linux-stable.git/fs/locks.c, branch linux-5.4.y

filelock: Correct the filelock owner in fcntl_setlk/fcntl_setlk64

2024-09-04T11:15:02+00:00

The locks_remove_posix() function in fcntl_setlk/fcntl_setlk64 is designed
to reliably remove locks when an fcntl/close race is detected. However, it
was passing in the wrong filelock owner, it looks like a mistake and
resulting in a failure to remove locks. More critically, if the lock
removal fails, it could lead to a uaf issue while traversing the locks.

This problem occurs only in the 4.19/5.4 stable version.

Fixes: 4c43ad4ab416 ("filelock: Fix fcntl/close race recovery compat path")
Fixes: dc2ce1dfceaa ("filelock: Remove locks reliably when fcntl/close race is detected")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Long Li 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

filelock: Fix fcntl/close race recovery compat path

2024-07-27T08:38:33+00:00

commit f8138f2ad2f745b9a1c696a05b749eabe44337ea upstream.

When I wrote commit 3cad1bc01041 ("filelock: Remove locks reliably when
fcntl/close race is detected"), I missed that there are two copies of the
code I was patching: The normal version, and the version for 64-bit offsets
on 32-bit kernels.
Thanks to Greg KH for stumbling over this while doing the stable
backport...

Apply exactly the same fix to the compat path for 32-bit kernels.

Fixes: c293621bbf67 ("[PATCH] stale POSIX lock handling")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=2563
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240723-fs-lock-recover-compatfix-v1-1-148096719529@google.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

filelock: Remove locks reliably when fcntl/close race is detected

2024-07-27T08:38:28+00:00

commit 3cad1bc010416c6dd780643476bc59ed742436b9 upstream.

When fcntl_setlk() races with close(), it removes the created lock with
do_lock_file_wait().
However, LSMs can allow the first do_lock_file_wait() that created the lock
while denying the second do_lock_file_wait() that tries to remove the lock.
In theory (but AFAIK not in practice), posix_lock_file() could also fail to
remove a lock due to GFP_KERNEL allocation failure (when splitting a range
in the middle).

After the bug has been triggered, use-after-free reads will occur in
lock_get_status() when userspace reads /proc/locks. This can likely be used
to read arbitrary kernel memory, but can't corrupt kernel memory.
This only affects systems with SELinux / Smack / AppArmor / BPF-LSM in
enforcing mode and only works from some security contexts.

Fix it by calling locks_remove_posix() instead, which is designed to
reliably get rid of POSIX locks associated with the given file and
files_struct and is also used by filp_flush().

Fixes: c293621bbf67 ("[PATCH] stale POSIX lock handling")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=2563
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240702-fs-lock-recover-2-v1-1-edd456f63789@google.com
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton 
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner 
[stable fixup: ->c.flc_type was ->fl_type in older kernels]
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

filelock: fix potential use-after-free in posix_lock_inode

2024-07-18T09:40:52+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1b3ec4f7c03d4b07bad70697d7e2f4088d2cfe92 ]

Light Hsieh reported a KASAN UAF warning in trace_posix_lock_inode().
The request pointer had been changed earlier to point to a lock entry
that was added to the inode's list. However, before the tracepoint could
fire, another task raced in and freed that lock.

Fix this by moving the tracepoint inside the spinlock, which should
ensure that this doesn't happen.

Fixes: 74f6f5912693 ("locks: fix KASAN: use-after-free in trace_event_raw_event_filelock_lock")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/724ffb0a2962e912ea62bb0515deadf39c325112.camel@kernel.org/
Reported-by: Light Hsieh (謝明燈) 
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240702-filelock-6-10-v1-1-96e766aadc98@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Alexander Aring 
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locks: fix KASAN: use-after-free in trace_event_raw_event_filelock_lock

2023-09-23T09:00:02+00:00

[ Upstream commit 74f6f5912693ce454384eaeec48705646a21c74f ]

As following backtrace, the struct file_lock request , in posix_lock_inode
is free before ftrace function using.
Replace the ftrace function ahead free flow could fix the use-after-free
issue.

[name:report&]===============================================
BUG:KASAN: use-after-free in trace_event_raw_event_filelock_lock+0x80/0x12c
[name:report&]Read at addr f6ffff8025622620 by task NativeThread/16753
[name:report_hw_tags&]Pointer tag: [f6], memory tag: [fe]
[name:report&]
BT:
Hardware name: MT6897 (DT)
Call trace:
 dump_backtrace+0xf8/0x148
 show_stack+0x18/0x24
 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x7c
 print_report+0x2c8/0xa08
 kasan_report+0xb0/0x120
 __do_kernel_fault+0xc8/0x248
 do_bad_area+0x30/0xdc
 do_tag_check_fault+0x1c/0x30
 do_mem_abort+0x58/0xbc
 el1_abort+0x3c/0x5c
 el1h_64_sync_handler+0x54/0x90
 el1h_64_sync+0x68/0x6c
 trace_event_raw_event_filelock_lock+0x80/0x12c
 posix_lock_inode+0xd0c/0xd60
 do_lock_file_wait+0xb8/0x190
 fcntl_setlk+0x2d8/0x440
...
[name:report&]
[name:report&]Allocated by task 16752:
...
 slab_post_alloc_hook+0x74/0x340
 kmem_cache_alloc+0x1b0/0x2f0
 posix_lock_inode+0xb0/0xd60
...
 [name:report&]
 [name:report&]Freed by task 16752:
...
  kmem_cache_free+0x274/0x5b0
  locks_dispose_list+0x3c/0x148
  posix_lock_inode+0xc40/0xd60
  do_lock_file_wait+0xb8/0x190
  fcntl_setlk+0x2d8/0x440
  do_fcntl+0x150/0xc18
...

Signed-off-by: Will Shiu 
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locks: reinstate locks_delete_block optimization

2020-03-25T07:25:41+00:00

[ Upstream commit dcf23ac3e846ca0cf626c155a0e3fcbbcf4fae8a ]

There is measurable performance impact in some synthetic tests due to
commit 6d390e4b5d48 (locks: fix a potential use-after-free problem when
wakeup a waiter). Fix the race condition instead by clearing the
fl_blocker pointer after the wake_up, using explicit acquire/release
semantics.

This does mean that we can no longer use the clearing of fl_blocker as
the wait condition, so switch the waiters over to checking whether the
fl_blocked_member list_head is empty.

Reviewed-by: yangerkun 
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown 
Fixes: 6d390e4b5d48 (locks: fix a potential use-after-free problem when wakeup a waiter)
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locks: fix a potential use-after-free problem when wakeup a waiter

2020-03-25T07:25:41+00:00

[ Upstream commit 6d390e4b5d48ec03bb87e63cf0a2bff5f4e116da ]

'16306a61d3b7 ("fs/locks: always delete_block after waiting.")' add the
logic to check waiter->fl_blocker without blocked_lock_lock. And it will
trigger a UAF when we try to wakeup some waiter：

Thread 1 has create a write flock a on file, and now thread 2 try to
unlock and delete flock a, thread 3 try to add flock b on the same file.

Thread2                         Thread3
                                flock syscall(create flock b)
	                        ...flock_lock_inode_wait
				    flock_lock_inode(will insert
				    our fl_blocked_member list
				    to flock a's fl_blocked_requests)
				   sleep
flock syscall(unlock)
...flock_lock_inode_wait
    locks_delete_lock_ctx
    ...__locks_wake_up_blocks
        __locks_delete_blocks(
	b->fl_blocker = NULL)
	...
                                   break by a signal
				   locks_delete_block
				    b->fl_blocker == NULL &&
				    list_empty(&b->fl_blocked_requests)
	                            success, return directly
				 locks_free_lock b
	wake_up(&b->fl_waiter)
	trigger UAF

Fix it by remove this logic, and this patch may also fix CVE-2019-19769.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 16306a61d3b7 ("fs/locks: always delete_block after waiting.")
Signed-off-by: yangerkun 
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locks: print unsigned ino in /proc/locks

2020-01-09T09:19:57+00:00

commit 98ca480a8f22fdbd768e3dad07024c8d4856576c upstream.

An ino is unsigned, so display it as such in /proc/locks.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein 
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Merge tag 'nfsd-5.4' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux

2019-09-28T00:00:27+00:00

Pull nfsd updates from Bruce Fields:
 "Highlights:

   - Add a new knfsd file cache, so that we don't have to open and close
     on each (NFSv2/v3) READ or WRITE. This can speed up read and write
     in some cases. It also replaces our readahead cache.

   - Prevent silent data loss on write errors, by treating write errors
     like server reboots for the purposes of write caching, thus forcing
     clients to resend their writes.

   - Tweak the code that allocates sessions to be more forgiving, so
     that NFSv4.1 mounts are less likely to hang when a server already
     has a lot of clients.

   - Eliminate an arbitrary limit on NFSv4 ACL sizes; they should now be
     limited only by the backend filesystem and the maximum RPC size.

   - Allow the server to enforce use of the correct kerberos credentials
     when a client reclaims state after a reboot.

  And some miscellaneous smaller bugfixes and cleanup"

* tag 'nfsd-5.4' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux: (34 commits)
  sunrpc: clean up indentation issue
  nfsd: fix nfs read eof detection
  nfsd: Make nfsd_reset_boot_verifier_locked static
  nfsd: degraded slot-count more gracefully as allocation nears exhaustion.
  nfsd: handle drc over-allocation gracefully.
  nfsd: add support for upcall version 2
  nfsd: add a "GetVersion" upcall for nfsdcld
  nfsd: Reset the boot verifier on all write I/O errors
  nfsd: Don't garbage collect files that might contain write errors
  nfsd: Support the server resetting the boot verifier
  nfsd: nfsd_file cache entries should be per net namespace
  nfsd: eliminate an unnecessary acl size limit
  Deprecate nfsd fault injection
  nfsd: remove duplicated include from filecache.c
  nfsd: Fix the documentation for svcxdr_tmpalloc()
  nfsd: Fix up some unused variable warnings
  nfsd: close cached files prior to a REMOVE or RENAME that would replace target
  nfsd: rip out the raparms cache
  nfsd: have nfsd_test_lock use the nfsd_file cache
  nfsd: hook up nfs4_preprocess_stateid_op to the nfsd_file cache
  ...

locks: fix a memory leak bug in __break_lease()

2019-08-20T09:48:52+00:00

In __break_lease(), the file lock 'new_fl' is allocated in lease_alloc().
However, it is not deallocated in the following execution if
smp_load_acquire() fails, leading to a memory leak bug. To fix this issue,
free 'new_fl' before returning the error.

Signed-off-by: Wenwen Wang 
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton