linux-stable.git/fs/fuse, branch v5.10.78

fuse: fix use after free in fuse_read_interrupt()

2021-09-22T10:28:00+00:00

[ Upstream commit e1e71c168813564be0f6ea3d6740a059ca42d177 ]

There is a potential race between fuse_read_interrupt() and
fuse_request_end().

TASK1
  in fuse_read_interrupt(): delete req->intr_entry (while holding
  fiq->lock)

TASK2
  in fuse_request_end(): req->intr_entry is empty -> skip fiq->lock
  wake up TASK3

TASK3
  request is freed

TASK1
  in fuse_read_interrupt(): dereference req->in.h.unique ***BAM***

Fix by always grabbing fiq->lock if the request was ever interrupted
(FR_INTERRUPTED set) thereby serializing with concurrent
fuse_read_interrupt() calls.

FR_INTERRUPTED is set before the request is queued on fiq->interrupts.
Dequeing the request is done with list_del_init() but FR_INTERRUPTED is not
cleared in this case.

Reported-by: lijiazi 
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fuse: flush extending writes

2021-09-15T07:50:48+00:00

commit 59bda8ecee2ffc6a602b7bf2b9e43ca669cdbdcd upstream.

Callers of fuse_writeback_range() assume that the file is ready for
modification by the server in the supplied byte range after the call
returns.

If there's a write that extends the file beyond the end of the supplied
range, then the file needs to be extended to at least the end of the range,
but currently that's not done.

There are at least two cases where this can cause problems:

 - copy_file_range() will return short count if the file is not extended
   up to end of the source range.

 - FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE | FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE will not extend the file,
   hence the region may not be fully allocated.

Fix by flushing writes from the start of the range up to the end of the
file.  This could be optimized if the writes are non-extending, etc, but
it's probably not worth the trouble.

Fixes: a2bc92362941 ("fuse: fix copy_file_range() in the writeback case")
Fixes: 6b1bdb56b17c ("fuse: allow fallocate(FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE)")
Cc:   # v5.2
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fuse: truncate pagecache on atomic_o_trunc

2021-09-15T07:50:48+00:00

commit 76224355db7570cbe6b6f75c8929a1558828dd55 upstream.

fuse_finish_open() will be called with FUSE_NOWRITE in case of atomic
O_TRUNC.  This can deadlock with fuse_wait_on_page_writeback() in
fuse_launder_page() triggered by invalidate_inode_pages2().

Fix by replacing invalidate_inode_pages2() in fuse_finish_open() with a
truncate_pagecache() call.  This makes sense regardless of FOPEN_KEEP_CACHE
or fc->writeback cache, so do it unconditionally.

Reported-by: Xie Yongji 
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+bea44a5189836d956894@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: e4648309b85a ("fuse: truncate pending writes on O_TRUNC")
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fuse: fix illegal access to inode with reused nodeid

2021-09-08T06:49:02+00:00

commit 15db16837a35d8007cb8563358787412213db25e upstream.

Server responds to LOOKUP and other ops (READDIRPLUS/CREATE/MKNOD/...)
with ourarg containing nodeid and generation.

If a fuse inode is found in inode cache with the same nodeid but different
generation, the existing fuse inode should be unhashed and marked "bad" and
a new inode with the new generation should be hashed instead.

This can happen, for example, with passhrough fuse filesystem that returns
the real filesystem ino/generation on lookup and where real inode numbers
can get recycled due to real files being unlinked not via the fuse
passthrough filesystem.

With current code, this situation will not be detected and an old fuse
dentry that used to point to an older generation real inode, can be used to
access a completely new inode, which should be accessed only via the new
dentry.

Note that because the FORGET message carries the nodeid w/o generation, the
server should wait to get FORGET counts for the nlookup counts of the old
and reused inodes combined, before it can free the resources associated to
that nodeid.

Stable backport notes:
* This is not a regression. The bug has been in fuse forever, but only
  a certain class of low level fuse filesystems can trigger this bug
* Because there is no way to check if this fix is applied in runtime,
  libfuse test_examples.py tests this fix with hardcoded check for
  kernel version >= 5.14
* After backport to stable kernel(s), the libfuse test can be updated
  to also check minimal stable kernel version(s)
* Depends on "fuse: fix bad inode" which is already applied to stable
  kernels v5.4.y and v5.10.y
* Required backporting helper inode_wrong_type()

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein 
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CAOQ4uxi8DymG=JO_sAU+wS8akFdzh+PuXwW3Ebgahd2Nwnh7zA@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

new helper: inode_wrong_type()

2021-09-08T06:49:01+00:00

commit 6e3e2c4362e41a2f18e3f7a5ad81bd2f49a47b85 upstream.

inode_wrong_type(inode, mode) returns true if setting inode->i_mode
to given value would've changed the inode type.  We have enough of
those checks open-coded to make a helper worthwhile.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro 
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fuse: reject internal errno

2021-07-14T14:55:47+00:00

commit 49221cf86d18bb66fe95d3338cb33bd4b9880ca5 upstream.

