commit 9c6ac78eb3521c5937b2dd8a7d1b300f41092f45 upstream. After invoking ->dirty_inode(), __mark_inode_dirty() does smp_mb() and tests inode->i_state locklessly to see whether it already has all the necessary I_DIRTY bits set. The comment above the barrier doesn't contain any useful information - memory barriers can't ensure "changes are seen by all cpus" by itself. And it sure enough was broken. Please consider the following scenario. CPU 0 CPU 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- enters __writeback_single_inode() grabs inode->i_lock tests PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY which is clear enters __set_page_dirty() grabs mapping->tree_lock sets PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY releases mapping->tree_lock leaves __set_page_dirty() enters __mark_inode_dirty() smp_mb() sees I_DIRTY_PAGES set leaves __mark_inode_dirty() clears I_DIRTY_PAGES releases inode->i_lock Now @inode has dirty pages w/ I_DIRTY_PAGES clear. This doesn't seem to lead to an immediately critical problem because requeue_inode() later checks PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY instead of I_DIRTY_PAGES when deciding whether the inode needs to be requeued for IO and there are enough unintentional memory barriers inbetween, so while the inode ends up with inconsistent I_DIRTY_PAGES flag, it doesn't fall off the IO list. The lack of explicit barrier may also theoretically affect the other I_DIRTY bits which deal with metadata dirtiness. There is no guarantee that a strong enough barrier exists between I_DIRTY_[DATA]SYNC clearing and write_inode() writing out the dirtied inode. Filesystem inode writeout path likely has enough stuff which can behave as full barrier but it's theoretically possible that the writeout may not see all the updates from ->dirty_inode(). Fix it by adding an explicit smp_mb() after I_DIRTY clearing. Note that I_DIRTY_PAGES needs a special treatment as it always needs to be cleared to be interlocked with the lockless test on __mark_inode_dirty() side. It's cleared unconditionally and reinstated after smp_mb() if the mapping still has dirty pages. Also add comments explaining how and why the barriers are paired. Lightly tested. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit 6290be1c1dc6589eeda213aa40946b27fa4faac8 upstream. Instead of clearing I_DIRTY_PAGES and resetting it when we didn't succeed in writing them all, just clear the bit only when we succeeded writing all the pages. We also move the clearing of the bit close to other i_state handling to separate it from writeback list handling. This is desirable because list handling will differ for flusher thread and other writeback_single_inode() callers in future. No filesystem plays any tricks with I_DIRTY_PAGES (like checking it in ->writepages or ->write_inode implementation) so this movement is safe. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit 00d4e7362ed01987183e9528295de3213031309c upstream.
In ext4_nonda_switch(), if the file system is getting full we used to
call writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle(). The problem is that we can be
holding i_mutex already, and this causes a potential deadlock when
writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle() when it tries to take s_umount. (See
lockdep output below).
As it turns out we don't need need to hold s_umount; the fact that we
are in the middle of the write(2) system call will keep the superblock
pinned. Unfortunately writeback_inodes_sb() checks to make sure
s_umount is taken, and the VFS uses a different mechanism for making
sure the file system doesn't get unmounted out from under us. The
simplest way of dealing with this is to just simply grab s_umount
using a trylock, and skip kicking the writeback flusher thread in the
very unlikely case that we can't take a read lock on s_umount without
blocking.
Also, we now check the cirteria for kicking the writeback thread
before we decide to whether to fall back to non-delayed writeback, so
if there are any outstanding delayed allocation writes, we try to get
them resolved as soon as possible.
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
3.6.0-rc1-00042-gce894ca #367 Not tainted
-------------------------------------------------------
dd/8298 is trying to acquire lock:
(&type->s_umount_key#18){++++..}, at: [<c02277d4>] writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle+0x28/0x46
but task is already holding lock:
(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){+.+...}, at: [<c01ddcce>] generic_file_aio_write+0x5f/0xd3
which lock already depends on the new lock.
