linux-stable.git/fs/ext4, branch v5.4.185 Linux kernel stable tree ext4: add check to prevent attempting to resize an fs with sparse_super2 2022-03-16T12:21:48+00:00 Josh Triplett josh@joshtriplett.org 2021-06-07T19:15:24+00:00 a4eef9e76934a92b1744fac973a46c4eb495a040 commit b1489186cc8391e0c1e342f9fbc3eedf6b944c61 upstream. The in-kernel ext4 resize code doesn't support filesystem with the sparse_super2 feature. It fails with errors like this and doesn't finish the resize: EXT4-fs (loop0): resizing filesystem from 16640 to 7864320 blocks EXT4-fs warning (device loop0): verify_reserved_gdb:760: reserved GDT 2 missing grp 1 (32770) EXT4-fs warning (device loop0): ext4_resize_fs:2111: error (-22) occurred during file system resize EXT4-fs (loop0): resized filesystem to 2097152 To reproduce: mkfs.ext4 -b 4096 -I 256 -J size=32 -E resize=$((256*1024*1024)) -O sparse_super2 ext4.img 65M truncate -s 30G ext4.img mount ext4.img /mnt python3 -c 'import fcntl, os, struct ; fd = os.open("/mnt", os.O_RDONLY | os.O_DIRECTORY) ; fcntl.ioctl(fd, 0x40086610, struct.pack("Q", 30 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 // 4096), False) ; os.close(fd)' dmesg | tail e2fsck ext4.img The userspace resize2fs tool has a check for this case: it checks if the filesystem has sparse_super2 set and if the kernel provides /sys/fs/ext4/features/sparse_super2. However, the former check requires manually reading and parsing the filesystem superblock. Detect this case in ext4_resize_begin and error out early with a clear error message. Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/74b8ae78405270211943cd7393e65586c5faeed1.1623093259.git.josh@joshtriplett.org Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit b1489186cc8391e0c1e342f9fbc3eedf6b944c61 upstream.

The in-kernel ext4 resize code doesn't support filesystem with the
sparse_super2 feature. It fails with errors like this and doesn't finish
the resize:
EXT4-fs (loop0): resizing filesystem from 16640 to 7864320 blocks
EXT4-fs warning (device loop0): verify_reserved_gdb:760: reserved GDT 2 missing grp 1 (32770)
EXT4-fs warning (device loop0): ext4_resize_fs:2111: error (-22) occurred during file system resize
EXT4-fs (loop0): resized filesystem to 2097152

To reproduce:
mkfs.ext4 -b 4096 -I 256 -J size=32 -E resize=$((256*1024*1024)) -O sparse_super2 ext4.img 65M
truncate -s 30G ext4.img
mount ext4.img /mnt
python3 -c 'import fcntl, os, struct ; fd = os.open("/mnt", os.O_RDONLY | os.O_DIRECTORY) ; fcntl.ioctl(fd, 0x40086610, struct.pack("Q", 30 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 // 4096), False) ; os.close(fd)'
dmesg | tail
e2fsck ext4.img

The userspace resize2fs tool has a check for this case: it checks if the
filesystem has sparse_super2 set and if the kernel provides
/sys/fs/ext4/features/sparse_super2. However, the former check requires
manually reading and parsing the filesystem superblock.

Detect this case in ext4_resize_begin and error out early with a clear
error message.

Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/74b8ae78405270211943cd7393e65586c5faeed1.1623093259.git.josh@joshtriplett.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: prevent partial update of the extent blocks 2022-02-23T10:59:57+00:00 Zhang Yi yi.zhang@huawei.com 2021-09-08T12:08:50+00:00 8583d2ea90fe4f41af865225d5be326499d6cc6f commit 0f2f87d51aebcf71a709b52f661d681594c7dffa upstream. In the most error path of current extents updating operations are not roll back partial updates properly when some bad things happens(.e.g in ext4_ext_insert_extent()). So we may get an inconsistent extents tree if journal has been aborted due to IO error, which may probability lead to BUGON later when we accessing these extent entries in errors=continue mode. This patch drop extent buffer's verify flag before updatng the contents in ext4_ext_get_access(), and reset it after updating in __ext4_ext_dirty(). After this patch we could force to check the extent buffer if extents tree updating was break off, make sure the extents are consistent. Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210908120850.4012324-4-yi.zhang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Leah Rumancik <leah.rumancik@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 0f2f87d51aebcf71a709b52f661d681594c7dffa upstream.

In the most error path of current extents updating operations are not
roll back partial updates properly when some bad things happens(.e.g in
ext4_ext_insert_extent()). So we may get an inconsistent extents tree
if journal has been aborted due to IO error, which may probability lead
to BUGON later when we accessing these extent entries in errors=continue
mode. This patch drop extent buffer's verify flag before updatng the
contents in ext4_ext_get_access(), and reset it after updating in
__ext4_ext_dirty(). After this patch we could force to check the extent
buffer if extents tree updating was break off, make sure the extents are
consistent.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210908120850.4012324-4-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Leah Rumancik <leah.rumancik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: check for inconsistent extents between index and leaf block 2022-02-23T10:59:57+00:00 Zhang Yi yi.zhang@huawei.com 2021-09-08T12:08:49+00:00 d57fcf0d9195543efc392e147209e150dcbabb5b commit 9c6e071913792d80894cd0be98cc3c4b770e26d3 upstream. Now that we can check out overlapping extents in leaf block and out-of-order index extents in index block. But the .ee_block in the first extent of one leaf block should equal to the .ei_block in it's parent index extent entry. This patch add a check to verify such inconsistent between the index and leaf block. Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210908120850.4012324-3-yi.zhang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Leah Rumancik <leah.rumancik@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 9c6e071913792d80894cd0be98cc3c4b770e26d3 upstream.

Now that we can check out overlapping extents in leaf block and
out-of-order index extents in index block. But the .ee_block in the
first extent of one leaf block should equal to the .ei_block in it's
parent index extent entry. This patch add a check to verify such
inconsistent between the index and leaf block.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210908120850.4012324-3-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Leah Rumancik <leah.rumancik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: check for out-of-order index extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries() 2022-02-23T10:59:57+00:00 Zhang Yi yi.zhang@huawei.com 2021-09-08T12:08:48+00:00 6a332d095ce4accd064805c0e3654d3bd0383711 commit 8dd27fecede55e8a4e67eef2878040ecad0f0d33 upstream. After commit 5946d089379a ("ext4: check for overlapping extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries()"), we can check out the overlapping extent entry in leaf extent blocks. But the out-of-order extent entry in index extent blocks could also trigger bad things if the filesystem is inconsistent. So this patch add a check to figure out the out-of-order index extents and return error. Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210908120850.4012324-2-yi.zhang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Leah Rumancik <leah.rumancik@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 8dd27fecede55e8a4e67eef2878040ecad0f0d33 upstream.

After commit 5946d089379a ("ext4: check for overlapping extents in
ext4_valid_extent_entries()"), we can check out the overlapping extent
entry in leaf extent blocks. But the out-of-order extent entry in index
extent blocks could also trigger bad things if the filesystem is
inconsistent. So this patch add a check to figure out the out-of-order
index extents and return error.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210908120850.4012324-2-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Leah Rumancik <leah.rumancik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: fix error handling in ext4_restore_inline_data() 2022-02-08T17:24:34+00:00 Ritesh Harjani riteshh@linux.ibm.com 2022-01-17T12:11:47+00:00 c8d7d7c58e6442efedf78c489e78904fd4ea98cb commit 897026aaa73eb2517dfea8d147f20ddb0b813044 upstream. While running "./check -I 200 generic/475" it sometimes gives below kernel BUG(). Ideally we should not call ext4_write_inline_data() if ext4_create_inline_data() has failed. <log snip> [73131.453234] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inline.c:223! <code snip> 212 static void ext4_write_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_iloc *iloc, 213 void *buffer, loff_t pos, unsigned int len) 214 { <...> 223 BUG_ON(!EXT4_I(inode)->i_inline_off); 224 BUG_ON(pos + len > EXT4_I(inode)->i_inline_size); This patch handles the error and prints out a emergency msg saying potential data loss for the given inode (since we couldn't restore the original inline_data due to some previous error). [ 9571.070313] EXT4-fs (dm-0): error restoring inline_data for inode -- potential data loss! (inode 1703982, error -30) Reported-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9f4cd7dfd54fa58ff27270881823d94ddf78dd07.1642416995.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 897026aaa73eb2517dfea8d147f20ddb0b813044 upstream.

