Commit 8844618d8aa7: "ext4: only look at the bg_flags field if it is
valid" will complain if block group zero does not have the
EXT4_BG_INODE_ZEROED flag set.  Unfortunately, this is not correct,
since a freshly created file system has this flag cleared.  It gets
almost immediately after the file system is mounted read-write --- but
the following somewhat unlikely sequence will end up triggering a
false positive report of a corrupted file system:

   mkfs.ext4 /dev/vdc
   mount -o ro /dev/vdc /vdc
   mount -o remount,rw /dev/vdc

Instead, when initializing the inode table for block group zero, test
to make sure that itable_unused count is not too large, since that is
the case that will result in some or all of the reserved inodes
getting cleared.

This fixes the failures reported by Eric Whiteney when running
generic/230 and generic/231 in the the nojournal test case.

Fixes: 8844618d8aa7 ("ext4: only look at the bg_flags field if it is valid")
Reported-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

With commit 044e6e3d74a3: "ext4: don't update checksum of new
initialized bitmaps" the buffer valid bit will get set without
actually setting up the checksum for the allocation bitmap, since the
checksum will get calculated once we actually allocate an inode or
block.

If we are doing this, then we need to (re-)check the verified bit
after we take the block group lock.  Otherwise, we could race with
another process reading and verifying the bitmap, which would then
complain about the checksum being invalid.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1780137

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org

The inline data code was updating the raw inode directly; this is
problematic since if metadata checksums are enabled,
ext4_mark_inode_dirty() must be called to update the inode's checksum.
In addition, the jbd2 layer requires that get_write_access() be called
before the metadata buffer is modified.  Fix both of these problems.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200443

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Previously, when an MMP-protected file system is remounted read-only,
the kmmpd thread would exit the next time it woke up (a few seconds
later), without resetting the MMP sequence number back to
EXT4_MMP_SEQ_CLEAN.

Fix this by explicitly killing the MMP thread when the file system is
remounted read-only.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>

Ext4_check_descriptors() was getting called before s_gdb_count was
initialized.  So for file systems w/o the meta_bg feature, allocation
bitmaps could overlap the block group descriptors and ext4 wouldn't
notice.

For file systems with the meta_bg feature enabled, there was a
fencepost error which would cause the ext4_check_descriptors() to
incorrectly believe that the block allocation bitmap overlaps with the
block group descriptor blocks, and it would reject the mount.

Fix both of these problems.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Pull ext4 bugfixes from Ted Ts'o:
 "Bug fixes for ext4; most of which relate to vulnerabilities where a
  maliciously crafted file system image can result in a kernel OOPS or
  hang.

  At least one fix addresses an inline data bug could be triggered by
  userspace without the need of a crafted file system (although it does
  require that the inline data feature be enabled)"

* tag 'ext4_for_linus_stable' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4:
  ext4: check superblock mapped prior to committing
  ext4: add more mount time checks of the superblock
  ext4: add more inode number paranoia checks
  ext4: avoid running out of journal credits when appending to an inline file
  jbd2: don't mark block as modified if the handle is out of credits
  ext4: never move the system.data xattr out of the inode body
  ext4: clear i_data in ext4_inode_info when removing inline data
  ext4: include the illegal physical block in the bad map ext4_error msg
  ext4: verify the depth of extent tree in ext4_find_extent()
  ext4: only look at the bg_flags field if it is valid
  ext4: make sure bitmaps and the inode table don't overlap with bg descriptors
  ext4: always check block group bounds in ext4_init_block_bitmap()
  ext4: always verify the magic number in xattr blocks
  ext4: add corruption check in ext4_xattr_set_entry()
  ext4: add warn_on_error mount option

This patch attempts to close a hole leading to a BUG seen with hot
removals during writes [1].

A block device (NVME namespace in this test case) is formatted to EXT4
without partitions. It's mounted and write I/O is run to a file, then
the device is hot removed from the slot. The superblock attempts to be
written to the drive which is no longer present.

The typical chain of events leading to the BUG:
ext4_commit_super()
  __sync_dirty_buffer()
    submit_bh()
      submit_bh_wbc()
        BUG_ON(!buffer_mapped(bh));

This fix checks for the superblock's buffer head being mapped prior to
syncing.

[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg56527.html

Signed-off-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org

The kernel's ext4 mount-time checks were more permissive than
e2fsprogs's libext2fs checks when opening a file system.  The
superblock is considered too insane for debugfs or e2fsck to operate
on it, the kernel has no business trying to mount it.

This will make file system fuzzing tools work harder, but the failure
cases that they find will be more useful and be easier to evaluate.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org

If there is a directory entry pointing to a system inode (such as a
journal inode), complain and declare the file system to be corrupted.

Also, if the superblock's first inode number field is too small,
refuse to mount the file system.

This addresses CVE-2018-10882.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200069

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org

Use a separate journal transaction if it turns out that we need to
convert an inline file to use an data block.  Otherwise we could end
up failing due to not having journal credits.

This addresses CVE-2018-10883.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200071

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org