linux-stable.git/fs/ext4, branch linux-3.16.y

ext4: add cond_resched() to ext4_protect_reserved_inode

2020-06-11T18:05:55+00:00

commit af133ade9a40794a37104ecbcc2827c0ea373a3c upstream.

When journal size is set too big by "mkfs.ext4 -J size=", or when
we mount a crafted image to make journal inode->i_size too big,
the loop, "while (i < num)", holds cpu too long. This could cause
soft lockup.

[  529.357541] Call trace:
[  529.357551]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x198
[  529.357555]  show_stack+0x24/0x30
[  529.357562]  dump_stack+0xa4/0xcc
[  529.357568]  watchdog_timer_fn+0x300/0x3e8
[  529.357574]  __hrtimer_run_queues+0x114/0x358
[  529.357576]  hrtimer_interrupt+0x104/0x2d8
[  529.357580]  arch_timer_handler_virt+0x38/0x58
[  529.357584]  handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x90/0x248
[  529.357588]  generic_handle_irq+0x34/0x50
[  529.357590]  __handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0
[  529.357593]  gic_handle_irq+0x6c/0x150
[  529.357595]  el1_irq+0xb8/0x140
[  529.357599]  __ll_sc_atomic_add_return_acquire+0x14/0x20
[  529.357668]  ext4_map_blocks+0x64/0x5c0 [ext4]
[  529.357693]  ext4_setup_system_zone+0x330/0x458 [ext4]
[  529.357717]  ext4_fill_super+0x2170/0x2ba8 [ext4]
[  529.357722]  mount_bdev+0x1a8/0x1e8
[  529.357746]  ext4_mount+0x44/0x58 [ext4]
[  529.357748]  mount_fs+0x50/0x170
[  529.357752]  vfs_kern_mount.part.9+0x54/0x188
[  529.357755]  do_mount+0x5ac/0xd78
[  529.357758]  ksys_mount+0x9c/0x118
[  529.357760]  __arm64_sys_mount+0x28/0x38
[  529.357764]  el0_svc_common+0x78/0x130
[  529.357766]  el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78
[  529.357769]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc
[  541.356516] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [mount:18674]

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200211011752.29242-1-luoshijie1@huawei.com
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Shijie Luo 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ext4: don't perform block validity checks on the journal inode

2020-06-11T18:05:55+00:00

commit 0a944e8a6c66ca04c7afbaa17e22bf208a8b37f0 upstream.

Since the journal inode is already checked when we added it to the
block validity's system zone, if we check it again, we'll just trigger
a failure.

This was causing failures like this:

[   53.897001] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_find_extent:909: inode
#8: comm jbd2/sda-8: pblk 121667583 bad header/extent: invalid extent entries - magic f30a, entries 8, max 340(340), depth 0(0)
[   53.931430] jbd2_journal_bmap: journal block not found at offset 49 on sda-8
[   53.938480] Aborting journal on device sda-8.

... but only if the system was under enough memory pressure that
logical->physical mapping for the journal inode gets pushed out of the
extent cache.  (This is why it wasn't noticed earlier.)

Fixes: 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity")
Reported-by: Dan Rue 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju 
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: Use EXT4_HAS_COMPAT_FEATURE()]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ext4: fix block validity checks for journal inodes using indirect blocks

2020-06-11T18:05:54+00:00

commit 170417c8c7bb2cbbdd949bf5c443c0c8f24a203b upstream.

Commit 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using
block_validity") failed to add an exception for the journal inode in
ext4_check_blockref(), which is the function used by ext4_get_branch()
for indirect blocks.  This caused attempts to read from the ext3-style
journals to fail with:

[  848.968550] EXT4-fs error (device sdb7): ext4_get_branch:171: inode #8: block 30343695: comm jbd2/sdb7-8: invalid block

Fix this by adding the missing exception check.

Fixes: 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity")
Reported-by: Arthur Marsh 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: Use EXT4_HAS_COMPAT_FEATURE]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ext4: unsigned int compared against zero

2020-06-11T18:05:54+00:00

commit fbbbbd2f28aec991f3fbc248df211550fbdfd58c upstream.

There are two cases where u32 variables n and err are being checked
for less than zero error values, the checks is always false because
the variables are not signed. Fix this by making the variables ints.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared against 0")
Fixes: 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity

2020-06-11T18:05:53+00:00

commit 345c0dbf3a30872d9b204db96b5857cd00808cae upstream.

Add the blocks which belong to the journal inode to block_validity's
system zone so attempts to deallocate or overwrite the journal due a
corrupted file system where the journal blocks are also claimed by
another inode.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202879
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Cc: stable@kernel.org
[bwh: Backported to 3.16:
 - Use EXT4_HAS_COMPAT_FEATURE()
 - Use EIO instead of EFSCORRUPTED]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ext4: Make checks for metadata_csum feature safer

2020-06-11T18:05:53+00:00

This is just a small part of commit dec214d00e0d7 "ext4: xattr inode
deduplication" that makes checks for metadata_csum feature safer and is
actually needed by following fixes.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan 
Acked-by: Jan Kara 
[bwh: Ported to 3.16: Use EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE()]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ext4: check for directory entries too close to block end

2020-04-28T18:03:02+00:00

commit 109ba779d6cca2d519c5dd624a3276d03e21948e upstream.

ext4_check_dir_entry() currently does not catch a case when a directory
entry ends so close to the block end that the header of the next
directory entry would not fit in the remaining space. This can lead to
directory iteration code trying to access address beyond end of current
buffer head leading to oops.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191202170213.4761-3-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ext4: fix races of writeback with punch hole and zero range

2020-04-28T18:02:21+00:00

commit 011278485ecc3cd2a3954b5d4c73101d919bf1fa upstream.

When doing delayed allocation, update of on-disk inode size is postponed
until IO submission time. However hole punch or zero range fallocate
calls can end up discarding the tail page cache page and thus on-disk
inode size would never be properly updated.

Make sure the on-disk inode size is updated before truncating page
cache.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ext4: fix races between buffered IO and collapse / insert range

2020-04-28T18:02:20+00:00

commit 32ebffd3bbb4162da5ff88f9a35dd32d0a28ea70 upstream.

Current code implementing FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE and
FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE is prone to races with buffered writes and page
faults. If buffered write or write via mmap manages to squeeze between
filemap_write_and_wait_range() and truncate_pagecache() in the fallocate
implementations, the written data is simply discarded by
truncate_pagecache() although it should have been shifted.

Fix the problem by moving filemap_write_and_wait_range() call inside
i_mutex and i_mmap_sem. That way we are protected against races with
both buffered writes and page faults.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: drop changes in ext4_insert_range()]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ext4: move unlocked dio protection from ext4_alloc_file_blocks()

2020-04-28T18:02:20+00:00

commit 17048e8a083fec7ad841d88ef0812707fbc7e39f upstream.

Currently ext4_alloc_file_blocks() was handling protection against
unlocked DIO. However we now need to sometimes call it under i_mmap_sem
and sometimes not and DIO protection ranks above it (although strictly
speaking this cannot currently create any deadlocks). Also
ext4_zero_range() was actually getting & releasing unlocked DIO
protection twice in some cases. Luckily it didn't introduce any real bug
but it was a land mine waiting to be stepped on.  So move DIO protection
out from ext4_alloc_file_blocks() into the two callsites.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings