linux-stable.git/fs/dlm/lock.c, branch linux-5.4.y

dlm: replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator variable

2023-08-30T14:27:20+00:00

[ Upstream commit dc1acd5c94699389a9ed023e94dd860c846ea1f6 ]

To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
variable after the loop body.

To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
concluded to use a separate iterator variable instead of a
found boolean [1].

This removes the need to use a found variable and simply checking if
the variable was set, can determine if the break/goto was hit.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel 
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring 
Signed-off-by: David Teigland 
Stable-dep-of: 57e2c2f2d94c ("fs: dlm: fix mismatch of plock results from userspace")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fs: dlm: handle -EBUSY first in lock arg validation

2022-10-26T11:22:14+00:00

commit 44637ca41d551d409a481117b07fa209b330fca9 upstream.

During lock arg validation, first check for -EBUSY cases, then for
-EINVAL cases. The -EINVAL checks look at lkb state variables
which are not stable when an lkb is busy and would cause an
-EBUSY result, e.g. lkb->lkb_grmode.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring 
Signed-off-by: David Teigland 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

dlm: fix pending remove if msg allocation fails

2022-07-29T15:14:16+00:00

[ Upstream commit ba58995909b5098ca4003af65b0ccd5a8d13dd25 ]

This patch unsets ls_remove_len and ls_remove_name if a message
allocation of a remove messages fails. In this case we never send a
remove message out but set the per ls ls_remove_len ls_remove_name
variable for a pending remove. Unset those variable should indicate
possible waiters in wait_pending_remove() that no pending remove is
going on at this moment.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring 
Signed-off-by: David Teigland 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

dlm: fix missing lkb refcount handling

2022-06-14T16:11:46+00:00

commit 1689c169134f4b5a39156122d799b7dca76d8ddb upstream.

We always call hold_lkb(lkb) if we increment lkb->lkb_wait_count.
So, we always need to call unhold_lkb(lkb) if we decrement
lkb->lkb_wait_count. This patch will add missing unhold_lkb(lkb) if we
decrement lkb->lkb_wait_count. In case of setting lkb->lkb_wait_count to
zero we need to countdown until reaching zero and call unhold_lkb(lkb).
The waiters list unhold_lkb(lkb) can be removed because it's done for
the last lkb_wait_count decrement iteration as it's done in
_remove_from_waiters().

This issue was discovered by a dlm gfs2 test case which use excessively
dlm_unlock(LKF_CANCEL) feature. Probably the lkb->lkb_wait_count value
never reached above 1 if this feature isn't used and so it was not
discovered before.

The testcase ended in a rsb on the rsb keep data structure with a
refcount of 1 but no lkb was associated with it, which is itself
an invalid behaviour. A side effect of that was a condition in which
the dlm was sending remove messages in a looping behaviour. With this
patch that has not been reproduced.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring 
Signed-off-by: David Teigland 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fs: dlm: filter user dlm messages for kernel locks

2022-01-27T08:19:40+00:00

[ Upstream commit 6c2e3bf68f3e5e5a647aa52be246d5f552d7496d ]

This patch fixes the following crash by receiving a invalid message:

[  160.672220] ==================================================================
[  160.676206] BUG: KASAN: user-memory-access in dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370
[  160.679659] Read of size 8 at addr 00000000deadbeef by task kworker/u32:13/319
[  160.681447]
[  160.681824] CPU: 10 PID: 319 Comm: kworker/u32:13 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #399
[  160.683472] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.14.0-1.module+el8.6.0+12648+6ede71a5 04/01/2014
[  160.685574] Workqueue: dlm_recv process_recv_sockets
[  160.686721] Call Trace:
[  160.687310]  dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f
[  160.688169]  ? dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370
[  160.689116]  kasan_report.cold.14+0x116/0x11b
[  160.690138]  ? dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370
[  160.690832]  dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370
[  160.691502]  _receive_unlock_reply+0x103/0x170
[  160.692241]  _receive_message+0x11df/0x1ec0
[  160.692926]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
[  160.693700]  ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0
[  160.694427]  ? lock_acquire+0x175/0x400
[  160.695058]  ? do_purge.isra.51+0x200/0x200
[  160.695744]  ? lock_acquired+0x360/0x5d0
[  160.696400]  ? lock_contended+0x6a0/0x6a0
[  160.697055]  ? lock_release+0x21d/0x5e0
[  160.697686]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xe0/0x110
[  160.698352]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xe0/0x110
[  160.699026]  ? ___might_sleep+0x1cc/0x1e0
[  160.699698]  ? dlm_wait_requestqueue+0x94/0x140
[  160.700451]  ? dlm_process_requestqueue+0x240/0x240
[  160.701249]  ? down_write_killable+0x2b0/0x2b0
[  160.701988]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa2/0x130
[  160.702690]  dlm_receive_buffer+0x1a5/0x210
[  160.703385]  dlm_process_incoming_buffer+0x726/0x9f0
[  160.704210]  receive_from_sock+0x1c0/0x3b0
[  160.704886]  ? dlm_tcp_shutdown+0x30/0x30
[  160.705561]  ? lock_acquire+0x175/0x400
[  160.706197]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
[  160.706941]  ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0
[  160.707681]  process_recv_sockets+0x32/0x40
[  160.708366]  process_one_work+0x55e/0xad0
[  160.709045]  ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x110/0x110
[  160.709820]  worker_thread+0x65/0x5e0
[  160.710423]  ? process_one_work+0xad0/0xad0
[  160.711087]  kthread+0x1ed/0x220
[  160.711628]  ? set_kthread_struct+0x80/0x80
[  160.712314]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

The issue is that we received a DLM message for a user lock but the
destination lock is a kernel lock. Note that the address which is trying
to derefence is 00000000deadbeef, which is in a kernel lock
lkb->lkb_astparam, this field should never be derefenced by the DLM
kernel stack. In case of a user lock lkb->lkb_astparam is lkb->lkb_ua
(memory is shared by a union field). The struct lkb_ua will be handled
by the DLM kernel stack but on a kernel lock it will contain invalid
data and ends in most likely crashing the kernel.

It can be reproduced with two cluster nodes.

node 2:
dlm_tool join test
echo "862 fooobaar 1 2 1" > /sys/kernel/debug/dlm/test_locks
echo "862 3 1" > /sys/kernel/debug/dlm/test_waiters

node 1:
dlm_tool join test

python:
foo = DLM(h_cmd=3, o_nextcmd=1, h_nodeid=1, h_lockspace=0x77222027, \
          m_type=7, m_flags=0x1, m_remid=0x862, m_result=0xFFFEFFFE)
newFile = open("/sys/kernel/debug/dlm/comms/2/rawmsg", "wb")
newFile.write(bytes(foo))

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring 
Signed-off-by: David Teigland 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 193

2019-05-30T18:29:21+00:00

Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):

  this copyrighted material is made available to anyone wishing to use
  modify copy or redistribute it subject to the terms and conditions
  of the gnu general public license v 2

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

  GPL-2.0-only

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 45 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana 
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal 
Reviewed-by: Steve Winslow 
Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras 
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190528170027.342746075@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

dlm: memory leaks on error path in dlm_user_request()

2018-11-15T15:57:22+00:00

According to comment in dlm_user_request() ua should be freed
in dlm_free_lkb() after successful attach to lkb.

However ua is attached to lkb not in set_lock_args() but later,
inside request_lock().

Fixes 597d0cae0f99 ("[DLM] dlm: user locks")
Cc: stable@kernel.org # 2.6.19

Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin 
Signed-off-by: David Teigland

dlm: lost put_lkb on error path in receive_convert() and receive_unlock()

2018-11-15T15:57:22+00:00

Fixes 6d40c4a708e0 ("dlm: improve error and debug messages")
Cc: stable@kernel.org # 3.5

Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin 
Signed-off-by: David Teigland

dlm: possible memory leak on error path in create_lkb()

2018-11-15T15:57:22+00:00

Fixes 3d6aa675fff9 ("dlm: keep lkbs in idr")
Cc: stable@kernel.org # 3.1

Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin 
Signed-off-by: David Teigland

dlm: remove dlm_send_rcom_lookup_dump

2017-10-09T14:29:31+00:00

This function was only for debugging.  It would be
called in a condition that should not happen, and
should probably have been removed from the final
version of the original commit.

Remove it because it does mutex lock under spin lock.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland