate() discovered that i_size
> changed (due to our own fuse_do_setattr()) and is going to call
> truncate_pagecache() for some  'new_size' it believes valid right now. But by
> the time that particular truncate_pagecache() is called ...
> 2. fuse_do_setattr() returns (either having called truncate_pagecache() or
> not -- it doesn't matter).
> 3. The file is extended either by write(2) or ftruncate(2) or fallocate(2).
> 4. mmap-ed write makes a page in the extended region dirty.

This patch adds necessary bits to fuse_file_fallocate() to protect from that
race.

Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
fuse: wait for writeback in fuse_file_fallocate() 2013-10-13T23:08:31+00:00 Maxim Patlasov MPatlasov@parallels.com 2013-09-13T15:19:54+00:00 eb12ca30f11b89eab811b23562e976c1c954c7f3 commit bde52788bdb755b9e4b75db6c434f30e32a0ca0b upstream. The patch fixes a race between mmap-ed write and fallocate(PUNCH_HOLE): 1) An user makes a page dirty via mmap-ed write. 2) The user performs fallocate(2) with mode == PUNCH_HOLE|KEEP_SIZE and <offset, size> covering the page. 3) Before truncate_pagecache_range call from fuse_file_fallocate, the page goes to write-back. The page is fully processed by fuse_writepage (including end_page_writeback on the page), but fuse_flush_writepages did nothing because fi->writectr < 0. 4) truncate_pagecache_range is called and fuse_file_fallocate is finishing by calling fuse_release_nowrite. The latter triggers processing queued write-back request which will write stale data to the hole soon. Changed in v2 (thanks to Brian for suggestion): - Do not truncate page cache until FUSE_FALLOCATE succeeded. Otherwise, we can end up in returning -ENOTSUPP while user data is already punched from page cache. Use filemap_write_and_wait_range() instead. Changed in v3 (thanks to Miklos for suggestion): - fuse_wait_on_writeback() is prone to livelocks; use fuse_set_nowrite() instead. So far as we need a dirty-page barrier only, fuse_sync_writes() should be enough. - rebased to for-linus branch of fuse.git Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit bde52788bdb755b9e4b75db6c434f30e32a0ca0b upstream.

The patch fixes a race between mmap-ed write and fallocate(PUNCH_HOLE):

1) An user makes a page dirty via mmap-ed write.
2) The user performs fallocate(2) with mode == PUNCH_HOLE|KEEP_SIZE
   and <offset, size> covering the page.
3) Before truncate_pagecache_range call from fuse_file_fallocate,
   the page goes to write-back. The page is fully processed by fuse_writepage
   (including end_page_writeback on the page), but fuse_flush_writepages did
   nothing because fi->writectr < 0.
4) truncate_pagecache_range is called and fuse_file_fallocate is finishing
   by calling fuse_release_nowrite. The latter triggers processing queued
   write-back request which will write stale data to the hole soon.

Changed in v2 (thanks to Brian for suggestion):
 - Do not truncate page cache until FUSE_FALLOCATE succeeded. Otherwise,
   we can end up in returning -ENOTSUPP while user data is already punched
   from page cache. Use filemap_write_and_wait_range() instead.
Changed in v3 (thanks to Miklos for suggestion):
 - fuse_wait_on_writeback() is prone to livelocks; use fuse_set_nowrite()
   instead. So far as we need a dirty-page barrier only, fuse_sync_writes()
   should be enough.
 - rebased to for-linus branch of fuse.git

Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
fs/binfmt_elf.c: prevent a coredump with a large vm_map_count from Oopsing 2013-10-13T23:08:31+00:00 Dan Aloni alonid@stratoscale.com 2013-09-30T20:45:02+00:00 cc748eed10e7e91c4fbc3a4503537f5748342b16 commit 72023656961b8c81a168a7a6762d589339d0d7ec upstream. A high setting of max_map_count, and a process core-dumping with a large enough vm_map_count could result in an NT_FILE note not being written, and the kernel crashing immediately later because it has assumed otherwise. Reproduction of the oops-causing bug described here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/30/50 Rge ussue originated in commit 2aa362c49c31 ("coredump: extend core dump note section to contain file names of mapped file") from Oct 4, 2012. This patch make that section optional in that case. fill_files_note() should signify the error, and also let the info struct in elf_core_dump() be zero-initialized so that we can check for the optionally written note. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: avoid abusing E2BIG, remove a couple of not-really-needed local variables] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix sparse warning] Signed-off-by: Dan Aloni <alonid@stratoscale.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com> Reported-by: Martin MOKREJS <mmokrejs@gmail.com> Tested-by: Martin MOKREJS <mmokrejs@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 72023656961b8c81a168a7a6762d589339d0d7ec upstream.

A high setting of max_map_count, and a process core-dumping with a large
enough vm_map_count could result in an NT_FILE note not being written,
and the kernel crashing immediately later because it has assumed
otherwise.

Reproduction of the oops-causing bug described here:

    https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/30/50

Rge ussue originated in commit 2aa362c49c31 ("coredump: extend core dump
note section to contain file names of mapped file") from Oct 4, 2012.

This patch make that section optional in that case.  fill_files_note()
should signify the error, and also let the info struct in
elf_core_dump() be zero-initialized so that we can check for the
optionally written note.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: avoid abusing E2BIG, remove a couple of not-really-needed local variables]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix sparse warning]
Signed-off-by: Dan Aloni <alonid@stratoscale.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Reported-by: Martin MOKREJS <mmokrejs@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Martin MOKREJS <mmokrejs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
sysv: Add forgotten superblock lock init for v7 fs 2013-10-05T14:13:09+00:00 Lubomir Rintel lkundrak@v3.sk 2013-09-18T10:39:16+00:00 d8a1cf0bdbf668951b3ad4dfea4cde19c3fbe432 commit 49475555848d396a0c78fb2f8ecceb3f3f263ef1 upstream. Superblock lock was replaced with (un)lock_super() removal, but left uninitialized for Seventh Edition UNIX filesystem in the following commit (3.7): c07cb01 sysv: drop lock/unlock super Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 49475555848d396a0c78fb2f8ecceb3f3f263ef1 upstream.

Superblock lock was replaced with (un)lock_super() removal, but left
uninitialized for Seventh Edition UNIX filesystem in the following commit (3.7):
c07cb01 sysv: drop lock/unlock super

Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>