[ Upstream commit 85e833cd7243bda7285492b0653c3abb1e2e757b ]
In ondemand mode, when the daemon is processing an open request, if the
kernel flags the cache as CACHEFILES_DEAD, the cachefiles_daemon_write()
will always return -EIO, so the daemon can't pass the copen to the kernel.
Then the kernel process that is waiting for the copen triggers a hung_task.
Since the DEAD state is irreversible, it can only be exited by closing
/dev/cachefiles. Therefore, after calling cachefiles_io_error() to mark
the cache as CACHEFILES_DEAD, if in ondemand mode, flush all requests to
avoid the above hungtask. We may still be able to read some of the cached
data before closing the fd of /dev/cachefiles.
Note that this relies on the patch that adds reference counting to the req,
otherwise it may UAF.
Fixes: c8383054506c ("cachefiles: notify the user daemon when looking up cookie")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522114308.2402121-12-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4b4391e77a6bf24cba2ef1590e113d9b73b11039 ]
After installing the anonymous fd, we can now see it in userland and close
it. However, at this point we may not have gotten the reference count of
the cache, but we will put it during colse fd, so this may cause a cache
UAF.
So grab the cache reference count before fd_install(). In addition, by
kernel convention, fd is taken over by the user land after fd_install(),
and the kernel should not call close_fd() after that, i.e., it should call
fd_install() after everything is ready, thus fd_install() is called after
copy_to_user() succeeds.
Fixes: c8383054506c ("cachefiles: notify the user daemon when looking up cookie")
Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522114308.2402121-10-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4988e35e95fc938bdde0e15880fe72042fc86acf ]
Now every time the daemon reads an open request, it gets a new anonymous fd
and ondemand_id. With the introduction of "restore", it is possible to read
the same open request more than once, and therefore an object can have more
than one anonymous fd.
If the anonymous fd is not unique, the following concurrencies will result
in an fd leak:
t1 | t2 | t3
------------------------------------------------------------
cachefiles_ondemand_init_object
cachefiles_ondemand_send_req
REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len)
wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done)
cachefiles_daemon_read
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd
load->fd = fd0
ondemand_id = object_id0
------ restore ------
cachefiles_ondemand_restore
// restore REQ_A
cachefiles_daemon_read
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd
load->fd = fd1
ondemand_id = object_id1
process_open_req(REQ_A)
write(devfd, ("copen %u,%llu", msg->msg_id, size))
cachefiles_ondemand_copen
xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id)
complete(&REQ_A->done)
kfree(REQ_A)
process_open_req(REQ_A)
// copen fails due to no req
// daemon close(fd1)
cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release
// set object closed
-- umount --
cachefiles_withdraw_cookie
cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object
cachefiles_ondemand_init_close_req
if (!cachefiles_ondemand_object_is_open(object))
return -ENOENT;
// The fd0 is not closed until the daemon exits.
However, the anonymous fd holds the reference count of the object and the
object holds the reference count of the cookie. So even though the cookie
has been relinquished, it will not be unhashed and freed until the daemon
exits.
In fscache_hash_cookie(), when the same cookie is found in the hash list,
if the cookie is set with the FSCACHE_COOKIE_RELINQUISHED bit, then the new
cookie waits for the old cookie to be unhashed, while the old cookie is
waiting for the leaked fd to be closed, if the daemon does not exit in time
it will trigger a hung task.
To avoid this, allocate a new anonymous fd only if no anonymous fd has
been allocated (ondemand_id == 0) or if the previously allocated anonymous
fd has been closed (ondemand_id == -1). Moreover, returns an error if
ondemand_id is valid, letting the daemon know that the current userland
restore logic is abnormal and needs to be checked.
Fixes: c8383054506c ("cachefiles: notify the user daemon when looking up cookie")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522114308.2402121-9-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 3e6d704f02aa4c50c7bc5fe91a4401df249a137b ]
The err_put_fd label is only used once, so remove it to make the code
more readable. In addition, the logic for deleting error request and
CLOSE request is merged to simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522114308.2402121-6-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 4988e35e95fc ("cachefiles: never get a new anonymous fd if ondemand_id is valid")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 0a790040838c736495d5afd6b2d636f159f817f1 ]
The following concurrency may cause a read request to fail to be completed
and result in a hung:
t1 | t2
---------------------------------------------------------
cachefiles_ondemand_copen
req = xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id)
// Anon fd is maliciously closed.
cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release
xa_lock(&cache->reqs)
cachefiles_ondemand_set_object_close(object)
xa_unlock(&cache->reqs)
cachefiles_ondemand_set_object_open
// No one will ever close it again.
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
// Get a read req but its fd is already closed.
// The daemon can't issue a cread ioctl with an closed fd, then hung.
So add spin_lock for cachefiles_ondemand_info to protect ondemand_id and
state, thus we can avoid the above problem in cachefiles_ondemand_copen()
by using ondemand_id to determine if fd has been closed.
Fixes: c8383054506c ("cachefiles: notify the user daemon when looking up cookie")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522114308.2402121-8-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit da4a827416066191aafeeccee50a8836a826ba10 ]
We got the following issue in a fuzz test of randomly issuing the restore
command:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0xb41/0xb60
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888122e84088 by task ondemand-04-dae/963
CPU: 13 PID: 963 Comm: ondemand-04-dae Not tainted 6.8.0-dirty #564
Call Trace:
kasan_report+0x93/0xc0
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0xb41/0xb60
vfs_read+0x169/0xb50
ksys_read+0xf5/0x1e0
Allocated by task 116:
kmem_cache_alloc+0x140/0x3a0
cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x140/0xcd0
fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230
[...]
Freed by task 792:
kmem_cache_free+0xfe/0x390
cachefiles_put_object+0x241/0x480
fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x5c8/0x1230
[...]
==================================================================
Following is the process that triggers the issue:
mount | daemon_thread1 | daemon_thread2
------------------------------------------------------------
cachefiles_withdraw_cookie
cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object(object)
cachefiles_ondemand_send_req
REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len)
wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done)
cachefiles_daemon_read
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
msg->object_id = req->object->ondemand->ondemand_id
------ restore ------
cachefiles_ondemand_restore
xas_for_each(&xas, req, ULONG_MAX)
xas_set_mark(&xas, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW)
cachefiles_daemon_read
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
copy_to_user(_buffer, msg, n)
xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id)
complete(&REQ_A->done)
------ close(fd) ------
cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release
cachefiles_put_object
cachefiles_put_object
kmem_cache_free(cachefiles_object_jar, object)
REQ_A->object->ondemand->ondemand_id
// object UAF !!!
When we see the request within xa_lock, req->object must not have been
freed yet, so grab the reference count of object before xa_unlock to
avoid the above issue.
Fixes: 0a7e54c1959c ("cachefiles: resend an open request if the read request's object is closed")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522114308.2402121-5-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit de3e26f9e5b76fc628077578c001c4a51bf54d06 ]
We got the following issue in a fuzz test of randomly issuing the restore
command:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0x609/0xab0
Write of size 4 at addr ffff888109164a80 by task ondemand-04-dae/4962
CPU: 11 PID: 4962 Comm: ondemand-04-dae Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-dirty #542
Call Trace:
kasan_report+0x94/0xc0
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0x609/0xab0
vfs_read+0x169/0xb50
ksys_read+0xf5/0x1e0
Allocated by task 626:
__kmalloc+0x1df/0x4b0
cachefiles_ondemand_send_req+0x24d/0x690
cachefiles_create_tmpfile+0x249/0xb30
cachefiles_create_file+0x6f/0x140
cachefiles_look_up_object+0x29c/0xa60
cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x37d/0xca0
fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230
[...]
Freed by task 626:
kfree+0xf1/0x2c0
cachefiles_ondemand_send_req+0x568/0x690
cachefiles_create_tmpfile+0x249/0xb30
cachefiles_create_file+0x6f/0x140
cachefiles_look_up_object+0x29c/0xa60
cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x37d/0xca0
fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230
[...]
==================================================================
Following is the process that triggers the issue:
mount | daemon_thread1 | daemon_thread2
------------------------------------------------------------
cachefiles_ondemand_init_object
cachefiles_ondemand_send_req
REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len)
wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done)
cachefiles_daemon_read
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd
copy_to_user(_buffer, msg, n)
process_open_req(REQ_A)
------ restore ------
cachefiles_ondemand_restore
xas_for_each(&xas, req, ULONG_MAX)
xas_set_mark(&xas, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW);
cachefiles_daemon_read
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
write(devfd, ("copen %u,%llu", msg->msg_id, size));
cachefiles_ondemand_copen
xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id)
complete(&REQ_A->done)
kfree(REQ_A)
cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd(REQ_A)
fd = get_unused_fd_flags
file = anon_inode_getfile
fd_install(fd, file)
load = (void *)REQ_A->msg.data;
load->fd = fd;
// load UAF !!!
This issue is caused by issuing a restore command when the daemon is still
alive, which results in a request being processed multiple times thus
triggering a UAF. So to avoid this problem, add an additional reference
count to cachefiles_req, which is held while waiting and reading, and then
released when the waiting and reading is over.
Note that since there is only one reference count for waiting, we need to
avoid the same request being completed multiple times, so we can only
complete the request if it is successfully removed from the xarray.
Fixes: e73fa11a356c ("cachefiles: add restore command to recover inflight ondemand read requests")
Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522114308.2402121-4-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 0fc75c5940fa634d84e64c93bfc388e1274ed013 ]
Even with CACHEFILES_DEAD set, we can still read the requests, so in the
following concurrency the request may be used after it has been freed:
mount | daemon_thread1 | daemon_thread2
------------------------------------------------------------
cachefiles_ondemand_init_object
cachefiles_ondemand_send_req
REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len)
wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done)
cachefiles_daemon_read
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
// close dev fd
cachefiles_flush_reqs
complete(&REQ_A->done)
kfree(REQ_A)
xa_lock(&cache->reqs);
cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
req->msg.opcode != CACHEFILES_OP_READ
// req use-after-free !!!
xa_unlock(&cache->reqs);
xa_destroy(&cache->reqs)
Hence remove requests from cache->reqs when flushing them to avoid
accessing freed requests.
Fixes: c8383054506c ("cachefiles: notify the user daemon when looking up cookie")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522114308.2402121-3-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
The following memory leak was reported after unbinding /dev/cachefiles:
==================================================================
unreferenced object 0xffff9b674176e3c0 (size 192):
comm "cachefilesd2", pid 680, jiffies 4294881224
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace (crc ea38a44b):
[<ffffffff8eb8a1a5>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x2d5/0x370
[<ffffffff8e917f86>] prepare_creds+0x26/0x2e0
[<ffffffffc002eeef>] cachefiles_determine_cache_security+0x1f/0x120
[<ffffffffc00243ec>] cachefiles_add_cache+0x13c/0x3a0
[<ffffffffc0025216>] cachefiles_daemon_write+0x146/0x1c0
[<ffffffff8ebc4a3b>] vfs_write+0xcb/0x520
[<ffffffff8ebc5069>] ksys_write+0x69/0xf0
[<ffffffff8f6d4662>] do_syscall_64+0x72/0x140
[<ffffffff8f8000aa>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
==================================================================
Put the reference count of cache_cred in cachefiles_daemon_unbind() to
fix the problem. And also put cache_cred in cachefiles_add_cache() error
branch to avoid memory leaks.
Fixes: 9ae326a69004 ("CacheFiles: A cache that backs onto a mounted filesystem")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240217081431.796809-1-libaokun1@huawei.com
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
cachefiles_ondemand_init_object() as called from cachefiles_open_file() and
cachefiles_create_tmpfile() does not check if object->ondemand is set
before dereferencing it, leading to an oops something like:
RIP: 0010:cachefiles_ondemand_init_object+0x9/0x41
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
cachefiles_open_file+0xc9/0x187
cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x122/0x2be
fscache_cookie_state_machine+0xbe/0x32b
fscache_cookie_worker+0x1f/0x2d
process_one_work+0x136/0x208
process_scheduled_works+0x3a/0x41
worker_thread+0x1a2/0x1f6
kthread+0xca/0xd2
ret_from_fork+0x21/0x33
Fix this by making cachefiles_ondemand_init_object() return immediately if
cachefiles->ondemand is NULL.
Fixes: 3c5ecfe16e76 ("cachefiles: extract ondemand info field from cachefiles_object")
Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
cc: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>
cc: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org