Don't allow userspace to report errors that could be kernel-internal.

Reported-by: Anatoly Trosinenko 
Fixes: 334f485df85a ("[PATCH] FUSE - device functions")
Cc:  # v2.6.14
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fuse: check connected before queueing on fpq->io

2021-07-14T14:55:47+00:00

commit 80ef08670d4c28a06a3de954bd350368780bcfef upstream.

A request could end up on the fpq->io list after fuse_abort_conn() has
reset fpq->connected and aborted requests on that list:

Thread-1			  Thread-2
========			  ========
->fuse_simple_request()           ->shutdown
  ->__fuse_request_send()
    ->queue_request()		->fuse_abort_conn()
->fuse_dev_do_read()                ->acquire(fpq->lock)
  ->wait_for(fpq->lock) 	  ->set err to all req's in fpq->io
				  ->release(fpq->lock)
  ->acquire(fpq->lock)
  ->add req to fpq->io

After the userspace copy is done the request will be ended, but
req->out.h.error will remain uninitialized.  Also the copy might block
despite being already aborted.

Fix both issues by not allowing the request to be queued on the fpq->io
list after fuse_abort_conn() has processed this list.

Reported-by: Pradeep P V K 
Fixes: fd22d62ed0c3 ("fuse: no fc->lock for iqueue parts")
Cc:  # v4.2
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fuse: ignore PG_workingset after stealing

2021-07-14T14:55:47+00:00

commit b89ecd60d38ec042d63bdb376c722a16f92bcb88 upstream.

Fix the "fuse: trying to steal weird page" warning.

Description from Johannes Weiner:

  "Think of it as similar to PG_active. It's just another usage/heat
   indicator of file and anon pages on the reclaim LRU that, unlike
   PG_active, persists across deactivation and even reclaim (we store it in
   the page cache / swapper cache tree until the page refaults).

   So if fuse accepts pages that can legally have PG_active set,
   PG_workingset is fine too."

Reported-by: Thomas Lindroth 
Fixes: 1899ad18c607 ("mm: workingset: tell cache transitions from workingset thrashing")
Cc:  # v4.20
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fuse: Fix infinite loop in sget_fc()

2021-07-14T14:55:47+00:00

commit e4a9ccdd1c03b3dc58214874399d24331ea0a3ab upstream.

We don't set the SB_BORN flag on submounts. This is wrong as these
superblocks are then considered as partially constructed or dying
in the rest of the code and can break some assumptions.

One such case is when you have a virtiofs filesystem with submounts
and you try to mount it again : virtio_fs_get_tree() tries to obtain
a superblock with sget_fc(). The logic in sget_fc() is to loop until
it has either found an existing matching superblock with SB_BORN set
or to create a brand new one. It is assumed that a superblock without
SB_BORN is transient and the loop is restarted. Forgetting to set
SB_BORN on submounts hence causes sget_fc() to retry forever.

Setting SB_BORN requires special care, i.e. a write barrier for
super_cache_count() which can check SB_BORN without taking any lock.
We should call vfs_get_tree() to deal with that but this requires
to have a proper ->get_tree() implementation for submounts, which
is a bigger piece of work. Go for a simple bug fix in the meatime.

Fixes: bf109c64040f ("fuse: implement crossmounts")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.10+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz 
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz 
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fuse: Fix crash if superblock of submount gets killed early

2021-07-14T14:55:47+00:00

commit e3a43f2a95393000778f8f302d48795add2fc4a8 upstream.

As soon as fuse_dentry_automount() does up_write(&sb->s_umount), the
superblock can theoretically be killed. If this happens before the
submount was added to the &fc->mounts list, fuse_mount_remove() later
crashes in list_del_init() because it assumes the submount to be
already there.

Add the submount before dropping sb->s_umount to fix the inconsistency.
It is okay to nest fc->killsb under sb->s_umount, we already do this
on the ->kill_sb() path.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz 
Fixes: bf109c64040f ("fuse: implement crossmounts")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.10+
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz 
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman