linux-stable.git/fs/ext4, branch v4.9.232 Linux kernel stable tree ext4: fix partial cluster initialization when splitting extent 2020-06-30T19:38:31+00:00 Jeffle Xu jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com 2020-05-22T04:18:44+00:00 e09cb9c8a3c6102b61ee4ced02caf2b400416b9a [ Upstream commit cfb3c85a600c6aa25a2581b3c1c4db3460f14e46 ] Fix the bug when calculating the physical block number of the first block in the split extent. This bug will cause xfstests shared/298 failure on ext4 with bigalloc enabled occasionally. Ext4 error messages indicate that previously freed blocks are being freed again, and the following fsck will fail due to the inconsistency of block bitmap and bg descriptor. The following is an example case: 1. First, Initialize a ext4 filesystem with cluster size '16K', block size '4K', in which case, one cluster contains four blocks. 2. Create one file (e.g., xxx.img) on this ext4 filesystem. Now the extent tree of this file is like: ... 36864:[0]4:220160 36868:[0]14332:145408 51200:[0]2:231424 ... 3. Then execute PUNCH_HOLE fallocate on this file. The hole range is like: .. ext4_ext_remove_space: dev 254,16 ino 12 since 49506 end 49506 depth 1 ext4_ext_remove_space: dev 254,16 ino 12 since 49544 end 49546 depth 1 ext4_ext_remove_space: dev 254,16 ino 12 since 49605 end 49607 depth 1 ... 4. Then the extent tree of this file after punching is like ... 49507:[0]37:158047 49547:[0]58:158087 ... 5. Detailed procedure of punching hole [49544, 49546] 5.1. The block address space: ``` lblk ~49505 49506 49507~49543 49544~49546 49547~ ---------+------+-------------+----------------+-------- extent | hole | extent | hole | extent ---------+------+-------------+----------------+-------- pblk ~158045 158046 158047~158083 158084~158086 158087~ ``` 5.2. The detailed layout of cluster 39521: ``` cluster 39521 <-------------------------------> hole extent <----------------------><-------- lblk 49544 49545 49546 49547 +-------+-------+-------+-------+ | | | | | +-------+-------+-------+-------+ pblk 158084 1580845 158086 158087 ``` 5.3. The ftrace output when punching hole [49544, 49546]: - ext4_ext_remove_space (start 49544, end 49546) - ext4_ext_rm_leaf (start 49544, end 49546, last_extent [49507(158047), 40], partial [pclu 39522 lblk 0 state 2]) - ext4_remove_blocks (extent [49507(158047), 40], from 49544 to 49546, partial [pclu 39522 lblk 0 state 2] - ext4_free_blocks: (block 158084 count 4) - ext4_mballoc_free (extent 1/6753/1) 5.4. Ext4 error message in dmesg: EXT4-fs error (device vdb): mb_free_blocks:1457: group 1, block 158084:freeing already freed block (bit 6753); block bitmap corrupt. EXT4-fs error (device vdb): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:747: group 1, block bitmap and bg descriptor inconsistent: 19550 vs 19551 free clusters In this case, the whole cluster 39521 is freed mistakenly when freeing pblock 158084~158086 (i.e., the first three blocks of this cluster), although pblock 158087 (the last remaining block of this cluster) has not been freed yet. The root cause of this isuue is that, the pclu of the partial cluster is calculated mistakenly in ext4_ext_remove_space(). The correct partial_cluster.pclu (i.e., the cluster number of the first block in the next extent, that is, lblock 49597 (pblock 158086)) should be 39521 rather than 39522. Fixes: f4226d9ea400 ("ext4: fix partial cluster initialization") Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org # v3.19+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1590121124-37096-1-git-send-email-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit cfb3c85a600c6aa25a2581b3c1c4db3460f14e46 ]

Fix the bug when calculating the physical block number of the first
block in the split extent.

This bug will cause xfstests shared/298 failure on ext4 with bigalloc
enabled occasionally. Ext4 error messages indicate that previously freed
blocks are being freed again, and the following fsck will fail due to
the inconsistency of block bitmap and bg descriptor.

The following is an example case:

1. First, Initialize a ext4 filesystem with cluster size '16K', block size
'4K', in which case, one cluster contains four blocks.

2. Create one file (e.g., xxx.img) on this ext4 filesystem. Now the extent
tree of this file is like:

...
36864:[0]4:220160
36868:[0]14332:145408
51200:[0]2:231424
...