While running "./check -I 200 generic/475" it sometimes gives below
kernel BUG(). Ideally we should not call ext4_write_inline_data() if
ext4_create_inline_data() has failed.

<log snip>
[73131.453234] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inline.c:223!

<code snip>
 212 static void ext4_write_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_iloc *iloc,
 213                                    void *buffer, loff_t pos, unsigned int len)
 214 {
<...>
 223         BUG_ON(!EXT4_I(inode)->i_inline_off);
 224         BUG_ON(pos + len > EXT4_I(inode)->i_inline_size);

This patch handles the error and prints out a emergency msg saying potential
data loss for the given inode (since we couldn't restore the original
inline_data due to some previous error).

[ 9571.070313] EXT4-fs (dm-0): error restoring inline_data for inode -- potential data loss! (inode 1703982, error -30)

Reported-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9f4cd7dfd54fa58ff27270881823d94ddf78dd07.1642416995.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: don't use the orphan list when migrating an inode 2022-01-27T08:19:51+00:00 Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu 2022-01-06T04:59:56+00:00 d820cb6365635243ef90e03851daabaa2f42651d commit 6eeaf88fd586f05aaf1d48cb3a139d2a5c6eb055 upstream. We probably want to remove the indirect block to extents migration feature after a deprecation window, but until then, let's fix a potential data loss problem caused by the fact that we put the tmp_inode on the orphan list. In the unlikely case where we crash and do a journal recovery, the data blocks belonging to the inode being migrated are also represented in the tmp_inode on the orphan list --- and so its data blocks will get marked unallocated, and available for reuse. Instead, stop putting the tmp_inode on the oprhan list. So in the case where we crash while migrating the inode, we'll leak an inode, which is not a disaster. It will be easily fixed the next time we run fsck, and it's better than potentially having blocks getting claimed by two different files, and losing data as a result. Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 6eeaf88fd586f05aaf1d48cb3a139d2a5c6eb055 upstream.

We probably want to remove the indirect block to extents migration
feature after a deprecation window, but until then, let's fix a
potential data loss problem caused by the fact that we put the
tmp_inode on the orphan list.  In the unlikely case where we crash and
do a journal recovery, the data blocks belonging to the inode being
migrated are also represented in the tmp_inode on the orphan list ---
and so its data blocks will get marked unallocated, and available for
reuse.

Instead, stop putting the tmp_inode on the oprhan list.  So in the
case where we crash while migrating the inode, we'll leak an inode,
which is not a disaster.  It will be easily fixed the next time we run
fsck, and it's better than potentially having blocks getting claimed
by two different files, and losing data as a result.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: Fix BUG_ON in ext4_bread when write quota data 2022-01-27T08:19:51+00:00 Ye Bin yebin10@huawei.com 2021-12-23T01:55:06+00:00 85c121cf17fd2719ab0cd67b164c20653d28da7a commit 380a0091cab482489e9b19e07f2a166ad2b76d5c upstream. We got issue as follows when run syzkaller: [ 167.936972] EXT4-fs error (device loop0): __ext4_remount:6314: comm rep: Abort forced by user [ 167.938306] EXT4-fs (loop0): Remounting filesystem read-only [ 167.981637] Assertion failure in ext4_getblk() at fs/ext4/inode.c:847: '(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_mount_state & EXT4_FC_REPLAY) || handle != NULL || create == 0' [ 167.983601] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 167.984245] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:847! [ 167.984882] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI [ 167.985624] CPU: 7 PID: 2290 Comm: rep Tainted: G B 5.16.0-rc5-next-20211217+ #123 [ 167.986823] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014 [ 167.988590] RIP: 0010:ext4_getblk+0x17e/0x504 [ 167.989189] Code: c6 01 74 28 49 c7 c0 a0 a3 5c 9b b9 4f 03 00 00 48 c7 c2 80 9c 5c 9b 48 c7 c6 40 b6 5c 9b 48 c7 c7 20 a4 5c 9b e8 77 e3 fd ff <0f> 0b 8b 04 244 [ 167.991679] RSP: 0018:ffff8881736f7398 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 167.992385] RAX: 0000000000000094 RBX: 1ffff1102e6dee75 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 167.993337] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff9b6e29e0 RDI: ffffed102e6dee66 [ 167.994292] RBP: ffff88816a076210 R08: 0000000000000094 R09: ffffed107363fa09 [ 167.995252] R10: ffff88839b1fd047 R11: ffffed107363fa08 R12: ffff88816a0761e8 [ 167.996205] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000021 R15: 0000000000000001 [ 167.997158] FS: 00007f6a1428c740(0000) GS:ffff88839b000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 167.998238] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 167.999025] CR2: 00007f6a140716c8 CR3: 0000000133216000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 167.999987] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 168.000944] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 168.001899] Call Trace: [ 168.002235] <TASK> [ 168.007167] ext4_bread+0xd/0x53 [ 168.007612] ext4_quota_write+0x20c/0x5c0 [ 168.010457] write_blk+0x100/0x220 [ 168.010944] remove_free_dqentry+0x1c6/0x440 [ 168.011525] free_dqentry.isra.0+0x565/0x830 [ 168.012133] remove_tree+0x318/0x6d0 [ 168.014744] remove_tree+0x1eb/0x6d0 [ 168.017346] remove_tree+0x1eb/0x6d0 [ 168.019969] remove_tree+0x1eb/0x6d0 [ 168.022128] qtree_release_dquot+0x291/0x340 [ 168.023297] v2_release_dquot+0xce/0x120 [ 168.023847] dquot_release+0x197/0x3e0 [ 168.024358] ext4_release_dquot+0x22a/0x2d0 [ 168.024932] dqput.part.0+0x1c9/0x900 [ 168.025430] __dquot_drop+0x120/0x190 [ 168.025942] ext4_clear_inode+0x86/0x220 [ 168.026472] ext4_evict_inode+0x9e8/0xa22 [ 168.028200] evict+0x29e/0x4f0 [ 168.028625] dispose_list+0x102/0x1f0 [ 168.029148] evict_inodes+0x2c1/0x3e0 [ 168.030188] generic_shutdown_super+0xa4/0x3b0 [ 168.030817] kill_block_super+0x95/0xd0 [ 168.031360] deactivate_locked_super+0x85/0xd0 [ 168.031977] cleanup_mnt+0x2bc/0x480 [ 168.033062] task_work_run+0xd1/0x170 [ 168.033565] do_exit+0xa4f/0x2b50 [ 168.037155] do_group_exit+0xef/0x2d0 [ 168.037666] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3a/0x50 [ 168.038237] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [ 168.038751] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae In order to reproduce this problem, the following conditions need to be met: 1. Ext4 filesystem with no journal; 2. Filesystem image with incorrect quota data; 3. Abort filesystem forced by user; 4. umount filesystem; As in ext4_quota_write: ... if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal && !handle) { ext4_msg(sb, KERN_WARNING, "Quota write (off=%llu, len=%llu)" " cancelled because transaction is not started", (unsigned long long)off, (unsigned long long)len); return -EIO; } ... We only check handle if NULL when filesystem has journal. There is need check handle if NULL even when filesystem has no journal. Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211223015506.297766-1-yebin10@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 380a0091cab482489e9b19e07f2a166ad2b76d5c upstream.

We got issue as follows when run syzkaller:
[  167.936972] EXT4-fs error (device loop0): __ext4_remount:6314: comm rep: Abort forced by user
[  167.938306] EXT4-fs (loop0): Remounting filesystem read-only
[  167.981637] Assertion failure in ext4_getblk() at fs/ext4/inode.c:847: '(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_mount_state & EXT4_FC_REPLAY) || handle != NULL || create == 0'
[  167.983601] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  167.984245] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:847!
[  167.984882] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
[  167.985624] CPU: 7 PID: 2290 Comm: rep Tainted: G    B             5.16.0-rc5-next-20211217+ #123
[  167.986823] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014
[  167.988590] RIP: 0010:ext4_getblk+0x17e/0x504
[  167.989189] Code: c6 01 74 28 49 c7 c0 a0 a3 5c 9b b9 4f 03 00 00 48 c7 c2 80 9c 5c 9b 48 c7 c6 40 b6 5c 9b 48 c7 c7 20 a4 5c 9b e8 77 e3 fd ff <0f> 0b 8b 04 244
[  167.991679] RSP: 0018:ffff8881736f7398 EFLAGS: 00010282
[  167.992385] RAX: 0000000000000094 RBX: 1ffff1102e6dee75 RCX: 0000000000000000
[  167.993337] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff9b6e29e0 RDI: ffffed102e6dee66
[  167.994292] RBP: ffff88816a076210 R08: 0000000000000094 R09: ffffed107363fa09
[  167.995252] R10: ffff88839b1fd047 R11: ffffed107363fa08 R12: ffff88816a0761e8
[  167.996205] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000021 R15: 0000000000000001
[  167.997158] FS:  00007f6a1428c740(0000) GS:ffff88839b000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  167.998238] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  167.999025] CR2: 00007f6a140716c8 CR3: 0000000133216000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[  167.999987] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[  168.000944] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[  168.001899] Call Trace:
[  168.002235]  <TASK>
[  168.007167]  ext4_bread+0xd/0x53
[  168.007612]  ext4_quota_write+0x20c/0x5c0
[  168.010457]  write_blk+0x100/0x220
[  168.010944]  remove_free_dqentry+0x1c6/0x440
[  168.011525]  free_dqentry.isra.0+0x565/0x830
[  168.012133]  remove_tree+0x318/0x6d0
[  168.014744]  remove_tree+0x1eb/0x6d0
[  168.017346]  remove_tree+0x1eb/0x6d0
[  168.019969]  remove_tree+0x1eb/0x6d0
[  168.022128]  qtree_release_dquot+0x291/0x340
[  168.023297]  v2_release_dquot+0xce/0x120
[  168.023847]  dquot_release+0x197/0x3e0
[  168.024358]  ext4_release_dquot+0x22a/0x2d0
[  168.024932]  dqput.part.0+0x1c9/0x900
[  168.025430]  __dquot_drop+0x120/0x190
[  168.025942]  ext4_clear_inode+0x86/0x220
[  168.026472]  ext4_evict_inode+0x9e8/0xa22
[  168.028200]  evict+0x29e/0x4f0
[  168.028625]  dispose_list+0x102/0x1f0
[  168.029148]  evict_inodes+0x2c1/0x3e0
[  168.030188]  generic_shutdown_super+0xa4/0x3b0
[  168.030817]  kill_block_super+0x95/0xd0
[  168.031360]  deactivate_locked_super+0x85/0xd0
[  168.031977]  cleanup_mnt+0x2bc/0x480
[  168.033062]  task_work_run+0xd1/0x170
[  168.033565]  do_exit+0xa4f/0x2b50
[  168.037155]  do_group_exit+0xef/0x2d0
[  168.037666]  __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3a/0x50
[  168.038237]  do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
[  168.038751]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

In order to reproduce this problem, the following conditions need to be met:
1. Ext4 filesystem with no journal;
2. Filesystem image with incorrect quota data;
3. Abort filesystem forced by user;
4. umount filesystem;

As in ext4_quota_write:
...
         if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal && !handle) {
                 ext4_msg(sb, KERN_WARNING, "Quota write (off=%llu, len=%llu)"
                         " cancelled because transaction is not started",
                         (unsigned long long)off, (unsigned long long)len);
                 return -EIO;
         }
...
We only check handle if NULL when filesystem has journal. There is need
check handle if NULL even when filesystem has no journal.

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211223015506.297766-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: set csum seed in tmp inode while migrating to extents 2022-01-27T08:19:51+00:00 Luís Henriques lhenriques@suse.de 2021-12-14T17:50:58+00:00 b985c8521dac3a7858cd5132f0fc7494e8c33f82 commit e81c9302a6c3c008f5c30beb73b38adb0170ff2d upstream. When migrating to extents, the temporary inode will have it's own checksum seed. This means that, when swapping the inodes data, the inode checksums will be incorrect. This can be fixed by recalculating the extents checksums again. Or simply by copying the seed into the temporary inode. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213357 Reported-by: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl> Signed-off-by: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211214175058.19511-1-lhenriques@suse.de Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit e81c9302a6c3c008f5c30beb73b38adb0170ff2d upstream.

When migrating to extents, the temporary inode will have it's own checksum
seed.  This means that, when swapping the inodes data, the inode checksums
will be incorrect.

This can be fixed by recalculating the extents checksums again.  Or simply
by copying the seed into the temporary inode.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213357
Reported-by: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl>
Signed-off-by: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211214175058.19511-1-lhenriques@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: make sure quota gets properly shutdown on error 2022-01-27T08:19:51+00:00 Jan Kara jack@suse.cz 2021-10-07T15:53:35+00:00 6e23e0bb1a11dce2844053acbb349f592639c3c5 commit 15fc69bbbbbc8c72e5f6cc4e1be0f51283c5448e upstream. When we hit an error when enabling quotas and setting inode flags, we do not properly shutdown quota subsystem despite returning error from Q_QUOTAON quotactl. This can lead to some odd situations like kernel using quota file while it is still writeable for userspace. Make sure we properly cleanup the quota subsystem in case of error. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211007155336.12493-2-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 15fc69bbbbbc8c72e5f6cc4e1be0f51283c5448e upstream.

When we hit an error when enabling quotas and setting inode flags, we do
not properly shutdown quota subsystem despite returning error from
Q_QUOTAON quotactl. This can lead to some odd situations like kernel
using quota file while it is still writeable for userspace. Make sure we
properly cleanup the quota subsystem in case of error.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211007155336.12493-2-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: make sure to reset inode lockdep class when quota enabling fails 2022-01-27T08:19:51+00:00 Jan Kara jack@suse.cz 2021-10-07T15:53:36+00:00 86be63aea2b17f81697b70db4d3566d58b8ce3f7 commit 4013d47a5307fdb5c13370b5392498b00fedd274 upstream. When we succeed in enabling some quota type but fail to enable another one with quota feature, we correctly disable all enabled quota types. However we forget to reset i_data_sem lockdep class. When the inode gets freed and reused, it will inherit this lockdep class (i_data_sem is initialized only when a slab is created) and thus eventually lockdep barfs about possible deadlocks. Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+3b6f9218b1301ddda3e2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211007155336.12493-3-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 4013d47a5307fdb5c13370b5392498b00fedd274 upstream.

When we succeed in enabling some quota type but fail to enable another
one with quota feature, we correctly disable all enabled quota types.
However we forget to reset i_data_sem lockdep class. When the inode gets
freed and reused, it will inherit this lockdep class (i_data_sem is
initialized only when a slab is created) and thus eventually lockdep
barfs about possible deadlocks.

Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+3b6f9218b1301ddda3e2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211007155336.12493-3-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>