commit efc968d450e013049a662d22727cf132618dcb2f upstream

This is debatable, but while we're debating it, let's disallow the
combination of splice and an O_APPEND destination.

It's not entirely clear what the semantics of O_APPEND should be, and
POSIX apparently expects pwrite() to ignore O_APPEND, for example.  So
we could make up any semantics we want, including the old ones.

But Miklos convinced me that we should at least give it some thought,
and that accepting writes at arbitrary offsets is wrong at least for
IS_APPEND() files (which always have O_APPEND set, even if the reverse
isn't true: you can obviously have O_APPEND set on a regular file).

So disallow O_APPEND entirely for now.  I doubt anybody cares, and this
way we have one less gray area to worry about.

Reported-and-argued-for-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <ens.axboe@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

splice currently assumes that try_to_release_page() always suceeds,
but it can return failure. If it does, we cannot steal the page.

Acked-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>

Splice isn't always incrementing the ppos correctly, which broke
relay splice.

Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@comcast.net>
Tested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>

This reverts commit c3270e577c18b3d0e984c3371493205a4807db9d.

generic_file_splice_write() duplicates remove_suid() just because it
doesn't hold i_mutex.  But it grabs i_mutex inside splice_from_pipe()
anyway, so this is rather pointless.

Move locking to generic_file_splice_write() and call remove_suid() and
__splice_from_pipe() instead.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>

Splice isn't always incrementing the ppos correctly, which broke
relay splice.

Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@comcast.net>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>

There's a quirky loop in generic_file_splice_read() that could go
on indefinitely, if the file splice returns 0 permanently (and not
just as a temporary condition). Get rid of the loop and pass
back -EAGAIN correctly from __generic_file_splice_read(), so we
handle that condition properly as well.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>

The loop block driver is careful to mask __GFP_IO|__GFP_FS out of its
mapping_gfp_mask, to avoid hangs under memory pressure.  But nowadays
it uses splice, usually going through __generic_file_splice_read.  That
must use mapping_gfp_mask instead of GFP_KERNEL to avoid those hangs.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

sys_tee() currently is a bit eager in returning -EAGAIN, it may do so
even if we don't have a chance of anymore data becoming available. So
improve the logic and only return -EAGAIN if we have an attached writer
to the input pipe.

Reported by Johann Felix Soden <johfel@gmx.de> and
Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>.

Tested-by: Johann Felix Soden <johfel@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>

Commit 8811930dc74a503415b35c4a79d14fb0b408a361 ("splice: missing user
pointer access verification") added the proper access_ok() calls to
copy_from_user_mmap_sem() which ensures we can copy the struct iovecs
from userspace to the kernel.

But we also must check whether we can access the actual memory region
pointed to by the struct iovec to fix the access checks properly.

Signed-off-by: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
Acked-by: Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>