linux-stable.git/fs/ext4, branch v5.6 Linux kernel stable tree ext4: potential crash on allocation error in ext4_alloc_flex_bg_array() 2020-02-29T22:48:08+00:00 Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@oracle.com 2020-02-28T09:22:56+00:00 37b0b6b8b99c0e1c1f11abbe7cf49b6d03795b3f If sbi->s_flex_groups_allocated is zero and the first allocation fails then this code will crash. The problem is that "i--" will set "i" to -1 but when we compare "i >= sbi->s_flex_groups_allocated" then the -1 is type promoted to unsigned and becomes UINT_MAX. Since UINT_MAX is more than zero, the condition is true so we call kvfree(new_groups[-1]). The loop will carry on freeing invalid memory until it crashes. Fixes: 7c990728b99e ("ext4: fix potential race between s_flex_groups online resizing and access") Reviewed-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200228092142.7irbc44yaz3by7nb@kili.mountain Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> 
If sbi->s_flex_groups_allocated is zero and the first allocation fails
then this code will crash.  The problem is that "i--" will set "i" to
-1 but when we compare "i >= sbi->s_flex_groups_allocated" then the -1
is type promoted to unsigned and becomes UINT_MAX.  Since UINT_MAX
is more than zero, the condition is true so we call kvfree(new_groups[-1]).
The loop will carry on freeing invalid memory until it crashes.

Fixes: 7c990728b99e ("ext4: fix potential race between s_flex_groups online resizing and access")
Reviewed-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200228092142.7irbc44yaz3by7nb@kili.mountain
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4: fix mount failure with quota configured as module 2020-02-22T00:32:07+00:00 Jan Kara jack@suse.cz 2020-02-21T10:08:35+00:00 9db176bceb5c5df4990486709da386edadc6bd1d When CONFIG_QFMT_V2 is configured as a module, the test in ext4_feature_set_ok() fails and so mount of filesystems with quota or project features fails. Fix the test to use IS_ENABLED macro which works properly even for modules. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221100835.9332-1-jack@suse.cz Fixes: d65d87a07476 ("ext4: improve explanation of a mount failure caused by a misconfigured kernel") Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org 
When CONFIG_QFMT_V2 is configured as a module, the test in
ext4_feature_set_ok() fails and so mount of filesystems with quota or
project features fails. Fix the test to use IS_ENABLED macro which
works properly even for modules.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221100835.9332-1-jack@suse.cz
Fixes: d65d87a07476 ("ext4: improve explanation of a mount failure caused by a misconfigured kernel")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
ext4: fix race between writepages and enabling EXT4_EXTENTS_FL 2020-02-22T00:32:07+00:00 Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com 2020-02-19T18:30:47+00:00 cb85f4d23f794e24127f3e562cb3b54b0803f456 If EXT4_EXTENTS_FL is set on an inode while ext4_writepages() is running on it, the following warning in ext4_add_complete_io() can be hit: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at fs/ext4/page-io.c:234 ext4_put_io_end_defer+0xf0/0x120 Here's a minimal reproducer (not 100% reliable) (root isn't required): while true; do sync done & while true; do rm -f file touch file chattr -e file echo X >> file chattr +e file done The problem is that in ext4_writepages(), ext4_should_dioread_nolock() (which only returns true on extent-based files) is checked once to set the number of reserved journal credits, and also again later to select the flags for ext4_map_blocks() and copy the reserved journal handle to ext4_io_end::handle. But if EXT4_EXTENTS_FL is being concurrently set, the first check can see dioread_nolock disabled while the later one can see it enabled, causing the reserved handle to unexpectedly be NULL. Since changing EXT4_EXTENTS_FL is uncommon, and there may be other races related to doing so as well, fix this by synchronizing changing EXT4_EXTENTS_FL with ext4_writepages() via the existing s_writepages_rwsem (previously called s_journal_flag_rwsem). This was originally reported by syzbot without a reproducer at https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2202a584a00fffd19fbf, but now that dioread_nolock is the default I also started seeing this when running syzkaller locally. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200219183047.47417-3-ebiggers@kernel.org Reported-by: syzbot+2202a584a00fffd19fbf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 6b523df4fb5a ("ext4: use transaction reservation for extent conversion in ext4_end_io") Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@kernel.org 
If EXT4_EXTENTS_FL is set on an inode while ext4_writepages() is running
on it, the following warning in ext4_add_complete_io() can be hit:

WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at fs/ext4/page-io.c:234 ext4_put_io_end_defer+0xf0/0x120

Here's a minimal reproducer (not 100% reliable) (root isn't required):

        while true; do
                sync
        done &
        while true; do
                rm -f file
                touch file
                chattr -e file
                echo X >> file
                chattr +e file
        done

The problem is that in ext4_writepages(), ext4_should_dioread_nolock()
(which only returns true on extent-based files) is checked once to set
the number of reserved journal credits, and also again later to select
the flags for ext4_map_blocks() and copy the reserved journal handle to
ext4_io_end::handle.  But if EXT4_EXTENTS_FL is being concurrently set,
the first check can see dioread_nolock disabled while the later one can
see it enabled, causing the reserved handle to unexpectedly be NULL.

Since changing EXT4_EXTENTS_FL is uncommon, and there may be other races
related to doing so as well, fix this by synchronizing changing
EXT4_EXTENTS_FL with ext4_writepages() via the existing
s_writepages_rwsem (previously called s_journal_flag_rwsem).

This was originally reported by syzbot without a reproducer at
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2202a584a00fffd19fbf,
but now that dioread_nolock is the default I also started seeing this
when running syzkaller locally.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200219183047.47417-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Reported-by: syzbot+2202a584a00fffd19fbf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 6b523df4fb5a ("ext4: use transaction reservation for extent conversion in ext4_end_io")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
ext4: rename s_journal_flag_rwsem to s_writepages_rwsem 2020-02-22T00:32:07+00:00 Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com 2020-02-19T18:30:46+00:00 bbd55937de8f2754adc5792b0f8e5ff7d9c0420e In preparation for making s_journal_flag_rwsem synchronize ext4_writepages() with changes to both the EXTENTS and JOURNAL_DATA flags (rather than just JOURNAL_DATA as it does currently), rename it to s_writepages_rwsem. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200219183047.47417-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@kernel.org 
In preparation for making s_journal_flag_rwsem synchronize
ext4_writepages() with changes to both the EXTENTS and JOURNAL_DATA
flags (rather than just JOURNAL_DATA as it does currently), rename it to
s_writepages_rwsem.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200219183047.47417-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
ext4: fix potential race between s_flex_groups online resizing and access 2020-02-22T00:31:46+00:00 Suraj Jitindar Singh surajjs@amazon.com 2020-02-19T03:08:51+00:00 7c990728b99ed6fbe9c75fc202fce1172d9916da During an online resize an array of s_flex_groups structures gets replaced so it can get enlarged. If there is a concurrent access to the array and this memory has been reused then this can lead to an invalid memory access. The s_flex_group array has been converted into an array of pointers rather than an array of structures. This is to ensure that the information contained in the structures cannot get out of sync during a resize due to an accessor updating the value in the old structure after it has been copied but before the array pointer is updated. Since the structures them- selves are no longer copied but only the pointers to them this case is mitigated. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206443 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221053458.730016-4-tytso@mit.edu Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org 
During an online resize an array of s_flex_groups structures gets replaced
so it can get enlarged. If there is a concurrent access to the array and
this memory has been reused then this can lead to an invalid memory access.