3. Then execute PUNCH_HOLE fallocate on this file. The hole range is
like:

..
ext4_ext_remove_space: dev 254,16 ino 12 since 49506 end 49506 depth 1
ext4_ext_remove_space: dev 254,16 ino 12 since 49544 end 49546 depth 1
ext4_ext_remove_space: dev 254,16 ino 12 since 49605 end 49607 depth 1
...

4. Then the extent tree of this file after punching is like

...
49507:[0]37:158047
49547:[0]58:158087
...

5. Detailed procedure of punching hole [49544, 49546]

5.1. The block address space:
```
lblk        ~49505  49506   49507~49543     49544~49546    49547~
	  ---------+------+-------------+----------------+--------
	    extent | hole |   extent	|	hole	 | extent
	  ---------+------+-------------+----------------+--------
pblk       ~158045  158046  158047~158083  158084~158086   158087~
```

5.2. The detailed layout of cluster 39521:
```
		cluster 39521
	<------------------------------->

		hole		  extent
	<----------------------><--------

lblk      49544   49545   49546   49547
	+-------+-------+-------+-------+
	|	|	|	|	|
	+-------+-------+-------+-------+
pblk     158084  1580845  158086  158087
```

5.3. The ftrace output when punching hole [49544, 49546]:
- ext4_ext_remove_space (start 49544, end 49546)
  - ext4_ext_rm_leaf (start 49544, end 49546, last_extent [49507(158047), 40], partial [pclu 39522 lblk 0 state 2])
    - ext4_remove_blocks (extent [49507(158047), 40], from 49544 to 49546, partial [pclu 39522 lblk 0 state 2]
      - ext4_free_blocks: (block 158084 count 4)
        - ext4_mballoc_free (extent 1/6753/1)

5.4. Ext4 error message in dmesg:
EXT4-fs error (device vdb): mb_free_blocks:1457: group 1, block 158084:freeing already freed block (bit 6753); block bitmap corrupt.
EXT4-fs error (device vdb): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:747: group 1, block bitmap and bg descriptor inconsistent: 19550 vs 19551 free clusters

In this case, the whole cluster 39521 is freed mistakenly when freeing
pblock 158084~158086 (i.e., the first three blocks of this cluster),
although pblock 158087 (the last remaining block of this cluster) has
not been freed yet.

The root cause of this isuue is that, the pclu of the partial cluster is
calculated mistakenly in ext4_ext_remove_space(). The correct
partial_cluster.pclu (i.e., the cluster number of the first block in the
next extent, that is, lblock 49597 (pblock 158086)) should be 39521 rather
than 39522.

Fixes: f4226d9ea400 ("ext4: fix partial cluster initialization")
Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org # v3.19+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1590121124-37096-1-git-send-email-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ext4: fix race between ext4_sync_parent() and rename() 2020-06-20T08:24:19+00:00 Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com 2020-05-06T18:31:40+00:00 86498641bfff80f65ce848db03bd3cd462db844c commit 08adf452e628b0e2ce9a01048cfbec52353703d7 upstream. 'igrab(d_inode(dentry->d_parent))' without holding dentry->d_lock is broken because without d_lock, d_parent can be concurrently changed due to a rename(). Then if the old directory is immediately deleted, old d_parent->inode can be NULL. That causes a NULL dereference in igrab(). To fix this, use dget_parent() to safely grab a reference to the parent dentry, which pins the inode. This also eliminates the need to use d_find_any_alias() other than for the initial inode, as we no longer throw away the dentry at each step. This is an extremely hard race to hit, but it is possible. Adding a udelay() in between the reads of ->d_parent and its ->d_inode makes it reproducible on a no-journal filesystem using the following program: #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> int main() { if (fork()) { for (;;) { mkdir("dir1", 0700); int fd = open("dir1/file", O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_SYNC); write(fd, "X", 1); close(fd); } } else { mkdir("dir2", 0700); for (;;) { rename("dir1/file", "dir2/file"); rmdir("dir1"); } } } Fixes: d59729f4e794 ("ext4: fix races in ext4_sync_parent()") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506183140.541194-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 08adf452e628b0e2ce9a01048cfbec52353703d7 upstream.

'igrab(d_inode(dentry->d_parent))' without holding dentry->d_lock is
broken because without d_lock, d_parent can be concurrently changed due
to a rename().  Then if the old directory is immediately deleted, old
d_parent->inode can be NULL.  That causes a NULL dereference in igrab().

