linux-stable.git/fs/ext2, branch v4.14.321

ext2: Check block size validity during mount

2023-05-30T11:38:34+00:00

[ Upstream commit 62aeb94433fcec80241754b70d0d1836d5926b0a ]

Check that log of block size stored in the superblock has sensible
value. Otherwise the shift computing the block size can overflow leading
to undefined behavior.

Reported-by: syzbot+4fec412f59eba8c01b77@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ext2: Add more validity checks for inode counts

2022-08-25T09:11:14+00:00

[ Upstream commit fa78f336937240d1bc598db817d638086060e7e9 ]

Add checks verifying number of inodes stored in the superblock matches
the number computed from number of inodes per group. Also verify we have
at least one block worth of inodes per group. This prevents crashes on
corrupted filesystems.

Reported-by: syzbot+d273f7d7f58afd93be48@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ext2: correct max file size computing

2022-04-20T07:08:17+00:00

[ Upstream commit 50b3a818991074177a56c87124c7a7bdf5fa4f67 ]

We need to calculate the max file size accurately if the total blocks
that can address by block tree exceed the upper_limit. But this check is
not correct now, it only compute the total data blocks but missing
metadata blocks are needed. So in the case of "data blocks < upper_limit
&& total blocks > upper_limit", we will get wrong result. Fortunately,
this case could not happen in reality, but it's confused and better to
correct the computing.

  bits   data blocks   metadatablocks   upper_limit
  10        16843020            66051    2147483647
  11       134480396           263171    1073741823
  12      1074791436          1050627     536870911 (*)
  13      8594130956          4198403     268435455 (*)
  14     68736258060         16785411     134217727 (*)
  15    549822930956         67125251      67108863 (*)
  16   4398314962956        268468227      33554431 (*)

  [*] Need to calculate in depth.

Fixes: 1c2d14212b15 ("ext2: Fix underflow in ext2_max_size()")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220212050532.179055-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi 
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ext2: fix sleeping in atomic bugs on error

2021-10-09T12:09:46+00:00

[ Upstream commit 372d1f3e1bfede719864d0d1fbf3146b1e638c88 ]

The ext2_error() function syncs the filesystem so it sleeps.  The caller
is holding a spinlock so it's not allowed to sleep.

   ext2_statfs() <- disables preempt
   -> ext2_count_free_blocks()
      -> ext2_get_group_desc()

Fix this by using WARN() to print an error message and a stack trace
instead of using ext2_error().

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210921203233.GA16529@kili
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter 
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ext2: fix missing percpu_counter_inc

2020-08-21T07:48:18+00:00

commit bc2fbaa4d3808aef82dd1064a8e61c16549fe956 upstream.

sbi->s_freeinodes_counter is only decreased by the ext2 code, it is never
increased. This patch fixes it.

Note that sbi->s_freeinodes_counter is only used in the algorithm that
tries to find the group for new allocations, so this bug is not easily
visible (the only visibility is that the group finding algorithm selects
inoptinal result).

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.LRH.2.02.2004201538300.19436@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext2: fix debug reference to ext2_xattr_cache

2020-04-24T06:01:22+00:00

[ Upstream commit 32302085a8d90859c40cf1a5e8313f575d06ec75 ]

Fix a debug-only build error in ext2/xattr.c:

When building without extra debugging, (and with another patch that uses
no_printk() instead of  for the ext2-xattr debug-print macros,
this build error happens:

../fs/ext2/xattr.c: In function ‘ext2_xattr_cache_insert’:
../fs/ext2/xattr.c:869:18: error: ‘ext2_xattr_cache’ undeclared (first use in
this function); did you mean ‘ext2_xattr_list’?
     atomic_read(&ext2_xattr_cache->c_entry_count));

Fix the problem by removing cached entry count from the debug message
since otherwise we'd have to export the mbcache structure just for that.

Fixes: be0726d33cb8 ("ext2: convert to mbcache2")
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap 
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ext2: fix empty body warnings when -Wextra is used

2020-04-24T06:01:21+00:00

[ Upstream commit 44a52022e7f15cbaab957df1c14f7a4f527ef7cf ]

When EXT2_ATTR_DEBUG is not defined, modify the 2 debug macros
to use the no_printk() macro instead of .
This fixes gcc warnings when -Wextra is used:

../fs/ext2/xattr.c:252:42: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ‘if’ statement [-Wempty-body]
../fs/ext2/xattr.c:258:42: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ‘if’ statement [-Wempty-body]
../fs/ext2/xattr.c:330:42: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ‘if’ statement [-Wempty-body]
../fs/ext2/xattr.c:872:45: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ‘else’ statement [-Wempty-body]

I have verified that the only object code change (with gcc 7.5.0) is
the reversal of some instructions from 'cmp a,b' to 'cmp b,a'.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e18a7395-61fb-2093-18e8-ed4f8cf56248@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap 
Cc: Jan Kara 
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ext2: Adjust indentation in ext2_fill_super

2020-02-14T21:32:17+00:00

commit d9e9866803f7b6c3fdd35d345e97fb0b2908bbbc upstream.

Clang warns:

../fs/ext2/super.c:1076:3: warning: misleading indentation; statement is
not part of the previous 'if' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
        sbi->s_groups_count = ((le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count) -
        ^
../fs/ext2/super.c:1074:2: note: previous statement is here
        if (EXT2_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) == 0)
        ^
1 warning generated.

This warning occurs because there is a space before the tab on this
line. Remove it so that the indentation is consistent with the Linux
kernel coding style and clang no longer warns.

Fixes: 41f04d852e35 ("[PATCH] ext2: fix mounts at 16T")
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/827
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191218031930.31393-1-natechancellor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor 
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext2: check err when partial != NULL

2019-12-17T19:39:43+00:00

commit e705f4b8aa27a59f8933e8f384e9752f052c469c upstream.

Check err when partial == NULL is meaningless because
partial == NULL means getting branch successfully without
error.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105045100.7104-1-cgxu519@mykernel.net
Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu 
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext2: Fix underflow in ext2_max_size()

2019-03-23T13:35:23+00:00

commit 1c2d14212b15a60300a2d4f6364753e87394c521 upstream.

When ext2 filesystem is created with 64k block size, ext2_max_size()
will return value less than 0. Also, we cannot write any file in this fs
since the sb->maxbytes is less than 0. The core of the problem is that
the size of block index tree for such large block size is more than
i_blocks can carry. So fix the computation to count with this
possibility.

File size limits computed with the new function for the full range of
possible block sizes look like:

bits file_size
10     17247252480
11    275415851008
12   2196873666560
13   2197948973056
14   2198486220800
15   2198754754560
16   2198888906752

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: yangerkun 
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman