linux-stable.git/fs, branch v3.0.53 Linux kernel stable tree reiserfs: Protect reiserfs_quota_write() with write lock 2012-11-26T19:34:56+00:00 Jan Kara jack@suse.cz 2012-11-13T17:25:38+00:00 7eebd4fb8bac3b4b69783e9333cf6e383376702d commit 361d94a338a3fd0cee6a4ea32bbc427ba228e628 upstream. Calls into reiserfs journalling code and reiserfs_get_block() need to be protected with write lock. We remove write lock around calls to high level quota code in the next patch so these paths would suddently become unprotected. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 361d94a338a3fd0cee6a4ea32bbc427ba228e628 upstream.

Calls into reiserfs journalling code and reiserfs_get_block() need to
be protected with write lock. We remove write lock around calls to high
level quota code in the next patch so these paths would suddently become
unprotected.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
reiserfs: Move quota calls out of write lock 2012-11-26T19:34:56+00:00 Jan Kara jack@suse.cz 2012-11-13T16:05:14+00:00 2f21676d17f0c67263e87f13859682712b643323 commit 7af11686933726e99af22901d622f9e161404e6b upstream. Calls into highlevel quota code cannot happen under the write lock. These calls take dqio_mutex which ranks above write lock. So drop write lock before calling back into quota code. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 7af11686933726e99af22901d622f9e161404e6b upstream.

Calls into highlevel quota code cannot happen under the write lock. These
calls take dqio_mutex which ranks above write lock. So drop write lock
before calling back into quota code.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
reiserfs: Protect reiserfs_quota_on() with write lock 2012-11-26T19:34:56+00:00 Jan Kara jack@suse.cz 2012-11-13T15:34:17+00:00 a7b8408f3c42adc601513bb7b8dae9ef05a1719e commit b9e06ef2e8706fe669b51f4364e3aeed58639eb2 upstream. In reiserfs_quota_on() we do quite some work - for example unpacking tail of a quota file. Thus we have to hold write lock until a moment we call back into the quota code. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit b9e06ef2e8706fe669b51f4364e3aeed58639eb2 upstream.

In reiserfs_quota_on() we do quite some work - for example unpacking
tail of a quota file. Thus we have to hold write lock until a moment
we call back into the quota code.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
reiserfs: Fix lock ordering during remount 2012-11-26T19:34:56+00:00 Jan Kara jack@suse.cz 2012-11-13T13:55:52+00:00 daa88cb107f76cf9b563a2c0c25bbf2f47c67abf commit 3bb3e1fc47aca554e7e2cc4deeddc24750987ac2 upstream. When remounting reiserfs dquot_suspend() or dquot_resume() can be called. These functions take dqonoff_mutex which ranks above write lock so we have to drop it before calling into quota code. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 3bb3e1fc47aca554e7e2cc4deeddc24750987ac2 upstream.

When remounting reiserfs dquot_suspend() or dquot_resume() can be called.
These functions take dqonoff_mutex which ranks above write lock so we have
to drop it before calling into quota code.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
NFS: Wait for session recovery to finish before returning 2012-11-26T19:34:56+00:00 Bryan Schumaker bjschuma@netapp.com 2012-10-30T20:06:35+00:00 31fcdd0d4e11b4fe065277932ab7e3fe60a9ed6e commit 399f11c3d872bd748e1575574de265a6304c7c43 upstream. Currently, we will schedule session recovery and then return to the caller of nfs4_handle_exception. This works for most cases, but causes a hang on the following test case: Client Server ------ ------ Open file over NFS v4.1 Write to file Expire client Try to lock file The server will return NFS4ERR_BADSESSION, prompting the client to schedule recovery. However, the client will continue placing lock attempts and the open recovery never seems to be scheduled. The simplest solution is to wait for session recovery to run before retrying the lock. Signed-off-by: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> [bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 399f11c3d872bd748e1575574de265a6304c7c43 upstream.

Currently, we will schedule session recovery and then return to the
caller of nfs4_handle_exception.  This works for most cases, but causes
a hang on the following test case:

	Client				Server
	------				------
	Open file over NFS v4.1
	Write to file
					Expire client
	Try to lock file

The server will return NFS4ERR_BADSESSION, prompting the client to
schedule recovery.  However, the client will continue placing lock
attempts and the open recovery never seems to be scheduled.  The
simplest solution is to wait for session recovery to run before retrying
the lock.

Signed-off-by: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
eCryptfs: check for eCryptfs cipher support at mount 2012-11-26T19:34:55+00:00 Tim Sally tsally@atomicpeace.com 2012-07-12T23:10:24+00:00 6c0e7633180a62ae295075e044e0a821c0a934b5 commit 5f5b331d5c21228a6519dcb793fc1629646c51a6 upstream. The issue occurs when eCryptfs is mounted with a cipher supported by the crypto subsystem but not by eCryptfs. The mount succeeds and an error does not occur until a write. This change checks for eCryptfs cipher support at mount time. Resolves Launchpad issue #338914, reported by Tyler Hicks in 03/2009. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/338914 Signed-off-by: Tim Sally <tsally@atomicpeace.com> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> Cc: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 5f5b331d5c21228a6519dcb793fc1629646c51a6 upstream.

The issue occurs when eCryptfs is mounted with a cipher supported by
the crypto subsystem but not by eCryptfs. The mount succeeds and an
error does not occur until a write. This change checks for eCryptfs
cipher support at mount time.

Resolves Launchpad issue #338914, reported by Tyler Hicks in 03/2009.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/338914

Signed-off-by: Tim Sally <tsally@atomicpeace.com>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Cc: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
eCryptfs: Copy up POSIX ACL and read-only flags from lower mount 2012-11-26T19:34:55+00:00 Tyler Hicks tyhicks@canonical.com 2012-06-11T22:42:32+00:00 34396c6b75ce93cf1ee38ddd492b542a6c8c63eb commit 069ddcda37b2cf5bb4b6031a944c0e9359213262 upstream. When the eCryptfs mount options do not include '-o acl', but the lower filesystem's mount options do include 'acl', the MS_POSIXACL flag is not flipped on in the eCryptfs super block flags. This flag is what the VFS checks in do_last() when deciding if the current umask should be applied to a newly created inode's mode or not. When a default POSIX ACL mask is set on a directory, the current umask is incorrectly applied to new inodes created in the directory. This patch ignores the MS_POSIXACL flag passed into ecryptfs_mount() and sets the flag on the eCryptfs super block depending on the flag's presence on the lower super block. Additionally, it is incorrect to allow a writeable eCryptfs mount on top of a read-only lower mount. This missing check did not allow writes to the read-only lower mount because permissions checks are still performed on the lower filesystem's objects but it is best to simply not allow a rw mount on top of ro mount. However, a ro eCryptfs mount on top of a rw mount is valid and still allowed. https://launchpad.net/bugs/1009207 Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> Reported-by: Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@googlemail.com> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Cc: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 069ddcda37b2cf5bb4b6031a944c0e9359213262 upstream.

When the eCryptfs mount options do not include '-o acl', but the lower
filesystem's mount options do include 'acl', the MS_POSIXACL flag is not
flipped on in the eCryptfs super block flags. This flag is what the VFS
checks in do_last() when deciding if the current umask should be applied
to a newly created inode's mode or not. When a default POSIX ACL mask is
set on a directory, the current umask is incorrectly applied to new
inodes created in the directory. This patch ignores the MS_POSIXACL flag
passed into ecryptfs_mount() and sets the flag on the eCryptfs super
block depending on the flag's presence on the lower super block.

Additionally, it is incorrect to allow a writeable eCryptfs mount on top
of a read-only lower mount. This missing check did not allow writes to
the read-only lower mount because permissions checks are still performed
on the lower filesystem's objects but it is best to simply not allow a
rw mount on top of ro mount. However, a ro eCryptfs mount on top of a rw
mount is valid and still allowed.

https://launchpad.net/bugs/1009207

Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Reported-by: Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@googlemail.com>
Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Cc: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
UBIFS: introduce categorized lprops counter 2012-11-26T19:34:34+00:00 Artem Bityutskiy artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com 2012-10-10T07:55:28+00:00 f174b32dc1a6912576d75d77afd00096f44878d4 commit 98a1eebda3cb2a84ecf1f219bb3a95769033d1bf upstream. This commit is a preparation for a subsequent bugfix. We introduce a counter for categorized lprops. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 98a1eebda3cb2a84ecf1f219bb3a95769033d1bf upstream.

This commit is a preparation for a subsequent bugfix. We introduce a
counter for categorized lprops.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
UBIFS: fix mounting problems after power cuts 2012-11-26T19:34:34+00:00 Artem Bityutskiy artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com 2012-10-09T13:20:15+00:00 ad33dc05bfe7c600d898e1f7857d1fd51308ba09 commit a28ad42a4a0c6f302f488f26488b8b37c9b30024 upstream. This is a bugfix for a problem with the following symptoms: 1. A power cut happens 2. After reboot, we try to mount UBIFS 3. Mount fails with "No space left on device" error message UBIFS complains like this: UBIFS error (pid 28225): grab_empty_leb: could not find an empty LEB The root cause of this problem is that when we mount, not all LEBs are categorized. Only those which were read are. However, the 'ubifs_find_free_leb_for_idx()' function assumes that all LEBs were categorized and 'c->freeable_cnt' is valid, which is a false assumption. This patch fixes the problem by teaching 'ubifs_find_free_leb_for_idx()' to always fall back to LPT scanning if no freeable LEBs were found. This problem was reported by few people in the past, but Brent Taylor was able to reproduce it and send me a flash image which cannot be mounted, which made it easy to hunt the bug. Kudos to Brent. Reported-by: Brent Taylor <motobud@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit a28ad42a4a0c6f302f488f26488b8b37c9b30024 upstream.

This is a bugfix for a problem with the following symptoms:

1. A power cut happens
2. After reboot, we try to mount UBIFS
3. Mount fails with "No space left on device" error message

UBIFS complains like this:

UBIFS error (pid 28225): grab_empty_leb: could not find an empty LEB

The root cause of this problem is that when we mount, not all LEBs are
categorized. Only those which were read are. However, the
'ubifs_find_free_leb_for_idx()' function assumes that all LEBs were
categorized and 'c->freeable_cnt' is valid, which is a false assumption.

This patch fixes the problem by teaching 'ubifs_find_free_leb_for_idx()'
to always fall back to LPT scanning if no freeable LEBs were found.

This problem was reported by few people in the past, but Brent Taylor
was able to reproduce it and send me a flash image which cannot be mounted,
which made it easy to hunt the bug. Kudos to Brent.

Reported-by: Brent Taylor <motobud@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
fanotify: fix missing break 2012-11-26T19:34:33+00:00 Eric Paris eparis@redhat.com 2012-11-08T23:53:37+00:00 5a5ffbe9623739953af7cbec40ae8d33472cb638 commit 848561d368751a1c0f679b9f045a02944506a801 upstream. Anders Blomdell noted in 2010 that Fanotify lost events and provided a test case. Eric Paris confirmed it was a bug and posted a fix to the list https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/linux.kernel/RrJfTfyW2BE but never applied it. Repeated attempts over time to actually get him to apply it have never had a reply from anyone who has raised it So apply it anyway Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Reported-by: Anders Blomdell <anders.blomdell@control.lth.se> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 848561d368751a1c0f679b9f045a02944506a801 upstream.

Anders Blomdell noted in 2010 that Fanotify lost events and provided a
test case.  Eric Paris confirmed it was a bug and posted a fix to the
list

  https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/linux.kernel/RrJfTfyW2BE

but never applied it.  Repeated attempts over time to actually get him
to apply it have never had a reply from anyone who has raised it

So apply it anyway

Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Anders Blomdell <anders.blomdell@control.lth.se>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>