[ Upstream commit 835659598c67907b98cd2aa57bb951dfaf675c69 ]
Syzbot found the following issue:
loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 2048
EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 without journal. Quota mode: none.
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ext4_ext_binsearch_idx fs/ext4/extents.c:768 [inline]
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ext4_find_extent+0x76e/0xd90 fs/ext4/extents.c:931
Read of size 4 at addr ffff888073644750 by task syz-executor420/5067
CPU: 0 PID: 5067 Comm: syz-executor420 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc1-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x1b1/0x290 lib/dump_stack.c:106
print_address_description+0x74/0x340 mm/kasan/report.c:306
print_report+0x107/0x1f0 mm/kasan/report.c:417
kasan_report+0xcd/0x100 mm/kasan/report.c:517
ext4_ext_binsearch_idx fs/ext4/extents.c:768 [inline]
ext4_find_extent+0x76e/0xd90 fs/ext4/extents.c:931
ext4_clu_mapped+0x117/0x970 fs/ext4/extents.c:5809
ext4_insert_delayed_block fs/ext4/inode.c:1696 [inline]
ext4_da_map_blocks fs/ext4/inode.c:1806 [inline]
ext4_da_get_block_prep+0x9e8/0x13c0 fs/ext4/inode.c:1870
ext4_block_write_begin+0x6a8/0x2290 fs/ext4/inode.c:1098
ext4_da_write_begin+0x539/0x760 fs/ext4/inode.c:3082
generic_perform_write+0x2e4/0x5e0 mm/filemap.c:3772
ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x122/0x3a0 fs/ext4/file.c:285
ext4_file_write_iter+0x1d0/0x18f0
call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2186 [inline]
new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline]
vfs_write+0x7dc/0xc50 fs/read_write.c:584
ksys_write+0x177/0x2a0 fs/read_write.c:637
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f4b7a9737b9
RSP: 002b:00007ffc5cac3668 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f4b7a9737b9
RDX: 00000000175d9003 RSI: 0000000020000200 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007f4b7a933050 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 000000000000079f R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f4b7a9330e0
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
</TASK>
Above issue is happens when enable bigalloc and inline data feature. As
commit 131294c35ed6 fixed delayed allocation bug in ext4_clu_mapped for
bigalloc + inline. But it only resolved issue when has inline data, if
inline data has been converted to extent(ext4_da_convert_inline_data_to_extent)
before writepages, there is no EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA flag. However
i_data is still store inline data in this scene. Then will trigger UAF
when find extent.
To resolve above issue, there is need to add judge "ext4_has_inline_data(inode)"
in ext4_clu_mapped().
Fixes: 131294c35ed6 ("ext4: fix delayed allocation bug in ext4_clu_mapped for bigalloc + inline")
Reported-by: syzbot+bf4bb7731ef73b83a3b4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230406111627.1916759-1-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 1dedde690303c05ef732b7c5c8356fdf60a4ade3 ]
It is possible for i_disksize can exceed i_size, triggering a warning.
generic_perform_write
copied = iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic(len) // copied < len
ext4_da_write_end
| ext4_update_i_disksize
| new_i_size = pos + copied;
| WRITE_ONCE(EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize, newsize) // update i_disksize
| generic_write_end
| copied = block_write_end(copied, len) // copied = 0
| if (unlikely(copied < len))
| if (!PageUptodate(page))
| copied = 0;
| if (pos + copied > inode->i_size) // return false
if (unlikely(copied == 0))
goto again;
if (unlikely(iov_iter_fault_in_readable(i, bytes))) {
status = -EFAULT;
break;
}
We get i_disksize greater than i_size here, which could trigger WARNING
check 'i_size_read(inode) < EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize' while doing dio:
ext4_dio_write_iter
iomap_dio_rw
__iomap_dio_rw // return err, length is not aligned to 512
ext4_handle_inode_extension
WARN_ON_ONCE(i_size_read(inode) < EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize) // Oops
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2609 at fs/ext4/file.c:319
CPU: 2 PID: 2609 Comm: aa Not tainted 6.3.0-rc2
RIP: 0010:ext4_file_write_iter+0xbc7
Call Trace:
vfs_write+0x3b1
ksys_write+0x77
do_syscall_64+0x39
Fix it by updating 'copied' value before updating i_disksize just like
ext4_write_inline_data_end() does.
A reproducer can be found in the buganizer link below.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217209
Fixes: 64769240bd07 ("ext4: Add delayed allocation support in data=writeback mode")
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230321013721.89818-1-chengzhihao1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Fixes: 0813299c586b ("ext4: Fix possible corruption when moving a directory")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5efbe1b9-ad8b-4a4f-b422-24824d2b775c@kili.mountain
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+0c73d1d8b952c5f3d714@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Pull ext4 fixes from Ted Ts'o: "Bug fixes and regressions for ext4, the most serious of which is a potential deadlock during directory renames that was introduced during the merge window discovered by a combination of syzbot and lockdep" * tag 'ext4_for_linus_stable' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: ext4: zero i_disksize when initializing the bootloader inode ext4: make sure fs error flag setted before clear journal error ext4: commit super block if fs record error when journal record without error ext4, jbd2: add an optimized bmap for the journal inode ext4: fix WARNING in ext4_update_inline_data ext4: move where set the MAY_INLINE_DATA flag is set ext4: Fix deadlock during directory rename ext4: Fix comment about the 64BIT feature docs: ext4: modify the group desc size to 64 ext4: fix another off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystems ext4: fix RENAME_WHITEOUT handling for inline directories ext4: make kobj_type structures constant ext4: fix cgroup writeback accounting with fs-layer encryption
If the boot loader inode has never been used before, the
EXT4_IOC_SWAP_BOOT inode will initialize it, including setting the
i_size to 0. However, if the "never before used" boot loader has a
non-zero i_size, then i_disksize will be non-zero, and the
inconsistency between i_size and i_disksize can trigger a kernel
warning:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2580 at fs/ext4/file.c:319
CPU: 0 PID: 2580 Comm: bb Not tainted 6.3.0-rc1-00004-g703695902cfa
RIP: 0010:ext4_file_write_iter+0xbc7/0xd10
Call Trace:
vfs_write+0x3b1/0x5c0
ksys_write+0x77/0x160
__x64_sys_write+0x22/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x39/0x80
Reproducer:
1. create corrupted image and mount it:
mke2fs -t ext4 /tmp/foo.img 200
debugfs -wR "sif <5> size 25700" /tmp/foo.img
mount -t ext4 /tmp/foo.img /mnt
cd /mnt
echo 123 > file
2. Run the reproducer program:
posix_memalign(&buf, 1024, 1024)
fd = open("file", O_RDWR | O_DIRECT);
ioctl(fd, EXT4_IOC_SWAP_BOOT);
write(fd, buf, 1024);
Fix this by setting i_disksize as well as i_size to zero when
initiaizing the boot loader inode.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217159
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308032643.641113-1-chengzhihao1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Now, jounral error number maybe cleared even though ext4_commit_super() failed. This may lead to error flag miss, then fsck will miss to check file system deeply. Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230307061703.245965-3-yebin@huaweicloud.com
Now, 'es->s_state' maybe covered by recover journal. And journal errno maybe not recorded in journal sb as IO error. ext4_update_super() only update error information when 'sbi->s_add_error_count' large than zero. Then 'EXT4_ERROR_FS' flag maybe lost. To solve above issue just recover 'es->s_state' error flag after journal replay like error info. Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230307061703.245965-2-yebin@huaweicloud.com
The generic bmap() function exported by the VFS takes locks and does checks that are not necessary for the journal inode. So allow the file system to set a journal-optimized bmap function in journal->j_bmap. Reported-by: syzbot+9543479984ae9e576000@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=e4aaa78795e490421c79f76ec3679006c8ff4cf0 Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Syzbot found the following issue:
EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 without journal. Quota mode: none.
fscrypt: AES-256-CTS-CBC using implementation "cts-cbc-aes-aesni"
fscrypt: AES-256-XTS using implementation "xts-aes-aesni"
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5071 at mm/page_alloc.c:5525 __alloc_pages+0x30a/0x560 mm/page_alloc.c:5525
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 5071 Comm: syz-executor263 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc1-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages+0x30a/0x560 mm/page_alloc.c:5525
RSP: 0018:ffffc90003c2f1c0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: ffffc90003c2f220 RBX: 0000000000000014 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000028 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffc90003c2f248
RBP: ffffc90003c2f2d8 R08: dffffc0000000000 R09: ffffc90003c2f220
R10: fffff52000785e49 R11: 1ffff92000785e44 R12: 0000000000040d40
R13: 1ffff92000785e40 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 1ffff92000785e3c
FS: 0000555556c0d300(0000) GS:ffff8880b9800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f95d5e04138 CR3: 00000000793aa000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:237 [inline]
alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:260 [inline]
__kmalloc_large_node+0x95/0x1e0 mm/slab_common.c:1113
__do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:956 [inline]
__kmalloc+0xfe/0x190 mm/slab_common.c:981
kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:584 [inline]
kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:720 [inline]
ext4_update_inline_data+0x236/0x6b0 fs/ext4/inline.c:346
ext4_update_inline_dir fs/ext4/inline.c:1115 [inline]
ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x328/0x990 fs/ext4/inline.c:1307
ext4_add_entry+0x5a4/0xeb0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2385
ext4_add_nondir+0x96/0x260 fs/ext4/namei.c:2772
ext4_create+0x36c/0x560 fs/ext4/namei.c:2817
lookup_open fs/namei.c:3413 [inline]
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3481 [inline]
path_openat+0x12ac/0x2dd0 fs/namei.c:3711
do_filp_open+0x264/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:3741
do_sys_openat2+0x124/0x4e0 fs/open.c:1310
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1326 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1342 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1337 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x243/0x290 fs/open.c:1337
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
Above issue happens as follows:
ext4_iget
ext4_find_inline_data_nolock ->i_inline_off=164 i_inline_size=60
ext4_try_add_inline_entry
__ext4_mark_inode_dirty
ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea ->i_extra_isize=32 s_want_extra_isize=44
ext4_xattr_shift_entries
->after shift i_inline_off is incorrect, actually is change to 176
ext4_try_add_inline_entry
ext4_update_inline_dir
get_max_inline_xattr_value_size
if (EXT4_I(inode)->i_inline_off)
entry = (struct ext4_xattr_entry *)((void *)raw_inode +
EXT4_I(inode)->i_inline_off);
free += EXT4_XATTR_SIZE(le32_to_cpu(entry->e_value_size));
->As entry is incorrect, then 'free' may be negative
ext4_update_inline_data
value = kzalloc(len, GFP_NOFS);
-> len is unsigned int, maybe very large, then trigger warning when
'kzalloc()'
To resolve the above issue we need to update 'i_inline_off' after
'ext4_xattr_shift_entries()'. We do not need to set
EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA flag here, since ext4_mark_inode_dirty()
already sets this flag if needed. Setting EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA
when it is needed may trigger a BUG_ON in ext4_writepages().
Reported-by: syzbot+d30838395804afc2fa6f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230307015253.2232062-3-yebin@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The only caller of ext4_find_inline_data_nolock() that needs setting of EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA flag is ext4_iget_extra_inode(). In ext4_write_inline_data_end() we just need to update inode->i_inline_off. Since we are going to add one more caller that does not need to set EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA, just move setting of EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA out to ext4_iget_extra_inode(). Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230307015253.2232062-2-yebin@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>