commit 20bd723ec6a3261df5e02250cd3a1fbb09a343f2 upstream.

When a bio is cloned, the newly created bio must be associated with
the same blkcg as the original bio (if BLK_CGROUP is enabled). If
this operation is not performed, then the new bio is not associated
with any group, and the group of the current task is returned when
the group of the bio is requested.

Depending on the cloning frequency, this may cause a large
percentage of the bios belonging to a given group to be treated
as if belonging to other groups (in most cases as if belonging to
the root group). The expected group isolation may thereby be broken.

This commit adds the missing association in bio-cloning functions.

Fixes: da2f0f74cf7d ("Btrfs: add support for blkio controllers")

Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit 8b8b08cbfb9021af4b54b4175fc4c51d655aac8c upstream.

Commit 56244ef151c3cd11 was almost but not quite enough to fix the
reservation math after btrfs_copy_from_user returned partial copies.

Some users are still seeing warnings in btrfs_destroy_inode, and with a
long enough test run I'm able to trigger them as well.

This patch fixes the accounting math again, bringing it much closer to
the way it was before the sectorsize conversion Chandan did.  The
problem is accounting for the offset into the page/sector when we do a
partial copy.  This one just uses the dirty_sectors variable which
should already be updated properly.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Pull btrfs fixes part 2 from Chris Mason:
 "This has one patch from Omar to bring iterate_shared back to btrfs.

  We have a tree of work we queue up for directory items and it doesn't
  lend itself well to shared access.  While we're cleaning it up, Omar
  has changed things to use an exclusive lock when there are delayed
  items"

* 'for-linus-4.7-part2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
  Btrfs: fix ->iterate_shared() by upgrading i_rwsem for delayed nodes

Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason:
 "I have a two part pull this time because one of the patches Dave
  Sterba collected needed to be against v4.7-rc2 or higher (we used
  rc4).  I try to make my for-linus-xx branch testable on top of the
  last major so we can hand fixes to people on the list more easily, so
  I've split this pull in two.

  This first part has some fixes and two performance improvements that
  we've been testing for some time.

  Josef's two performance fixes are most notable.  The transid tracking
  patch makes a big improvement on pretty much every workload"

* 'for-linus-4.7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
  Btrfs: Force stripesize to the value of sectorsize
  btrfs: fix disk_i_size update bug when fallocate() fails
  Btrfs: fix error handling in map_private_extent_buffer
  Btrfs: fix error return code in btrfs_init_test_fs()
  Btrfs: don't do nocow check unless we have to
  btrfs: fix deadlock in delayed_ref_async_start
  Btrfs: track transid for delayed ref flushing

Commit fe742fd4f90f ("Revert "btrfs: switch to ->iterate_shared()"")
backed out the conversion to ->iterate_shared() for Btrfs because the
delayed inode handling in btrfs_real_readdir() is racy. However, we can
still do readdir in parallel if there are no delayed nodes.

This is a temporary fix which upgrades the shared inode lock to an
exclusive lock only when we have delayed items until we come up with a
more complete solution. While we're here, rename the
btrfs_{get,put}_delayed_items functions to make it very clear that
they're just for readdir.

Tested with xfstests and by doing a parallel kernel build:

	while make tinyconfig && make -j4 && git clean dqfx; do
		:
	done

along with a bunch of parallel finds in another shell:

	while true; do
		for ((i=0; i<4; i++)); do
			find . >/dev/null &
		done
		wait
	done

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Btrfs code currently assumes stripesize to be same as
sectorsize. However Btrfs-progs (until commit
df05c7ed455f519e6e15e46196392e4757257305) has been setting
btrfs_super_block->stripesize to a value of 4096.

This commit makes sure that the value of btrfs_super_block->stripesize
is a power of 2. Later, it unconditionally sets btrfs_root->stripesize
to sectorsize.

Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When doing truncate operation, btrfs_setsize() will first call
truncate_setsize() to set new inode->i_size, but if later
btrfs_truncate() fails, btrfs_setsize() will call
"i_size_write(inode, BTRFS_I(inode)->disk_i_size)" to reset the
inmemory inode size, now bug occurs. It's because for truncate
case btrfs_ordered_update_i_size() directly uses inode->i_size
to update BTRFS_I(inode)->disk_i_size, indeed we should use the
"offset" argument to update disk_i_size. Here is the call graph:
==>btrfs_truncate()
====>btrfs_truncate_inode_items()
======>btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, last_size, NULL);
Here btrfs_ordered_update_i_size()'s offset argument is last_size.

And below test case can reveal this bug:

dd if=/dev/zero of=fs.img bs=$((1024*1024)) count=100
dev=$(losetup --show -f fs.img)
mkdir -p /mnt/mntpoint
mkfs.btrfs  -f $dev
mount $dev /mnt/mntpoint
cd /mnt/mntpoint

echo "workdir is: /mnt/mntpoint"
blocksize=$((128 * 1024))
dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=$blocksize count=1
sync
count=$((17*1024*1024*1024/blocksize))
echo "file size is:" $((count*blocksize))
for ((i = 1; i <= $count; i++)); do
	i=$((i + 1))
	dst_offset=$((blocksize * i))
	xfs_io -f -c "reflink testfile 0 $dst_offset $blocksize"\
		testfile > /dev/null
done
sync

truncate --size 0 testfile
ls -l testfile
du -sh testfile
exit

In this case, truncate operation will fail for enospc reason and
"du -sh testfile" returns value greater than 0, but testfile's
size is 0, we need to reflect correct inode->i_size.

Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

map_private_extent_buffer() can return -EINVAL in two different cases,
1. when the requested contents span two pages if nodesize is larger
   than pagesize,
2. when it detects something insane.

The 2nd one used to be only a WARN_ON(1), and we decided to return a error
to callers, but we didn't fix up all its callers, which will be
addressed by this patch.

Without this, btrfs may end up with 'general protection', ie.
reading invalid memory.

Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Fix to return a negative error code from the kern_mount() error handling
case instead of 0(ret is set to 0 by register_filesystem), as done
elsewhere in this function.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Before we write into prealloc/nocow space we have to make sure that there are no
references to the extents we are writing into, which means checking the extent
tree and csum tree in the case of nocow.  So we don't want to do the nocow dance
unless we can't reserve data space, since it's a serious drag on performance.
With the following sequence

fallocate -l10737418240 /mnt/btrfs-test/file
cp --reflink /mnt/btrfs-test/file /mnt/btrfs-test/link
fio --name=randwrite --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --filename=/mnt/btrfs-test/file \
	--end_fsync=1

we get the worst case scenario where we have to fall back on to doing the check
anyway.

Without this patch
lat (usec): min=5, max=111598, avg=27.65, stdev=124.51
write: io=10240MB, bw=126876KB/s, iops=31718, runt= 82646msec

With this patch
lat (usec): min=3, max=91210, avg=14.09, stdev=110.62
write: io=10240MB, bw=212753KB/s, iops=53188, runt= 49286msec

We get twice the throughput, half of the runtime, and half of the average
latency.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
[ PAGE_CACHE_ removal related fixups ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>