Pull misc fixes from Andrew Morton: "Thirteen hotfixes. Eight are cc:stable and the remainder are for post-5.18 issues or are too minor to warrant backporting" * tag 'mm-hotfixes-stable-2022-07-26' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm: mailmap: update Gao Xiang's email addresses userfaultfd: provide properly masked address for huge-pages Revert "ocfs2: mount shared volume without ha stack" hugetlb: fix memoryleak in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte fs: sendfile handles O_NONBLOCK of out_fd ntfs: fix use-after-free in ntfs_ucsncmp() secretmem: fix unhandled fault in truncate mm/hugetlb: separate path for hwpoison entry in copy_hugetlb_page_range() mm: fix missing wake-up event for FSDAX pages mm: fix page leak with multiple threads mapping the same page mailmap: update Seth Forshee's email address tmpfs: fix the issue that the mount and remount results are inconsistent. mm: kfence: apply kmemleak_ignore_phys on early allocated pool
sendfile has to return EAGAIN if out_fd is nonblocking and the write into
it would block.
Here is a small reproducer for the problem:
#define _GNU_SOURCE /* See feature_test_macros(7) */
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/sendfile.h>
#define FILE_SIZE (1UL << 30)
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
int p[2], fd;
if (pipe2(p, O_NONBLOCK))
return 1;
fd = open(argv[1], O_RDWR | O_TMPFILE, 0666);
if (fd < 0)
return 1;
ftruncate(fd, FILE_SIZE);
if (sendfile(p[1], fd, 0, FILE_SIZE) == -1) {
fprintf(stderr, "FAIL\n");
}
if (sendfile(p[1], fd, 0, FILE_SIZE) != -1 || errno != EAGAIN) {
fprintf(stderr, "FAIL\n");
}
return 0;
}
It worked before b964bf53e540, it is stuck after b964bf53e540, and it
works again with this fix.
This regression occurred because do_splice_direct() calls pipe_write
that handles O_NONBLOCK. Here is a trace log from the reproducer:
1) | __x64_sys_sendfile64() {
1) | do_sendfile() {
1) | __fdget()
1) | rw_verify_area()
1) | __fdget()
1) | rw_verify_area()
1) | do_splice_direct() {
1) | rw_verify_area()
1) | splice_direct_to_actor() {
1) | do_splice_to() {
1) | rw_verify_area()
1) | generic_file_splice_read()
1) + 74.153 us | }
1) | direct_splice_actor() {
1) | iter_file_splice_write() {
1) | __kmalloc()
1) 0.148 us | pipe_lock();
1) 0.153 us | splice_from_pipe_next.part.0();
1) 0.162 us | page_cache_pipe_buf_confirm();
... 16 times
1) 0.159 us | page_cache_pipe_buf_confirm();
1) | vfs_iter_write() {
1) | do_iter_write() {
1) | rw_verify_area()
1) | do_iter_readv_writev() {
1) | pipe_write() {
1) | mutex_lock()
1) 0.153 us | mutex_unlock();
1) 1.368 us | }
1) 1.686 us | }
1) 5.798 us | }
1) 6.084 us | }
1) 0.174 us | kfree();
1) 0.152 us | pipe_unlock();
1) + 14.461 us | }
1) + 14.783 us | }
1) 0.164 us | page_cache_pipe_buf_release();
... 16 times
1) 0.161 us | page_cache_pipe_buf_release();
1) | touch_atime()
1) + 95.854 us | }
1) + 99.784 us | }
1) ! 107.393 us | }
1) ! 107.699 us | }
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220415005015.525191-1-avagin@gmail.com
Fixes: b964bf53e540 ("teach sendfile(2) to handle send-to-pipe directly")
Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
A regression has been reported by Nicolas Boichat, found while using the
copy_file_range syscall to copy a tracefs file.
Before commit 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across
devices") the kernel would return -EXDEV to userspace when trying to
copy a file across different filesystems. After this commit, the
syscall doesn't fail anymore and instead returns zero (zero bytes
copied), as this file's content is generated on-the-fly and thus reports
a size of zero.
Another regression has been reported by He Zhe - the assertion of
WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) can be triggered from userspace when
copying from a sysfs file whose read operation may return -EOPNOTSUPP.
Since we do not have test coverage for copy_file_range() between any two
types of filesystems, the best way to avoid these sort of issues in the
future is for the kernel to be more picky about filesystems that are
allowed to do copy_file_range().
This patch restores some cross-filesystem copy restrictions that existed
prior to commit 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across
devices"), namely, cross-sb copy is not allowed for filesystems that do
not implement ->copy_file_range().
Filesystems that do implement ->copy_file_range() have full control of
the result - if this method returns an error, the error is returned to
the user. Before this change this was only true for fs that did not
implement the ->remap_file_range() operation (i.e. nfsv3).
Filesystems that do not implement ->copy_file_range() still fall-back to
the generic_copy_file_range() implementation when the copy is within the
same sb. This helps the kernel can maintain a more consistent story
about which filesystems support copy_file_range().
nfsd and ksmbd servers are modified to fall-back to the
generic_copy_file_range() implementation in case vfs_copy_file_range()
fails with -EOPNOTSUPP or -EXDEV, which preserves behavior of
server-side-copy.
fall-back to generic_copy_file_range() is not implemented for the smb
operation FSCTL_DUPLICATE_EXTENTS_TO_FILE, which is arguably a correct
change of behavior.
Fixes: 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across devices")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210212044405.4120619-1-drinkcat@chromium.org/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CANMq1KDZuxir2LM5jOTm0xx+BnvW=ZmpsG47CyHFJwnw7zSX6Q@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210126135012.1.If45b7cdc3ff707bc1efa17f5366057d60603c45f@changeid/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210630161320.29006-1-lhenriques@suse.de/
Reported-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
Fixes: 64bf5ff58dff ("vfs: no fallback for ->copy_file_range")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20f17f64-88cb-4e80-07c1-85cb96c83619@windriver.com/
Reported-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
Tested-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Implement compat sys_call_table and some system call functions: truncate64, ftruncate64, fallocate, pread64, pwrite64, sync_file_range, readahead, fadvise64_64 which need argument translation. Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220405071314.3225832-12-guoren@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Pull vfs updates from Al Viro: "Assorted bits and pieces" * 'work.misc' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: aio: drop needless assignment in aio_read() clean overflow checks in count_mounts() a bit seq_file: fix NULL pointer arithmetic warning uml/x86: use x86 load_unaligned_zeropad() asm/user.h: killed unused macros constify struct path argument of finish_automount()/do_add_mount() fs: Remove FIXME comment in generic_write_checks()
Encoded I/O in Btrfs needs to check a write with a given logical size without an iov_iter that matches that size (because the iov_iter we have is for the compressed data). So, factor out the parts of generic_write_check() that don't need an iov_iter into a new generic_write_checks_count() function and export that. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
I'm adding btrfs ioctls to read and write compressed data, and rather than duplicating the checks in rw_verify_area(), let's just export it. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This patch removes an unnecessary comment that had to do with block special files from `generic_write_checks()`. The comment, originally added in Linux v2.4.14.9, was to clarify that we only set `pos` to the file size when the file was opened with `O_APPEND` if the file wasn't a block special file. Prior to Linux v2.4, block special files had a different `write()` function which was unified into a generic `write()` function in Linux v2.4. This generic `write()` function called `generic_write_checks()`. For more details, see this earlier conversation: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/Yc4Czk5A+p5p2Y4W@mit.edu/ Currently, block special devices have their own `write_iter()` function and no longer share the same `generic_write_checks()`, therefore rendering the comment irrelevant. Signed-off-by: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu> Co-authored-by: Xijiao Li <xl2950@columbia.edu> Co-authored-by: Hans Montero <hjm2133@columbia.edu> Suggested-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Stragglers from commit f7e33bdbd6d1 ("fs: remove mandatory file locking
support").
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Commit 3efee0567b4a ("fs: remove mandatory file locking support") removes
some operations in functions rw_verify_area().
As these functions are now simplified, do some syntactic clean-up as
follow-up to the removal as well, which was pointed out by compiler
warnings and static analysis.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>