linux-stable.git/fs/ext4, branch v6.3.4 Linux kernel stable tree ext4: Fix best extent lstart adjustment logic in ext4_mb_new_inode_pa() 2023-05-24T16:30:05+00:00 Ojaswin Mujoo ojaswin@linux.ibm.com 2023-03-25T08:13:39+00:00 cec4ef62b36b04e0bc8905732adab091f4bc1cfd [ Upstream commit 93cdf49f6eca5e23f6546b8f28457b2e6a6961d9 ] When the length of best extent found is less than the length of goal extent we need to make sure that the best extent atleast covers the start of the original request. This is done by adjusting the ac_b_ex.fe_logical (logical start) of the extent. While doing so, the current logic sometimes results in the best extent's logical range overflowing the goal extent. Since this best extent is later added to the inode preallocation list, we have a possibility of introducing overlapping preallocations. This is discussed in detail here [1]. As per Jan's suggestion, to fix this, replace the existing logic with the below logic for adjusting best extent as it keeps fragmentation in check while ensuring logical range of best extent doesn't overflow out of goal extent: 1. Check if best extent can be kept at end of goal range and still cover original start. 2. Else, check if best extent can be kept at start of goal range and still cover original start. 3. Else, keep the best extent at start of original request. Also, add a few extra BUG_ONs that might help catch errors faster. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y+OGkVvzPN0RMv0O@li-bb2b2a4c-3307-11b2-a85c-8fa5c3a69313.ibm.com Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f96aca6d415b36d1f90db86c1a8cd7e2e9d7ab0e.1679731817.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 93cdf49f6eca5e23f6546b8f28457b2e6a6961d9 ]

When the length of best extent found is less than the length of goal extent
we need to make sure that the best extent atleast covers the start of the
original request. This is done by adjusting the ac_b_ex.fe_logical (logical
start) of the extent.

While doing so, the current logic sometimes results in the best extent's
logical range overflowing the goal extent. Since this best extent is later
added to the inode preallocation list, we have a possibility of introducing
overlapping preallocations. This is discussed in detail here [1].

As per Jan's suggestion, to fix this, replace the existing logic with the
below logic for adjusting best extent as it keeps fragmentation in check
while ensuring logical range of best extent doesn't overflow out of goal
extent:

1. Check if best extent can be kept at end of goal range and still cover
   original start.
2. Else, check if best extent can be kept at start of goal range and still
   cover original start.
3. Else, keep the best extent at start of original request.

Also, add a few extra BUG_ONs that might help catch errors faster.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y+OGkVvzPN0RMv0O@li-bb2b2a4c-3307-11b2-a85c-8fa5c3a69313.ibm.com

Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f96aca6d415b36d1f90db86c1a8cd7e2e9d7ab0e.1679731817.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ext4: set goal start correctly in ext4_mb_normalize_request 2023-05-24T16:30:05+00:00 Kemeng Shi shikemeng@huaweicloud.com 2023-03-03T17:21:01+00:00 abb330ffaa3a0ae7ce632e28c9260b461c01f19f [ Upstream commit b07ffe6927c75d99af534d685282ea188d9f71a6 ] We need to set ac_g_ex to notify the goal start used in ext4_mb_find_by_goal. Set ac_g_ex instead of ac_f_ex in ext4_mb_normalize_request. Besides we should assure goal start is in range [first_data_block, blocks_count) as ext4_mb_initialize_context does. [ Added a check to make sure size is less than ar->pright; otherwise we could end up passing an underflowed value of ar->pright - size to ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(), which will trigger a BUG_ON later on. - TYT ] Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit b07ffe6927c75d99af534d685282ea188d9f71a6 ]

We need to set ac_g_ex to notify the goal start used in
ext4_mb_find_by_goal. Set ac_g_ex instead of ac_f_ex in
ext4_mb_normalize_request.
Besides we should assure goal start is in range [first_data_block,
blocks_count) as ext4_mb_initialize_context does.