To fix this, use dget_parent() to safely grab a reference to the parent
dentry, which pins the inode.  This also eliminates the need to use
d_find_any_alias() other than for the initial inode, as we no longer
throw away the dentry at each step.

This is an extremely hard race to hit, but it is possible.  Adding a
udelay() in between the reads of ->d_parent and its ->d_inode makes it
reproducible on a no-journal filesystem using the following program:

    #include <fcntl.h>
    #include <unistd.h>

    int main()
    {
        if (fork()) {
            for (;;) {
                mkdir("dir1", 0700);
                int fd = open("dir1/file", O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_SYNC);
                write(fd, "X", 1);
                close(fd);
            }
        } else {
            mkdir("dir2", 0700);
            for (;;) {
                rename("dir1/file", "dir2/file");
                rmdir("dir1");
            }
        }
    }

Fixes: d59729f4e794 ("ext4: fix races in ext4_sync_parent()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506183140.541194-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: fix EXT_MAX_EXTENT/INDEX to check for zeroed eh_max 2020-06-20T08:24:19+00:00 Harshad Shirwadkar harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com 2020-04-21T02:39:59+00:00 b61a98f7173bff9ed2cf982619222d3608fac2d1 commit c36a71b4e35ab35340facdd6964a00956b9fef0a upstream. If eh->eh_max is 0, EXT_MAX_EXTENT/INDEX would evaluate to unsigned (-1) resulting in illegal memory accesses. Although there is no consistent repro, we see that generic/019 sometimes crashes because of this bug. Ran gce-xfstests smoke and verified that there were no regressions. Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421023959.20879-2-harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit c36a71b4e35ab35340facdd6964a00956b9fef0a upstream.

If eh->eh_max is 0, EXT_MAX_EXTENT/INDEX would evaluate to unsigned
(-1) resulting in illegal memory accesses. Although there is no
consistent repro, we see that generic/019 sometimes crashes because of
this bug.

Ran gce-xfstests smoke and verified that there were no regressions.

Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421023959.20879-2-harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: add cond_resched() to ext4_protect_reserved_inode 2020-05-20T06:15:29+00:00 Shijie Luo luoshijie1@huawei.com 2020-02-11T01:17:52+00:00 e94c149b8aed0bd1035ad24354af02eee9481da9 commit af133ade9a40794a37104ecbcc2827c0ea373a3c upstream. When journal size is set too big by "mkfs.ext4 -J size=", or when we mount a crafted image to make journal inode->i_size too big, the loop, "while (i < num)", holds cpu too long. This could cause soft lockup. [ 529.357541] Call trace: [ 529.357551] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x198 [ 529.357555] show_stack+0x24/0x30 [ 529.357562] dump_stack+0xa4/0xcc [ 529.357568] watchdog_timer_fn+0x300/0x3e8 [ 529.357574] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x114/0x358 [ 529.357576] hrtimer_interrupt+0x104/0x2d8 [ 529.357580] arch_timer_handler_virt+0x38/0x58 [ 529.357584] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x90/0x248 [ 529.357588] generic_handle_irq+0x34/0x50 [ 529.357590] __handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0 [ 529.357593] gic_handle_irq+0x6c/0x150 [ 529.357595] el1_irq+0xb8/0x140 [ 529.357599] __ll_sc_atomic_add_return_acquire+0x14/0x20 [ 529.357668] ext4_map_blocks+0x64/0x5c0 [ext4] [ 529.357693] ext4_setup_system_zone+0x330/0x458 [ext4] [ 529.357717] ext4_fill_super+0x2170/0x2ba8 [ext4] [ 529.357722] mount_bdev+0x1a8/0x1e8 [ 529.357746] ext4_mount+0x44/0x58 [ext4] [ 529.357748] mount_fs+0x50/0x170 [ 529.357752] vfs_kern_mount.part.9+0x54/0x188 [ 529.357755] do_mount+0x5ac/0xd78 [ 529.357758] ksys_mount+0x9c/0x118 [ 529.357760] __arm64_sys_mount+0x28/0x38 [ 529.357764] el0_svc_common+0x78/0x130 [ 529.357766] el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78 [ 529.357769] el0_svc+0x8/0xc [ 541.356516] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [mount:18674] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200211011752.29242-1-luoshijie1@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
commit af133ade9a40794a37104ecbcc2827c0ea373a3c upstream.

When journal size is set too big by "mkfs.ext4 -J size=", or when
we mount a crafted image to make journal inode->i_size too big,
the loop, "while (i < num)", holds cpu too long. This could cause
soft lockup.

[  529.357541] Call trace:
[  529.357551]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x198
[  529.357555]  show_stack+0x24/0x30
[  529.357562]  dump_stack+0xa4/0xcc
[  529.357568]  watchdog_timer_fn+0x300/0x3e8
[  529.357574]  __hrtimer_run_queues+0x114/0x358
[  529.357576]  hrtimer_interrupt+0x104/0x2d8
[  529.357580]  arch_timer_handler_virt+0x38/0x58
[  529.357584]  handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x90/0x248
[  529.357588]  generic_handle_irq+0x34/0x50
[  529.357590]  __handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0
[  529.357593]  gic_handle_irq+0x6c/0x150
[  529.357595]  el1_irq+0xb8/0x140
[  529.357599]  __ll_sc_atomic_add_return_acquire+0x14/0x20
[  529.357668]  ext4_map_blocks+0x64/0x5c0 [ext4]
[  529.357693]  ext4_setup_system_zone+0x330/0x458 [ext4]
[  529.357717]  ext4_fill_super+0x2170/0x2ba8 [ext4]
[  529.357722]  mount_bdev+0x1a8/0x1e8
[  529.357746]  ext4_mount+0x44/0x58 [ext4]
[  529.357748]  mount_fs+0x50/0x170
[  529.357752]  vfs_kern_mount.part.9+0x54/0x188
[  529.357755]  do_mount+0x5ac/0xd78
[  529.357758]  ksys_mount+0x9c/0x118
[  529.357760]  __arm64_sys_mount+0x28/0x38
[  529.357764]  el0_svc_common+0x78/0x130
[  529.357766]  el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78
[  529.357769]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc
[  541.356516] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [mount:18674]

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200211011752.29242-1-luoshijie1@huawei.com
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ext4: fix special inode number checks in __ext4_iget() 2020-05-05T17:14:29+00:00 Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu 2019-01-01T03:34:31+00:00 fb57d4e291ff7c618587df2fb7a3d38e18ac1c4d commit 191ce17876c9367819c4b0a25b503c0f6d9054d8 upstream. The check for special (reserved) inode number checks in __ext4_iget() was broken by commit 8a363970d1dc: ("ext4: avoid declaring fs inconsistent due to invalid file handles"). This was caused by a botched reversal of the sense of the flag now known as EXT4_IGET_SPECIAL (when it was previously named EXT4_IGET_NORMAL). Fix the logic appropriately. Fixes: 8a363970d1dc ("ext4: avoid declaring fs inconsistent...") Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 191ce17876c9367819c4b0a25b503c0f6d9054d8 upstream.

The check for special (reserved) inode number checks in __ext4_iget()
was broken by commit 8a363970d1dc: ("ext4: avoid declaring fs
inconsistent due to invalid file handles").  This was caused by a
botched reversal of the sense of the flag now known as
EXT4_IGET_SPECIAL (when it was previously named EXT4_IGET_NORMAL).
Fix the logic appropriately.

Fixes: 8a363970d1dc ("ext4: avoid declaring fs inconsistent...")
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: check for non-zero journal inum in ext4_calculate_overhead 2020-05-02T15:23:19+00:00 Ritesh Harjani riteshh@linux.ibm.com 2020-03-16T09:30:38+00:00 b1880905a1cf0ab136122e9dbae532cde5e4d58e commit f1eec3b0d0a849996ebee733b053efa71803dad5 upstream. While calculating overhead for internal journal, also check that j_inum shouldn't be 0. Otherwise we get below error with xfstests generic/050 with external journal (XXX_LOGDEV config) enabled. It could be simply reproduced with loop device with an external journal and marking blockdev as RO before mounting. [ 3337.146838] EXT4-fs error (device pmem1p2): ext4_get_journal_inode:4634: comm mount: inode #0: comm mount: iget: illegal inode # ------------[ cut here ]------------ generic_make_request: Trying to write to read-only block-device pmem1p2 (partno 2) WARNING: CPU: 107 PID: 115347 at block/blk-core.c:788 generic_make_request_checks+0x6b4/0x7d0 CPU: 107 PID: 115347 Comm: mount Tainted: G L --------- -t - 4.18.0-167.el8.ppc64le #1 NIP: c0000000006f6d44 LR: c0000000006f6d40 CTR: 0000000030041dd4 <...> NIP [c0000000006f6d44] generic_make_request_checks+0x6b4/0x7d0 LR [c0000000006f6d40] generic_make_request_checks+0x6b0/0x7d0 <...> Call Trace: generic_make_request_checks+0x6b0/0x7d0 (unreliable) generic_make_request+0x3c/0x420 submit_bio+0xd8/0x200 submit_bh_wbc+0x1e8/0x250 __sync_dirty_buffer+0xd0/0x210 ext4_commit_super+0x310/0x420 [ext4] __ext4_error+0xa4/0x1e0 [ext4] __ext4_iget+0x388/0xe10 [ext4] ext4_get_journal_inode+0x40/0x150 [ext4] ext4_calculate_overhead+0x5a8/0x610 [ext4] ext4_fill_super+0x3188/0x3260 [ext4] mount_bdev+0x778/0x8f0 ext4_mount+0x28/0x50 [ext4] mount_fs+0x74/0x230 vfs_kern_mount.part.6+0x6c/0x250 do_mount+0x2fc/0x1280 sys_mount+0x158/0x180 system_call+0x5c/0x70 EXT4-fs (pmem1p2): no journal found EXT4-fs (pmem1p2): can't get journal size EXT4-fs (pmem1p2): mounted filesystem without journal. Opts: dax,norecovery Fixes: 3c816ded78bb ("ext4: use journal inode to determine journal overhead") Reported-by: Harish Sriram <harish@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200316093038.25485-1-riteshh@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit f1eec3b0d0a849996ebee733b053efa71803dad5 upstream.

While calculating overhead for internal journal, also check
that j_inum shouldn't be 0. Otherwise we get below error with
xfstests generic/050 with external journal (XXX_LOGDEV config) enabled.

It could be simply reproduced with loop device with an external journal
and marking blockdev as RO before mounting.

[ 3337.146838] EXT4-fs error (device pmem1p2): ext4_get_journal_inode:4634: comm mount: inode #0: comm mount: iget: illegal inode #
------------[ cut here ]------------
generic_make_request: Trying to write to read-only block-device pmem1p2 (partno 2)
WARNING: CPU: 107 PID: 115347 at block/blk-core.c:788 generic_make_request_checks+0x6b4/0x7d0
CPU: 107 PID: 115347 Comm: mount Tainted: G             L   --------- -t - 4.18.0-167.el8.ppc64le #1
NIP:  c0000000006f6d44 LR: c0000000006f6d40 CTR: 0000000030041dd4
<...>
NIP [c0000000006f6d44] generic_make_request_checks+0x6b4/0x7d0
LR [c0000000006f6d40] generic_make_request_checks+0x6b0/0x7d0
<...>
Call Trace:
generic_make_request_checks+0x6b0/0x7d0 (unreliable)
generic_make_request+0x3c/0x420
submit_bio+0xd8/0x200
submit_bh_wbc+0x1e8/0x250
__sync_dirty_buffer+0xd0/0x210
ext4_commit_super+0x310/0x420 [ext4]
__ext4_error+0xa4/0x1e0 [ext4]
__ext4_iget+0x388/0xe10 [ext4]
ext4_get_journal_inode+0x40/0x150 [ext4]
ext4_calculate_overhead+0x5a8/0x610 [ext4]
ext4_fill_super+0x3188/0x3260 [ext4]
mount_bdev+0x778/0x8f0
ext4_mount+0x28/0x50 [ext4]
mount_fs+0x74/0x230
vfs_kern_mount.part.6+0x6c/0x250
do_mount+0x2fc/0x1280
sys_mount+0x158/0x180
system_call+0x5c/0x70
EXT4-fs (pmem1p2): no journal found
EXT4-fs (pmem1p2): can't get journal size
EXT4-fs (pmem1p2): mounted filesystem without journal. Opts: dax,norecovery

Fixes: 3c816ded78bb ("ext4: use journal inode to determine journal overhead")
Reported-by: Harish Sriram <harish@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200316093038.25485-1-riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: unsigned int compared against zero 2020-05-02T15:23:19+00:00 Colin Ian King colin.king@canonical.com 2019-05-11T02:06:38+00:00 5a905c2d2cf2b11676d1c5e9a0a035c1369ae9df commit fbbbbd2f28aec991f3fbc248df211550fbdfd58c upstream. There are two cases where u32 variables n and err are being checked for less than zero error values, the checks is always false because the variables are not signed. Fix this by making the variables ints. Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared against 0") Fixes: 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Ashwin H <ashwinh@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit fbbbbd2f28aec991f3fbc248df211550fbdfd58c upstream.

There are two cases where u32 variables n and err are being checked
for less than zero error values, the checks is always false because
the variables are not signed. Fix this by making the variables ints.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared against 0")
Fixes: 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ashwin H <ashwinh@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: fix block validity checks for journal inodes using indirect blocks 2020-05-02T15:23:19+00:00 Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu 2019-05-15T04:51:19+00:00 12140f9b8f5aa316b2888b2c876d3b59a7dac524 commit 170417c8c7bb2cbbdd949bf5c443c0c8f24a203b upstream. Commit 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity") failed to add an exception for the journal inode in ext4_check_blockref(), which is the function used by ext4_get_branch() for indirect blocks. This caused attempts to read from the ext3-style journals to fail with: [ 848.968550] EXT4-fs error (device sdb7): ext4_get_branch:171: inode #8: block 30343695: comm jbd2/sdb7-8: invalid block Fix this by adding the missing exception check. Fixes: 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity") Reported-by: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Ashwin H <ashwinh@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 170417c8c7bb2cbbdd949bf5c443c0c8f24a203b upstream.

Commit 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using
block_validity") failed to add an exception for the journal inode in
ext4_check_blockref(), which is the function used by ext4_get_branch()
for indirect blocks.  This caused attempts to read from the ext3-style
journals to fail with:

[  848.968550] EXT4-fs error (device sdb7): ext4_get_branch:171: inode #8: block 30343695: comm jbd2/sdb7-8: invalid block

Fix this by adding the missing exception check.

Fixes: 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity")
Reported-by: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ashwin H <ashwinh@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: don't perform block validity checks on the journal inode 2020-05-02T15:23:19+00:00 Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu 2019-05-22T14:27:01+00:00 2130aae807893cff163404bf6f6f6a4906dd14a1 commit 0a944e8a6c66ca04c7afbaa17e22bf208a8b37f0 upstream. Since the journal inode is already checked when we added it to the block validity's system zone, if we check it again, we'll just trigger a failure. This was causing failures like this: [ 53.897001] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_find_extent:909: inode #8: comm jbd2/sda-8: pblk 121667583 bad header/extent: invalid extent entries - magic f30a, entries 8, max 340(340), depth 0(0) [ 53.931430] jbd2_journal_bmap: journal block not found at offset 49 on sda-8 [ 53.938480] Aborting journal on device sda-8. ... but only if the system was under enough memory pressure that logical->physical mapping for the journal inode gets pushed out of the extent cache. (This is why it wasn't noticed earlier.) Fixes: 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity") Reported-by: Dan Rue <dan.rue@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ashwin H <ashwinh@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 0a944e8a6c66ca04c7afbaa17e22bf208a8b37f0 upstream.

Since the journal inode is already checked when we added it to the
block validity's system zone, if we check it again, we'll just trigger
a failure.

This was causing failures like this:

[   53.897001] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_find_extent:909: inode
#8: comm jbd2/sda-8: pblk 121667583 bad header/extent: invalid extent entries - magic f30a, entries 8, max 340(340), depth 0(0)
[   53.931430] jbd2_journal_bmap: journal block not found at offset 49 on sda-8
[   53.938480] Aborting journal on device sda-8.

... but only if the system was under enough memory pressure that
logical->physical mapping for the journal inode gets pushed out of the
extent cache.  (This is why it wasn't noticed earlier.)

Fixes: 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity")
Reported-by: Dan Rue <dan.rue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ashwin H <ashwinh@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity 2020-05-02T15:23:18+00:00 Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu 2019-04-10T03:37:08+00:00 a9855260fe8d8680bf8c4f0d8303b696c861e99b commit 345c0dbf3a30872d9b204db96b5857cd00808cae upstream. Add the blocks which belong to the journal inode to block_validity's system zone so attempts to deallocate or overwrite the journal due a corrupted file system where the journal blocks are also claimed by another inode. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202879 Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ashwin H <ashwinh@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 345c0dbf3a30872d9b204db96b5857cd00808cae upstream.

Add the blocks which belong to the journal inode to block_validity's
system zone so attempts to deallocate or overwrite the journal due a
corrupted file system where the journal blocks are also claimed by
another inode.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202879
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ashwin H <ashwinh@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>