linux-stable.git/fs/ext4, branch linux-6.6.y Linux kernel stable tree ext4: validate p_idx bounds in ext4_ext_correct_indexes 2026-05-17T15:13:35+00:00 Tejas Bharambe tejas.bharambe@outlook.com 2026-05-08T06:58:45+00:00 4d08401aa13f1531216f1a7ae281ca4806e90a5c [ Upstream commit 2acb5c12ebd860f30e4faf67e6cc8c44ddfe5fe8 ] ext4_ext_correct_indexes() walks up the extent tree correcting index entries when the first extent in a leaf is modified. Before accessing path[k].p_idx->ei_block, there is no validation that p_idx falls within the valid range of index entries for that level. If the on-disk extent header contains a corrupted or crafted eh_entries value, p_idx can point past the end of the allocated buffer, causing a slab-out-of-bounds read. Fix this by validating path[k].p_idx against EXT_LAST_INDEX() at both access sites: before the while loop and inside it. Return -EFSCORRUPTED if the index pointer is out of range, consistent with how other bounds violations are handled in the ext4 extent tree code. Reported-by: syzbot+04c4e65cab786a2e5b7e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=04c4e65cab786a2e5b7e Signed-off-by: Tejas Bharambe <tejas.bharambe@outlook.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/JH0PR06MB66326016F9B6AD24097D232B897CA@JH0PR06MB6632.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org [ Minor conflict resolved. ] Signed-off-by: Jianqiang kang <jianqkang@sina.cn> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 2acb5c12ebd860f30e4faf67e6cc8c44ddfe5fe8 ]

ext4_ext_correct_indexes() walks up the extent tree correcting
index entries when the first extent in a leaf is modified. Before
accessing path[k].p_idx->ei_block, there is no validation that
p_idx falls within the valid range of index entries for that
level.

If the on-disk extent header contains a corrupted or crafted
eh_entries value, p_idx can point past the end of the allocated
buffer, causing a slab-out-of-bounds read.

Fix this by validating path[k].p_idx against EXT_LAST_INDEX() at
both access sites: before the while loop and inside it. Return
-EFSCORRUPTED if the index pointer is out of range, consistent
with how other bounds violations are handled in the ext4 extent
tree code.

Reported-by: syzbot+04c4e65cab786a2e5b7e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=04c4e65cab786a2e5b7e
Signed-off-by: Tejas Bharambe <tejas.bharambe@outlook.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/JH0PR06MB66326016F9B6AD24097D232B897CA@JH0PR06MB6632.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
[ Minor conflict resolved. ]
Signed-off-by: Jianqiang kang <jianqkang@sina.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ext4: fix missing brelse() in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all() 2026-05-17T15:13:32+00:00 Sohei Koyama skoyama@ddn.com 2026-04-06T07:48:30+00:00 1bc1107a3a403a6d440673ed6666f7b07ef868a8 commit 77d059519382bd66283e6a4e83ee186e87e7708f upstream. The commit c8e008b60492 ("ext4: ignore xattrs past end") introduced a refcount leak in when block_csum is false. ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all() calls ext4_get_inode_loc() to get iloc.bh, but never releases it with brelse(). Fixes: c8e008b60492 ("ext4: ignore xattrs past end") Signed-off-by: Sohei Koyama <skoyama@ddn.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260406074830.8480-1-skoyama@ddn.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 77d059519382bd66283e6a4e83ee186e87e7708f upstream.

The commit c8e008b60492 ("ext4: ignore xattrs past end")
introduced a refcount leak in when block_csum is false.

ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all() calls ext4_get_inode_loc() to
get iloc.bh, but never releases it with brelse().

Fixes: c8e008b60492 ("ext4: ignore xattrs past end")
Signed-off-by: Sohei Koyama <skoyama@ddn.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260406074830.8480-1-skoyama@ddn.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: fix bounds check in check_xattrs() to prevent out-of-bounds access 2026-05-17T15:13:32+00:00 Deepanshu Kartikey kartikey406@gmail.com 2026-03-28T15:00:38+00:00 ab6da97bc310db35d4e4ef5354bc3ff626b0698c commit eceafc31ea7b42c984ece10d79d505c0bb6615d5 upstream. The bounds check for the next xattr entry in check_xattrs() uses (void *)next >= end, which allows next to point within sizeof(u32) bytes of end. On the next loop iteration, IS_LAST_ENTRY() reads 4 bytes via *(__u32 *)(entry), which can overrun the valid xattr region. For example, if next lands at end - 1, the check passes since next < end, but IS_LAST_ENTRY() reads 4 bytes starting at end - 1, accessing 3 bytes beyond the valid region. Fix this by changing the check to (void *)next + sizeof(u32) > end, ensuring there is always enough space for the IS_LAST_ENTRY() read on the subsequent iteration. Fixes: 3478c83cf26b ("ext4: improve xattr consistency checking and error reporting") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260224231429.31361-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/T/ [v1] Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260328150038.349497-1-kartikey406@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit eceafc31ea7b42c984ece10d79d505c0bb6615d5 upstream.

The bounds check for the next xattr entry in check_xattrs() uses
(void *)next >= end, which allows next to point within sizeof(u32)
bytes of end. On the next loop iteration, IS_LAST_ENTRY() reads 4
bytes via *(__u32 *)(entry), which can overrun the valid xattr region.

For example, if next lands at end - 1, the check passes since
next < end, but IS_LAST_ENTRY() reads 4 bytes starting at end - 1,
accessing 3 bytes beyond the valid region.

Fix this by changing the check to (void *)next + sizeof(u32) > end,
ensuring there is always enough space for the IS_LAST_ENTRY() read
on the subsequent iteration.

Fixes: 3478c83cf26b ("ext4: improve xattr consistency checking and error reporting")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260224231429.31361-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/T/ [v1]
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260328150038.349497-1-kartikey406@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: handle wraparound when searching for blocks for indirect mapped blocks 2026-04-11T12:19:36+00:00 Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu 2026-04-03T11:50:27+00:00 83170a05908b6cf2fb3235d3065bf613ff866f3c [ Upstream commit bb81702370fad22c06ca12b6e1648754dbc37e0f ] Commit 4865c768b563 ("ext4: always allocate blocks only from groups inode can use") restricts what blocks will be allocated for indirect block based files to block numbers that fit within 32-bit block numbers. However, when using a review bot running on the latest Gemini LLM to check this commit when backporting into an LTS based kernel, it raised this concern: If ac->ac_g_ex.fe_group is >= ngroups (for instance, if the goal group was populated via stream allocation from s_mb_last_groups), then start will be >= ngroups. Does this allow allocating blocks beyond the 32-bit limit for indirect block mapped files? The commit message mentions that ext4_mb_scan_groups_linear() takes care to not select unsupported groups. However, its loop uses group = *start, and the very first iteration will call ext4_mb_scan_group() with this unsupported group because next_linear_group() is only called at the end of the iteration. After reviewing the code paths involved and considering the LLM review, I determined that this can happen when there is a file system where some files/directories are extent-mapped and others are indirect-block mapped. To address this, add a safety clamp in ext4_mb_scan_groups(). Fixes: 4865c768b563 ("ext4: always allocate blocks only from groups inode can use") Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260326045834.1175822-1-tytso@mit.edu Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
[ Upstream commit bb81702370fad22c06ca12b6e1648754dbc37e0f ]

Commit 4865c768b563 ("ext4: always allocate blocks only from groups
inode can use") restricts what blocks will be allocated for indirect
block based files to block numbers that fit within 32-bit block
numbers.

However, when using a review bot running on the latest Gemini LLM to
check this commit when backporting into an LTS based kernel, it raised
this concern:

   If ac->ac_g_ex.fe_group is >= ngroups (for instance, if the goal
   group was populated via stream allocation from s_mb_last_groups),
   then start will be >= ngroups.

   Does this allow allocating blocks beyond the 32-bit limit for
   indirect block mapped files? The commit message mentions that
   ext4_mb_scan_groups_linear() takes care to not select unsupported
   groups. However, its loop uses group = *start, and the very first
   iteration will call ext4_mb_scan_group() with this unsupported
   group because next_linear_group() is only called at the end of the
   iteration.

After reviewing the code paths involved and considering the LLM
review, I determined that this can happen when there is a file system
where some files/directories are extent-mapped and others are
indirect-block mapped.  To address this, add a safety clamp in
ext4_mb_scan_groups().

Fixes: 4865c768b563 ("ext4: always allocate blocks only from groups inode can use")
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260326045834.1175822-1-tytso@mit.edu
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: publish jinode after initialization 2026-04-11T12:19:36+00:00 Li Chen me@linux.beauty 2026-04-02T17:13:31+00:00 a070d5a872ffe0e0fe5c46eda6386140ded39adb [ Upstream commit 1aec30021edd410b986c156f195f3d23959a9d11 ] ext4_inode_attach_jinode() publishes ei->jinode to concurrent users. It used to set ei->jinode before jbd2_journal_init_jbd_inode(), allowing a reader to observe a non-NULL jinode with i_vfs_inode still unset. The fast commit flush path can then pass this jinode to jbd2_wait_inode_data(), which dereferences i_vfs_inode->i_mapping and may crash. Below is the crash I observe: ``` BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 000000010beb47f4 PGD 110e51067 P4D 110e51067 PUD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 4850 Comm: fc_fsync_bench_ Not tainted 6.18.0-00764-g795a690c06a5 #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.17.0-2-2 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:xas_find_marked+0x3d/0x2e0 Code: e0 03 48 83 f8 02 0f 84 f0 01 00 00 48 8b 47 08 48 89 c3 48 39 c6 0f 82 fd 01 00 00 48 85 c9 74 3d 48 83 f9 03 77 63 4c 8b 0f <49> 8b 71 08 48 c7 47 18 00 00 00 00 48 89 f1 83 e1 03 48 83 f9 02 RSP: 0018:ffffbbee806e7bf0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 000000000010beb4 RBX: 000000000010beb4 RCX: 0000000000000003 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000002000300000 RDI: ffffbbee806e7c10 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000002000300000 R09: 000000010beb47ec R10: ffff9ea494590090 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000002000300000 R13: ffffbbee806e7c90 R14: ffff9ea494513788 R15: ffffbbee806e7c88 FS: 00007fc2f9e3e6c0(0000) GS:ffff9ea6b1444000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000010beb47f4 CR3: 0000000119ac5000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> filemap_get_folios_tag+0x87/0x2a0 __filemap_fdatawait_range+0x5f/0xd0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __schedule+0x3e7/0x10c0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? preempt_count_sub+0x5f/0x80 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? cap_safe_nice+0x37/0x70 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? preempt_count_sub+0x5f/0x80 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 filemap_fdatawait_range_keep_errors+0x12/0x40 ext4_fc_commit+0x697/0x8b0 ? ext4_file_write_iter+0x64b/0x950 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? preempt_count_sub+0x5f/0x80 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? vfs_write+0x356/0x480 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? preempt_count_sub+0x5f/0x80 ext4_sync_file+0xf7/0x370 do_fsync+0x3b/0x80 ? syscall_trace_enter+0x108/0x1d0 __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x62/0x2c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e ... ``` Fix this by initializing the jbd2_inode first. Use smp_wmb() and WRITE_ONCE() to publish ei->jinode after initialization. Readers use READ_ONCE() to fetch the pointer. Fixes: a361293f5fede ("jbd2: Fix oops in jbd2_journal_file_inode()") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Li Chen <me@linux.beauty> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260225082617.147957-1-me@linux.beauty Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org [ adapted READ_ONCE(ei->jinode) to use pos->jinode ] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
[ Upstream commit 1aec30021edd410b986c156f195f3d23959a9d11 ]

ext4_inode_attach_jinode() publishes ei->jinode to concurrent users.
It used to set ei->jinode before jbd2_journal_init_jbd_inode(),
allowing a reader to observe a non-NULL jinode with i_vfs_inode
still unset.

The fast commit flush path can then pass this jinode to
jbd2_wait_inode_data(), which dereferences i_vfs_inode->i_mapping and
may crash.

Below is the crash I observe:
```
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 000000010beb47f4
PGD 110e51067 P4D 110e51067 PUD 0
Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 4850 Comm: fc_fsync_bench_ Not tainted 6.18.0-00764-g795a690c06a5 #1 PREEMPT(voluntary)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.17.0-2-2 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:xas_find_marked+0x3d/0x2e0
Code: e0 03 48 83 f8 02 0f 84 f0 01 00 00 48 8b 47 08 48 89 c3 48 39 c6 0f 82 fd 01 00 00 48 85 c9 74 3d 48 83 f9 03 77 63 4c 8b 0f <49> 8b 71 08 48 c7 47 18 00 00 00 00 48 89 f1 83 e1 03 48 83 f9 02
RSP: 0018:ffffbbee806e7bf0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 000000000010beb4 RBX: 000000000010beb4 RCX: 0000000000000003
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000002000300000 RDI: ffffbbee806e7c10
RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000002000300000 R09: 000000010beb47ec
R10: ffff9ea494590090 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000002000300000
R13: ffffbbee806e7c90 R14: ffff9ea494513788 R15: ffffbbee806e7c88
FS: 00007fc2f9e3e6c0(0000) GS:ffff9ea6b1444000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000010beb47f4 CR3: 0000000119ac5000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
<TASK>
filemap_get_folios_tag+0x87/0x2a0
__filemap_fdatawait_range+0x5f/0xd0
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? __schedule+0x3e7/0x10c0
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? preempt_count_sub+0x5f/0x80
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? cap_safe_nice+0x37/0x70
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? preempt_count_sub+0x5f/0x80
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
filemap_fdatawait_range_keep_errors+0x12/0x40
ext4_fc_commit+0x697/0x8b0
? ext4_file_write_iter+0x64b/0x950
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? preempt_count_sub+0x5f/0x80
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? vfs_write+0x356/0x480
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? preempt_count_sub+0x5f/0x80
ext4_sync_file+0xf7/0x370
do_fsync+0x3b/0x80
? syscall_trace_enter+0x108/0x1d0
__x64_sys_fdatasync+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x62/0x2c0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
...
```

Fix this by initializing the jbd2_inode first.
Use smp_wmb() and WRITE_ONCE() to publish ei->jinode after
initialization. Readers use READ_ONCE() to fetch the pointer.

Fixes: a361293f5fede ("jbd2: Fix oops in jbd2_journal_file_inode()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Li Chen <me@linux.beauty>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260225082617.147957-1-me@linux.beauty
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
[ adapted READ_ONCE(ei->jinode) to use pos->jinode ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: always drain queued discard work in ext4_mb_release() 2026-04-02T11:07:29+00:00 Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu 2026-03-27T06:13:15+00:00 1c82f863f090ab899085bdfade073313384b514b commit 9ee29d20aab228adfb02ca93f87fb53c56c2f3af upstream. While reviewing recent ext4 patch[1], Sashiko raised the following concern[2]: > If the filesystem is initially mounted with the discard option, > deleting files will populate sbi->s_discard_list and queue > s_discard_work. If it is then remounted with nodiscard, the > EXT4_MOUNT_DISCARD flag is cleared, but the pending s_discard_work is > neither cancelled nor flushed. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang@linux.dev/ [2] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang%40linux.dev The concern was valid, but it had nothing to do with the patch[1]. One of the problems with Sashiko in its current (early) form is that it will detect pre-existing issues and report it as a problem with the patch that it is reviewing. In practice, it would be hard to hit deliberately (unless you are a malicious syzkaller fuzzer), since it would involve mounting the file system with -o discard, and then deleting a large number of files, remounting the file system with -o nodiscard, and then immediately unmounting the file system before the queued discard work has a change to drain on its own. Fix it because it's a real bug, and to avoid Sashiko from raising this concern when analyzing future patches to mballoc.c. Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Fixes: 55cdd0af2bc5 ("ext4: get discard out of jbd2 commit kthread contex") Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 9ee29d20aab228adfb02ca93f87fb53c56c2f3af upstream.

While reviewing recent ext4 patch[1], Sashiko raised the following
concern[2]:

> If the filesystem is initially mounted with the discard option,
> deleting files will populate sbi->s_discard_list and queue
> s_discard_work. If it is then remounted with nodiscard, the
> EXT4_MOUNT_DISCARD flag is cleared, but the pending s_discard_work is
> neither cancelled nor flushed.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang@linux.dev/
[2] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang%40linux.dev

The concern was valid, but it had nothing to do with the patch[1].
One of the problems with Sashiko in its current (early) form is that
it will detect pre-existing issues and report it as a problem with the
patch that it is reviewing.

In practice, it would be hard to hit deliberately (unless you are a
malicious syzkaller fuzzer), since it would involve mounting the file
system with -o discard, and then deleting a large number of files,
remounting the file system with -o nodiscard, and then immediately
unmounting the file system before the queued discard work has a change
to drain on its own.

Fix it because it's a real bug, and to avoid Sashiko from raising this
concern when analyzing future patches to mballoc.c.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Fixes: 55cdd0af2bc5 ("ext4: get discard out of jbd2 commit kthread contex")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: fix iloc.bh leak in ext4_fc_replay_inode() error paths 2026-04-02T11:07:29+00:00 Baokun Li libaokun@linux.alibaba.com 2026-03-23T06:08:36+00:00 ca99cbcc316cdfd2040cc2b13d1426ccb3b3b50b commit ec0a7500d8eace5b4f305fa0c594dd148f0e8d29 upstream. During code review, Joseph found that ext4_fc_replay_inode() calls ext4_get_fc_inode_loc() to get the inode location, which holds a reference to iloc.bh that must be released via brelse(). However, several error paths jump to the 'out' label without releasing iloc.bh: - ext4_handle_dirty_metadata() failure - sync_dirty_buffer() failure - ext4_mark_inode_used() failure - ext4_iget() failure Fix this by introducing an 'out_brelse' label placed just before the existing 'out' label to ensure iloc.bh is always released. Additionally, make ext4_fc_replay_inode() propagate errors properly instead of always returning 0. Reported-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Fixes: 8016e29f4362 ("ext4: fast commit recovery path") Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260323060836.3452660-1-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit ec0a7500d8eace5b4f305fa0c594dd148f0e8d29 upstream.

During code review, Joseph found that ext4_fc_replay_inode() calls
ext4_get_fc_inode_loc() to get the inode location, which holds a
reference to iloc.bh that must be released via brelse().

However, several error paths jump to the 'out' label without
releasing iloc.bh:

 - ext4_handle_dirty_metadata() failure
 - sync_dirty_buffer() failure
 - ext4_mark_inode_used() failure
 - ext4_iget() failure

Fix this by introducing an 'out_brelse' label placed just before
the existing 'out' label to ensure iloc.bh is always released.

Additionally, make ext4_fc_replay_inode() propagate errors
properly instead of always returning 0.

Reported-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Fixes: 8016e29f4362 ("ext4: fast commit recovery path")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260323060836.3452660-1-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: fix the might_sleep() warnings in kvfree() 2026-04-02T11:07:28+00:00 Zqiang qiang.zhang@linux.dev 2026-03-19T09:45:45+00:00 c84c0272e0b66c292ffe1e98a431fae2bec7f390 commit 496bb99b7e66f48b178126626f47e9ba79e2d0fa upstream. Use the kvfree() in the RCU read critical section can trigger the following warnings: EXT4-fs (vdb): unmounting filesystem cd983e5b-3c83-4f5a-a136-17b00eb9d018. WARNING: suspicious RCU usage ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:409 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xbb/0xd0 dump_stack+0x14/0x20 lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x15a/0x1b0 __might_resched+0x375/0x4d0 ? put_object.part.0+0x2c/0x50 __might_sleep+0x108/0x160 vfree+0x58/0x910 ? ext4_group_desc_free+0x27/0x270 kvfree+0x23/0x40 ext4_group_desc_free+0x111/0x270 ext4_put_super+0x3c8/0xd40 generic_shutdown_super+0x14c/0x4a0 ? __pfx_shrinker_free+0x10/0x10 kill_block_super+0x40/0x90 ext4_kill_sb+0x6d/0xb0 deactivate_locked_super+0xb4/0x180 deactivate_super+0x7e/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x296/0x3e0 __cleanup_mnt+0x16/0x20 task_work_run+0x157/0x250 ? __pfx_task_work_run+0x10/0x10 ? exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x6a/0x550 exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x102/0x550 do_syscall_64+0x44a/0x500 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/vmalloc.c:3441 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 556, name: umount preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 556 Comm: umount Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xbb/0xd0 dump_stack+0x14/0x20 __might_resched+0x275/0x4d0 ? put_object.part.0+0x2c/0x50 __might_sleep+0x108/0x160 vfree+0x58/0x910 ? ext4_group_desc_free+0x27/0x270 kvfree+0x23/0x40 ext4_group_desc_free+0x111/0x270 ext4_put_super+0x3c8/0xd40 generic_shutdown_super+0x14c/0x4a0 ? __pfx_shrinker_free+0x10/0x10 kill_block_super+0x40/0x90 ext4_kill_sb+0x6d/0xb0 deactivate_locked_super+0xb4/0x180 deactivate_super+0x7e/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x296/0x3e0 __cleanup_mnt+0x16/0x20 task_work_run+0x157/0x250 ? __pfx_task_work_run+0x10/0x10 ? exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x6a/0x550 exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x102/0x550 do_syscall_64+0x44a/0x500 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f The above scenarios occur in initialization failures and teardown paths, there are no parallel operations on the resources released by kvfree(), this commit therefore remove rcu_read_lock/unlock() and use rcu_access_pointer() instead of rcu_dereference() operations. Fixes: 7c990728b99e ("ext4: fix potential race between s_flex_groups online resizing and access") Fixes: df3da4ea5a0f ("ext4: fix potential race between s_group_info online resizing and access") Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev> Reviewed-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 496bb99b7e66f48b178126626f47e9ba79e2d0fa upstream.

Use the kvfree() in the RCU read critical section can trigger
the following warnings:

EXT4-fs (vdb): unmounting filesystem cd983e5b-3c83-4f5a-a136-17b00eb9d018.

WARNING: suspicious RCU usage

./include/linux/rcupdate.h:409 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1

Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0xbb/0xd0
 dump_stack+0x14/0x20
 lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x15a/0x1b0
 __might_resched+0x375/0x4d0
 ? put_object.part.0+0x2c/0x50
 __might_sleep+0x108/0x160
 vfree+0x58/0x910
 ? ext4_group_desc_free+0x27/0x270
 kvfree+0x23/0x40
 ext4_group_desc_free+0x111/0x270
 ext4_put_super+0x3c8/0xd40
 generic_shutdown_super+0x14c/0x4a0
 ? __pfx_shrinker_free+0x10/0x10
 kill_block_super+0x40/0x90
 ext4_kill_sb+0x6d/0xb0
 deactivate_locked_super+0xb4/0x180
 deactivate_super+0x7e/0xa0
 cleanup_mnt+0x296/0x3e0
 __cleanup_mnt+0x16/0x20
 task_work_run+0x157/0x250
 ? __pfx_task_work_run+0x10/0x10
 ? exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x6a/0x550
 exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x102/0x550
 do_syscall_64+0x44a/0x500
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
 </TASK>

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/vmalloc.c:3441
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 556, name: umount
preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 556 Comm: umount
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0xbb/0xd0
 dump_stack+0x14/0x20
 __might_resched+0x275/0x4d0
 ? put_object.part.0+0x2c/0x50
 __might_sleep+0x108/0x160
 vfree+0x58/0x910
 ? ext4_group_desc_free+0x27/0x270
 kvfree+0x23/0x40
 ext4_group_desc_free+0x111/0x270
 ext4_put_super+0x3c8/0xd40
 generic_shutdown_super+0x14c/0x4a0
 ? __pfx_shrinker_free+0x10/0x10
 kill_block_super+0x40/0x90
 ext4_kill_sb+0x6d/0xb0
 deactivate_locked_super+0xb4/0x180
 deactivate_super+0x7e/0xa0
 cleanup_mnt+0x296/0x3e0
 __cleanup_mnt+0x16/0x20
 task_work_run+0x157/0x250
 ? __pfx_task_work_run+0x10/0x10
 ? exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x6a/0x550
 exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x102/0x550
 do_syscall_64+0x44a/0x500
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

The above scenarios occur in initialization failures and teardown
paths, there are no parallel operations on the resources released
by kvfree(), this commit therefore remove rcu_read_lock/unlock() and
use rcu_access_pointer() instead of rcu_dereference() operations.

Fixes: 7c990728b99e ("ext4: fix potential race between s_flex_groups online resizing and access")
Fixes: df3da4ea5a0f ("ext4: fix potential race between s_group_info online resizing and access")
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: fix use-after-free in update_super_work when racing with umount 2026-04-02T11:07:28+00:00 Jiayuan Chen jiayuan.chen@shopee.com 2026-03-19T12:03:35+00:00 9449f99ba04f5dd1c8423ad8a90b3651d7240d1d commit d15e4b0a418537aafa56b2cb80d44add83e83697 upstream. Commit b98535d09179 ("ext4: fix bug_on in start_this_handle during umount filesystem") moved ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing s_sb_upd_work to prevent new error work from being queued via /proc/fs/ext4/xx/mb_groups reads during unmount. However, this introduced a use-after-free because update_super_work calls ext4_notify_error_sysfs() -> sysfs_notify() which accesses the kobject's kernfs_node after it has been freed by kobject_del() in ext4_unregister_sysfs(): update_super_work ext4_put_super ----------------- -------------- ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb) kobject_del(&sbi->s_kobj) __kobject_del() sysfs_remove_dir() kobj->sd = NULL sysfs_put(sd) kernfs_put() // RCU free ext4_notify_error_sysfs(sbi) sysfs_notify(&sbi->s_kobj) kn = kobj->sd // stale pointer kernfs_get(kn) // UAF on freed kernfs_node ext4_journal_destroy() flush_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work) Instead of reordering the teardown sequence, fix this by making ext4_notify_error_sysfs() detect that sysfs has already been torn down by checking s_kobj.state_in_sysfs, and skipping the sysfs_notify() call in that case. A dedicated mutex (s_error_notify_mutex) serializes ext4_notify_error_sysfs() against kobject_del() in ext4_unregister_sysfs() to prevent TOCTOU races where the kobject could be deleted between the state_in_sysfs check and the sysfs_notify() call. Fixes: b98535d09179 ("ext4: fix bug_on in start_this_handle during umount filesystem") Cc: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@shopee.com> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319120336.157873-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit d15e4b0a418537aafa56b2cb80d44add83e83697 upstream.

Commit b98535d09179 ("ext4: fix bug_on in start_this_handle during umount
filesystem") moved ext4_unregister_sysfs() before flushing s_sb_upd_work
to prevent new error work from being queued via /proc/fs/ext4/xx/mb_groups
reads during unmount. However, this introduced a use-after-free because
update_super_work calls ext4_notify_error_sysfs() -> sysfs_notify() which
accesses the kobject's kernfs_node after it has been freed by kobject_del()
in ext4_unregister_sysfs():

  update_super_work                ext4_put_super
  -----------------                --------------
                                   ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb)
                                     kobject_del(&sbi->s_kobj)
                                       __kobject_del()
                                         sysfs_remove_dir()
                                           kobj->sd = NULL
                                         sysfs_put(sd)
                                           kernfs_put()  // RCU free
  ext4_notify_error_sysfs(sbi)
    sysfs_notify(&sbi->s_kobj)
      kn = kobj->sd              // stale pointer
      kernfs_get(kn)             // UAF on freed kernfs_node
                                   ext4_journal_destroy()
                                     flush_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work)

Instead of reordering the teardown sequence, fix this by making
ext4_notify_error_sysfs() detect that sysfs has already been torn down
by checking s_kobj.state_in_sysfs, and skipping the sysfs_notify() call
in that case. A dedicated mutex (s_error_notify_mutex) serializes
ext4_notify_error_sysfs() against kobject_del() in ext4_unregister_sysfs()
to prevent TOCTOU races where the kobject could be deleted between the
state_in_sysfs check and the sysfs_notify() call.

Fixes: b98535d09179 ("ext4: fix bug_on in start_this_handle during umount filesystem")
Cc: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@shopee.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319120336.157873-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ext4: reject mount if bigalloc with s_first_data_block != 0 2026-04-02T11:07:28+00:00 Helen Koike koike@igalia.com 2026-03-17T14:23:10+00:00 b77de3fceafbb39f30e4ff5dc986f863d5456417 commit 3822743dc20386d9897e999dbb990befa3a5b3f8 upstream. bigalloc with s_first_data_block != 0 is not supported, reject mounting it. Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <koike@igalia.com> Suggested-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reported-by: syzbot+b73703b873a33d8eb8f6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b73703b873a33d8eb8f6 Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260317142325.135074-1-koike@igalia.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 3822743dc20386d9897e999dbb990befa3a5b3f8 upstream.

bigalloc with s_first_data_block != 0 is not supported, reject mounting
it.

Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <koike@igalia.com>
Suggested-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reported-by: syzbot+b73703b873a33d8eb8f6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b73703b873a33d8eb8f6
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260317142325.135074-1-koike@igalia.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>