[ Added a check to make sure size is less than ar->pright; otherwise
  we could end up passing an underflowed value of ar->pright - size to
  ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(), which will trigger a BUG_ON later on.
  - TYT ]

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ext4: allow ext4_get_group_info() to fail 2023-05-24T16:30:00+00:00 Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu 2023-04-29T04:06:28+00:00 31668cebf45adfb6283e465e641c4f5a21b07afa [ Upstream commit 5354b2af34064a4579be8bc0e2f15a7b70f14b5f ] Previously, ext4_get_group_info() would treat an invalid group number as BUG(), since in theory it should never happen. However, if a malicious attaker (or fuzzer) modifies the superblock via the block device while it is the file system is mounted, it is possible for s_first_data_block to get set to a very large number. In that case, when calculating the block group of some block number (such as the starting block of a preallocation region), could result in an underflow and very large block group number. Then the BUG_ON check in ext4_get_group_info() would fire, resutling in a denial of service attack that can be triggered by root or someone with write access to the block device. For a quality of implementation perspective, it's best that even if the system administrator does something that they shouldn't, that it will not trigger a BUG. So instead of BUG'ing, ext4_get_group_info() will call ext4_error and return NULL. We also add fallback code in all of the callers of ext4_get_group_info() that it might NULL. Also, since ext4_get_group_info() was already borderline to be an inline function, un-inline it. The results in a next reduction of the compiled text size of ext4 by roughly 2k. Cc: stable@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230430154311.579720-2-tytso@mit.edu Reported-by: syzbot+e2efa3efc15a1c9e95c3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=69b28112e098b070f639efb356393af3ffec4220 Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 5354b2af34064a4579be8bc0e2f15a7b70f14b5f ]

Previously, ext4_get_group_info() would treat an invalid group number
as BUG(), since in theory it should never happen.  However, if a
malicious attaker (or fuzzer) modifies the superblock via the block
device while it is the file system is mounted, it is possible for
s_first_data_block to get set to a very large number.  In that case,
when calculating the block group of some block number (such as the
starting block of a preallocation region), could result in an
underflow and very large block group number.  Then the BUG_ON check in
ext4_get_group_info() would fire, resutling in a denial of service
attack that can be triggered by root or someone with write access to
the block device.

For a quality of implementation perspective, it's best that even if
the system administrator does something that they shouldn't, that it
will not trigger a BUG.  So instead of BUG'ing, ext4_get_group_info()
will call ext4_error and return NULL.  We also add fallback code in
all of the callers of ext4_get_group_info() that it might NULL.

Also, since ext4_get_group_info() was already borderline to be an
inline function, un-inline it.  The results in a next reduction of the
compiled text size of ext4 by roughly 2k.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230430154311.579720-2-tytso@mit.edu
Reported-by: syzbot+e2efa3efc15a1c9e95c3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=69b28112e098b070f639efb356393af3ffec4220
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ext4: allow to find by goal if EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY is set 2023-05-24T16:30:00+00:00 Kemeng Shi shikemeng@huaweicloud.com 2023-03-03T17:21:02+00:00 5f1f6426d1a9239a730e3360f22200c79c1900a6 [ Upstream commit 01e4ca29451760b9ac10b4cdc231c52150842643 ] If EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY is set, ext4_mb_regular_allocator will only allocate blocks from ext4_mb_find_by_goal. Allow to find by goal in ext4_mb_find_by_goal if EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY is set or allocation with EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY set will always fail. EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY is not used at all, so the problem is not found for now. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Stable-dep-of: 5354b2af3406 ("ext4: allow ext4_get_group_info() to fail") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 01e4ca29451760b9ac10b4cdc231c52150842643 ]

If EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY is set, ext4_mb_regular_allocator will only
allocate blocks from ext4_mb_find_by_goal. Allow to find by goal in
ext4_mb_find_by_goal if EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY is set or allocation
with EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY set will always fail.

EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY is not used at all, so the problem is not
found for now.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 5354b2af3406 ("ext4: allow ext4_get_group_info() to fail")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ext4: don't clear SB_RDONLY when remounting r/w until quota is re-enabled 2023-05-24T16:30:00+00:00 Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu 2023-05-06T01:02:30+00:00 5570ac70264021c3a9b0c55e0e6d7a90f25cebbc [ Upstream commit a44be64bbecb15a452496f60db6eacfee2b59c79 ] When a file system currently mounted read/only is remounted read/write, if we clear the SB_RDONLY flag too early, before the quota is initialized, and there is another process/thread constantly attempting to create a directory, it's possible to trigger the WARN_ON_ONCE(dquot_initialize_needed(inode)); in ext4_xattr_block_set(), with the following stack trace: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5338 at fs/ext4/xattr.c:2141 ext4_xattr_block_set+0x2ef2/0x3680 RIP: 0010:ext4_xattr_block_set+0x2ef2/0x3680 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2141 Call Trace: ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xcd4/0x15c0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2458 ext4_initxattrs+0xa3/0x110 fs/ext4/xattr_security.c:44 security_inode_init_security+0x2df/0x3f0 security/security.c:1147 __ext4_new_inode+0x347e/0x43d0 fs/ext4/ialloc.c:1324 ext4_mkdir+0x425/0xce0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2992 vfs_mkdir+0x29d/0x450 fs/namei.c:4038 do_mkdirat+0x264/0x520 fs/namei.c:4061 __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4076 [inline] __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4074 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdirat+0x89/0xa0 fs/namei.c:4074 Cc: stable@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230506142419.984260-1-tytso@mit.edu Reported-by: syzbot+6385d7d3065524c5ca6d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=6513f6cb5cd6b5fc9f37e3bb70d273b94be9c34c Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit a44be64bbecb15a452496f60db6eacfee2b59c79 ]

