While testing the pid namespace code I hit this nasty warning. [ 176.262617] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 176.263388] WARNING: at /home/eric/projects/linux/linux-userns-devel/kernel/softirq.c:160 local_bh_enable_ip+0x7a/0xa0() [ 176.265145] Hardware name: Bochs [ 176.265677] Modules linked in: [ 176.266341] Pid: 742, comm: bash Not tainted 3.7.0userns+ #18 [ 176.266564] Call Trace: [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810a539f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810a53fa>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810ad9ea>] local_bh_enable_ip+0x7a/0xa0 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff819308c9>] _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x19/0x20 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff8123dbda>] proc_free_inum+0x3a/0x50 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff8111d0dc>] free_pid_ns+0x1c/0x80 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff8111d195>] put_pid_ns+0x35/0x50 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810c608a>] put_pid+0x4a/0x60 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff8146b177>] tty_ioctl+0x717/0xc10 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810aa4d5>] ? wait_consider_task+0x855/0xb90 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff81086bf9>] ? default_spin_lock_flags+0x9/0x10 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810cab0a>] ? remove_wait_queue+0x5a/0x70 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff811e37e8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x98/0x550 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810b8a0f>] ? recalc_sigpending+0x1f/0x60 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810b9127>] ? __set_task_blocked+0x37/0x80 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810ab95b>] ? sys_wait4+0xab/0xf0 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff811e3d31>] sys_ioctl+0x91/0xb0 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810a95f0>] ? task_stopped_code+0x50/0x50 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff81939199>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 176.266564] ---[ end trace 387af88219ad6143 ]--- It turns out that spin_unlock_bh(proc_inum_lock) is not safe when put_pid is called with another spinlock held and irqs disabled. For now take the easy path and use spin_lock_irqsave(proc_inum_lock) in proc_free_inum and spin_loc_irq in proc_alloc_inum(proc_inum_lock). Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Merge the rest of Andrew's patches for -rc1: "A bunch of fixes and misc missed-out-on things. That'll do for -rc1. I still have a batch of IPC patches which still have a possible bug report which I'm chasing down." * emailed patches from Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>: (25 commits) keys: use keyring_alloc() to create module signing keyring keys: fix unreachable code sendfile: allows bypassing of notifier events SGI-XP: handle non-fatal traps fat: fix incorrect function comment Documentation: ABI: remove testing/sysfs-devices-node proc: fix inconsistent lock state linux/kernel.h: fix DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST with unsigned divisors memcg: don't register hotcpu notifier from ->css_alloc() checkpatch: warn on uapi #includes that #include <uapi/... revert "rtc: recycle id when unloading a rtc driver" mm: clean up transparent hugepage sysfs error messages hfsplus: add error message for the case of failure of sync fs in delayed_sync_fs() method hfsplus: rework processing of hfs_btree_write() returned error hfsplus: rework processing errors in hfsplus_free_extents() hfsplus: avoid crash on failed block map free kcmp: include linux/ptrace.h drivers/rtc/rtc-imxdi.c: must include <linux/spinlock.h> mm: cma: WARN if freed memory is still in use exec: do not leave bprm->interp on stack ...
Lockdep found an inconsistent lock state when rcu is processing delayed
work in softirq. Currently, kernel is using spin_lock/spin_unlock to
protect proc_inum_ida, but proc_free_inum is called by rcu in softirq
context.
Use spin_lock_bh/spin_unlock_bh fix following lockdep warning.
=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
3.7.0 #36 Not tainted
---------------------------------
inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
swapper/1/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
(proc_inum_lock){+.?...}, at: proc_free_inum+0x1c/0x50
{SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
__lock_acquire+0x8ae/0xca0
lock_acquire+0x199/0x200
_raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x50
proc_alloc_inum+0x4c/0xd0
alloc_mnt_ns+0x49/0xc0
create_mnt_ns+0x25/0x70
mnt_init+0x161/0x1c7
vfs_caches_init+0x107/0x11a
start_kernel+0x348/0x38c
x86_64_start_reservations+0x131/0x136
x86_64_start_kernel+0x103/0x112
irq event stamp: 2993422
hardirqs last enabled at (2993422): _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x55/0x80
hardirqs last disabled at (2993421): _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x29/0x70
softirqs last enabled at (2993394): _local_bh_enable+0x13/0x20
softirqs last disabled at (2993395): call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(proc_inum_lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(proc_inum_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
no locks held by swapper/1/0.
stack backtrace:
Pid: 0, comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.7.0 #36
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff810a40f1>] ? vprintk_emit+0x471/0x510
print_usage_bug+0x2a5/0x2c0
mark_lock+0x33b/0x5e0
__lock_acquire+0x813/0xca0
lock_acquire+0x199/0x200
_raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x50
proc_free_inum+0x1c/0x50
free_pid_ns+0x1c/0x50
put_pid_ns+0x2e/0x50
put_pid+0x4a/0x60
delayed_put_pid+0x12/0x20
rcu_process_callbacks+0x462/0x790
__do_softirq+0x1b4/0x3b0
call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
do_softirq+0x59/0xd0
irq_exit+0x54/0xd0
smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x95/0xa3
apic_timer_interrupt+0x72/0x80
cpuidle_enter_tk+0x10/0x20
cpuidle_enter_state+0x17/0x50
cpuidle_idle_call+0x287/0x520
cpu_idle+0xba/0x130
start_secondary+0x2b3/0x2bc
Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng <dannyfeng@tencent.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Removed vmtruncate Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Generalize the proc inode allocation so that it can be used without having to having to create a proc_dir_entry. This will allow namespace file descriptors to remain light weight entitities but still have the same inode number when the backing namespace is the same. Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Part of the memory will be written twice after this change, but that should be negligible. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix __proc_create() coding-style issues, remove unneeded zero-initialisations] Signed-off-by: yan <clouds.yan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
If proc_get_inode() returns NULL then presumably it encountered memory exhaustion. proc_lookup_de() should return -ENOMEM in this case, not -EINVAL. Signed-off-by: yan <clouds.yan@gmail.com> Cc: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com> Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Just the flags; only NFS cares even about that, but there are legitimate uses for such argument. And getting rid of that completely would require splitting ->lookup() into a couple of methods (at least), so let's leave that alone for now... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
both proc_dir_entry ->mode and populating functions Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Replace remaining direct i_nlink updates with a new set_nlink() updater function. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Tested-by: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>