The s_flex_group array has been converted into an array of pointers rather
than an array of structures. This is to ensure that the information
contained in the structures cannot get out of sync during a resize due to
an accessor updating the value in the old structure after it has been
copied but before the array pointer is updated. Since the structures them-
selves are no longer copied but only the pointers to them this case is
mitigated.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206443
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221053458.730016-4-tytso@mit.edu
Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
ext4: fix potential race between s_group_info online resizing and access 2020-02-21T05:38:12+00:00 Suraj Jitindar Singh surajjs@amazon.com 2020-02-19T03:08:50+00:00 df3da4ea5a0fc5d115c90d5aa6caa4dd433750a7 During an online resize an array of pointers to s_group_info gets replaced so it can get enlarged. If there is a concurrent access to the array in ext4_get_group_info() and this memory has been reused then this can lead to an invalid memory access. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206443 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221053458.730016-3-tytso@mit.edu Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Balbir Singh <sblbir@amazon.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org 
During an online resize an array of pointers to s_group_info gets replaced
so it can get enlarged. If there is a concurrent access to the array in
ext4_get_group_info() and this memory has been reused then this can lead to
an invalid memory access.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206443
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221053458.730016-3-tytso@mit.edu
Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Balbir Singh <sblbir@amazon.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
ext4: fix potential race between online resizing and write operations 2020-02-21T05:37:09+00:00 Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu 2020-02-15T21:40:37+00:00 1d0c3924a92e69bfa91163bda83c12a994b4d106 During an online resize an array of pointers to buffer heads gets replaced so it can get enlarged. If there is a racing block allocation or deallocation which uses the old array, and the old array has gotten reused this can lead to a GPF or some other random kernel memory getting modified. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206443 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221053458.730016-2-tytso@mit.edu Reported-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org 
During an online resize an array of pointers to buffer heads gets
replaced so it can get enlarged.  If there is a racing block
allocation or deallocation which uses the old array, and the old array
has gotten reused this can lead to a GPF or some other random kernel
memory getting modified.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206443
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221053458.730016-2-tytso@mit.edu
Reported-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
ext4: add cond_resched() to __ext4_find_entry() 2020-02-20T04:53:52+00:00 Shijie Luo luoshijie1@huawei.com 2020-02-15T08:02:06+00:00 9424ef56e13a1f14c57ea161eed3ecfdc7b2770e We tested a soft lockup problem in linux 4.19 which could also be found in linux 5.x. When dir inode takes up a large number of blocks, and if the directory is growing when we are searching, it's possible the restart branch could be called many times, and the do while loop could hold cpu a long time. Here is the call trace in linux 4.19. [ 473.756186] Call trace: [ 473.756196] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x198 [ 473.756199] show_stack+0x24/0x30 [ 473.756205] dump_stack+0xa4/0xcc [ 473.756210] watchdog_timer_fn+0x300/0x3e8 [ 473.756215] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x114/0x358 [ 473.756217] hrtimer_interrupt+0x104/0x2d8 [ 473.756222] arch_timer_handler_virt+0x38/0x58 [ 473.756226] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x90/0x248 [ 473.756231] generic_handle_irq+0x34/0x50 [ 473.756234] __handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0 [ 473.756236] gic_handle_irq+0x6c/0x150 [ 473.756238] el1_irq+0xb8/0x140 [ 473.756286] ext4_es_lookup_extent+0xdc/0x258 [ext4] [ 473.756310] ext4_map_blocks+0x64/0x5c0 [ext4] [ 473.756333] ext4_getblk+0x6c/0x1d0 [ext4] [ 473.756356] ext4_bread_batch+0x7c/0x1f8 [ext4] [ 473.756379] ext4_find_entry+0x124/0x3f8 [ext4] [ 473.756402] ext4_lookup+0x8c/0x258 [ext4] [ 473.756407] __lookup_hash+0x8c/0xe8 [ 473.756411] filename_create+0xa0/0x170 [ 473.756413] do_mkdirat+0x6c/0x140 [ 473.756415] __arm64_sys_mkdirat+0x28/0x38 [ 473.756419] el0_svc_common+0x78/0x130 [ 473.756421] el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78 [ 473.756423] el0_svc+0x8/0xc [ 485.755156] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 22s! [tmp:5149] Add cond_resched() to avoid soft lockup and to provide a better system responding. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200215080206.13293-1-luoshijie1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@kernel.org 
We tested a soft lockup problem in linux 4.19 which could also
be found in linux 5.x.

When dir inode takes up a large number of blocks, and if the
directory is growing when we are searching, it's possible the
restart branch could be called many times, and the do while loop
could hold cpu a long time.

Here is the call trace in linux 4.19.

[  473.756186] Call trace:
[  473.756196]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x198
[  473.756199]  show_stack+0x24/0x30
[  473.756205]  dump_stack+0xa4/0xcc
[  473.756210]  watchdog_timer_fn+0x300/0x3e8
[  473.756215]  __hrtimer_run_queues+0x114/0x358
[  473.756217]  hrtimer_interrupt+0x104/0x2d8
[  473.756222]  arch_timer_handler_virt+0x38/0x58
[  473.756226]  handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x90/0x248
[  473.756231]  generic_handle_irq+0x34/0x50
[  473.756234]  __handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0
[  473.756236]  gic_handle_irq+0x6c/0x150
[  473.756238]  el1_irq+0xb8/0x140
[  473.756286]  ext4_es_lookup_extent+0xdc/0x258 [ext4]
[  473.756310]  ext4_map_blocks+0x64/0x5c0 [ext4]
[  473.756333]  ext4_getblk+0x6c/0x1d0 [ext4]
[  473.756356]  ext4_bread_batch+0x7c/0x1f8 [ext4]
[  473.756379]  ext4_find_entry+0x124/0x3f8 [ext4]
[  473.756402]  ext4_lookup+0x8c/0x258 [ext4]
[  473.756407]  __lookup_hash+0x8c/0xe8
[  473.756411]  filename_create+0xa0/0x170
[  473.756413]  do_mkdirat+0x6c/0x140
[  473.756415]  __arm64_sys_mkdirat+0x28/0x38
[  473.756419]  el0_svc_common+0x78/0x130
[  473.756421]  el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78
[  473.756423]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc
[  485.755156] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 22s! [tmp:5149]

Add cond_resched() to avoid soft lockup and to provide a better
system responding.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200215080206.13293-1-luoshijie1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
ext4: fix a data race in EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize 2020-02-20T04:17:02+00:00 Qian Cai cai@lca.pw 2020-02-07T14:29:11+00:00 35df4299a6487f323b0aca120ea3f485dfee2ae3 EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize could be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN, BUG: KCSAN: data-race in ext4_write_end [ext4] / ext4_writepages [ext4] write to 0xffff91c6713b00f8 of 8 bytes by task 49268 on cpu 127: ext4_write_end+0x4e3/0x750 [ext4] ext4_update_i_disksize at fs/ext4/ext4.h:3032 (inlined by) ext4_update_inode_size at fs/ext4/ext4.h:3046 (inlined by) ext4_write_end at fs/ext4/inode.c:1287 generic_perform_write+0x208/0x2a0 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4] ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4] new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0 __vfs_write+0x92/0xa0 vfs_write+0x103/0x260 ksys_write+0x9d/0x130 __x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb47 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe read to 0xffff91c6713b00f8 of 8 bytes by task 24872 on cpu 37: ext4_writepages+0x10ac/0x1d00 [ext4] mpage_map_and_submit_extent at fs/ext4/inode.c:2468 (inlined by) ext4_writepages at fs/ext4/inode.c:2772 do_writepages+0x5e/0x130 __writeback_single_inode+0xeb/0xb20 writeback_sb_inodes+0x429/0x900 __writeback_inodes_wb+0xc4/0x150 wb_writeback+0x4bd/0x870 wb_workfn+0x6b4/0x960 process_one_work+0x54c/0xbe0 worker_thread+0x80/0x650 kthread+0x1e0/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 37 PID: 24872 Comm: kworker/u261:2 Tainted: G W O L 5.5.0-next-20200204+ #5 Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019 Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-7:0) Since only the read is operating as lockless (outside of the "i_data_sem"), load tearing could introduce a logic bug. Fix it by adding READ_ONCE() for the read and WRITE_ONCE() for the write. Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1581085751-31793-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org 
EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize could be accessed concurrently as noticed by
KCSAN,

 BUG: KCSAN: data-race in ext4_write_end [ext4] / ext4_writepages [ext4]

 write to 0xffff91c6713b00f8 of 8 bytes by task 49268 on cpu 127:
  ext4_write_end+0x4e3/0x750 [ext4]
  ext4_update_i_disksize at fs/ext4/ext4.h:3032
  (inlined by) ext4_update_inode_size at fs/ext4/ext4.h:3046
  (inlined by) ext4_write_end at fs/ext4/inode.c:1287
  generic_perform_write+0x208/0x2a0
  ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4]
  ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4]
  new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0
  __vfs_write+0x92/0xa0
  vfs_write+0x103/0x260
  ksys_write+0x9d/0x130
  __x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60
  do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb47
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

 read to 0xffff91c6713b00f8 of 8 bytes by task 24872 on cpu 37:
  ext4_writepages+0x10ac/0x1d00 [ext4]
  mpage_map_and_submit_extent at fs/ext4/inode.c:2468
  (inlined by) ext4_writepages at fs/ext4/inode.c:2772
  do_writepages+0x5e/0x130
  __writeback_single_inode+0xeb/0xb20
  writeback_sb_inodes+0x429/0x900
  __writeback_inodes_wb+0xc4/0x150
  wb_writeback+0x4bd/0x870
  wb_workfn+0x6b4/0x960
  process_one_work+0x54c/0xbe0
  worker_thread+0x80/0x650
  kthread+0x1e0/0x200
  ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
 CPU: 37 PID: 24872 Comm: kworker/u261:2 Tainted: G        W  O L 5.5.0-next-20200204+ #5
 Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019
 Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-7:0)

Since only the read is operating as lockless (outside of the
"i_data_sem"), load tearing could introduce a logic bug. Fix it by
adding READ_ONCE() for the read and WRITE_ONCE() for the write.

Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1581085751-31793-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus_stable' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4 2020-02-16T19:12:06+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2020-02-16T19:12:06+00:00 8a8b80967b421218d89c1af61e759c54ab94fdb6 Pull ext4 fixes from Ted Ts'o: "Miscellaneous ext4 bug fixes (all stable fodder)" * tag 'ext4_for_linus_stable' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: ext4: improve explanation of a mount failure caused by a misconfigured kernel jbd2: do not clear the BH_Mapped flag when forgetting a metadata buffer jbd2: move the clearing of b_modified flag to the journal_unmap_buffer() ext4: add cond_resched() to ext4_protect_reserved_inode ext4: fix checksum errors with indexed dirs ext4: fix support for inode sizes > 1024 bytes ext4: simplify checking quota limits in ext4_statfs() ext4: don't assume that mmp_nodename/bdevname have NUL 
Pull ext4 fixes from Ted Ts'o:
 "Miscellaneous ext4 bug fixes (all stable fodder)"

* tag 'ext4_for_linus_stable' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4:
  ext4: improve explanation of a mount failure caused by a misconfigured kernel
  jbd2: do not clear the BH_Mapped flag when forgetting a metadata buffer
  jbd2: move the clearing of b_modified flag to the journal_unmap_buffer()
  ext4: add cond_resched() to ext4_protect_reserved_inode
  ext4: fix checksum errors with indexed dirs
  ext4: fix support for inode sizes > 1024 bytes
  ext4: simplify checking quota limits in ext4_statfs()
  ext4: don't assume that mmp_nodename/bdevname have NUL