Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason: "A couple of small fixes" * 'for-linus-4.4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: Btrfs: check prepare_uptodate_page() error code earlier Btrfs: check for empty bitmap list in setup_cluster_bitmaps btrfs: fix misleading warning when space cache failed to load Btrfs: fix transaction handle leak in balance Btrfs: fix unprotected list move from unused_bgs to deleted_bgs list
prepare_pages() may end up calling prepare_uptodate_page() twice if our write only spans a single page. But if the first call returns an error, our page will be unlocked and its not safe to call it again. This bug goes all the way back to 2011, and it's not something commonly hit. While we're here, add a more explicit check for the page being truncated away. The bare lock_page() alone is protected only by good thoughts and i_mutex, which we're sure to regret eventually. Reported-by: Dave Jones <dsj@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Dave Jones found a warning from kasan in setup_cluster_bitmaps() ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in setup_cluster_bitmap+0xc4/0x5a0 at addr ffff88039bef6828 Read of size 8 by task nfsd/1009 page:ffffea000e6fbd80 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) index:0x0 flags: 0x8000000000000000() page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected CPU: 1 PID: 1009 Comm: nfsd Tainted: G W 4.4.0-rc3-backup-debug+ #1 ffff880065647b50 000000006bb712c2 ffff88039bef6640 ffffffffa680a43e 0000004559c00000 ffff88039bef66c8 ffffffffa62638d1 ffffffffa61121c0 ffff8803a5769de8 0000000000000296 ffff8803a5769df0 0000000000046280 Call Trace: [<ffffffffa680a43e>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x6d [<ffffffffa62638d1>] kasan_report_error+0x501/0x520 [<ffffffffa61121c0>] ? debug_show_all_locks+0x1e0/0x1e0 [<ffffffffa6263948>] kasan_report+0x58/0x60 [<ffffffffa6814b00>] ? rb_last+0x10/0x40 [<ffffffffa66f8af4>] ? setup_cluster_bitmap+0xc4/0x5a0 [<ffffffffa6262ead>] __asan_load8+0x5d/0x70 [<ffffffffa66f8af4>] setup_cluster_bitmap+0xc4/0x5a0 [<ffffffffa66f675a>] ? setup_cluster_no_bitmap+0x6a/0x400 [<ffffffffa66fcd16>] btrfs_find_space_cluster+0x4b6/0x640 [<ffffffffa66fc860>] ? btrfs_alloc_from_cluster+0x4e0/0x4e0 [<ffffffffa66fc36e>] ? btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space+0x9e/0xb0 [<ffffffffa702dc37>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40 [<ffffffffa666a1a1>] find_free_extent+0xba1/0x1520 Andrey noticed this was because we were doing list_first_entry on a list that might be empty. Rework the tests a bit so we don't do that. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Reprorted-by: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> Reported-by: Dave Jones <dsj@fb.com>
When an inconsistent space cache is detected during loading we log a warning that users frequently mistake as instruction to invalidate the cache manually, even though this is not required. Fix the message to indicate that the cache will be rebuilt automatically. Signed-off-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com> Acked-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
If we fail to allocate a new data chunk, we were jumping to the error path
without release the transaction handle we got before. Fix this by always
releasing it before doing the jump.
Fixes: 2c9fe8355258 ("btrfs: Fix lost-data-profile caused by balance bg")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
As of my previous change titled "Btrfs: fix scrub preventing unused block
groups from being deleted", the following warning at
extent-tree.c:btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() can be hit when we mount the a
filesysten with "-o discard":
10263 void btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
10264 {
(...)
10405 if (trimming) {
10406 WARN_ON(!list_empty(&block_group->bg_list));
10407 spin_lock(&trans->transaction->deleted_bgs_lock);
10408 list_move(&block_group->bg_list,
10409 &trans->transaction->deleted_bgs);
10410 spin_unlock(&trans->transaction->deleted_bgs_lock);
10411 btrfs_get_block_group(block_group);
10412 }
(...)
This happens because scrub can now add back the block group to the list of
unused block groups (fs_info->unused_bgs). This is dangerous because we
are moving the block group from the unused block groups list to the list
of deleted block groups without holding the lock that protects the source
list (fs_info->unused_bgs_lock).
The following diagram illustrates how this happens:
CPU 1 CPU 2
cleaner_kthread()
btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()
sees bg X in list
fs_info->unused_bgs
deletes bg X from list
fs_info->unused_bgs
scrub_enumerate_chunks()
searches device tree using
its commit root
finds device extent for
block group X
gets block group X from the tree
fs_info->block_group_cache_tree
(via btrfs_lookup_block_group())
sets bg X to RO (again)
scrub_chunk(bg X)
sets bg X back to RW mode
adds bg X to the list
fs_info->unused_bgs again,
since it's still unused and
currently not in that list
sets bg X to RO mode
btrfs_remove_chunk(bg X)
--> discard is enabled and bg X
is in the fs_info->unused_bgs
list again so the warning is
triggered
--> we move it from that list into
the transaction's delete_bgs
list, but we can have another
task currently manipulating
the first list (fs_info->unused_bgs)
Fix this by using the same lock (fs_info->unused_bgs_lock) to protect both
the list of unused block groups and the list of deleted block groups. This
makes it safe and there's not much worry for more lock contention, as this
lock is seldom used and only the cleaner kthread adds elements to the list
of deleted block groups. The warning goes away too, as this was previously
an impossible case (and would have been better a BUG_ON/ASSERT) but it's
not impossible anymore.
Reproduced with fstest btrfs/073 (using MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o discard").
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason: "This has Mark Fasheh's patches to fix quota accounting during subvol deletion, which we've been working on for a while now. The patch is pretty small but it's a key fix. Otherwise it's a random assortment" * 'for-linus-4.4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: btrfs: fix balance range usage filters in 4.4-rc btrfs: qgroup: account shared subtree during snapshot delete Btrfs: use btrfs_get_fs_root in resolve_indirect_ref btrfs: qgroup: fix quota disable during rescan Btrfs: fix race between cleaner kthread and space cache writeout Btrfs: fix scrub preventing unused block groups from being deleted Btrfs: fix race between scrub and block group deletion btrfs: fix rcu warning during device replace btrfs: Continue replace when set_block_ro failed btrfs: fix clashing number of the enhanced balance usage filter Btrfs: fix the number of transaction units needed to remove a block group Btrfs: use global reserve when deleting unused block group after ENOSPC Btrfs: tests: checking for NULL instead of IS_ERR() btrfs: fix signed overflows in btrfs_sync_file
There's a regression in 4.4-rc since commit bc3094673f22
(btrfs: extend balance filter usage to take minimum and maximum) in that
existing (non-ranged) balance with -dusage=x no longer works; all chunks
are skipped.
After staring at the code for a while and wondering why a non-ranged
balance would even need min and max thresholds (..which then were not
set correctly, leading to the bug) I realized that the only problem
was the fact that the filter functions were named wrong, thanks to
patching copypasta. Simply renaming both functions lets the existing
btrfs-progs call balance with -dusage=x and now the non-ranged filter
function is invoked, properly using only a single chunk limit.
Signed-off-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
Fixes: bc3094673f22 ("btrfs: extend balance filter usage to take minimum and maximum")
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Commit 0ed4792 ('btrfs: qgroup: Switch to new extent-oriented qgroup
mechanism.') removed our qgroup accounting during
btrfs_drop_snapshot(). Predictably, this results in qgroup numbers
going bad shortly after a snapshot is removed.
Fix this by adding a dirty extent record when we encounter extents during
our shared subtree walk. This effectively restores the functionality we had
with the original shared subtree walking code in 1152651 (btrfs: qgroup:
account shared subtrees during snapshot delete).
The idea with the original patch (and this one) is that shared subtrees can
get skipped during drop_snapshot. The shared subtree walk then allows us a
chance to visit those extents and add them to the qgroup work for later
processing. This ultimately makes the accounting for drop snapshot work.
The new qgroup code nicely handles all the other extents during the tree
walk via the ref dec/inc functions so we don't have to add actions beyond
what we had originally.
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>