When a file system currently mounted read/only is remounted
read/write, if we clear the SB_RDONLY flag too early, before the quota
is initialized, and there is another process/thread constantly
attempting to create a directory, it's possible to trigger the

	WARN_ON_ONCE(dquot_initialize_needed(inode));

in ext4_xattr_block_set(), with the following stack trace:

   WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5338 at fs/ext4/xattr.c:2141 ext4_xattr_block_set+0x2ef2/0x3680
   RIP: 0010:ext4_xattr_block_set+0x2ef2/0x3680 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2141
   Call Trace:
    ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xcd4/0x15c0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2458
    ext4_initxattrs+0xa3/0x110 fs/ext4/xattr_security.c:44
    security_inode_init_security+0x2df/0x3f0 security/security.c:1147
    __ext4_new_inode+0x347e/0x43d0 fs/ext4/ialloc.c:1324
    ext4_mkdir+0x425/0xce0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2992
    vfs_mkdir+0x29d/0x450 fs/namei.c:4038
    do_mkdirat+0x264/0x520 fs/namei.c:4061
    __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4076 [inline]
    __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4074 [inline]
    __x64_sys_mkdirat+0x89/0xa0 fs/namei.c:4074

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230506142419.984260-1-tytso@mit.edu
Reported-by: syzbot+6385d7d3065524c5ca6d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=6513f6cb5cd6b5fc9f37e3bb70d273b94be9c34c
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ext4: reflect error codes from ext4_multi_mount_protect() to its callers 2023-05-24T16:30:00+00:00 Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu 2023-04-28T02:49:34+00:00 1bcc9855b9327ac368393e5810752462417eab6b [ Upstream commit 3b50d5018ed06a647bb26c44bb5ae74e59c903c7 ] This will allow more fine-grained errno codes to be returned by the mount system call. Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Stable-dep-of: a44be64bbecb ("ext4: don't clear SB_RDONLY when remounting r/w until quota is re-enabled") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 3b50d5018ed06a647bb26c44bb5ae74e59c903c7 ]

This will allow more fine-grained errno codes to be returned by the
mount system call.

Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: a44be64bbecb ("ext4: don't clear SB_RDONLY when remounting r/w until quota is re-enabled")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ext4: fix invalid free tracking in ext4_xattr_move_to_block() 2023-05-17T12:02:07+00:00 Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu 2023-04-30T07:04:13+00:00 b2fab1807d26acd1c6115b95b5eddd697d84751b commit b87c7cdf2bed4928b899e1ce91ef0d147017ba45 upstream. In ext4_xattr_move_to_block(), the value of the extended attribute which we need to move to an external block may be allocated by kvmalloc() if the value is stored in an external inode. So at the end of the function the code tried to check if this was the case by testing entry->e_value_inum. However, at this point, the pointer to the xattr entry is no longer valid, because it was removed from the original location where it had been stored. So we could end up calling kvfree() on a pointer which was not allocated by kvmalloc(); or we could also potentially leak memory by not freeing the buffer when it should be freed. Fix this by storing whether it should be freed in a separate variable. Cc: stable@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230430160426.581366-1-tytso@mit.edu Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=5c2aee8256e30b55ccf57312c16d88417adbd5e1 Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=41a6b5d4917c0412eb3b3c3c604965bed7d7420b Reported-by: syzbot+64b645917ce07d89bde5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+0d042627c4f2ad332195@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit b87c7cdf2bed4928b899e1ce91ef0d147017ba45 upstream.

In ext4_xattr_move_to_block(), the value of the extended attribute
which we need to move to an external block may be allocated by
kvmalloc() if the value is stored in an external inode.  So at the end
of the function the code tried to check if this was the case by
testing entry->e_value_inum.

However, at this point, the pointer to the xattr entry is no longer
valid, because it was removed from the original location where it had
been stored.  So we could end up calling kvfree() on a pointer which
was not allocated by kvmalloc(); or we could also potentially leak
memory by not freeing the buffer when it should be freed.  Fix this by
storing whether it should be freed in a separate variable.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230430160426.581366-1-tytso@mit.edu
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=5c2aee8256e30b55ccf57312c16d88417adbd5e1
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=41a6b5d4917c0412eb3b3c3c604965bed7d7420b
Reported-by: syzbot+64b645917ce07d89bde5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+0d042627c4f2ad332195@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: remove a BUG_ON in ext4_mb_release_group_pa() 2023-05-17T12:02:07+00:00 Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu 2023-04-29T20:14:46+00:00 53c14e7cc2257191ba15425c15638fc4f8abb92b commit 463808f237cf73e98a1a45ff7460c2406a150a0b upstream. If a malicious fuzzer overwrites the ext4 superblock while it is mounted such that the s_first_data_block is set to a very large number, the calculation of the block group can underflow, and trigger a BUG_ON check. Change this to be an ext4_warning so that we don't crash the kernel. Cc: stable@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230430154311.579720-3-tytso@mit.edu Reported-by: syzbot+e2efa3efc15a1c9e95c3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=69b28112e098b070f639efb356393af3ffec4220 Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 463808f237cf73e98a1a45ff7460c2406a150a0b upstream.

If a malicious fuzzer overwrites the ext4 superblock while it is
mounted such that the s_first_data_block is set to a very large
number, the calculation of the block group can underflow, and trigger
a BUG_ON check.  Change this to be an ext4_warning so that we don't
crash the kernel.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230430154311.579720-3-tytso@mit.edu
Reported-by: syzbot+e2efa3efc15a1c9e95c3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=69b28112e098b070f639efb356393af3ffec4220
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: fix lockdep warning when enabling MMP 2023-05-17T12:02:07+00:00 Jan Kara jack@suse.cz 2023-04-11T12:10:19+00:00 01346b25c5a863687a82f66dea6cba392eca869b commit 949f95ff39bf188e594e7ecd8e29b82eb108f5bf upstream. When we enable MMP in ext4_multi_mount_protect() during mount or remount, we end up calling sb_start_write() from write_mmp_block(). This triggers lockdep warning because freeze protection ranks above s_umount semaphore we are holding during mount / remount. The problem is harmless because we are guaranteed the filesystem is not frozen during mount / remount but still let's fix the warning by not grabbing freeze protection from ext4_multi_mount_protect(). Cc: stable@kernel.org Reported-by: syzbot+6b7df7d5506b32467149@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=ab7e5b6f400b7778d46f01841422e5718fb81843 Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230411121019.21940-1-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 949f95ff39bf188e594e7ecd8e29b82eb108f5bf upstream.

When we enable MMP in ext4_multi_mount_protect() during mount or
remount, we end up calling sb_start_write() from write_mmp_block(). This
triggers lockdep warning because freeze protection ranks above s_umount
semaphore we are holding during mount / remount. The problem is harmless
because we are guaranteed the filesystem is not frozen during mount /
remount but still let's fix the warning by not grabbing freeze
protection from ext4_multi_mount_protect().

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-by: syzbot+6b7df7d5506b32467149@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=ab7e5b6f400b7778d46f01841422e5718fb81843
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230411121019.21940-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: bail out of ext4_xattr_ibody_get() fails for any reason 2023-05-17T12:02:07+00:00 Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu 2023-05-12T19:16:27+00:00 7564c1498e995f80e43ecc9cd0bdb76a70303813 commit 2a534e1d0d1591e951f9ece2fb460b2ff92edabd upstream. In ext4_update_inline_data(), if ext4_xattr_ibody_get() fails for any reason, it's best if we just fail as opposed to stumbling on, especially if the failure is EFSCORRUPTED. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 2a534e1d0d1591e951f9ece2fb460b2ff92edabd upstream.

In ext4_update_inline_data(), if ext4_xattr_ibody_get() fails for any
reason, it's best if we just fail as opposed to stumbling on,
especially if the failure is EFSCORRUPTED.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>