2 locks held by dd/8298:
#0: (sb_writers#2){.+.+.+}, at: [<c01ddcc5>] generic_file_aio_write+0x56/0xd3
#1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){+.+...}, at: [<c01ddcce>] generic_file_aio_write+0x5f/0xd3
stack backtrace:
Pid: 8298, comm: dd Not tainted 3.6.0-rc1-00042-gce894ca #367
Call Trace:
[<c015b79c>] ? console_unlock+0x345/0x372
[<c06d62a1>] print_circular_bug+0x190/0x19d
[<c019906c>] __lock_acquire+0x86d/0xb6c
[<c01999db>] ? mark_held_locks+0x5c/0x7b
[<c0199724>] lock_acquire+0x66/0xb9
[<c02277d4>] ? writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle+0x28/0x46
[<c06db935>] down_read+0x28/0x58
[<c02277d4>] ? writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle+0x28/0x46
[<c02277d4>] writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle+0x28/0x46
[<c026f3b2>] ext4_nonda_switch+0xe1/0xf4
[<c0271ece>] ext4_da_write_begin+0x27/0x193
[<c01dcdb0>] generic_file_buffered_write+0xc8/0x1bb
[<c01ddc47>] __generic_file_aio_write+0x1dd/0x205
[<c01ddce7>] generic_file_aio_write+0x78/0xd3
[<c026d336>] ext4_file_write+0x480/0x4a6
[<c0198c1d>] ? __lock_acquire+0x41e/0xb6c
[<c0180944>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x11a/0x13e
[<c01967e9>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd
[<c018099f>] ? local_clock+0x37/0x4e
[<c0209f2c>] do_sync_write+0x67/0x9d
[<c0209ec5>] ? wait_on_retry_sync_kiocb+0x44/0x44
[<c020a7b9>] vfs_write+0x7b/0xe6
[<c020a9a6>] sys_write+0x3b/0x64
[<c06dd4bd>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit 15eb77a07c714ac80201abd0a9568888bcee6276 upstream. bdi_prune_sb() resets sb->s_bdi to default_backing_dev_info when the tearing down the original bdi. Fix trace_writeback_single_inode to use sb->s_bdi=default_backing_dev_info rather than bdi->dev=NULL for a teared down bdi. Reported-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Tested-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This makes the binary trace understandable by trace-cmd. CC: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> CC: Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com> CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Document the @reason parameter to make "make htmldocs" happy. Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.mage@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
This creates a new 'reason' field in a wb_writeback_work structure, which unambiguously identifies who initiates writeback activity. A 'wb_reason' enumeration has been added to writeback.h, to enumerate the possible reasons. The 'writeback_work_class' and tracepoint event class and 'writeback_queue_io' tracepoints are updated to include the symbolic 'reason' in all trace events. And the 'writeback_inodes_sbXXX' family of routines has had a wb_stats parameter added to them, so callers can specify why writeback is being started. Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Instead of sending ->older_than_this to queue_io() and move_expired_inodes(), send the entire wb_writeback_work structure. There are other fields of a work item that are useful in these routines and in tracepoints. Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
One thing puzzled me is that in JBOD case, the per-disk writeout
performance is smaller than the corresponding single-disk case even
when they have comparable bdi_thresh. Tracing shows find that in single
disk case, bdi_writeback is always kept high while in JBOD case, it
could drop low from time to time and correspondingly bdi_reclaimable
could sometimes rush high.
The fix is to watch bdi_reclaimable and kick background writeback as
soon as it goes high. This resembles the global background threshold
but in per-bdi manner. The trick is, as long as bdi_reclaimable does
not go high, bdi_writeback naturally won't go low because
bdi_reclaimable+bdi_writeback ~= bdi_thresh.
With less fluctuated writeback pages, JBOD performance is observed to
increase noticeably in various cases.
vmstat:nr_written values before/after patch:
3.1.0-rc4-wo-underrun+ 3.1.0-rc4-bgthresh3+
------------------------ ------------------------
125596480 +25.9% 158179363 JBOD-10HDD-16G/ext4-100dd-1M-24p-16384M-20:10-X
61790815 +110.4% 130032231 JBOD-10HDD-16G/ext4-10dd-1M-24p-16384M-20:10-X
58853546 -0.1% 58823828 JBOD-10HDD-16G/ext4-1dd-1M-24p-16384M-20:10-X
110159811 +24.7% 137355377 JBOD-10HDD-16G/xfs-100dd-1M-24p-16384M-20:10-X
69544762 +10.8% 77080047 JBOD-10HDD-16G/xfs-10dd-1M-24p-16384M-20:10-X
50644862 +0.5% 50890006 JBOD-10HDD-16G/xfs-1dd-1M-24p-16384M-20:10-X
42677090 +28.0% 54643527 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=100M/ext4-100dd-1M-24p-16384M-100M:10-X
47491324 +13.3% 53785605 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=100M/ext4-10dd-1M-24p-16384M-100M:10-X
52548986 +0.9% 53001031 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=100M/ext4-1dd-1M-24p-16384M-100M:10-X
26783091 +36.8% 36650248 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=100M/xfs-100dd-1M-24p-16384M-100M:10-X
35526347 +14.0% 40492312 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=100M/xfs-10dd-1M-24p-16384M-100M:10-X
44670723 -1.1% 44177606 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=100M/xfs-1dd-1M-24p-16384M-100M:10-X
127996037 +22.4% 156719990 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=2G/ext4-100dd-1M-24p-16384M-2048M:10-X
57518856 +3.8% 59677625 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=2G/ext4-10dd-1M-24p-16384M-2048M:10-X
51919909 +12.2% 58269894 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=2G/ext4-1dd-1M-24p-16384M-2048M:10-X
86410514 +79.0% 154660433 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=2G/xfs-100dd-1M-24p-16384M-2048M:10-X
40132519 +38.6% 55617893 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=2G/xfs-10dd-1M-24p-16384M-2048M:10-X
48423248 +7.5% 52042927 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=2G/xfs-1dd-1M-24p-16384M-2048M:10-X
206041046 +44.1% 296846536 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=4G/xfs-100dd-1M-24p-16384M-4096M:10-X
72312903 -19.4% 58272885 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=4G/xfs-10dd-1M-24p-16384M-4096M:10-X
50635672 -0.5% 50384787 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=4G/xfs-1dd-1M-24p-16384M-4096M:10-X
68308534 +115.7% 147324758 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=800M/ext4-100dd-1M-24p-16384M-800M:10-X
57882933 +14.5% 66269621 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=800M/ext4-10dd-1M-24p-16384M-800M:10-X
52183472 +12.8% 58855181 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=800M/ext4-1dd-1M-24p-16384M-800M:10-X
53788956 +94.2% 104460352 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=800M/xfs-100dd-1M-24p-16384M-800M:10-X
44493342 +35.5% 60298210 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=800M/xfs-10dd-1M-24p-16384M-800M:10-X
42641209 +18.9% 50681038 JBOD-10HDD-thresh=800M/xfs-1dd-1M-24p-16384M-800M:10-X
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
No behavior change. Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>