linux-stable.git/fs/locks.c, branch v5.2

treewide: Add SPDX license identifier for missed files

2019-05-21T08:50:45+00:00

Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which:

 - Have no license information of any form

 - Have EXPORT_.*_SYMBOL_GPL inside which was used in the
   initial scan/conversion to ignore the file

These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX
license identifier is:

  GPL-2.0-only

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Merge tag 'nfsd-5.2' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux

2019-05-16T01:21:43+00:00

Pull nfsd updates from Bruce Fields:
 "This consists mostly of nfsd container work:

  Scott Mayhew revived an old api that communicates with a userspace
  daemon to manage some on-disk state that's used to track clients
  across server reboots. We've been using a usermode_helper upcall for
  that, but it's tough to run those with the right namespaces, so a
  daemon is much friendlier to container use cases.

  Trond fixed nfsd's handling of user credentials in user namespaces. He
  also contributed patches that allow containers to support different
  sets of NFS protocol versions.

  The only remaining container bug I'm aware of is that the NFS reply
  cache is shared between all containers. If anyone's aware of other
  gaps in our container support, let me know.

  The rest of this is miscellaneous bugfixes"

* tag 'nfsd-5.2' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux: (23 commits)
  nfsd: update callback done processing
  locks: move checks from locks_free_lock() to locks_release_private()
  nfsd: fh_drop_write in nfsd_unlink
  nfsd: allow fh_want_write to be called twice
  nfsd: knfsd must use the container user namespace
  SUNRPC: rsi_parse() should use the current user namespace
  SUNRPC: Fix the server AUTH_UNIX userspace mappings
  lockd: Pass the user cred from knfsd when starting the lockd server
  SUNRPC: Temporary sockets should inherit the cred from their parent
  SUNRPC: Cache the process user cred in the RPC server listener
  nfsd: Allow containers to set supported nfs versions
  nfsd: Add custom rpcbind callbacks for knfsd
  SUNRPC: Allow further customisation of RPC program registration
  SUNRPC: Clean up generic dispatcher code
  SUNRPC: Add a callback to initialise server requests
  SUNRPC/nfs: Fix return value for nfs4_callback_compound()
  nfsd: handle legacy client tracking records sent by nfsdcld
  nfsd: re-order client tracking method selection
  nfsd: keep a tally of RECLAIM_COMPLETE operations when using nfsdcld
  nfsd: un-deprecate nfsdcld
  ...

Merge tag 'Wimplicit-fallthrough-5.2-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux

2019-05-07T19:48:10+00:00

Pull Wimplicit-fallthrough updates from Gustavo A. R. Silva:
 "Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.

  This is part of the ongoing efforts to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough.

  Most of them have been baking in linux-next for a whole development
  cycle. And with Stephen Rothwell's help, we've had linux-next
  nag-emails going out for newly introduced code that triggers
  -Wimplicit-fallthrough to avoid gaining more of these cases while we
  work to remove the ones that are already present.

  We are getting close to completing this work. Currently, there are
  only 32 of 2311 of these cases left to be addressed in linux-next. I'm
  auditing every case; I take a look into the code and analyze it in
  order to determine if I'm dealing with an actual bug or a false
  positive, as explained here:

      https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c2fad584-1705-a5f2-d63c-824e9b96cf50@embeddedor.com/

  While working on this, I've found and fixed the several missing
  break/return bugs, some of them introduced more than 5 years ago.

  Once this work is finished, we'll be able to universally enable
  "-Wimplicit-fallthrough" to avoid any of these kinds of bugs from
  entering the kernel again"

* tag 'Wimplicit-fallthrough-5.2-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux: (27 commits)
  memstick: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  drm/nouveau/nvkm: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  NFC: st21nfca: Fix fall-through warnings
  NFC: pn533: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  block: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
  ASN.1: mark expected switch fall-through
  lib/cmdline.c: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  lib: zstd: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
  scsi: sym53c8xx_2: sym_nvram: Mark expected switch fall-through
  scsi: sym53c8xx_2: sym_hipd: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  scsi: ppa: mark expected switch fall-through
  scsi: osst: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  scsi: lpfc: lpfc_scsi: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
  scsi: lpfc: lpfc_nvme: Mark expected switch fall-through
  scsi: lpfc: lpfc_nportdisc: Mark expected switch fall-through
  scsi: lpfc: lpfc_hbadisc: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
  scsi: lpfc: lpfc_els: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
  scsi: lpfc: lpfc_ct: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
  scsi: imm: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  scsi: csiostor: csio_wr: mark expected switch fall-through
  ...

locks: move checks from locks_free_lock() to locks_release_private()

2019-04-24T13:51:48+00:00

Code that allocates locks using locks_alloc_lock() will free it
using locks_free_lock(), and will benefit from the BUG_ON()
consistency checks therein.

However some code (nfsd and lockd) allocate a lock embedded in
some other data structure, and so free the lock themselves after
calling locks_release_private().  This path does not benefit from
the consistency checks.

To help catch future errors, move the BUG_ON() checks to
locks_release_private() - which locks_free_lock() already calls.
This ensures that all users for locks will find out if the lock
isn't detached properly before being free.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown 
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton 
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields

fs: mark expected switch fall-throughs

2019-04-08T23:21:02+00:00

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

This patch fixes the following warnings:

fs/affs/affs.h:124:38: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/configfs/dir.c:1692:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/configfs/dir.c:1694:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ceph/file.c:249:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ext4/hash.c:233:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ext4/hash.c:246:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ext2/inode.c:1237:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ext2/inode.c:1244:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ext4/indirect.c:1182:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ext4/indirect.c:1188:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ext4/indirect.c:1432:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ext4/indirect.c:1440:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/f2fs/node.c:618:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/f2fs/node.c:620:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c:522:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/gfs2/bmap.c:711:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/gfs2/bmap.c:722:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/jffs2/fs.c:339:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c:429:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ufs/util.h:62:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/ufs/util.h:43:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/fcntl.c:770:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/seq_file.c:319:10: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/libfs.c:148:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/libfs.c:150:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/signalfd.c:178:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fs/locks.c:1473:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]

Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3

This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook 
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva

locks: wake any locks blocked on request before deadlock check

2019-03-25T12:36:24+00:00

Andreas reported that he was seeing the tdbtorture test fail in some
cases with -EDEADLCK when it wasn't before. Some debugging showed that
deadlock detection was sometimes discovering the caller's lock request
itself in a dependency chain.

While we remove the request from the blocked_lock_hash prior to
reattempting to acquire it, any locks that are blocked on that request
will still be present in the hash and will still have their fl_blocker
pointer set to the current request.

This causes posix_locks_deadlock to find a deadlock dependency chain
when it shouldn't, as a lock request cannot block itself.

We are going to end up waking all of those blocked locks anyway when we
go to reinsert the request back into the blocked_lock_hash, so just do
it prior to checking for deadlocks. This ensures that any lock blocked
on the current request will no longer be part of any blocked request
chain.

URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202975
Fixes: 5946c4319ebb ("fs/locks: allow a lock request to block other requests.")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Andreas Schneider 
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown 
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton

locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove preempt_disable variants

2019-02-28T06:55:37+00:00

Effective revert commit:

  87709e28dc7c ("fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable()")

This is causing major pain for PREEMPT_RT.

Sebastian did a lot of lockperf runs on 2 and 4 node machines with all
preemption modes (PREEMPT=n should be an obvious NOP for this patch
and thus serves as a good control) and no results showed significance
over 2-sigma (the PREEMPT=n results were almost empty at 1-sigma).

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Paul E. McKenney 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Will Deacon 
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

locks: fix error in locks_move_blocks()

2019-01-03T01:14:50+00:00

After moving all requests from
   fl->fl_blocked_requests
to
   new->fl_blocked_requests

it is nonsensical to do anything to all the remaining elements, there
aren't any.  This should do something to all the requests that have been
moved. For simplicity, it does it to all requests in the target list.

Setting "f->fl_blocker = new" to all members of new->fl_blocked_requests
is "obviously correct" as it preserves the invariant of the linkage
among requests.

Reported-by: syzbot+239d99847eb49ecb3899@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 5946c4319ebb ("fs/locks: allow a lock request to block other requests.")
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown 
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton

locks: Use inode_is_open_for_write

2018-12-17T12:19:46+00:00

Use the aptly named function rather than open coding it. No functional
changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov 
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton

fs/locks: remove unnecessary white space.

2018-12-07T11:51:00+00:00

 - spaces before tabs,
 - spaces at the end of lines,
 - multiple blank lines,
 - blank lines before EXPORT_SYMBOL,
can all go.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown 
Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields 
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton