linux-stable.git/fs/ext4, branch v4.9.99

ext4: fix bitmap position validation

2018-05-01T22:13:03+00:00

commit 22be37acce25d66ecf6403fc8f44df9c5ded2372 upstream.

Currently in ext4_valid_block_bitmap() we expect the bitmap to be
positioned anywhere between 0 and s_blocksize clusters, but that's
wrong because the bitmap can be placed anywhere in the block group. This
causes false positives when validating bitmaps on perfectly valid file
system layouts. Fix it by checking whether the bitmap is within the group
boundary.

The problem can be reproduced using the following

mkfs -t ext3 -E stride=256 /dev/vdb1
mount /dev/vdb1 /mnt/test
cd /mnt/test
wget https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/linux-4.16.3.tar.xz
tar xf linux-4.16.3.tar.xz

This will result in the warnings in the logs

EXT4-fs error (device vdb1): ext4_validate_block_bitmap:399: comm tar: bg 84: block 2774529: invalid block bitmap

[ Changed slightly for clarity and to not drop a overflow test -- TYT ]

Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Reported-by: Ilya Dryomov 
Fixes: 7dac4a1726a9 ("ext4: add validity checks for bitmap block numbers")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: add validity checks for bitmap block numbers

2018-05-01T22:13:03+00:00

commit 7dac4a1726a9c64a517d595c40e95e2d0d135f6f upstream.

An privileged attacker can cause a crash by mounting a crafted ext4
image which triggers a out-of-bounds read in the function
ext4_valid_block_bitmap() in fs/ext4/balloc.c.

This issue has been assigned CVE-2018-1093.

BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199181
BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560782
Reported-by: Wen Xu 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: prevent right-shifting extents beyond EXT_MAX_BLOCKS

2018-05-01T22:13:03+00:00

commit 349fa7d6e1935f49bf4161c4900711b2989180a9 upstream.

During the "insert range" fallocate operation, extents starting at the
range offset are shifted "right" (to a higher file offset) by the range
length.  But, as shown by syzbot, it's not validated that this doesn't
cause extents to be shifted beyond EXT_MAX_BLOCKS.  In that case
->ee_block can wrap around, corrupting the extent tree.

Fix it by returning an error if the space between the end of the last
extent and EXT4_MAX_BLOCKS is smaller than the range being inserted.

This bug can be reproduced by running the following commands when the
current directory is on an ext4 filesystem with a 4k block size:

        fallocate -l 8192 file
        fallocate --keep-size -o 0xfffffffe000 -l 4096 -n file
        fallocate --insert-range -l 8192 file

Then after unmounting the filesystem, e2fsck reports corruption.

Reported-by: syzbot+06c885be0edcdaeab40c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 331573febb6a ("ext4: Add support FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE for fallocate")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.2+
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: don't allow r/w mounts if metadata blocks overlap the superblock

2018-04-24T07:34:15+00:00

commit 18db4b4e6fc31eda838dd1c1296d67dbcb3dc957 upstream.

If some metadata block, such as an allocation bitmap, overlaps the
superblock, it's very likely that if the file system is mounted
read/write, the results will not be pretty.  So disallow r/w mounts
for file systems corrupted in this particular way.

Backport notes:
3.18.y is missing bc98a42c1f7d ("VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb)")
and e462ec50cb5f ("VFS: Differentiate mount flags (MS_*) from internal superblock flags")
so we simply use the sb MS_RDONLY check from pre bc98a42c1f7d in place of the sb_rdonly
function used in the upstream variant of the patch.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Harsh Shandilya 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: fail ext4_iget for root directory if unallocated

2018-04-24T07:34:12+00:00

commit 8e4b5eae5decd9dfe5a4ee369c22028f90ab4c44 upstream.

If the root directory has an i_links_count of zero, then when the file
system is mounted, then when ext4_fill_super() notices the problem and
tries to call iput() the root directory in the error return path,
ext4_evict_inode() will try to free the inode on disk, before all of
the file system structures are set up, and this will result in an OOPS
caused by a NULL pointer dereference.

This issue has been assigned CVE-2018-1092.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199179
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560777

Reported-by: Wen Xu 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: protect i_disksize update by i_data_sem in direct write path

2018-04-24T07:34:12+00:00

commit 73fdad00b208b139cf43f3163fbc0f67e4c6047c upstream.

i_disksize update should be protected by i_data_sem, by either taking
the lock explicitly or by using ext4_update_i_disksize() helper. But the
i_disksize updates in ext4_direct_IO_write() are not protected at all,
which may be racing with i_disksize updates in writeback path in
delalloc buffer write path.

This is found by code inspection, and I didn't hit any i_disksize
corruption due to this bug. Thanks to Jan Kara for catching this bug and
suggesting the fix!

Reported-by: Jan Kara 
Suggested-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: don't update checksum of new initialized bitmaps

2018-04-24T07:34:12+00:00

commit 044e6e3d74a3d7103a0c8a9305dfd94d64000660 upstream.

When reading the inode or block allocation bitmap, if the bitmap needs
to be initialized, do not update the checksum in the block group
descriptor.  That's because we're not set up to journal those changes.
Instead, just set the verified bit on the bitmap block, so that it's
not necessary to validate the checksum.

When a block or inode allocation actually happens, at that point the
checksum will be calculated, and update of the bg descriptor block
will be properly journalled.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: fix off-by-one on max nr_pages in ext4_find_unwritten_pgoff()

2018-04-13T17:48:06+00:00

[ Upstream commit 624327f8794704c5066b11a52f9da6a09dce7f9a ]

ext4_find_unwritten_pgoff() is used to search for offset of hole or
data in page range [index, end] (both inclusive), and the max number
of pages to search should be at least one, if end == index.
Otherwise the only page is missed and no hole or data is found,
which is not correct.

When block size is smaller than page size, this can be demonstrated
by preallocating a file with size smaller than page size and writing
data to the last block. E.g. run this xfs_io command on a 1k block
size ext4 on x86_64 host.

  # xfs_io -fc "falloc 0 3k" -c "pwrite 2k 1k" \
  	    -c "seek -d 0" /mnt/ext4/testfile
  wrote 1024/1024 bytes at offset 2048
  1 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0000 sec (42.459 MiB/sec and 43478.2609 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  DATA    EOF

Data at offset 2k was missed, and lseek(2) returned ENXIO.

This is unconvered by generic/285 subtest 07 and 08 on ppc64 host,
where pagesize is 64k. Because a recent change to generic/285
reduced the preallocated file size to smaller than 64k.

Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: handle the rest of ext4_mb_load_buddy() ENOMEM errors

2018-04-13T17:48:02+00:00

[ Upstream commit 9651e6b2e20648d04d5e1fe6479a3056047e8781 ]

I've got another report about breaking ext4 by ENOMEM error returned from
ext4_mb_load_buddy() caused by memory shortage in memory cgroup.
This time inside ext4_discard_preallocations().

This patch replaces ext4_error() with ext4_warning() where errors returned
from ext4_mb_load_buddy() are not fatal and handled by caller:
* ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations() - called before generating ENOSPC,
  we'll try to discard other group or return ENOSPC into user-space.
* ext4_trim_all_free() - just stop trimming and return ENOMEM from ioctl.

Some callers cannot handle errors, thus __GFP_NOFAIL is used for them:
* ext4_discard_preallocations()
* ext4_mb_discard_lg_preallocations()

Fixes: adb7ef600cc9 ("ext4: use __GFP_NOFAIL in ext4_free_blocks()")
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: inplace xattr block update fails to deduplicate blocks

2018-03-18T10:18:54+00:00

commit ec00022030da5761518476096626338bd67df57a upstream.

When an xattr block has a single reference, block is updated inplace
and it is reinserted to the cache. Later, a cache lookup is performed
to see whether an existing block has the same contents. This cache
lookup will most of the time return the just inserted entry so
deduplication is not achieved.

Running the following test script will produce two xattr blocks which
can be observed in "File ACL: " line of debugfs output:

  mke2fs -b 1024 -I 128 -F -O extent /dev/sdb 1G
  mount /dev/sdb /mnt/sdb

  touch /mnt/sdb/{x,y}

  setfattr -n user.1 -v aaa /mnt/sdb/x
  setfattr -n user.2 -v bbb /mnt/sdb/x

  setfattr -n user.1 -v aaa /mnt/sdb/y
  setfattr -n user.2 -v bbb /mnt/sdb/y

  debugfs -R 'stat x' /dev/sdb | cat
  debugfs -R 'stat y' /dev/sdb | cat

This patch defers the reinsertion to the cache so that we can locate
other blocks with the same contents.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger 
Signed-off-by: Tommi Rantala 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman