linux-stable.git/fs/crypto, branch v5.9.2

fscrypt: restrict IV_INO_LBLK_32 to ino_bits <= 32

2020-10-29T09:11:05+00:00

[ Upstream commit 5e895bd4d5233cb054447d0491d4e63c8496d419 ]

When an encryption policy has the IV_INO_LBLK_32 flag set, the IV
generation method involves hashing the inode number.  This is different
from fscrypt's other IV generation methods, where the inode number is
either not used at all or is included directly in the IVs.

Therefore, in principle IV_INO_LBLK_32 can work with any length inode
number.  However, currently fscrypt gets the inode number from
inode::i_ino, which is 'unsigned long'.  So currently the implementation
limit is actually 32 bits (like IV_INO_LBLK_64), since longer inode
numbers will have been truncated by the VFS on 32-bit platforms.

Fix fscrypt_supported_v2_policy() to enforce the correct limit.

This doesn't actually matter currently, since only ext4 and f2fs support
IV_INO_LBLK_32, and they both only support 32-bit inode numbers.  But we
might as well fix it in case it matters in the future.

Ideally inode::i_ino would instead be made 64-bit, but for now it's not
needed.  (Note, this limit does *not* prevent filesystems with 64-bit
inode numbers from adding fscrypt support, since IV_INO_LBLK_* support
is optional and is useful only on certain hardware.)

Fixes: e3b1078bedd3 ("fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_32 policies")
Reported-by: Jeff Layton 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200824203841.1707847-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()

2020-08-07T18:33:22+00:00

As said by Linus:

  A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use.
  Otherwise it's actively misleading.

  In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the
  caller wants.

  In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the
  future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or
  something. The "zero" part of the interface isn't even _relevant_.

The main reason that kzfree() exists is to clear sensitive information
that should not be leaked to other future users of the same memory
objects.

Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() to follow the example of the recently
added kvfree_sensitive() and make the intention of the API more explicit.
In addition, memzero_explicit() is used to clear the memory to make sure
that it won't get optimized away by the compiler.

The renaming is done by using the command sequence:

  git grep -w --name-only kzfree |\
  xargs sed -i 's/kzfree/kfree_sensitive/'

followed by some editing of the kfree_sensitive() kerneldoc and adding
a kzfree backward compatibility macro in slab.h.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c needs linux/slab.h]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c some more]

Suggested-by: Joe Perches 
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Acked-by: David Howells 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen 
Cc: James Morris 
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" 
Cc: Joe Perches 
Cc: Matthew Wilcox 
Cc: David Rientjes 
Cc: Dan Carpenter 
Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200616154311.12314-3-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

fscrypt: don't load ->i_crypt_info before it's known to be valid

2020-07-30T21:21:50+00:00

In fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx(), ->i_crypt_info isn't known to be
non-NULL until we check fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto().  So, load
->i_crypt_info after the check rather than before.  This makes no
difference currently, but it prevents people from introducing bugs where
the pointer is dereferenced when it may be NULL.

Suggested-by: Dave Chinner 
Cc: Satya Tangirala 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200727174158.121456-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: use smp_load_acquire() for ->i_crypt_info

2020-07-21T23:02:13+00:00

Normally smp_store_release() or cmpxchg_release() is paired with
smp_load_acquire().  Sometimes smp_load_acquire() can be replaced with
the more lightweight READ_ONCE().  However, for this to be safe, all the
published memory must only be accessed in a way that involves the
pointer itself.  This may not be the case if allocating the object also
involves initializing a static or global variable, for example.

fscrypt_info includes various sub-objects which are internal to and are
allocated by other kernel subsystems such as keyrings and crypto.  So by
using READ_ONCE() for ->i_crypt_info, we're relying on internal
implementation details of these other kernel subsystems.

Remove this fragile assumption by using smp_load_acquire() instead.

(Note: I haven't seen any real-world problems here.  This change is just
fixing the code to be guaranteed correct and less fragile.)

Fixes: e37a784d8b6a ("fscrypt: use READ_ONCE() to access ->i_crypt_info")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721225920.114347-5-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: use smp_load_acquire() for ->s_master_keys

2020-07-21T23:02:13+00:00

Normally smp_store_release() or cmpxchg_release() is paired with
smp_load_acquire().  Sometimes smp_load_acquire() can be replaced with
the more lightweight READ_ONCE().  However, for this to be safe, all the
published memory must only be accessed in a way that involves the
pointer itself.  This may not be the case if allocating the object also
involves initializing a static or global variable, for example.

super_block::s_master_keys is a keyring, which is internal to and is
allocated by the keyrings subsystem.  By using READ_ONCE() for it, we're
relying on internal implementation details of the keyrings subsystem.

Remove this fragile assumption by using smp_load_acquire() instead.

(Note: I haven't seen any real-world problems here.  This change is just
fixing the code to be guaranteed correct and less fragile.)

Fixes: 22d94f493bfb ("fscrypt: add FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721225920.114347-4-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: use smp_load_acquire() for fscrypt_prepared_key

2020-07-21T23:02:13+00:00

Normally smp_store_release() or cmpxchg_release() is paired with
smp_load_acquire().  Sometimes smp_load_acquire() can be replaced with
the more lightweight READ_ONCE().  However, for this to be safe, all the
published memory must only be accessed in a way that involves the
pointer itself.  This may not be the case if allocating the object also
involves initializing a static or global variable, for example.

fscrypt_prepared_key includes a pointer to a crypto_skcipher object,
which is internal to and is allocated by the crypto subsystem.  By using
READ_ONCE() for it, we're relying on internal implementation details of
the crypto subsystem.

Remove this fragile assumption by using smp_load_acquire() instead.

(Note: I haven't seen any real-world problems here.  This change is just
fixing the code to be guaranteed correct and less fragile.)

Fixes: 5fee36095cda ("fscrypt: add inline encryption support")
Cc: Satya Tangirala 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721225920.114347-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: switch fscrypt_do_sha256() to use the SHA-256 library

2020-07-21T23:02:13+00:00

fscrypt_do_sha256() is only used for hashing encrypted filenames to
create no-key tokens, which isn't performance-critical.  Therefore a C
implementation of SHA-256 is sufficient.

Also, the logic to create no-key tokens is always potentially needed.
This differs from fscrypt's other dependencies on crypto API algorithms,
which are conditionally needed depending on what encryption policies
userspace is using.  Therefore, for fscrypt there isn't much benefit to
allowing SHA-256 to be a loadable module.

So, make fscrypt_do_sha256() use the SHA-256 library instead of the
crypto_shash API.  This is much simpler, since it avoids having to
implement one-time-init (which is hard to do correctly, and in fact was
implemented incorrectly) and handle failures to allocate the
crypto_shash object.

Fixes: edc440e3d27f ("fscrypt: improve format of no-key names")
Cc: Daniel Rosenberg 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721225920.114347-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: restrict IV_INO_LBLK_* to AES-256-XTS

2020-07-21T18:12:57+00:00

IV_INO_LBLK_* exist only because of hardware limitations, and currently
the only known use case for them involves AES-256-XTS.  Therefore, for
now only allow them in combination with AES-256-XTS.  This way we don't
have to worry about them being combined with other encryption modes.

(To be clear, combining IV_INO_LBLK_* with other encryption modes
*should* work just fine.  It's just not being tested, so we can't be
100% sure it works.  So with no known use case, it's best to disallow it
for now, just like we don't allow other weird combinations like
AES-256-XTS contents encryption with Adiantum filenames encryption.)

This can be relaxed later if a use case for other combinations arises.

Fixes: b103fb7653ff ("fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_64 policies")
Fixes: e3b1078bedd3 ("fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_32 policies")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721181012.39308-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: rename FS_KEY_DERIVATION_NONCE_SIZE

2020-07-21T00:26:33+00:00

The name "FS_KEY_DERIVATION_NONCE_SIZE" is a bit outdated since due to
the addition of FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY, the file nonce may now
be used as a tweak instead of for key derivation.  Also, we're now
prefixing the fscrypt constants with "FSCRYPT_" instead of "FS_".

Therefore, rename this constant to FSCRYPT_FILE_NONCE_SIZE.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200708215722.147154-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: add comments that describe the HKDF info strings

2020-07-21T00:26:32+00:00

Each HKDF context byte is associated with a specific format of the
remaining part of the application-specific info string.  Add comments so
that it's easier to keep track of what these all are.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200708215529.146890-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers